Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends in subtrochanteric, diaphyseal, and distal femur fractures, 1984–2007

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

The incidence of non-hip femur fractures increased between 1984 and 2007, with an increase in the rates for women after 1996.

Introduction

Recent reports have suggested that non-hip femur fractures may be decreasing over time, similar to proximal femur fractures.

Methods

Incidence rates for non-hip femur fractures among Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents were assessed before and after 1995 when the oral bisphosphonate, alendronate, was approved in the USA.

Results

From 1984 to 2007, 727 non-hip femur fractures were observed in 690 Olmsted County residents (51% female [median age, 71.6 years] and 49% male [21.4 years]). Altogether, 20% of the fractures were subtrochanteric, 51% were diaphyseal, and 29% involved the distal femur. Causes included severe trauma in 51%, minimal to moderate trauma in 34%, and pathologic causes in 15%. The overall age- and sex-adjusted annual incidence of first non-hip femur fracture was 26.7 per 100,000 (25.0 per 100,000 for women and 26.6 per 100,000 for men). Incidence rates increased with age and were greater in women than men. Between 1984–1995 and 1996–2007, age-adjusted rates increased significantly for women (20.4 vs. 28.7 per 100,000; p = 0.002) but not for men (22.4 vs. 29.5 per 100,000; p = 0.202).

Conclusion

The incidence of first non-hip femur fractures rose between 1984 and 2007, with an increase in the rates for women after 1995.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melton LJ III, Kearns AE, Atkinson EJ et al (2009) Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence. Osteoporos Int 20:687–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Al Dabbagh Z, Jansson KA (2009) National data of 6409 Swedish inpatients with femur shaft fractures: stable incidence between 1998 and 2004. Injury 40:304–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Singer BR, McLaughlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J (1998) Epidemiology of fractures in 15,000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:243–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nieves JW, Bilezikian JP, Lane JM et al (2010) Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int 21:399–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Melton LJ 3rd, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM (1999) Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time. Osteoporos Int 9:29–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knowelden J, Buhr AJ, Dunbar O (1964) Incidence of fractures in persons over 35 years of age. A report to the M.R.C. Working Party on Fractures in the Elderly. Br J Prev Soc Med 18:130–141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Soveid M, Serati AR, Masoompoor M (2005) Incidence of hip fractures in Shiraz, Iran. Osteoporos Int 16:1412–1416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J et al (1996) Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 7:612–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Donaldson LJ, Cook A, Thomson RG (1990) Incidence of fractures in a geographically defined population. J Epidemiol Community Health 44:241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong PC (1966) Fracture epidemiology in a mixed southeastern Asian community (Singapore). Clin Orthop Relat Res 45:55–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hedlund R, Lindgren U (1986) Epidemiology of diaphyseal femur fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 57:423–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Z, Bhattacharyya T (2011) Trends in incidence of subtrochanteric fragility fractures and bisphosphonate use among the US elderly, 1996–2007. J Bone Miner Res 26:553–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arneson TJ, Melton LJ III, Lewallen DG, O’Fallon WM (1988) Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965–1984. Clin Orthop Relat Res 234:188–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR et al (2010) Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur fractures: report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 25:2267–2294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Melton LJ III (1996) History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Mayo Clin Proc 71:266–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Melton LJ III (1997) The threat to medical-records research. N Engl J Med 337:1466–1470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities (1978) International classification of disease, 9th revision, clinical modification, volume 1, diseases tabular list. Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, Ann Arbor, MI

  18. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J et al (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification, Database, and Outcomes Committee. J Orthop Trauma 21(10 Suppl):S1–S133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bergstralh EJ, Offord KP, Chu CP et al (1992) Calculating incidence, prevalence and mortality rates for Olmsted County, Minnesota: an update. Technical Report no. 49, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

  20. Berry G (1983) The analysis of mortality by the subject-years method. Biometrics 39:173–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bilezikian JP (2009) Efficacy of bisphosphonates in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Am J Med 122(2 Suppl):S14–S21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mary Roberts for help in preparing the manuscript.

Financial support

This project was supported in part by research grant AG-04875 and made possible by the Rochester Epidemiology Project (AG-034676) from the National Institute on Aging, US Public Health Service.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. L. Clarke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, A.C., Drake, M.T., Clarke, B.L. et al. Trends in subtrochanteric, diaphyseal, and distal femur fractures, 1984–2007. Osteoporos Int 23, 1721–1726 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1777-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1777-9

Keywords

Navigation