Skip to main content
Log in

Restoration of the anatomic position during a meniscal allograft transplantation using pre-existing landmarks

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate sizing and positioning of a meniscal allograft is an important factor for successful outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantation. The objectives of this study were (1) to search a proper rotational landmark, (2) to determine the sagittal slope of meniscus, and, thus (3) to determine the meniscal positioning.

Materials and methods

A total of 121 consecutive patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging in the 3 months prior to the beginning of the study were selected. To assess the meniscal rotation, rotation 0° line of the meniscus was defined as a line connecting the center of the anterior and the posterior horn of the medial and lateral meniscus, respectively. At this level, four possible reference lines were compared: Akagi line, line perpendicular to the largest mediolateral dimension (LMLD), line between the medial border of the patellar tendon and the apex of the medial tibial spine (PTMS), and line between the lateral border of the patellar tendon and the apex of the lateral tibial spine. To assess the meniscal slope, the slope of the insertional area, meniscal and bony slopes at the mid-plateau area were compared.

Results

Akagi line was significantly different with a true meniscal rotation (line connecting between centers of the anterior and posterior horns) in both medial and lateral meniscus (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01). LMLD was significantly different in the lateral meniscus (p < 0.01), however, no statistical difference was observed in the medial meniscus (n.s.). PTMS was not different in the medial meniscus (n.s.), however, it was different in the lateral meniscus (p < 0.01). On the medial side, significant statistical difference was observed between insertional and bony slope (p < 0.01) and between meniscal and bony slope (p < 0.01). On the lateral side, comparison of three slopes showed significant statistical differences (p < 0.01–p = 0.03).

Conclusion

Line between patellar tendon and tibial spine was a good reference line for a meniscal rotation in the medial meniscus. Among previously introduced reference lines, LMLD showed approximity with a true meniscal rotation. The slope between tibial insertion and mid-portion was significantly different in the lateral meniscus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berhouet J, Beaufils P, Boisrenoult P, Frasca D, Pujol N (2011) Rotational positioning of the tibial tray in total knee arthroplasty: a CT evaluation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:699–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnin MP, Saffarini M, Mercier PE, Laurent JR, Carrillon Y (2010) Is the anterior tibial tuberosity a reliable rotational landmark for the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplast 26(260–267):e261–e262

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang TW, Huang CH, McClean CJ, Lai YS, Lu YC, Cheng CK (2011) Morphometrical measurement of resected surface of medial and lateral proximal tibia for Chinese population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1730–1735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi NH, Yoo SY, Victoroff BN (2011) Position of the bony bridge of lateral meniscal transplants can affect meniscal extrusion. Am J Sports Med 39:1955–1959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cinotti G, Sessa P, Ragusa G, Romana Ripani F, Postacchini R, Masciangelo R, Giannicola G (2013) Influence of cartilage and menisci on the sagittal slope of the tibial plateaus. Clin Anat 26(7):883–892. doi:10.1002/ca.22118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dienst M, Greis PE, Ellis BJ, Bachus KN, Burks RT (2007) Effect of lateral meniscal allograft sizing on contact mechanics of the lateral tibial plateau: an experimental study in human cadaveric knee joints. Am J Sports Med 35:34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Graw BP, Harris AH, Tripuraneni KR, Giori NJ (2010) Rotational references for total knee arthroplasty tibial components change with level of resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2734–2738

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jang SH, Kim JG, Ha JG, Shim JC (2011) Reducing the size of the meniscal allograft decreases the percentage of extrusion after meniscal allograft transplantation. Arthroscopy 27:914–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee DH, Kim JM, Lee BS, Kim KA, Bin SI (2012) Greater axial trough obliquity increases the risk of graft extrusion in lateral meniscus allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med 40:1597–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee YS, Kim JG, Lim HC, Park JH, Park JW (2009) The relationship between tibial slope and meniscal insertion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1416–1420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McDermott ID, Sharifi F, Bull AM, Gupte CM, Thomas RW, Amis AA (2004) An anatomical study of meniscal allograft sizing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:130–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pollard ME, Kang Q, Berg EE (1995) Radiographic sizing for meniscal transplantation. Arthroscopy 11:684–687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rossi R, Bruzzone M, Bonasia DE, Marmotti A, Castoldi F (2010) Evaluation of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:889–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahin N, Atici T, Ozturk A, Ozkaya G, Ozkan Y, Avcu B (2011) Accuracy of anatomical references used for rotational alignment of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Samitier G, Alentorn-Geli E, Taylor DC, Rill B, Lock T, Moutzouros V, Kolowich P (2015) Meniscal allograft transplantation. Part 1: systematic review of graft biology, graft shrinkage, graft extrusion, graft sizing, and graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(1):310–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaffer B, Kennedy S, Klimkiewicz J, Yao L (2000) Preoperative sizing of meniscal allografts in meniscus transplantation. Am J Sports Med 28:524–533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sweigart MA, Zhu CF, Burt DM, DeHoll PD, Agrawal CM, Clanton TO, Athanasiou KA (2004) Intraspecies and interspecies comparison of the compressive properties of the medial meniscus. Ann Biomed Eng 32:1569–1579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Urban WP Jr, Nyland J, Caborn DN, Johnson DL (1999) The radiographic position of medial and lateral meniscal horns as a basis for meniscal reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15:147–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilcox TR, Goble EM (1996) Indications for meniscal allograft reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg 9:35–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoon JR, Kim TS, Lee YM, Jang HW, Kim YC, Yang JH (2010) Transpatellar approach in lateral meniscal allograft transplantation using the keyhole method: can we prevent graft extrusion? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:214–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2012R1A1B3000971).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Seuk Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, B.K., Lee, Y.S., Oh, W.S. et al. Restoration of the anatomic position during a meniscal allograft transplantation using pre-existing landmarks. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 393–399 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2161-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2161-6

Keywords

Navigation