Abstract
Purpose
The International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC) has proposed a new definition of anastomotic leakage (AL) which was simply classified into three grades; however, these criteria have not been assessed well. The aims of this study are to assess the new definition and to show the clinical features of AL after an anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Methods
Fifty consecutive patients developed AL after an anterior resection for rectal cancer was retrospectively assessed. AL was defined by the ISREC criteria.
Results
Twenty-seven (54 %) patients with AL were diagnosed by drain contents. The postoperative day of diagnosis for AL was later in grade A versus grades B and C (p = 0.038 vs p = 0.006, respectively). Permanent stoma (PS) was significantly more frequent in patients with grade C but not grade B compared to the patients with no AL (p < 0.001 and p = 0.171, respectively). In patients without diverting stoma, there was more serious grade of AL (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Differences were observed in the postoperative day of diagnosis, the creation rate of PS, and impact on diverting stoma after AL between each grade of leakage. The new classification was easy and reasonable to evaluate AL. As a result, it should be widely used in future studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Law WL, Chu KW (2004) Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg 240:260–268
Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 6:462–469
Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216
Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, Chen JS, Chen HH, Chiang JM et al (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 241:9–13
Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the international study group of rectal cancer. Surgery 147:339–351
Kulu Y, Ulrich A, Bruckner T, Contin P, Welsch T, Rahbari NN et al (2013) Validation of the international study group of rectal cancer definition and severity grading of anastomotic leakage. Surgery 153:753–761
Junginger T, Gonner U, Trinh TT, Lollert A, Oberholzer K, Berres M (2010) Permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1632–1639
Lindgren R, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R, Matthiessen P (2011) What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:41–47
Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13
Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the international study group of liver surgery. Surgery 149:680–688
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Adam R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the international study group of liver surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149:713–724
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25
Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214
Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA (2007) Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it’s later than you think. Ann Surg 245:254–258
Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Yahchouchi E, Laborde Y, Pelissier E et al (1999) Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Assoc Surgical Res Surgery 125:529–535
Tsujinaka S, Kawamura YJ, Konishi F, Maeda T, Mizokami K (2008) Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks. ANZ J Surg 78:461–465
Conflicts of interest
Kenji Matsuda and coauthors have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsuda, K., Hotta, T., Takifuji, K. et al. Clinical characteristics of anastomotic leakage after an anterior resection for rectal cancer by assessing of the international classification on anastomotic leakage. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400, 207–212 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1272-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1272-4