Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting recurrent cases of intussusception in children after air enema reduction with machine learning models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a model to identify risk factors and predict recurrent cases of intussusception in children.

Methods

Consecutive cases and recurrent cases of intussusception in children from January 2016 to April 2022 were screened. The cohort was divided randomly at a 4:1 ratio to a training dataset and a validation dataset. Three parallel models were developed using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), logistic regression (LR), and support vector machine (SVM). Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).

Results

A total of 2469 cases of intussusception were included, where 225 were recurrent cases. The XGBoost (AUC = 0.718) models showed the best performance in the validation dataset, followed by the LR model (AUC = 0.652), while the SVM model (AUC = 0.613) performed worst among the three models. Based on the Shapley Additive exPlanation values, the most important variables in the XGBoost models were air enema pressure, mass size, age, duration of symptoms, and absence of vomiting.

Conclusions

Machine learning models, especially XGBoost, could be used to predict recurrent cases of intussusception in children. The most important contributing factors to the models are air enema pressure, mass size, age, duration of symptoms and absence of vomiting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niramis R, Watanatittan S, Kruatrachue A et al (2010) Management of recurrent intussusception: nonoperative or operative reduction? J Pediatr Surg 45(11):2175–2180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cho MJ, Nam CW, Choi SH et al (2020) Management of recurrent ileocolic intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 55(10):2150–2153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen X, Chen Q, Wang X et al (2021) Clinical characteristics of recurrent intussusception: a single-center retrospective study. J Pediatr Surg 56(10):1831–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo WL, Wang J, Zhou M et al (2011) The role of plain radiography in assessing intussusception with vascular compromise in children. Arch Med Sci 7(5):877–881

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo WL, Hu ZC, Tan YL et al (2017) Risk factors for recurrent intussusception in children: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 7(11):e018604

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie X, Wu Y, Wang Q et al (2018) Risk factors for recurrence of intussusception in pediatric patients: a retrospective study. J Pediatr Surg 53(11):2307–2311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kourou K, Exarchos TP, Exarchos KP et al (2014) Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput Struct Biotechnol J13:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Han X, Geng J, Zhang XX et al (2022) Using machine learning models to predict acute pancreatitis in children with pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Surg Today. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02571-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ting X, Xufei D, Jiangbin L et al (2022) Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting pathological intussusceptions in children prior to surgical intervention. Front Pediatr 10:877358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tseng PY, Chen YT, Wang CH et al (2020) Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning. Crit Care 24(1):478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Goto T, Camargo CA Jr, Faridi MK et al (2018) Machine learning approaches for predicting disposition of asthma and COPD exacerbations in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 36:1650–1654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goto T, Camargo CA Jr, Faridi MK et al (2019) Machine learning-based prediction of clinical outcomes for children during emergency department triage. JAMA Netw Open 2(1):e186937

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan KC, Tsai LW, Lee KH et al (2020) The development an artificial intelligence algorithm for early sepsis diagnosis in the intensive care unit. Int J Med Inform 141:104176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu L, Yang P, Liang W et al (2019) A radiomics approach based on support vector machine using MR images for preoperative lymph node status evaluation in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Theranostics 9(18):5374–5385

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Shao CC, Wei XL et al (2022) Ultrasound findings to predict risk of recurrence in pediatric intussusception after air enema reduction. J Ultrasound Med 41(5):1227–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim JH, Lee JS, Ryu JM et al (2018) Risk factors for recurrent intussusception after fluoroscopy–guided air enema. Pediatr Emerg Care 34(7):484–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen G, Zhang C, Li J, Zhang J et al (2018) Risk factors for short-term recurrent intussusception and reduction failure after ultrasound-guided saline enema. Pediatr Surg Int 34(11):1225–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Z, He QM, Zhang H et al (2015) Intussusception patients older than 1 year tend to have early re-currence after pneumatic enema reduction. Pediatr Surg Int 31(9):855–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Justice FA, Nguyen LT, Tran SN et al (2011) Recurrent intussusception in infants. J Paediatr Child Health 47:802–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Champoux AN, Del Beccaro MA, Nazar-Stewart V (1994) Recurrent intussusception. Risks and features. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148:474–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin XK, Xia QZ, Huang XZ et al (2017) Clinical characteristics of intussusception secondary to pathologic lead points in children: a single-center experience with 65 cases. Pediatr Surg Int 33(7):793–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Contributors Y-FQ designed the study; J-YG and Y-FQ collected data; J-YG analysed the data; J-YG and Y-FQ wrote and revised the manuscript; and all authors read and approved the final version of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-feng Qian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Children’s Hospital of Soochow University.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Jy., Qian, Yf. Predicting recurrent cases of intussusception in children after air enema reduction with machine learning models. Pediatr Surg Int 39, 9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05309-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05309-6

Keywords

Navigation