Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The amount of information provided in articles published in clinical anatomy and surgical and radiologic anatomy regarding human cadaveric materials and trends in acknowledging donors/cadavers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Appreciating the contribution of donor-cadavers to medical education is a well observed practice among anatomists. However, the appreciation of their contribution in research and scientific articles remains dubious. We aimed to evaluate how much data anatomists provide about specimens they have used and how frequently anatomists acknowledge their cadavers in published articles.

Materials and methods

We evaluated all articles performed on human cadaveric specimens that were published in Clinical Anatomy and Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy between January 2011 and December 2015. We evaluated how much data on the demographics, preservation method(s), source, and ethical/legal permissions regarding cadavers were provided. We also evaluated the number of articles that acknowledged donor-cadavers.

Results

The majority of articles provided demographic data (age and sex) and preservation method used in the article. The source of the specimens was not mentioned in 45.6 % of the articles. Only 26.2 % of the articles provided a degree of consent and only 32.4 % of the articles reported some form of ethical approval for the study. The cadavers and their families were acknowledged in 17.7 % of the articles. We observed that no standard method for reporting data has been established.

Conclusions

Anatomists should collaborate to create awareness among the scientific community for providing adequate information regarding donor-cadavers, including source and consent. Acknowledging donor-cadavers and/or their families should also be promoted. Scientific articles should be used to create a transparent relationship of trust between anatomists and their society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Association of Anatomists. (2009) The donation of bodies for education and biomedical research. Guidelines suggested by the American Association of Anatomists. 13 November 2009. http://www.anatomy.org/body-donation-policy.html. Accessed 24 March 2016

  2. Aragao JA, de Oliviera Pacheco JM, Silva LA, Reis FP (2012) Frequency of multiple renal arteries in human fetuses. Surg Radiol Anat 34:133–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benninger B (2013) Formally acknowledging donor-cadaver-patients in the basic and clinical science research arena. Clin Anat 26:810–813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolt S (2012) Bodies does matter: gift giving and the unveiling of body donor monuments in the Netherlands. Med Anthropol Q 26:613–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Champney TH (2011) A proposal for a policy on the ethical care and use of cadavers and their tissues. Anat Sci Educ 4:49–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Champney TH (2016) The business of bodies: ethical perspectives on for-profit body donation companies. Clin Anat 29:25–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman T, Sholukha V, Semal P, Louryan S, Rooze M, Van Sint Jan S (2015) Femoral curvature variability in modern humans using three-dimensional quadric surface fitting. Surg Radiol Anat 37:1169–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clinical Anatomy (2016) Author guidelines. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2353/homepage/ForAuthors.html. Accessed 02 February 2016

  9. Çubukçu B (2016) Kadavrasız anatomi dersi. Al Jazeera Turk. 09 February 2016 http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/al-jazeera-ozel/kadavrasiz-anatomi-dersi. Accessed 24 March 2016

  10. Halperin EC (2007) The poor, the black, and the marginalized as the source of cadavers in United States anatomical education. Clin Anat 20:489–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayashi S, Homma H, Naito M et al (2014) Saturated salt solution method: a useful cadaver embalming for surgical skills training. Med (Baltimore) 93:e196

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hildebrandt S (2008) Capital punishment and anatomy: history and ethics of an ongoing association. Clin Anat 21:5–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hildebrandt S (2013) The women on Stieve’s list: victims of national socialism whose bodies were used for anatomical research. Clin Anat 26:3–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hürriyet (2016) Doktor adaylarına ithal kadavra. Hürriyet Kelebek. 23 January 2016 http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/doktor-adaylarina-ithal-kadavra-40044207. Accessed 24 March 2016

  15. İnsan Cesedi Üzerinde Bilimsel Araştırma Yapılmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/main.aspx?home, http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/17727.pdf&main, =http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/17727.pdf. Accessed 02 February 2016

  16. International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (2012) Recommendations of good practice for the donation and study of human bodies and tissues for anatomical examination. Plexus January 2012:4-5. http://ifaa.net/index.php/plexus/finish/3-plexus/3-plexus-2012/0. Accessed 24 March 2016

  17. Jones DG, Whitaker MI (2012) Anatomy’s use of unclaimed bodies: reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice. Clin Anat 25:246–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones DG (2016) Anatomy in ethical review. Clin Anat 29:2–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones DG (2016) Searching for good practice recommendations on body donation across diverse cultures. Clin Anat 29:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones TW, Lachman N, Pawlina W (2013) Honoring our donors: a survey of memorial ceremonies in United States anatomy programs. Anat Sci Educ 7:219–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jung MH, Choi BY, Lee JY, Han CS, Lee JS, Yang YC, Cho BP (2015) Types of subtalar facets. Surg Radiol Anat 37:629–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kooloos JGM, Bolt S, van der Straaten J, Ruiter DJ (2010) An altar in honor of the anatomical gift. Anat Sci Educ 3:323–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leon Kier E, Staib LH, Davis LM, Bronen R (2004) Anatomic dissection tractography: a new method for precise MR localization of white matter tracts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:670–676

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin SC, Hsu J, Fan VY (2009) Silent virtuous Taiwanese teachers. BMJ 339:1438–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McHanwell S, Brenner E, Chirculescu ARM et al (2008) The legal and ethical framework governing body donation in Europe—a review of current practice and recommendations for good practice. Eur J Anat 12:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  26. Organ ve Doku Alınması, Saklanması, Aşılanması ve Nakli Hakkında Kanun. Kanun Numarası: 2238. http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2238.pdf. Accessed 02 February 2016

  27. Parakevas G, Tzika M, Anastasopoulos N, Kitsoulis P, Sifidis G, Natsis K (2015) Sternal foramina: incidence in greek population, anatomy and clinical considerations. Surg Radiol Anat 37:845–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Park JT, Jang Y, Park MS, Pae C, Park J, Hu KS, Park JS, Han SH, Koh KS, Kim HJ (2011) The trend of body donation for education based on Korean social and religious culture. Anat Sci Educ 4:33–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Riederer BM, Bolt S, Brenner E et al (2012) The legal and ethical framework governing body donation in Europe—1st update on current practice. Eur J Anat 16:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riederer BM, Bueno-Lopez JL (2014) Anatomy, respect for the body and body donation—a guide for good practice. Eur J Anat 18:361–368

    Google Scholar 

  31. Riederer BM (2016) Body donations today and tomorrow: what is best practice and why? Clin Anat 29:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rochcongar G, Emily S, Lebel B, Pineau V, Burdin G, Hulet C (2012) Measure of horizontal and vertical displacement of the acromioclavicular joint after cutting ligament using X-ray and opto-electronic system. Surg Radiol Anat 34:639–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sağlık Bakanlığı ve bağlı kuruluşların teşkilat ve görevleri hakkında kanun hükmünde karaname ile bazı kanunlarda değişiklik yapılmasına dair kanun. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/01/20140118.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2016

  34. Sharma NA, Sharma A, Garud RS (2013) Rare peritoneal bands and recesses: incidental findings in a cadaveric dissection. Surg Radiol Anat 35:359–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sözcü. Çin’den kadavra ithal edeceğiz. Sözcü Gazetesi. 28 April 2015. http://www.sozcu.com.tr/2015/gundem/cinden-kadavra-ithal-edecegiz-816673/. Accessed 24 March 2016

  36. Stefan U, Michael B, Werner S (2010) Effects of three different preservation methods on the mechanical properties of human and bovine cortical bone. Bone 47:1048–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Subasinghe SK, Jones DG (2015) Human body donation programs in Sri Lanka: buddhist perspectives. Anat Sci Educ 8:484–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Topp T, Müller T, Huss S, Kann PH, Weihe E, Ruchholtz S, Zettl RP (2012) Embalmed and fresh frozen human bones in orthopedic cadaveric studies: which bone is authentic and feasible? A mechanical study. Acta Orthop 83:543–547

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Turkish Society for Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy (2016) Ulusal Anatomi Haftası Basın Bildirgesi. http://www.anatomidernegi.org.tr/kadavra-bagisi-ve-temini. Accessed 02 February 2016

  40. Wheeler RL, Hampton AD, Langley NR (2015) The effects of body mass index and age on cross-sectional properties of the femoral neck. Clin Anat 28:1048–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Winkelmann A (2007) Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 41:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Winkelmann A, Heinze AK, Hendrix S (2016) Acknowledging tissue donation: human cadaveric specimens in musculoskeletal research. Clin Anat 29:65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank David F. Chapman BSc. for polishing the English of the final version of the manuscript. We also wish to thank the reviewers and the editor(s) for their suggestions and guidence during the peer-review process of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Millet Caddesi, Fatih, Istanbul, 34093, Turkey

    İlke Ali Gürses, Osman Coşkun & Ayşin Kale

  2. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Millet Caddesi, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey

    Başak Gürtekin

Authors
  1. İlke Ali Gürses
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Osman Coşkun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Başak Gürtekin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ayşin Kale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to İlke Ali Gürses.

Ethics declarations

Institutional Review Board approval was not needed for this study.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gürses, İ.A., Coşkun, O., Gürtekin, B. et al. The amount of information provided in articles published in clinical anatomy and surgical and radiologic anatomy regarding human cadaveric materials and trends in acknowledging donors/cadavers. Surg Radiol Anat 38, 1225–1231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1684-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1684-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation