Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Predicting Pathologic Response After Induction Therapy for Thymic Epithelial Tumors

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We investigated the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in predicting the effect of induction therapy in patients with thymic epithelial tumors.

Methods

Fourteen patients with thymic epithelial tumors who underwent PET-CT before and after induction therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between the change in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in PET-CT, the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and the pathologic response (Ef0, no necrosis of tumor cells; Ef1, some necrosis of tumor cells with more than one-third of viable tumor cells; Ef2, less than one-third of tumor cells were viable; and Ef3, no tumor cells were viable) was analyzed.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 5 males and 9 females. Nine of the patients had thymoma, and 5 had thymic carcinoma. The induction therapy included chemotherapy in 9 cases, chemoradiation therapy in 4 cases and radiation therapy in 1 case. Among the 8 patients with a pathologic response of Ef0/1, 5 were clinically evaluated as having stable disease (SD), while 3 were found to have had a partial response (PR). The SUVmax was elevated in 2 cases, unchanged in 1 and decreased in 5. On the other hand, 3 of the 6 patients with a pathologic response of Ef2, 3 were classified as having SD, while the other 3 had a PR. The SUVmax decreased in all of the patients.

Conclusions

In comparison with CT, PET-CT seems to be useful for predicting the pathologic response to induction therapy in patients with thymic epithelial tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Masuda M, Kuwano H, Okumura M et al (2015) Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2013: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 63:670–701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer B, Lassen U, Mortensen J et al (2009) Preoperative staging of lung cancer with combined PET-CT. N Engl J Med 361:32–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu J, Dong M, Sun X et al (2016) Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in surgical non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0146195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Groheux D, Sanna A, Majdoub M et al (2015) Baseline tumor 18F-FDG uptake and modifications after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are prognostic of outcome in ER +/HER2 − breast cancer. J Nucl Med 56:824–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kittaka H, Takahashi H, Ohigashi H et al (2013) Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting the pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with resectable T3 pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 37:169–178. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1775-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maffione AM, Marzola MC, Capirci C et al (2015) Value of 18F-FDG PET for predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am Roentgenol 204:1261–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Winokur TS et al (2004) Repeat FDG-PET after neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of pathologic response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1903–1909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozeki N, Kawaguchi K, Fukui T et al (2015) Which variables should be considered in patients with stage II and III non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy? Nagoya J Med Sci 77:475–480

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kukar M, Alnaji RM, Jabi F et al (2015) Role of repeat 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography examination in predicting pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 150:555–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng L, Tunairu N, Collins DJ et al (2015) Response evaluation in mesothelioma: beyond RECIST. Lung Cancer 90:433–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaira K, Murakami H, Miura S et al (2011) 18F-FDG uptake on PET helps predict outcome and response after treatment in unresectable thymic epithelial tumors. Ann Nucl Med 25:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas A, Mena E, Kurdziel K et al (2013) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with thymic epithelial tumors. Clin Cancer Res 19:1487–1493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Masaoka A, Monden Y, Nakahara K et al (1981) Follow-up study of thymomas with special reference to their clinical stages. Cancer 48:2485–2492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fukumoto K, Taniguchi T, Ishikawa Y et al (2012) The utility of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in thymic epithelial tumours. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:e152–e156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Japan Lung Cancer Society (2003) General rule for clinical and pathological record of lung cancer, 7th edn. Kanehara, Tokyo, pp 175–177

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yokoi K, Matsuguma H, Nakahara R et al (2007) Multidisciplinary treatment for advanced invasive thymoma with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methylprednisolone. J Thorac Oncol 2:73–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Treglia G, Sadeghi R, Giovanella L et al (2014) Is 18F-FDG PET useful in predicting the WHO grade of malignancy in thymic epithelial tumors? A meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 86:5–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Terzi A, Bertolaccini L, Rizzardi G et al (2011) Usefulness of 18F FDG PET/CT in the pre-treatment evaluation of thymic epithelial neoplasms. Lung Cancer 74:239–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shiono S, Abiko M, Okazaki T et al (2011) Positron emission tomography for predicting recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma: standardized uptake value corrected by mean liver standardized uptake value. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:1165–1169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Hisashi Tateyama, MD, at the Department of Pathology, Clinical Laboratory, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, Kasugai, Japan, for providing the pathologic data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koichi Fukumoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukumoto, K., Fukui, T., Okasaka, T. et al. The Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Predicting Pathologic Response After Induction Therapy for Thymic Epithelial Tumors. World J Surg 41, 1828–1833 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3938-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3938-2

Keywords

Navigation