Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gynecomastia and Chest Masculinization: An Updated Comprehensive Reconstructive Algorithm

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gynecomastia is a common finding in males. Clinical aspect varies widely in world populations showing peculiar hallmarks according to different body shapes reflecting personal expectations; therefore, a surgical plan must be tailored on individual basis to all type of patients.

Materials and Method

A total of 522 patients, treated for bilateral gynecomastia from January 2007 to January 2019, were included and reviewed in this retrospective study. Considering physical status BMI, muscular trophism, hypertrophy of the mammary region, nipple–areola disorder, gland and skin cover consistency, a four-tier classification system has been used to classify the deformity and to assess a surgical plan. In all cases, a subcutaneous mastectomy was performed under direct vision.

Results

No recurrence of the deformity was observed as well as major complications such as necrosis, and high level of satisfaction was observed in all groups. No breast cancer was found at the histological examinations Operative time ranged from 25 minutes up to 120 minutes and hospitalization time ranged from 1 to 3 days.

Conclusion

Since the physical status is strictly related to the clinical features of the disorder, a comprehensive classification system and a reconstructive algorithm are proposed.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM (2003) A systematic approach to the surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. Br J Plast Surg. 56:237–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Friedman JD, Echo A (2017) Complications and outcomes after gynecomastia surgery: analysis of 204 pediatric and 1583 adult cases from a national multi-center database. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(4):761–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0833-z (Epub 2017 Mar 24 PMID: 28341949)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2018) Comment to: “complications and outcomes after gynecomastia surgery: analysis of 204 pediatric and 1583 adult cases from a national multi-center database.” Aesthetic Plast Surg. 42(1):334–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0989-6 (Epub 2017 Oct 26 PMID: 29075817)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Management of gynecomastia in patients with different body types: considerations on 312 consecutive treated cases. Ann Plast Surg. 78(5):492–496. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000940.PMID:27805927;PMCID:PMC5400408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wollina U, Goldman A (2011) Minimally invasive esthetic procedures of the male breast. J Cosmet Dermatol. 10(2):150–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00548.x (PMID: 21649820)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuhaci N, Polat SB, Evranos B, Ersoy R, Cakir B (2014) Gynecomastia: Clinical evaluation and management. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 18(2):150–158. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.129104.PMID:24741509;PMCID:PMC3987263

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi BS, Lee SR, Byun GY, Hwang SB, Koo BH (2017) The characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of adolescent gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(5):1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0886-z (Epub 2017 Apr 27 PMID: 28451801)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Innocenti A, Melita D, Ghezzi S, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to: “the characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of adolescent gynecomastia.” Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(6):1467–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0901-4 (Epub 2017 Jun 7 PMID: 28593489)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Waltho D, Hatchell A, Thoma A (2017) Gynecomastia classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 139(3):638e–648e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003059 (PMID: 28234829)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ciancio F, Innocenti A, Parisi D, Portincasa A (2017) Gynecomastia classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 140(4):620e–621e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003732 (PMID: 28617739)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ridha H et al (2009) How happy are patients with their gynaecomastia reduction surgery? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(11):1473–1478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Innocenti A (2019) Male tuberous breast: a rare variant of gynecomastia clinical considerations and personal experience: tips and tricks to maximize surgical outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 43(6):1500–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01418-1 (Epub 2019 Jun 19. PMID: 31218378)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klinger M, Caviggioli F, Klinger F, Villani F, Arra E, Di Tommaso L (2011) Tuberous breast: Morphological study and overview of a borderline entity. Can J Plast Surg. Summer 19(2):42–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031101900210 (PMID: 22654530; PMCID: PMC3328117)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Godwin Y (2018) Correction of tuberous nipple areolar complex deformity in gynecomastia: the deformity that can get forgotten. Ann Plast Surg. 81(1):3–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001442 (PMID: 29762454)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Innocenti M (2019) Correction of tuberous nipple areolar complex deformity in gynecomastia: the deformity that can get forgotten. Ann Plast Surg. 83(3):367. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001605 (PMID: 30161048)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Innocenti A (2020) Male tuberous breast. Cordova A, Innocenti A, Toia F. Springer International Publishing, Tripoli M. Plastic and cosmetic surgery of the male breast, pp 67–74

    Google Scholar 

  17. Innocenti A, Pino D, Buccheri F, Cappello F, Larcher L (2020) Preoperative considerations on the thorax: Anatomy and surgical landmarks. Cordova A, Innocenti A, Toia F. Springer International Publishing, Tripoli M. Plastic and cosmetic surgery of the male breast, pp 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tripathy S, Likhyani A, Sharma R, Sharma RK (2020) Prospective analysis and comparison of periareolar excision (delivery) technique and pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 44(3):653–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01618-0 (Epub 2020 Jan 27 PMID: 31989232)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Melita D, Innocenti A (2020) Prospective analysis and comparison of periareolar excision (delivery) and pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 44(3):1089–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01676-4 (Epub 2020 Mar 17 PMID: 32185498)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Keskin M, Sutcu M, Hanci M, Cigsar B (2017) Reduction of the areolar diameter after ultrasound-assisted liposuction for gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg. 79(2):135–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000994 (PMID: 28252545)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Innocenti A, Mori F, Melita D, Innocenti M, Ciancio F (2018) Discussion on “reduction of the areolar diameter after ultrasound-assisted liposuction for gynecomastia.” Ann Plast Surg. 80(2):193. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001163 (PMID: 28650407)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim DH, Byun IH, Lee WJ, Rah DK, Kim JY, Lee DW (2016) Surgical management of gynecomastia: subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 40(6):877–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0705-y (Epub 2016 Sep 27 PMID: 27679453)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Portincasa A, Parisi D (2017) Discussion: surgical management of gynecomastia-subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(4):983–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0811-5 (Epub 2017 Feb 15 PMID: 28204929)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Walden JL, Schmid RP, Blackwell SJ (2004) Cross-chest lipoplasty and surgical excision for gynecomastia: a 10-year experience. Aesthet Surg J. 24(3):216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2004.03.005 (PMID: 19336159)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Esme DL, Beekman WH, Hage JJ, Nipshagen MD (2007) Combined use of ultrasonic-assisted liposuction and semicircular periareolar incision for the treatment of gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg. 59(6):629–634. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318038f762 (PMID: 18046142)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to “postero-inferior pedicle surgical technique for the treatment of grade iii gynecomastia.” Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(3):747–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0849-4 (Epub 2017 Apr 3 PMID: 28374294)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ibrahiem SM (2016) Severe gynecomastia: new technique using superior pedicle nac flap through a circumareolar approach. Ann Plast Surg. 76(6):645–651. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000229 (PMID: 25003440)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Haddad Filho D, Arruda RG, Alonso N (2006) Treatment of severe gynecomastia (Grade III) by resection of periareolar skin. Aesthet Surg J 26(6):669–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2006.10.009 (PMID: 19338957)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Innocenti A, Innocenti M (2015) Retro-areola distally based flap in the management of the full expression of tuberous breast: a simple strategy to resolve a weak point of the deformity. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 39(5):700–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0539-z (Epub 2015 Aug 15 PMID: 26275562)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Innocenti A, Serena G, Innocenti M (2020) External quilting: new technique to avoid haematoma in gynaecomastia surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01734-x (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32333029)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chao JW, Raveendran JA, Maly C, Rogers G, Boyajian M, Oh AK (2017) Closed-suction drains after subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia: do they reduce complications? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(6):1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0959-z (Epub 2017 Aug 25 PMID: 28842781)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Innocenti A, Melita D, Ghezzi S (2019) Closed-suction drains after subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia: do they reduce complications? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 43(4):1124–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1060-3 (Epub 2018 Jan 4 PMID: 29302730)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Innocenti A, Melita D, Re IM (2018) A novel method to insert drain atraumatically after liposuction in gynecomastia. Indian J Plast Surg 51(3):342–343. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_106_18 (PMID: 30983743; PMCID: PMC6440363)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Petty PM, Solomon M, Buchel EW, Tran NV (2010) Gynecomastia: evolving paradigm of management and comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 125(5):1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d62962 (PMID: 20440151)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee SR, Lee SG, Byun GY, Kim MJ, Koo BH (2018) Clinical characteristics of asymmetric bilateral gynecomastia: suggestion of desirable surgical method based on a single-institution experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 42(3):708–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1102-5 (Epub 2018 Feb 20 PMID: 29464386)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D, Innocenti M (2018) Clinical characteristics of asymmetric bilateral gynecomastia: suggestion of desirable surgical method based on a single-institution experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 42(6):1716–1717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1161-7 (Epub 2018 Aug 9 PMID: 30094549)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cardenas-Camarena L, Dorado C, Guerrero MT, Nava R (2017) Surgical masculinization of the breast: clinical classification and surgical procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(3):507–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0731-9 (Epub 2017 Mar 24 PMID: 28341946)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment on: “surgical masculinization of the breast: clinical classification and surgical procedures.” Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(6):1475–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0925-9 (Epub 2017 Jun 29 PMID: 28664304)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fricke A, Lehner GM, Stark GB, Penna V (2017) Long-term follow-up of recurrence and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(3):491–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0827-x (Epub 2017 Mar 9 PMID: 28280898)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Innocenti A, Melita D, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Discussion: “long-term follow-up of recurrence and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of gynecomastia.” Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(5):1242–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0866-3 (Epub 2017 Apr 3 PMID: 28374297)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Barone M, Cogliandro A, Tsangaris E, Salzillo R, Morelli Coppola M, Ciarrocchi S, Brunetti B, Tenna S, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2018) Treatment of severe gynecomastia after massive weight loss: analysis of long-term outcomes measured with the italian version of the BODY-Q. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 42(6):1506–1518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1232-9 (Epub 2018 Sep 26 PMID: 30259165)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Aiache AE (1989) Surgical treatment of gynecomastia in the body builder. Plast Reconstr Surg. 83(1):61–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198901000-00011 (PMID: 2909079)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Blau M, Hazani R (2015) Correction of gynecomastia in body builders and patients with good physique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 135(2):425–432. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000887 (PMID: 25626789)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ward CM, Khalid K (1989) Surgical treatment of grade III gynaecomastia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 71(4):226–228

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Innocenti A, Innocenti M, Mori F, Melita D, Ciancio F, Cordova A (2018) Tuberous breast: past, present, and future: personal classification, treatment, and surgical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 80(2):104–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001200 (PMID: 28885315)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pfeiler PP, Luketina R, Dastagir K, Vogt PM, Mett TR, Kaltenborn A, Könneker S (2020) Expected reduction of the nipple-areolar complex over time after treatment of gynecomastia with ultrasound-assisted liposuction mastectomy compared to subcutaneous mastectomy alone. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02029-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Innocenti A, Melita D (2020) Expected reduction of the nipple-areolar complex over time after treatment of gynecomastia with ultrasound-assisted liposuction mastectomy compared to subcutaneous mastectomy alone. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02052-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Özalp B, Berköz Ö, Aydınol M (2018) Is the transposition of the nipple-areolar complex necessary in Simon grade 2b gynecomastia operations using suction-assisted liposuction? J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 52(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2017.1313260 (Epub 2017 May 4 PMID: 28471290)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Innocenti, A., Ghezzi, S, Melita, D. (2020). Commentary on “Surgical treatment of gynaecomastia: a standard of care in plastic surgery” by Tobias R. Mett, Peter P. Pfeiler, Rosalia Luketina, Alperen S. Bingöl, Nicco Krezdorn & Peter M. Vogt. Eur J Plast Surg43, 687–688 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01721-0

  50. Apesos J, Chami R (1991) Functional applications of suction-assisted lipectomy: a new treatment for old disorders. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 15(1):73–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02273837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stark GB, Grandel S, Spilker G (1992) Tissue suction of the male and female breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 16(4):317–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Qu S, Zhang W, Li S, He W, Lu R, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Wang N (2020) The vacuum-assisted breast biopsy system is an effective strategy for the treatment of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01931-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Benito-Ruiz J, Raigosa M, Manzano M, Salvador L (2009) Assessment of a suction-assisted cartilage shaver plus liposuction for the treatment of gynecomastia. Aesthet Surg J. 29(4):302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2009.02.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sim N, Tan G, Tan BK, Goh T (2020) Review of the microdebrider excision and liposuction technique (MELT) for the treatment of gynecomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 73(2):303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.003 (Epub 2019 Sep 24 PMID: 31672463)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Akhtar A, Eitezaz F, Rashid M, Khan I, Malik SA (2019) Liposuction in gynecomastia: an assessment of the suction-assisted arthroscopic shaver versus open disc excision techniques. Cureus. 11(10):e5897. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5897.PMID:31772867;PMCID:PMC6839758

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Francesco M, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to “no-drain single incision liposuction pull-through technique for gynecomastia.” Aesthetic Plast Surg. 41(4):990–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0821-3 (Epub 2017 Feb 15 PMID: 28204934)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Parisi D, Portincasa A, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to “orange peel excision of gland: a novel surgical technique for treatment of gynecomastia.” Ann Plast Surg. 79(3):326. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001126 (PMID: 28795985)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Abdelrahman I, Steinvall I, Mossaad B, Sjoberg F, Elmasry M (2018) Evaluation of glandular liposculpture as a single treatment for grades I and II gynaecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 42(5):1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1118-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Innocenti A, Melita D, Innocenti M (2018) Evaluation of glandular liposculpture as a single treatment for grades I and II gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 42(6):1707–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1156-4 (Epub 2018 Jun 4 PMID: 29869229)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cao H, Yang ZX, Sun YH, Wu HR, Jiang GQ (2013) Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy: a novel and effective treatment for gynecomastia. Exp Ther Med. 5(6):1683–1686. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Jian C, Wu L, Lin L, Liu W, Zheng Z, Yang C (2020) Single-port endoscopic mastectomy via the lateral chest approach for the treatment of grade II gynecomastia. Medicine (Baltimore) 99(22):e20100. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020100 (PMID: 32481376)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Diyarbakirlioglu M, Ercan A, Dogan Y (2020) Correction of high-grade pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: modified inferior dermoglandular pedicled transverse scar reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 44(2):435–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01477-4 (Epub 2019 Aug 26 PMID: 31451852)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Innocenti A, Ghezzi S (2019) Correction of high-grade pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: modified inferior dermoglandular pedicled transverse scar reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01509-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, Innocenti M, Ciancio F (2018) Discussion on “gynecomastia surgery-impact on life quality: a prospective case-control study.” Ann Plast Surg. 80(2):193–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001172 (PMID: 29319580)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kasielska-Trojan A, Antoszewski B (2017) Gynecomastia surgery-impact on life quality: a prospective case-control study. Ann Plast Surg. 78(3):264–268. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000860 (PMID: 27404477)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Innocenti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Innocenti, A., Melita, D. & Innocenti, M. Gynecomastia and Chest Masculinization: An Updated Comprehensive Reconstructive Algorithm. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 2118–2126 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02275-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02275-7

Keywords

Navigation