References
Tripathy S, Likhyani A, Sharma R, Sharma RK (2020) Prospective analysis and comparison of periareolar excision (delivery) and pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01618-0
Innocenti A, Melita D, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Discussion: “Long-term follow-up of recurrence and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of gynecomastia”. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(5):1242–1243
Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Management of gynecomastia in patients with different body types: considerations on 312 consecutive treated cases. Ann Plast Surg 78(5):492–496
Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Portincasa A, Parisi D (2017) Discussion: surgical management of gynecomastia-subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(4):983–984
Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Francesco M, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to “no-drain single incision liposuction pull-through technique for gynecomastia”. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(4):990–991
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Melita, D., Innocenti, A. Prospective Analysis and Comparison of Periareolar Excision (Delivery) and Pull-Through Technique for the Treatment of Gynecomastia. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 1089–1090 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01676-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01676-4