Skip to main content
Log in

To hatch and hatch not: does heterochrony in onset of vestibular mechanosensing explain species differences in escape-hatching success of Agalychnis embryos in snake attacks?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phyllomedusid treefrogs hatch prematurely to escape egg predation, but escape success varies among species. Snake attacks elicited 55% less escape hatching in spontaneously hatching Agalychnis spurrelli than in less developed A. callidryas. Agalychnis callidryas use their vestibular system and, secondarily, their lateral line to sense physical disturbances that cue hatching. Since A. spurrelli develop faster, we hypothesized that heterochronic shifts in the onset timing of vestibular mechanosensory function, relative to hatching ability, might explain their lower escape response to mechanosensory cues. To test this, we compared onset timings of hypoxia- and mechanosensory-cued hatching (MCH) and vestibular mechanosensory function in developmental series of both species. Across species, most sibships began responding to each cue at the same developmental stage and vestibular function development, measured by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), was similar. These results demonstrate that low escape-hatching success in A. spurrelli is not caused by a delay in the onset of vestibular mechanosensory function. MCH onset in A. spurrelli was associated with VOR, but with a higher threshold than in A. callidryas. The absence of MCH before strong vestibular function suggests multimodal mechanosensing may not contribute to antipredator responses of A. spurrelli embryos. Our observations of higher escape success of larger clutches in snake attacks and hatching complications in flooded A. spurrelli suggest that differences in clutch and egg capsule structure may contribute directly to species differences in escape-hatching success. Moreover, hatching complications in A. spurrelli may select against false alarms, increasing the stringency of hatching decision rules.

Significance statement

Hatching is an essential life-stage transition during development. For some species, it also functions as an effective defense against egg-stage risks. However, the causes for variation in environmentally cued hatching responses are poorly understood. We assessed why two closely related treefrogs exhibit different escape-hatching responses to snake attacks. Comparing the onset of induced-hatching responses and vestibular function in Agalychnis callidryas and A. spurrelli revealed that the primary mechanism for mechanosensing and its developmental timing are conserved within this group, but the sensory function threshold for behavioral response differs. It also revealed that egg-clutch properties, including egg-clutch size and individual egg structure, affect the escape-hatching response. This motivates further research assessing the role of egg-clutch properties and their biomechanics in embryo escape-hatching responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data collected for and analyzed in this paper is available on Dryad at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cnp5hqc8x.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Adrian Tanner and J. Gregory McDaniel for helping design and build the tadpole rotator, Sonia M. Pérez Arias for developing the Python code to construct VOR curves, Katherine González for field assistance, Elena K. Gomez for measuring images to calculate VOR, and Osa Conservation for laboratory space and logistical support. We also thank members of the BU Egg Science Research Group for feedback that improved this work at many stages of its development and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (DGE-1247312 to BAG and IOS-1354072 to KMW), Sigma Xi (G2018031596022314 to BAG), and Boston University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BAG: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, validation, visualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. KMW: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, validation, writing – review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon A. Güell.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed. This research was conducted under BU IACUC protocol 18–003 and permits from the Costa Rican Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía (MINAE) and the Sistema Nacional de Áreas de Conservación (SINAC) (ACOSA-INV-048–18, INV-ACOSA-055–18, ACOSA-DASP-OI-R-019–2021).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Ringler

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Güell, B.A., Warkentin, K.M. To hatch and hatch not: does heterochrony in onset of vestibular mechanosensing explain species differences in escape-hatching success of Agalychnis embryos in snake attacks?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 77, 141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-023-03417-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-023-03417-4

Keywords

Navigation