Abstract
Purpose
To compare the performance of non-contrast MRI with half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) vs. contrast-enhanced MRI/3D-MRCP for assessment of suspected choledocholithiasis in hospitalized patients.
Methods and Materials
123 contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI/MRCP scans in the hospital setting for possible choledocholithiasis were retrospectively evaluated. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraoperative cholangiogram or documented clinical resolution served as the reference standard. Readers first evaluated the biliary tree using coronal and axial HASTE and other non-contrast sequences, and later reviewed the entire exam with post-contrast sequences and 3D-MRCP. Test performance for the image sets was compared for choledocholithiasis, acute hepatitis, cholangitis, and acute cholecystitis. Reader agreement, MRCP image quality, and confidence levels were also assessed. Clinical predictors of age and fever were tested for association with perceived need for contrast in biliary assessment.
Results
There were 27 cases of choledocholithiasis, 31 cases of acute hepatitis, 37 cases of acute cholecystitis, and 3 clinically diagnosed cases of acute cholangitis. Both the abbreviated and full contrast-enhanced/MRCP image sets resulted in high accuracy for choledocholithiasis (91.1–94.3% vs. 91.9–92.7%). There was no difference in sensitivity or specificity for either reader for any diagnosis between image sets (p > 0.40). 1 reader showed improved confidence (p < 0.001) with inclusion of MRCP and contrast-enhanced images, but neither confidence nor MRCP quality scores were associated with diagnostic accuracy. Patient age and fever did not predict the need for contrast-enhanced images.
Conclusion
In hospitalized patients with suspected choledocholithiasis, performance of non-contrast abdominal MRI with HASTE is similar to contrast-enhanced MRI with 3D-MRCP, offering potential for decreased scanning time and improved patient tolerability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stinton LM, Shaffer EA (2012) Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver 6(2):172–187
Committee ASoP, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, et al. (2010) The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 71(1):1–9
Shaffer EA (2005) Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7(2):132–140
Kaltenthaler EC, Walters SJ, Chilcott J, et al. (2006) MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging 6:9
Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, et al. (2003) The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg 90(1):42–47
Petrov MS, Savides TJ (2009) Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasonography vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 96(9):967–974
Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48(1):1–10
Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J (2004) Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 60(5):721–731
Ong TZ, Khor JL, Selamat DS, Yeoh KG, Ho KY (2005) Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the post-MRCP era: a tertiary center experience. World J Gastroenterol 11(33):5209–5212
Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. (2007) Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 102(8):1781–1788
Baillie J (2002) Predicting and preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 4(2):112–119
Garrow D, Miller S, Sinha D, et al. (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(5):616–623
Kohut M, Nowakowska-Dulawa E, Marek T, Kaczor R, Nowak A (2002) Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Endoscopy 34(4):299–303
Tse F, Liu L, Barkun AN, Armstrong D, Moayyedi P (2008) EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 67(2):235–244
Lachter J, Rubin A, Shiller M, et al. (2000) Linear EUS for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 51(1):51–54
Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG (2006) EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 64(2):248–254
Mandelia A, Gupta AK, Verma DK, Sharma S (2013) The value of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of choledocholithiasis. J Clin Diagn Res 7(9):1941–1945
Giljaca V, Gurusamy KS, Takwoingi Y, et al. (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD011549
Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T (1996) MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166(6):1297–1303
Lalani T, Couto CA, Rosen MP, et al. (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria jaundice. J Am Coll Radiol 10(6):402–409
Wada K, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. (2007) Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholangitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14(1):52–58
Martin DR, Seibert D, Yang M, Salman K, Frick MP (2004) Reversible heterogeneous arterial phase liver perfusion associated with transient acute hepatitis: findings on gadolinium-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 20(5):838–842
Matsui O, Kadoya M, Takashima T, et al. (1989) Intrahepatic periportal abnormal intensity on MR images: an indication of various hepatobiliary diseases. Radiology 171(2):335–338
Bader TR, Braga L, Beavers KL, Semelka RC (2001) MR imaging findings of infectious cholangitis. Magn Reson Imaging 19(6):781–788
Kaltenthaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcott J, et al. (2004) A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Health Technol Assess 8(10):1–89
Byott S, Harris I (2016) Rapid acquisition axial and coronal T2 HASTE MR in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain. Eur J Radiol 85(1):286–290
Bannas P, Pickhardt PJ (2015) MR evaluation of the nontraumatic acute abdomen with CT correlation. Radiol Clin North Am 53(6):1327–1339
Ding A, Eisenberg JD, Pandharipande PV (2011) The economic burden of incidentally detected findings. Radiol Clin N Am 49(2):257–265
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
Dr. Kang and this investigation were funded in part by an Association of University Radiologists-GE Radiology Research Academic Fellowship Award.
Conflicts of interest
Dr. Kang has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health (K07CA197134) and the Association of University Radiologists (sponsored by GE Healthcare). The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Statement of informed consent was not applicable since the manuscript does not contain any patient data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, S.K., Heacock, L., Doshi, A.M. et al. Comparative performance of non-contrast MRI with HASTE vs. contrast-enhanced MRI/3D-MRCP for possible choledocholithiasis in hospitalized patients. Abdom Radiol 42, 1650–1658 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1039-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1039-6