Skip to main content
Log in

A 1-year study of the activities of seven hydrolases in a communal wastewater treatment plant: trends and correlations

  • Environmental biotechnology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The activities of seven hydrolytic enzymes (L-alanine aminopeptidase, esterase, α-and β-glucosidase, phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiesterase, sulfatase) were monitored during 1 year in parallel and serial treatment units of the biological stage of a communal wastewater treatment plant. The spatial homogeneity of enzyme activities was high (coefficients of variation <10 % for the entire treatment stage). A significant difference between aerated and stirred tanks was not observed. Temperature seemed not to exert a direct influence. Long periods with comparably constant activities were interrupted by a few strong, short-time rises. The mean enzyme activities followed the sequence sulfatase < α-glucosidase < phosphodiesterase ≈ β-glucosidase≈esterase < phosphomonoesterase < L-alanine aminopeptidase. The enzyme activities correlated among themselves at different levels. Very strong (r > 0.8) and highly significant (p < 0.01) correlations between the activities of both glucosidases, both phosphoesterases, and between phosphomonoesterase and both glucosidases were ascertained, pointing to the importance of substrate specificity and similarity of metabolic functions. Moderate and strong activity correlations with various wastewater constituents and with process parameters, e.g., concentrations, loads and eliminated amounts of phosphorous, TOC concentrations and loads of the plant effluent, dry matter content of activated sludge, and sludge volume, were found. The esterase activity was least correlated with other enzymes and often showed deviating dependencies on process parameters, raising questions concerning its appropriateness as a sum parameter for enzymatic and heterotrophic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banister SS, Pretorius WA (1998) Optimisation of primary sludge acidogenic fermentation for biological nutrient removal. Water SA 24:35–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boczar BA, Begley WM, Larson RJ (1992) Characterization of enzyme activity in activated sludge using rapid analyses for specific hydrolases. Wat environ res 64:792–797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess JE, Pletschke BI (2008) Hydrolytic enzymes in sewage sludge treatment: a mini review. Wat SA 34:343–349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calderón K, Reboleiro-Rivas P, Rodríguez FA, Poyatos JM, González-López J, Rodelas B (2013) Comparative analysis of the enzyme activities and the bacterial community structure based on the aeration source supplied to a MBR to treat urban wastewater. J environ Managem 128:471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chróst RJ (1991) Environmental control of the synthesis and activity of aquatic microbial ectoenzymes. In: Chróst RJ (ed) Microbial Enzymes in Aquatic Environments. Springer Publ, Berlin, pp. 29–59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte F, Amrein BA, Kamerlin SCL (2013) Modeling catalytic promiscuity in the alkaline phosphatase superfamily. PNAS 107:2740–2745

    Google Scholar 

  • Elisov B, Argaman Y (1995) Hydrolysis of particulate organics in activated sludge systems. Wat Res 29:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer K, Wolff B, Emmerling C (2013) Inter and intra plant variability of enzyme profiles including various phosphoesterases and sulfatase of six wastewater treatment plants. Biores Technol 137:209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fontvieille DA, Outagerouine A, Thevenot DR (1992) Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of microbial activity in aquatic systems. Environ Technol 13:531–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frølund B, Griebe T, Nielsen PH (1995) enzymatic activity in the activated sludge floc matrix. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43:755–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goel R, Mino T, Satoh H, Matsuo T (1998) enzyme activities under anaerobic and aerobic conditions in activated sludge sequencing batch reactor. Wat Res 32:2081–2088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Silván C, Arévalo J, Pérez J, González-López J, Rodela B (2013) Linking hydrolytic activities to variables influencing a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating urban wastewater under real operating conditions. Wat Res 47:66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guihua M, Love NG (2001) BTX biodegradation in activated sludge under multiple redox conditions. J Environ Engineer 127:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Cai W, Huang H, Lei Z, Zhang Z, Tay JH, Lee D-J (2015) Identification of inorganic and organic species of phosphorous and its bio-availability in nitrifying aerobic granular sludge. Water Res 68:423–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ittisupornrat S, Tobino T, Yamamoto K (2014) A study of the relationship among sludge retention time, bacterial communities, and hydrolytic enzyme activities in inclined plate membrane bioreactors for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Appl Microbial Biotechnol 98:9107–9118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leszczynska M, Oleszkiewicz JA (1996) Application of the fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as an acute toxicity test. Environ Technol 17:79–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine AD (1991) Size distribution of particulate contaminants in wastewater and their impact on treatability. Wat Res 25:911–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macomber J, Cicek N, Suidan MT, Devel J, Ginestet P, Audie JM (2005) Biological kinetic evaluation of an activated sludge system coupled with an ultrafiltration membrane. J Environ Engineer 131:579–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Muñoz M, Poyatos JM, Vilchez R, Hontoria E, Rodelas B, González-López J (2007) Effect of the concentration of suspended solids on the enzymatic activities and biodiversity of a submerged membrane bioreactor for aerobic treatment of domestic wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73:1441–1451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Muñoz M, Poyatos JM, Rodelas B, Manzanera M, Hontoria E, González-López J (2010) Microbial enzymatic activities in a pilot-scale MBR experimental plant under different working conditions. Biores Technol 101:696–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen PH, Raunkjær K, Norsker NH, Jensen NA, Hvitved-Jacobsen T (1992) Transformation of wastewater in sewer systems – a review. Wat Sci Technol 25:17–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nybroe O, Jørgensen PE, Henze M (1992) Enzyme activities in waste water and activated sludge. Wat Res 26:679–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien PJ, Herschlag D (1999) catalytic promiscuity and the evolution of new enzymatic activities. Chem Biol 6:R91–R105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Obst U (2012) Enzymatische Tests für die Wasseranalytik, 3. Aufl edn. Deutscher Industrieverlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiquampoix H, Mousain D (2005) Enzymatic hydrolysis of organic phosphorus. In: Turner BL, Frossard E, Baldwin DS (eds) Organic Phosphorus in the Environment, 1st edn. Business expert press

  • Raunkjær K, Hvitved-Jacobsen T, Nielsen PH (1994) Measurement of pools of protein, carbohydrate and lipid in domestic wastewater. Wat Res 28:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards SR, Hastewell C, Davies M (1984) The comparative examination of 14 activated-sludge plants using enzymatic techniques. Wat Pollut control 38:300–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert DA, Hunter JV (1967) Rapid fractionation and material balance of solid fractions in wastewater effluent. J Wat Pollut Control Fed 29:1475–1486

    Google Scholar 

  • San Pedro DC, Mino T, Malsuo T (1994) Evaluation of the rate of hydrolysis of slowly biodegradable COD (SBCOD) using starch as substrate under anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic conditions. Water Sci Technol 30:191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnürer J, Rosswall T (1982) Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Appl Environ Microbial 43:1256–1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuber M, Brodisch KEU (1977) Enzymatic activities of activated sludge. Europ J Appl Microbiol 4:85–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Loo B, Jonas S, Babtie AC, Benjdia A, Berteau O, Hyvönen M, Hollfelder F (2010) An efficient, multiply promiscous hydrolase in the alkaline phosphatase superfamily. PNAS 107:2740–2745

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley CG, Heron P, Pletschke B, Rose PD, Tshivhunge S, Van Jaarsveld FP, Whittington-Jones K (2002) the enzymology of sludge solubilisation utilizing sulphate reducing systems – properties of proteases and phosphatases. Enzyme microbial Technol 31:419–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley CG, Lee D-J (2006) enzyme technology and biological remediation. Enzym Microb Technol 38:291–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie CS, Lu RJ, Huang Y, Wang Q, Xu XH (2010) Effects of ions and phosphates on alkaline phosphatase activity in aerobic activated sludge systems. Biores Technol 101:3394–3399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie C, Zhao J, Tang J, Xu J, Lin X, Xu X (2011) The phosphorus fractions and alkaline phosphatase activities in sludge. Biores Technol 102:2455–2461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu G.-H, He P.-J, Shao, L-M, Lee, D-J (2007) Enzyme activities in activated sludge flocs. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77:605-612

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude for research funding to the Rhineland-Palatinate Ministry of Environment, Agriculture, Nutrition, Viniculture, and Forests (MULEWF) and to the Stadtwerke Trier GmbH (SWT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Fischer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kreutz, J.A., Böckenhüser, I., Wacht, M. et al. A 1-year study of the activities of seven hydrolases in a communal wastewater treatment plant: trends and correlations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100, 6903–6915 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7540-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7540-6

Keywords

Navigation