Abstract
This study focused on plasma treatment of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and heat-treated European beech surfaces with varying distance from the planar electrode of the diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge. In addition to the treatment in the air, plasma treatment was also carried out in O2, CO2, N2 and Ar atmospheres. Treatment was differentiated between treatment in the active plasma zone and in the so-called plasma afterglow region. Air plasma treatment in the active plasma zone led to the well-known improvement of surface wettability of polar liquids due to increased polar part of surface free energy. Treatment in plasma afterglow region caused the wettability decline of polar liquids and caused a more hydrophobic surface. The phenomenon was primarily present for air plasma treatment. Oxygen-to-carbon ratio measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy did not change with the treatment in air plasma afterglow. Based on additional tests with pure cellulose paper and based on findings in previous studies, the reason for increased hydrophobicity was suggested to be degradation of hemicelluloses on the wood surface.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alén R, Kotilainen R, Zaman A (2002) Thermochemical behavior of Norway spruce (Picea abies) at 180–225 °C. Wood Sci Technol 36:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-001-0133-1
Altgen D, Avramidis G, Viöl W, Mai C (2016) The effect of air plasma treatment at atmospheric pressure on thermally modified wood surfaces. Wood Sci Technol 50:1227–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-016-0856-7
Avramidis G, Klarhöfer L, Maus-Friedrichs W, Militz H, Viöl W (2012) Influence of air plasma treatment at atmospheric pressure on wood extractives. Polym Degrad Stab 97:469–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.12.030
Belgacem M, Czeremuszkin G, Sapieha S (1995) Surface characterization of cellulose fibres by XPS and inverse gas chromatography. Cellulose 2:145–157
Benard N, Balcon N, Moreau E (2008) Electric wind produced by a surface dielectric barrier discharge operating in air at different pressures: aeronautical control insights. J Phys D Appl Phys 41:042002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/4/042002
Bibinov NK, Fateev AA, Wiesemann K (2001) On the influence of metastable reactions on rotational temperatures in dielectric barrier discharges in He-N2 mixtures. J Phys D Appl Phys 34:1819–1826. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/34/12/309
Braun D, Kühler U, Pietsch G (1988) Behaviour of NOx in air-fed ozonizers. Pure Appl Chem 60:741–746
Černák M, Černáková L, Hudec I, Kováčik D, Zahoranová A (2009) Diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge and its applications for in-line processing of low-added-value materials. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 47:22806. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2009131
Chu D, Xue L, Zhang Y, Kang L, Mu J (2016) Surface characteristics of poplar wood with high-temperature heat treatment: wettability and surface britleness. BioResources 11:6948–6967. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.3.6948-6967
Eliasson B, Egli W, Kogelschatz U (1994) Modelling of dielectric barrier discharge chemistry. Pure Appl Chem 66:1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199466061275
Galmiz O, Talviste R, Kováčik D, Panáček R (2019) Cold atmospheric pressure plasma facilitated nano-structuring of thermally modified wood. Wood Sci Technol 53:1339–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-019-01128-6
Gérardin P, Petrič M, Petrissans M, Lambert J, Ehrhrardt JJ (2007) Evolution of wood surface free energy after heat treatment. Polym Degrad Stab 92:653–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.01.016
Gerullis S, Kretzschmar BS, Pfuch A et al (2018) Influence of atmospheric pressure plasma jet and diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge treatments on wood surface properties: a comparative study. Plasma Process Polym 15(10):1800058 https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.201800058
Gindl M, Sinn G, Gindl W, Reiterer A, Stanzl-Tschegg S (2001) A comparison of different methods to calculate the surface free energy of wood using contact angle measurements. Colloids Surf 181:279–287
Hoder T, Íra M, Kozlov KV, Wagner HE (2008) Investigation of the coplanar barrier discharge in synthetic air at atmospheric pressure by cross-correlation spectroscopy. J Phys D Appl Phys 41:35212–35219 https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/3/035212
Homola T, Matoušek J, Kormunda M, Wu LYL, Černák M (2013) Plasma treatment of glass surfaces using diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge in ambient air. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 33:881–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-013-9467-3
Inari NG, Petrissans M, Lambert J, Ehrhardt JJ, Gérardin P (2006) XPS characterization of wood chemical composition after heat-treatment. Surf Interface Anal 38:1336–1342. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.2455
Jablonsky M, Smatko L, Botkova M, Tino R, Sima J (2016) Modification of wood wettability (European beech) by diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge plasma. Cellul Chem Technol 50:41–48
Jamali A, Evans PD (2011) Etching of wood surfaces by glow discharge plasma. Wood Sci Technol 45:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-010-0317-7
Jõgi I, Erme K, Levoll E, Stamate E (2017) Radical production efficiency and electrical characteristics of a coplanar barrier discharge built by multilayer ceramic technology. J Phys D Appl Phys 50:aa8dab. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa8dab
Kirdponpattara S, Phisalaphong M, Newby BZ (2013) Washburn capillary rise for determining contact angles of powders/porous materials. J Colloid Interface Sci 397:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.01.033
Klarhöfer L, Viöl W, Maus-Friedrichs W (2010) Electron spectroscopy on plasma treated lignin and cellulose. Holzforschung 64:331–336. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2010.048
Kolarova K, Vosmanska V, Rimpelova S, Svorcik V (2013) Effect of plasma treatment on cellulose fiber. Cellulose 20:953–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9863-0
Kormunda M, Homola T, Matousek J, Kovacik D, Cernak M, Pavlik J (2012) Surface analysis of poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) films treated at atmospheric pressure using diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge in air and in nitrogen. Polym Degrad Stab 97:547–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.01.014
Liston EM, Martinu L, Wertheimer MR (1993) Plasma surface modification of polymers for improved adhesion: a critical review. J Adhes Sci Technol 7:1091
Lux C, Szalay Z, Beikircher W, Kovacik D, Pulker HK (2013) Investigation of the plasma effects on wood after activation by diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge. Eur J Wood Prod 71:539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-013-0706-3
Mahlberg R, Niemi HEM, Denes F, Rowell RM (1998) Effect of oxygen and hexamethyldisiloxane plasma on morphology, wettability and adhesion properties of polypropylene and lignocellulosics. Int J Adhes Adhes 18:283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00007-4
Nussbaum RM (1999) Natural surface inactivation of Scots pine and Norway spruce evaluated by contact angle measurements. Holz Roh-Werkst 57:419–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001070050067
Odrášková M, Ráhel’ J, Zahoranová A, Tino R, Černák M (2008) Plasma activation of wood surface by diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 28:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-007-9117-8
Peters F, Hünnekens B, Wieneke S, Militz H, Ohms G, Viöl W (2017) Comparison of three dielectric barrier discharges regarding their physical characteristics and influence on the adhesion properties on maple, high density fiberboards and wood plastic composite. J Phys D Appl Phys 50:475206. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa8fad
Sakata I, Morita M, Tsuruta N, Morita K (1993) Activation of wood surface by corona treatment to improve adhesive bonding. J Appl Polym Sci 49:1251–1258. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1993.070490714
Sakiyama Y, Graves DB, Chang HW, Shimizu T, Morfill GE (2012) Plasma chemistry model of surface microdischarge in humid air and dynamics of reactive neutral species. J Phys D Appl Phys 45:425201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/45/42/425201
Sansonetti E, Andersons B, Biziks V, Grinins J, Chirkova J (2013) Investigation of surface properties of hydrothermally modified soft deciduous wood. Int Wood Prod J 4:122–127. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042645312Y.0000000028
Simek M, Pekarek S, Prukner V (2010) Influence of power modulation on ozone production using an AC surface dielectric barrier discharge in oxygen. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 30:607–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-010-9245-4
Stepanova V, Kelar J, Galmiz O et al (2017) Areal homogeneity verification of plasma generated by diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge in ambient air at atmospheric pressure. Contrib Plasma Phys 57:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctpp.201600093
Talviste R, Galmiz O, Stupavska M, Tucekova Z, Kaarna K, Kovacik D (2019) Effect of DCSBD plasma treatment on surface properties of thermally modified wood R. Surf Interfaces 16:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2019.04.005
Tino R, Smatko L (2014) Modifying wood surfaces with atmospheric diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge plasma. Wood Fiber Sci 46:459–464
Tjeerdsma BF, Militz H (2005) Chemical changes in hydrothermal treated wood: FTIR analysis of combined hydrothermal and dry heat-treated wood. Holz Roh-Werkst 63:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-004-0532-8
Wagner HE, Brandenburg R, Kozlov KV, Sonnenfeld A, Michel P, Behnke JF (2003) The barrier discharge: basic properties and applications to surface treatment. Vacuum 71:417–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-207X(02)00765-0
Wascher R, Avramidis G, Vetter U et al (2014) Plasma induced effects within the bulk material of wood veneers. Surf Coat Technol 259:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.07.005
Wendt DK, Owens RC (1969) Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13:1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.650986
Wexler A, Hasegawa S (1954) Relative humidity-temperature relationships of some saturated salt solutions in the temperature range 0° to 50°C. J Res Natl Bur Stand 53(1934):19–26
Wolkenhauer A, Avramidis G, Militz H, Viöl W (2008) Plasma treatment of heat treated beech wood—investigation on surface free energy. Holzforschung 62:472–474. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2008.074
Wolkenhauer A, Avramidis G, Hauswald E, Militz H, Viöl W (2009) Sanding vs. plasma treatment of aged wood: a comparison with respect to surface energy. Int J Adhes Adhes 29:18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.11.001
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Estonian Research Council (Grant No. PUTJD732) and Project LO1411 (NPU I) funded by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of Czech Republic. We would also like to thank the Department of Wood Science at the Mendel University in Brno for providing the thermally treated wood samples.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Talviste, R., Galmiz, O., Stupavská, M. et al. Effect of DCSBD plasma treatment distance on surface characteristics of wood and thermally modified wood. Wood Sci Technol 54, 651–665 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01175-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01175-4