Abstract
We examined a key aspect of sensorimotor skill: the capability to correct performance errors that arise mid-movement. Participants grasped the handle of a robot that imposed a nominal viscous resistance to hand movement. They watched a target move pseudo-randomly just above the horizontal plane of hand motion and initiated quick interception movements when cued. On some trials, the robot's viscosity or the target's speed changed without warning coincident with the GO cue. We fit a sum-of-Gaussians model to mechanical power measured at the handle to determine the number, magnitude, and relative timing of submovements occurring in each interception attempt. When a single submovement successfully intercepted the target, capture times averaged 410 ms. Sometimes, two or more submovements were required. Initial error corrections typically occurred before feedback could indicate the target had been captured or missed. Error corrections occurred sooner after movement onset in response to mechanical viscosity increases (at 154 ms) than to unprovoked errors on control trials (215 ms). Corrections occurred later (272 ms) in response to viscosity decreases. The latency of corrections for target speed changes did not differ from those in control trials. Remarkably, these early error corrections accommodated the altered testing conditions; speed/viscosity increases elicited more vigorous corrections than in control trials with unprovoked errors; speed/viscosity decreases elicited less vigorous corrections. These results suggest that the brain monitors and predicts the outcome of evolving movements, rapidly infers causes of mid-movement errors, and plans and executes corrections—all within 300 ms of movement onset.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
De-identified data will be made available upon reasonable request.
Code availability
N/A.
References
Brenner E, Smeets JB (2009) Modifying one’s hand’s trajectory when a moving target’s orientation changes. Exp Brain Res 196(3):375–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1857-7
Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2011) Continuous visual control of interception. Hum Mov Sci 30(3):475–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2010.12.007
Brenner E, Smeets JB (2015) How people achieve their amazing temporal precision in interception. J vis 15(3):8. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.3.8
Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2018) Continuously updating one’s predictions underlies successful interception. J Neurophysiol 120(6):3257–3274. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00517.2018 (PMID: 30379633)
Brenner E, Smeets JB, de Lussanet M (1998) Hitting moving targets continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target’s velocity. Exp Brain Res 122:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050535
Brouwer AM, Brenner E, Smeets JB (2002) Hitting moving objects: is target speed used in guiding the hand? Exp Brain Res 143(2):198–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-001-0980-x (PMID: 11880896)
Brouwer AM, Middelburg T, Smeets JB, Brenner E (2003) Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target’s speed and direction of motion. Exp Brain Res 152(3):368–375
Cluff T, Crevecoeur F, Scott SH (2015) A perspective on multisensory integration and rapid perturbation responses. Vis Res 110(Pt B):215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.011
Colebatch JG, Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI, Potter EK (1979) Subject instruction and long latency reflex responses to muscle stretch. J Physiol 292(1):527–534
Crago PE, Houk JC, Hasan Z (1976) Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 39(5):925–935
Crossman ER, Goodeve PJ (1983) Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts’ Law. Q J Exp Psychol: A Hum Exp Psychol 35(Pt 2):251–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748308402133 (PMID: 6571310)
Daum MM, Huber S, Krist H (2007) Controlling reaching movements with predictable and unpredictable target motion in 10-year-old children and adults. Exp Brain Res 177(4):483–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0704-3
Day BL, Brown P (2001) Evidence for subcortical involvement in the visual control of human reaching. Brain 124(9):1832–1840. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.9.1832
Day B, Lyon IN (1999) Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Exp Brain Res 130:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002219900218
de Lussanet MH, Smeets JB, Brenner E (2001) The effect of expectations on hitting moving targets: influence of the preceding target’s speed. Exp Brain Res 137(2):246–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000607
Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4(11):423–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01537-0
Desmurget M, Pélisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C (1998) From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22(6):761–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(98)00004-9
Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2(6):563–567. https://doi.org/10.1038/9219
Dessing JC, Oostwoud Wijdenes L, Peper CE, Beek PJ (2009) Visuomotor transformation for interception: catching while fixating. Exp Brain Res 196(4):511–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1882-6
Engel KC, Soechting JF (2000) Manual tracking in two dimensions. J Neurophysiol 83(6):3483–3496. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.83.6.3483
Evarts EV, Vaughn WJ (1978) Intended arm movements in response to externally produced arm displacements in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Cerebral motor control in man: long loop mechanisms. Karger, Basel, pp 178–192
Fink PW, Foo PS, Warren WH (2009) Catching fly balls in virtual reality: a critical test of the outfielder problem. J vis 9(13):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.13.14
Fishbach A, Roy SA, Bastianen C, Miller LE, Houk JC (2007) Deciding when and how to correct a movement: discrete submovements as a decision making process. Exp Brain Res 177(1):45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0652-y
Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47(6):381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392
Flanagan JR, Vetter P, Johansson RS, Wolpert DM (2003) Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol CB 13(2):146–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00007-1
Flash T, Henis E (1991) Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets. J Cogn Neurosci 3(3):220–230. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1991.3.3.220
Franklin DW, Reichenbach A, Franklin S, Diedrichsen J (2016) Temporal evolution of spatial computations for visuomotor control. J Neurosci 36(8):2329–2341
Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1981) Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. J Neurophysiol 46(4):725–743. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1981.46.4.725 (PMID: 7288461)
Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15(1):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8
Goodale MA, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320(6064):748–750. https://doi.org/10.1038/320748a0
Gottlieb GL (1996) On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 76(5):3207–3229
Hasan Z (2005) The human motor control system’s response to mechanical perturbation: should it, can it and does it ensure stability? J Mot Behav 37(6):484–493
Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9(6):718–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8
Keele SW (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychol Bull 70(6 Pt 1):387–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026739
Kozak RA, Kreyenmeier P, Gu C, Johnston K, Corneil BD (2019) Stimulus-locked responses on human upper limb muscles and corrective reaches are preferentially evoked by low spatial frequencies. eNeuro. https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0301-19.2019
Ledouit S, Casanova R, Zaal FT, Bootsma RJ (2013) Prospective control in catching: the persistent Angle-of-approach effect in lateral interception. PLoS ONE 8(11):e80827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080827
Lee H, Perreault EJ (2019) Stabilizing stretch reflexes are modulated independently from the rapid release of perturbation-triggered motor plans. Sci Rep 9(1):1–11
Lee JH, van Donkelaar P (2002) Dorsal and ventral visual stream contributions to perception-action interactions during pointing. Exp Brain Res 143(4):440–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1011-2
Lee D, Port NL, Georgopoulos AP (1997) Manual interception of moving targets. II. On-line control of overlapping submovements. Exp Brain Res 116(3):421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00005770 (PMID: 9372291)
Lisberger SG, Movshon JA (1999) Visual motion analysis for pursuit eye movements in area MT of macaque monkeys. J Neurosci 19(6):2224–2246. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-06-02224.1999PMID:10066275;PMCID:PMC6782544
Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Keith Smith JE (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95(3):340–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.340
Milner TE (1992) A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision. Neuroscience 49(2):487–496
Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, Macko KA (1983) Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci 6:414–417
Morasso P, Mussa Ivaldi FA (1982) Trajectory formation and handwriting: a computational model. Biol Cybern 45(2):131–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335240 (PMID: 7138957)
Morasso P, Mussa Ivaldi FA, Ruggiero C (1983) How a discontinuous mechanism can produce continuous patterns in trajectory formation and handwriting. Acta Physiol (oxf) 54(1–3):83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(83)90025-2
Mrotek LA (2013) Following and intercepting scribbles: interactions between eye and hand control. Exp Brain Res 227(2):161–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3496-2 (PMID: 23552996)
Mrotek LA, Soechting JF (2007) Target interception: hand-eye coordination and strategies. J Neurosci 27(27):7297–7309. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2046-07.2007 (PMID: 17611282)
Mutha PK, Boulinguez P, Sainburg RL (2008) Visual modulation of proprioceptive reflexes during movement. Brain Res 1246:54–69
Novak KE, Miller LE, Houk JC (2000) Kinematic properties of rapid hand movements in a knob turning task. Exp Brain Res 132(4):419–433
Novak KE, Miller LE, Houk JC (2002) The use of overlapping submovements in the control of rapid hand movements. Exp Brain Res 144(3):351–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1060-6
Novak K, Miller L, Houk J (2003) Features of motor performance that drive adaptation in rapid hand movements. Exp Brain Res 148(3):388–400
Omrani M, Pruszynski JA, Murnaghan CD, Scott SH (2014) Perturbation-evoked responses in primary motor cortex are modulated by behavioral context. J Neurophysiol 112(11):2985–3000
Oostwoud Wijdenes L, Brenner E, Smeets JB (2011) Fast and fine-tuned corrections when the target of a hand movement is displaced. Exp Brain Res 214(3):453–462
Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie C, Materniuk R (1991) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 87:407–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231858
Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67(2):455–469
Pruszynski JA, Scott SH (2012) Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response. Exp Brain Res 218(3):341–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3041-8
Pruszynski JA, King GL, Boisse L, Scott SH, Flanagan JR, Munoz DP (2010) Stimulus-locked responses on human arm muscles reveal a rapid neural pathway linking visual input to arm motor output. Eur J Neurosci 32:1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07380.x
Pruszynski JA, Kurtzer I, Scott SH (2011) The long-latency reflex is composed of at least two functionally independent processes. J Neurophysiol 106(1):449–459
Ravichandran VJ, Honeycutt CF, Shemmell J, Perreault EJ (2013) Instruction-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch reflex is associated with indicators of startle. Exp Brain Res 230(1):59–69
Rohrer B, Hogan N (2003) Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions: a globally optimal algorithm. Biol Cybern 89(3):190–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-003-0428-4 (PMID: 14504938)
Rohrer B, Hogan N (2006) Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions II: a scattershot algorithm. Biol Cybern 94(5):409–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0055-y (PMID: 16570179)
Saunders JA, Knill DC (2003) Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 152(3):341–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1525-2
Saunders JA, Knill DC (2004) Visual feedback control of hand movements. J Neurosci 24(13):3223–3234. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4319-03.2004
Scheidt RA, Ghez C, Asnani S (2011) Patterns of hypermetria and terminal cocontraction during point-to-point movements demonstrate independent action of trajectory and postural controllers. J Neurophysiol 106(5):2368–2382. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00763.2010 (PMID: 21849613; PMCID: PMC3214114)
Scheidt RA, Zimbelman JL, Salowitz NM, Suminski AJ, Mosier KM, Houk J, Simo L (2012) Remembering forward: neural correlates of memory and prediction in human motor adaptation. Neuroimage 59(1):582–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.072
Shapiro MB, Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM (2004) EMG responses to an unexpected load in fast movements are delayed with an increase in the expected movement time. J Neurophysiol 91(5):2135–2147
Shemmell J, An JH, Perreault EJ (2009) The differential role of motor cortex in stretch reflex modulation induced by changes in environmental mechanics and verbal instruction. J Neurosci 29(42):13255–13263
Smeets JBJ, Erkelens CJ, van der Gon Denier JJ (1990) Adjustments of fast goal-directed movements in response to an unexpected inertial load. Exp Brain Res 81(2):303–312
Smeets JBJ, Oostwoud WL, Brenner E (2016) Movement adjustments have short latencies because there is no need to detect anything. Mot Control 20:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1123/mc.2014-0064 (PMID 25674946)
Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1983) Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol 49(2):548–564. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1983.49.2.548 (PMID: 6834087)
Soechting JF, Mrotek LA, Flanders M (2005) Smooth pursuit tracking of an abrupt change in target direction: vector superposition of discrete responses. Exp Brain Res 160(2):245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2010-2 (PMID: 15322786)
Soechting JF, Juveli JZ, Rao HM (2009) Models for the extrapolation of target motion for manual interception. J Neurophysiol 102(3):1491–1502. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00398.2009 (PMID: 19571194; PMCID: PMC2746781)
Suminski AJ, Rao SM, Mosier KM, Scheidt RA (2007) Neural and electromyographic correlates of wrist posture control. J Neurophysiol 97(2):1527–1545. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01160.2006
Suminski AJ, Doudlah RC, Scheidt RA (2022) Neural correlates of multisensory integration for feedback stabilization of the wrist. Front Integr Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.815750
Tunik E, Houk JC, Grafton ST (2009) Basal ganglia contribution to the initiation of corrective submovements. Neuroimage 47(4):1757–1766
Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (1994) ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4:157–165
van Donkelaar P, Lee RG, Gellman RS (1992) Control strategies in directing the hand to moving targets. Exp Brain Res 91(1):151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230023
Veerman MM, Brenner E, Smeets JB (2008) The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target. Exp Brain Res 187(2):219–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1296-x
Whiting HTA, Sharp RH (1974) Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task. J Mot Behav 6(1):11–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1974.10734974
Wolpert DM, Miall RC (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9(8):1265–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4
Zago M, Bosco G, Maffei V, Iosa M, Ivanenko YP, Lacquaniti F (2005) Fast adaptation of the internal model of gravity for manual interceptions: evidence for event-dependent learning. J Neurophysiol 93:1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1152/Jn.00833.2004 (PMID: 15456796)
Zago M, McIntyre J, Senot P, Lacquaniti F (2009) Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception. Exp Brain Res 192(4):571–604
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders And Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21NS121624-01A1, and by the National Science Foundation under an Individual Research and Development Plan (RAS). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: LAM and RAS. Data curation: PGP and LAM. Funding acquisition: RAS. Investigation: PGP. Methodology: LAM, RAS, and PGP. Project administration: RAS and LAM. Software: RAS, PGP, and LAM. Supervision: RAS and LAM. Validation: RAS, LAM, and PGP. Interpretation: PGP, KAN, SAB, RAS, and LAM. Writing: PGP, KAN, SAB, RAS, and LAM.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts or competing interest.
Ethical approval
The study protocol was approved by the IRB at Marquette University (HR-1674).
Consent to participate
All subjects in this study gave informed written consent to participate in this study.
Consent for publication
Each author has read and concurs with the content in the manuscript.
Additional information
Communicated by Francesco Lacquaniti.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gonzalez Polanco, P., Mrotek, L.A., Nielson, K.A. et al. When intercepting moving targets, mid-movement error corrections reflect distinct responses to visual and haptic perturbations. Exp Brain Res 241, 231–247 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06515-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06515-3