Abstract
We consider a pivotal monoidal functor whose domain is a modular tensor category (MTC). We show that the trace of such a functor naturally extends to a representation of the corresponding tube category. As irreducible representations of the tube category are indexed by pairs of simple objects in the underlying MTC, the simple multiplicities of this representation form a candidate modular invariant matrix. In general, this matrix will not be modular invariant, however it will always commute with the T-matrix. Furthermore, under certain additional conditions on the original functor, it is shown that the corresponding representation of the tube category is a haploid, symmetric, commutative Frobenius algebra. Such algebras are known to be connected to modular invariants, in particular a result of Kong and Runkel implies that the matrix of simple multiplicities commutes with the S-matrix if and only if the dimension of the algebra is equal to the dimension of the underlying MTC. Finally, this procedure is applied to certain pivotal monoidal functors arising from module categories over the Temperley–Lieb category and the associated MTC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Böckenhauer, J., Evans, D.E.: Modular invariants, graphs and \(\alpha \)-induction for nets of subfactors. I. Commun. Math. Phys. 197(2), 361–386 (1998)
Böckenhauer, J., Evans, D.E.: Modular invariants and subfactors. In: Mathematical Physics in Mathematics and Physics (Siena, 2000), volume 30 of Fields Inst. Commun., pp. 11–37. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2001)
Bruguières, A., Natale, S.: Exact sequences of tensor categories. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 24, 5644–5705 (2011)
Bruguières, A., Natale, S.: Central exact sequences of tensor categories, equivariantization and applications. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 66(1), 257–287 (2014)
Cardy, J.L.: Boundary conditions in conformal field theory. In: Integrable Systems in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics, volume 19 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pp. 127–148. Academic Press, Boston, MA (1989)
Cappelli, A., Itzykson, C., Zuber, J.-B.: The \({\rm A}\)-\({\rm D}\)-\({\rm E}\) classification of minimal and \(A^{(1)}_1\) conformal invariant theories. Commun. Math. Phys. 113(1), 1–26 (1987)
Clark, D., Morrison, S., Walker, K.: Fixing the functoriality of Khovanov homology. Geom. Topol. 13(3), 1499–1582 (2009)
Davydov, A., Kong, L., Runkel, I.: Functoriality of the center of an algebra. Adv. Math. 285, 811–876 (2015)
Etingof, P., Gelaki, S., Nikshych, D., Ostrik, V.: Tensor categories. In: Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 205. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2015)
Etingof, P., Nikshych, D., Ostrik, V.: On fusion categories. Ann. Math. (2) 162(2), 581–642 (2005)
Etingof, P., Ostrik, V.: Module categories over representations of \({\rm SL}_q(2)\) and graphs. Math. Res. Lett. 11(1), 103–114 (2004)
Fjelstad, J., Fuchs, J., Runkel, I., Schweigert, C.: Uniqueness of open/closed rational CFT with given algebra of open states. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 12(6), 1283–1375 (2008)
Gannon, T.: The Cappelli–Itzykson–Zuber A–D–E classification. Rev. Math. Phys. 12(5), 739–748 (2000)
Goodman, F.M., Wenzl, H.: Ideals in the temperley lieb category (2002). arXiv:math/0206301v1
Hardiman, L.: A graphical approach to the Drinfeld centre. (2019). arXiv:1911.07271
Hardiman, L., King, A.: Decomposing the tube category. Glasgow Math. J. (2019)
Huang, Y.-Z.: Vertex operator algebras, the Verlinde conjecture, and modular tensor categories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(15), 5352–5356 (2005)
Kirillov Jr., A., Ostrik, V.: On a \(q\)-analogue of the McKay correspondence and the ADE classification of \({\mathfrak{sl}}_{2}\) conformal field theories. Adv. Math. 171(2), 183–227 (2002)
Kong, L.: Cardy condition for open-closed field algebras. Commun. Math. Phys. 283(1), 25–92 (2008)
Kong, L., Runkel, I.: Cardy algebras and sewing constraints. I. Commun. Math. Phys. 292(3), 871–912 (2009)
Ocneanu, A.: Chirality for operator algebras. In: Subfactors (Kyuzeso, 1993), pp. 39–63. World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ (1994)
Ocneanu, A.: Paths on coxeter diagrams: From platonic solids and singularities to minimal models and subfactors. In: Lectures on Operator Theory, Volume 13 of Fields Inst. Monographs. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (1999). Notes by S. Goto
Ostrik, V.: Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants. Transform. Groups 8(2), 177–206 (2003)
Schaumann, G.: Traces on module categories over fusion categories. J. Algebra 379, 382–425 (2013)
Snyder, N., Tingley, P.: The half-twist for \(U_q(\mathfrak{g})\) representations. Algebra Number Theory 3(7), 809–834 (2009)
Sugawara, H.: A field theory of currents. Phys. Rev. 170, 1659–1662 (Jun 1968)
Turaev, V.G.: Quantum invariants of knots and 3-manifolds, Volume 18 of De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics. De Gruyter, Berlin, (2016). Third edition [of MR1292673]
Yamagami, S.: Frobenius algebras in tensor categories and bimodule extensions. In: Galois Theory, Hopf Algebras, and Semiabelian Categories, Volume 43 of Fields Inst. Commun., pp. 551–570. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2004)
Zuber, J.-B.: CFT, BCFT, ADE and all that. In: Quantum Symmetries in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics (Bariloche, 2000), Volume 294 of Contemp. Math., pp. 233–266. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2002)
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Alastair King for his guidance during the period this work was carried out. He is also grateful to Ingo Runkel for multiple helpful conversations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by C. Schweigert
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A. Lemmas on Frobenius Algebras
Appendix A. Lemmas on Frobenius Algebras
The purpose of this section is to provide the necessary definitions on Frobenius algebras followed by certain technical results required in Sect. 6.
Definition A.1
Let \( {\mathcal {B}}\) be a monoidal category. A Frobenius algebra A in \( {\mathcal {B}}\) is an algebra and a coalgebra in \( {\mathcal {B}}\) such that
where \( \nabla \) is the product and \( \Delta \) is the coproduct. Using the graphical notation
we can rewrite Condition (24) as
We also use
to denote the unit and
to denote the counit. A is called haploid if is satisfies \( {{\,\mathrm{Hom}\,}}_{{\mathcal {B}}}({\mathbf{1 }}, A) = {{\mathbb {C}}} \). If \( {\mathcal {B}}\) is braided then A is called commutative if the underlying algebra structure is commutative i.e.
If \( {\mathcal {B}}\) is pivotal then A is called symmetric if is satisfies
Remark A.2
Let \( {\mathcal {B}}\) be a fusion category with complete set of simples \( {{\,\mathrm{Irr}\,}}({\mathcal {B}}) \) and let A be an object in \( {\mathcal {B}}\). Any morphism \( \nabla \) from \( A \otimes A \) to A gives rise to the following morphisms,
where X, Y, Z are in \( {\mathcal {B}}\) and \( A_X :={{\,\mathrm{Hom}\,}}_{{\mathcal {B}}}(X,A) \). The full map \( \nabla \) is determined by \( \nabla _R^{S,T} \) for \( R,S,T \in {{\,\mathrm{Irr}\,}}({\mathcal {B}}) \). Indeed we can recover it via
where g ranges over a basis of \( A_S \), h ranges over a basis of \( A_T \) and \( \alpha \) ranges over a basis of \( {{\,\mathrm{Hom}\,}}_{{\mathcal {B}}}(R,ST) \). Similarly any morphism from A to \( A \otimes A \) can also be decomposed in the following way
and then recovered via
Lemma A.3
Let A be an object in \( {\mathcal {B}}\) and let \( \nabla \) be in \( {{\,\mathrm{Hom}\,}}_{{\mathcal {B}}}(A \otimes A,A) \). Then \( \nabla \) is associative if
for all \( R,S,T \in {{\,\mathrm{Irr}\,}}({\mathcal {B}}) \), \( \alpha \in {{\,\mathrm{Hom}\,}}_{{\mathcal {B}}}(R,ST) \), \( f \in A_R \), \( g \in A_S \) and \( h \in A_T \). An element \( u \in A_{{\mathbf{1 }}} \) is a unit for \( \nabla \) if
Furthermore, if \( {\mathcal {B}}\) is braided then \( \nabla \) is commutative if
Proof
The first claim follows from the fact that, by decomposing the top of each strand (as in, for example, [HK19, Lemma 3.3]), we have
and
Similarly the second claim follows from
and the third claim from
\(\square \)
Lemma A.4
Let \( {\mathcal {B}}\) be a spherical fusion category and let A be an object in \( {\mathcal {B}}\) together with a collection of perfect pairings
for all \(S \in {{\,\mathrm{Irr}\,}}({\mathcal {B}}) \). Let c be a map from \( {{\,\mathrm{Irr}\,}}({\mathcal {B}}) \) to \( {{\mathbb {C}}} \setminus \{ 0 \} \). We consider the morphisms
and
where \( \{b\} \) is a basis of \( A_S \) and \( \{b'\} \) is the corresponding dual basis of \( A_{S^\vee } \) with respect to \( \langle -, -\rangle _S \). Then is a dual object to A. Furthermore, with respect to this duality, we have
for all \( f,g \in A_S \).
Proof
We have
and, in the same way, we also have
To prove the second claim we simply compute
\(\square \)
Lemma A.5
Let \( {\mathcal {B}}\) be a spherical fusion category and let A be an algebra object in \( {\mathcal {B}}\) (with product \( \nabla \)) together with structure maps that make A self-dual. Then A satisfies (16) if and only if
for all \( R,S,T \in {{\,\mathrm{Irr}\,}}({\mathcal {B}}) \), \( \beta \in {{\,\mathrm{Hom}\,}}_{{\mathcal {B}}}(ST,R) \), \( h,f \in A_R \), \( g,h \in A_T \) and \( f,g \in A_S \).
Proof
Decomposing the coproduct given by the left-hand side of (16) gives
In an analogous way, we also have
which proves the proposition. \(\quad \square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hardiman, L. Extending the Trace of a Pivotal Monoidal Functor. Commun. Math. Phys. 381, 1055–1090 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-020-03909-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-020-03909-8