Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancement of a visual reinforcer by d-amphetamine and nicotine in adult rats: relation to habituation and food restriction

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale and objectives

Nicotine and d-amphetamine can strengthen reinforcing effects of unconditioned visual stimuli. We investigated whether these reinforcement-enhancing effects reflect a slowing of stimulus habituation and depend on food restriction.

Methods

Adult male rats pressed an active lever to illuminate a cue light during daily 60-min sessions. Depending on the experiment, rats were challenged with fixed or varying doses of d-amphetamine (0.25–2 mg/kg IP) and nicotine (0.025–0.2 mg/kg SC) or with the tobacco constituent norharman (0.03–10 μg/kg IV). Experiment 1 tested for possible reinforcement-enhancing effects of d-amphetamine and norharman. Experiment 2 investigated whether nicotine and amphetamine inhibited the spontaneous within-session decline in lever pressing. Experiment 3 assessed the effects of food restriction.

Results

Amphetamine (0.25–1 mg/kg) and nicotine (0.1 mg/kg) increased active lever pressing specifically (two- to threefold increase). The highest doses of nicotine and amphetamine also affected inactive lever responding (increase and decrease, respectively). With the visual reinforcer omitted, responding was largely extinguished. Neither drug appeared to slow habituation, as assessed by the within-session decline in lever pressing, and reinforcement-enhancing effects still occurred if the drugs were given after this decline had occurred. Food restriction enhanced the reinforcement-enhancing effect of amphetamine but not that of nicotine.

Conclusions

Responding remained goal-directed after several weeks of testing. Low doses of d-amphetamine and nicotine produced reinforcement enhancement even in free-feeding subjects, independent of the spontaneous within-session decline in responding. Reinforcement enhancement by amphetamine, but not nicotine, was enhanced by concurrent subchronic food restriction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul B. S. Clarke.

Ethics declarations

All experiments comply with the current laws of Canada.

Conflict of interest

P.B.S.C. is a member of the Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology at Concordia University, Montreal. The authors have no financial relationship with the organizations that sponsored this research.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figure 1

Effect of food restriction on body weights in Experiment 3. Each rat was tested under ad libitum (AL) and food-restricted (FR) conditions, in a crossover design. Initially, 14 rats were tested under ad libitum feeding, and the remaining 16 rats were tested under food restriction. After a 10-day recovery period of ad libitum feeding and no testing, the feeding conditions were reversed. Y-axes show mean ± SEM (n = 14 and 16 rats per group). Note that most SEM bars are contained within the accompanying symbol. (JPEG 69 kb)

High resolution image (TIFF 145 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wright, J.M., Ren, S., Constantin, A. et al. Enhancement of a visual reinforcer by d-amphetamine and nicotine in adult rats: relation to habituation and food restriction. Psychopharmacology 235, 803–814 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4796-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4796-1

Keywords

Navigation