Abstract
Rifampicin is a strong inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1), leading to profound drug–drug interactions. In contrast, the chemically related rifabutin does not show such pronounced induction properties in vivo. The aim of our study was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the different induction potentials of rifampicin and rifabutin in primary human hepatocytes and to analyze the mechanism of potential differences. Therefore, we evaluated CYP3A4/ABCB1 mRNA expression (polymerase chain reaction), CYP3A4/P-gp protein expression (immunoaffinity–liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, IA-LC-MS/MS), CYP3A4 activity (testosterone hydroxylation), and considered intracellular drug uptake after treatment with increasing rifamycin concentrations (0.01–10 µM). Furthermore, rifamycin effects on the protein levels of CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 were analyzed (IA-LC-MS/MS). Mechanistic analysis included the evaluation of possible suicide CYP3A4 inhibition (IC50 shift assay) and drug impact on translational efficiency (cell-free luminescence assays). Rifabutin accumulated 6- to 15-fold higher in hepatocytes than rifampicin, but induced CYP3A4 mRNA comparably to rifampicin (e. g. rifampicin 61-fold vs. rifabutin 44-fold, 72 h). While rifampicin for example enhanced protein (10 µM: 21-fold) and activity levels considerably (53-fold), rifabutin only slightly increased CYP3A4 protein expression (10 µM: 3.3-fold) or activity (11-fold) compared to rifampicin after 72 h. Both rifamycins similarly influenced expression of other eliminating proteins. A potential CYP3A4 suicide inhibition by a specific rifabutin metabolite or disruption of ribosome function were excluded experimentally. In conclusion, the lack of protein enhancement, could explain rifabutin’s weaker induction-related drug–drug interaction risk in vivo.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Original data are available upon reasonable request.
References
Baciewicz AM, Chrisman CR, Finch CK, Self TH (2008) Update on rifampin and rifabutin drug interactions. Am J Med Sci 335:126–136. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31814a586a
Barluenga J, Aznar F, García A, Cabal M, Palacios JJ, Menéndez M (2006) New rifabutin analogs: synthesis and biological activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16:5717–5722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.08.090
Chen Y, Ferguson SS, Negishi M, Goldstein JA (2003) Identification of constitutive androstane receptor and glucocorticoid receptor binding sites in the CYP2C19 promoter. Mol Pharmacol 64:316–324. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.64.2.316
Chen Y, Ferguson SS, Negishi M, Goldstein JA (2004) Induction of human CYP2C9 by rifampicin, hyperforin, and phenobarbital is mediated by the pregnane X receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 308:495–501. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.058818
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency, Guideline on the investigation of drug interactions, 2012, CPMP/EWP/560/95/Rev. 1 Corr. 2**. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-investigation-drug-interactions-revision-1_en.pdf (Accessed on 5 February 2024)
Dooley KE, Sayre P, Borland J, Purdy E, Chen S, Song I, Peppercorn A, Everts S, Piscitelli S, Charles FC (2013) Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the HIV integrase inhibitor dolutegravir given twice daily with rifampin or once daily with rifabutin: Results of a phase 1 study among healthy subjects. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 62:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e318276cda9
Duszenko M, Kang X, Böhme U, Hömke R, Lehner M (1999) In vitro translation in a cell-free system from Trypanosoma brucei yields glycosylated and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins. Eur J Biochem 266:789–797. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00897.x
Dyavar SR, Mykris TM, Winchester LC, Scarsi KK, Fletcher CV, Podany AT (2020) Hepatocytic transcriptional signatures predict comparative drug interaction potential of rifamycin antibiotics. Sci Rep 10:12565. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69228-z
Ferguson SS, Chen Y, LeCluyse EL, Negishi M, Goldstein JA (2005) Human CYP2C8 is transcriptionally regulated by the nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor, pregnane X receptor, glucocorticoid receptor, and hepatic nuclear factor 4α. Mol Pharmacol 68:747–757. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.105.013169
Finch CK, Chrisman CR, Baciewicz AM, Self TH (2002) Rifampin and rifabutin drug interactions: an update. Arch Intern Med 162:985–992. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.9.985
Healan AH, Griffis JM, Proskin HM, O’Riordan MA, Gray WA, Salata RA, Blumer JL (2017) Impact of rifabutin or rifampin on bedaquiline safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics assessed in a randomized clinical trial with heala thy adult volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 21:855–917
Horne DJ, Spitters C, Narita M (2019) Experience with rifabutin replacing rifampin in the treatment of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:1319–1419
International council for harmonisation of technical requirements for pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonized guideline Drug Interaction Studies M12. Available online: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/M12_Step1_draft_Guideline_2022_0524.pdf (Accessed on 5 February 2024).
Kenny MT, Strates B (1981) Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of the antibiotic rifampin. Drug Metab Rev 12:159–218. https://doi.org/10.3109/03602538109011084
Kraft WK, McCrea JB, Winchell GA, Carides A, Lowry R, Woolf EJ, Kusma SE, Deutsch PJ, Greenberg HE, Waldman SA (2004) Indinavir and rifabutin drug interactions in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 44:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270003262807
LeBel M, Masson E, Guilbert E, Colborn D, Paquet F, Allard S, Vallée F, Narang PK (1998) Effects of rifabutin and rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone. J Clin Pharmacol 11:1042–1050. https://doi.org/10.1177/009127009803801109
LeCluyse EL, Alexandre E, Hamilton GA, Viollon-Abadie C, Coon DJ, Jolley S, Richert L (2005) Isolation and culture of primary human hepatocytes. Methods Mol Biol 290:207–229. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-838-2:207
Li AP, Reith MK, Rasmussen A, Gorski GC, Hall SD, Xu L, Kaminski DL, Cheng LK (1997) Primary human hepatocytes as a tool for the evaluation of structure-activity relationship in cytochrome P450 induction potential of xenobiotics: evaluation of rifampin, rifapentine and rifabutin. Chem Biol Interact 107:17–30
Li D, Tolleson WH, Yu D, Chen S, Guo L, Xiao W, Tong W, Ning B (2019) Regulation of cytochrome P450 expression by microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs: Epigenetic mechanisms in environmental toxicology and carcinogenesis. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 37:180–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2019.1639481
Lutz JD, Kirby BJ, Wang L, Song Q, Ling J, Massetto B, Worth A, Kearney BP, Mathias A (2018a) Cytochrome P450 3A induction predicts P-glycoprotein induction; Part 1: Establishing induction relationships using ascending dose rifampin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 104:1182–1190. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1073
Lutz JD, Kirby BJ, Wang L, Song Q, Ling J, Massetto B, Worth A, Kearney BP, Mathias A (2018b) Cytochrome P450 3A induction predicts P-glycoprotein induction; Part 2: Prediction of decreased substrate exposure after rifabutin or carbamazepine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 104:1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1072
Morishima Y, Peng H, Lin H-l, Hollenberg PF, Sunahara RK, Osawa Y, Pratt WB (2005) Regulation of cytochrome P450 2E1 by heat shock protein 90-dependent stabilization and CHIP-dependent proteasomal degradation. Biochem 44:16333–16340
Nilles J, Weiss J, Sauter M, Haefeli WE, Ruez S, Theile D (2023) Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug-drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin. Arch Toxicol 97:2219–2230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03531-2
Pan Y, Gao W, Yu A (2009) MicroRNAs regulate CYP3A4 expression via direct and indirect targeting. Drug Metab Dispos 37:2112–2117. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.109.027680
Pessayre D, Larrey D, Vitaux J, Breil P, Belghiti J, Benhamou J (1982) Formation of an inactive cytochrome P-450 Fe(II)-metabolite complex after administration of troleandomycin in humans. Biochem Pharmacol 31:1699–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(82)90671-2
Polk RE, Brophy DF, Israel DS, Patron R, Sadler BM, Chittick GE, Symonds WT, Lou Y, Kristoff D, Stein DS (2001) Pharmacokinetic Interaction between amprenavir and rifabutin or rifampin in healthy males. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:502–508. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.2.502-508.2001
Prodromou C, Roe SM, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH (1997) Identification and structural characterization of the ATP/ADP-binding site in the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. Cell 90:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80314-1
Ramamoorthy A, Liu Y, Philips S, Desta Z, Lin H, Goswami C, Gaedigk A, Li L, Flockhart DA, Skaar TC (2013) Regulation of microRNA expression by rifampin in human hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 41:1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.113.052886
Reinach B, Sousa G, Dostert P, Ings R, Gugenheim J, Rahmani R (1999) Comparative effects of rifabutin and rifampicin on cytochromes P450 and UDP-glucuronosyl-transferases expression in fresh and cryopreserved human hepatocytes. Chem Biol Interact 121:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2797(99)00089-7
Savaryn JP, Sun J, Ma J, Jenkins GJ, Stresser DM (2022) Broad application of CYP3A4 liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry protein quantification in hepatocyte cytochrome P450 induction assays identifies nonuniformity in mRNA and protein induction responses. Drug Metab Dispos 50:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.121.000638
Schaefer O, Ohtsuki S, Kawakami H, Inoue T, Liehner S, Saito A, Atsushi SA, Ishiguro N, Matsumaru T, Terasaki T, Ebner T (2012) Absolute quantification and differential expression of drug transporters, cytochrome P450 enzymes, and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in cultured primary human hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 40:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.111.042275
Schopf FH, Biebl MM, Buchner J (2017) The HSP90 chaperone machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18:345–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.20
Sekaggya-Wiltshire C, Dooley KE (2019) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations of rifamycin antibiotics for the treatment of tuberculosis. Expert Opin Drug Metabo Toxicol 15:615–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2019.1648432
Stebbins CE, Russo AA, Schneider C, Rosen N, Hartl FU, Pavletich NP (1997) Crystal structure of an Hsp90–geldanamycin complex: Targeting of a protein chaperone by an antitumor agent. Cell 89:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80203-2
Thasler WE, Weiss TS, Schillhorn K, Stoll P, Irrgang B, Jauch K (2003) Charitable state-controlled foundation human tissue and cell research: ethic and legal aspects in the supply of surgically removed human tissue for research in the academic and commercial sector in Germany. Cell Tissue Bank 4:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026392429112
US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. In vitro drug interaction studies- cytochrome P450 enzyme- and transporter-mediated drug interactions, guidance of industry. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/134582/download (Accessed 5 February 2024)
Vourvahis M, Davis J, Wang R, Layton G, Choo HW, Chong C, Tawadrous M (2012) Effect of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics of lersivirine and effect of lersivirine on the pharmacokinetics of rifabutin and 25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4303–4309. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.06282-11
Weiss J, Foerster KI, Weber M, Burhenne J, Mikus G, Lehr T, Haefeli WE (2022) Does the circulating ketoconazole metabolite N-deacetyl ketoconazole contribute to the drug-drug interaction potential of the parent compound? Eur J Pharm Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106076
Williamson B, Dooley KE, Zhang Y, Back DJ, Owen A (2013) Induction of influx and efflux transporters and cytochrome P450 3A4 in primary human hepatocytes by rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:6366–6369. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01124-13
Acknowledgements
We thank Vanessa Scherer, Michaela Rolf, and Stephanie Liehner for the excellent technical assistance. We also thank Dr. Thomas Ebner, Dr. Eva Ludwig-Schwellinger, and Prof. Dr. Gerd Mikus for their valuable input regarding experimental approaches in our studies. We acknowledge the support of the non-profit foundation Human Tissue & Cell Research, which holds human tissue on trust, making it broadly available for research on an ethical and legal basis.
Funding
Julie Nilles receives an allowance from the Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG. The company, however, had no role in the study design, the collection, analysis or interpretation of the data; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Experiments, data collection, and analyses were performed by JN and SR. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JN, SR, and DT. JW and WE.H guided experimental approaches and commented on previous versions of the manuscript, which led to considerable improvements of the first draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nilles, J., Theile, D., Weiss, J. et al. Lack of CYP3A4 protein induction despite mRNA induction in primary hepatocytes exposed to rifabutin as a possible explanation for its low interaction risk in vivo. Arch Toxicol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-024-03763-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-024-03763-w