Skip to main content
Log in

3D Printing of high melting iron alloys using metal-fused deposition modeling: a comprehensive review

  • Critical Review
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advancements in additive manufacturing (AM) have allowed for a transition in the manufacturing industry. The ability to print solid metal parts for use in prototypes, custom tooling, and fast replacement parts has driven advancements in the manufacturing sector. Material extrusion additive manufacturing processes such as fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a common AM processes in the world of thermoplastics and it is being developed in the field of metal additive manufacturing. Metal FDM (FDMm) process provides a low cost, customizable, and user-friendly printing experience while still delivering high printing tolerances. While there are many materials that can be printed using FDM technologies, process parameters vary across materials resulting in inconsistent process parameters across the industry. This review paper focuses on the techniques and parameters performed by various researchers for the printing, debinding, and sintering of FDM printed 316L Stainless Steel, 17-4PH Stainless Steel and high melt Iron alloy filaments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar S (2022) Additive manufacturing classification

  2. Markforged Metal 3D Printer: the metal X 3D printing system. https://markforged.com/3d-printers/metal-x. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  3. Gu W, Styger E, Warner DH (2020) Assessment of additive manufacturing for increasing sustainability and productivity of smallholder agriculture. 3D Print Addit Manuf 7:300–310. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mardis NJ (2018) Emerging technology and applications of 3D printing in the medical field. Mo Med 115(4):368–373

  5. Chohan JS, Singh R, Boparai KS (2019) Fused deposition modelling - applications and advancements. In: Additive Manufacturing Applications and Innovations, pp 131–136 LCCN 2018027130

  6. Additive Manufacturing for spare parts. https://www2.deloitte.com/nl/nl/pages/energy-resources-industrials/articles/industry40-additive-manufacturing-for-spare-parts.html. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  7. Foshammer J, Søberg PV, Helo P, Ituarte IF (2022) Identification of aftermarket and legacy parts suitable for additive manufacturing: a knowledge management-based approach. Int J Prod Econ:253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108573

  8. The Virtual Foundry Inc (2020) About us. https://thevirtualfoundry.com/about-us/. Accessed 14 Oct 2021

  9. Agarwal R, Sharma S, Gupta V et al (2023) Additive manufacturing: Materials, technologies, and applications. In: Additive Manufacturing; Advanced Materials and Design Techniques, pp 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003258391

  10. Godec D, Portolés L, Blasco JR et al (2022) Introduction to additive manufacturing. In: A Guide to Additive Manufacturing, pp 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05863-9

  11. Lalegani Dezaki M, Mohd Ariffin MKA, Hatami S (2021) An overview of fused deposition modelling (FDM): research, development and process optimisation. Rapid Prototyp J 27:562–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Types of 3D Printing in Metal. https://markforged.com/resources/learn/design-for-additive-manufacturing-metals/metal-additive-manufacturing-introduction/types-of-3d-printing-metal. Accessed 30 Sep 2022

  13. Toyserkani E, Sarker D, Ibhadode OO et al (2021) Additive manufacturing process classification, applications, trends, opportunities, and challenges. In: Metal Additive Manufacturing. Wiley, pp 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119210801

  14. Greguric L (2023) How much does a metal 3D printer cost? | All3DP Pro. In: All3DP’s Content Academy. https://all3dp.com/2/how-much-does-a-metal-3d-printer-cost/. Accessed 22 Apr 2023

  15. Suwanpreecha C, Manonukul A (2022) A review on material extrusion additive manufacturing of metal and how it compares with metal injection moulding. Metals (Basel) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12030429

  16. Savini A, Savini GG (2015) A short history of 3D printing, a technological revolution just started. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ICOHTEC/IEEE international history of high-technologies and their socio-cultural contexts conference, HISTELCON 2015. The 4th IEEE Region 8 Conference on the History of Electrotechnologies. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/HISTELCON.2015.7307314

  17. Fused filament fabrication – simply explained | All3DP. https://all3dp.com/2/fused-filament-fabrication-fff-3d-printing-simply-explained/. Accessed 6 May 2023

  18. What is atomic diffusion additive manufacturing (ADAM)? https://markforged.com/resources/learn/3d-printing-basics/3d-printing-processes/what-is-atomic-diffusion-additive-manufacturing-adam. Accessed 6 May 2023

  19. Atomic diffusion additive manufacturing (ADAM) - simply explained - Pick 3D Printer. https://pick3dprinter.com/atomic-diffusion-additive-manufacturing/#. Accessed 6 May 2023

  20. Gong C, Djouda JM, Hmima A et al (2021) 2D characterization at submicron scale of crack propagation of 17-4PH parts produced by Atomic diffusion additive manufacturing (ADAM) process. In: Procedia Structural Integrity. Elsevier B.V., pp 13–19

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ramazani H, Kami A (2022) Metal FDM, a new extrusion-based additive manufacturing technology for manufacturing of metallic parts: a review. Prog Additive Manuf 7:609–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chakravorty D (2020) Cura tutorial: master Cura Slicer Software settings. In: ALL3DP. https://all3dp.com/1/cura-tutorial-software-slicer-cura-3d/. Accessed 12 Oct 2021

  23. New filament means you can print metal on any 3D printer - 3D printing industry. https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/now-can-print-metal-3d-printer-85255/. Accessed 28 Sep 2022

  24. Rapidia - Fast & Simple Metal 3D Printing. https://www.rapidia.com/. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  25. Desktop Metal Studio 3D Printer | Affordable Metal 3D Printing. https://proto3000.com/product/desktop-metal-studio-3d-printer-2-2/. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  26. The best metal 3D printers of 2022 | All3DP Pro. https://all3dp.com/1/3d-metal-3d-printer-metal-3d-printing/. Accessed 28 Sep 2022

  27. Markforged Inc. Markforged Metal 3D Printer: the Metal X 3D printing system. https://markforged.com/3d-printers/metal-x. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  28. Siemiński P (2021) Introduction to fused deposition modeling. In: Additive Manufacturing. Elsevier, pp 217–265

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Original Prusa 3D printers directly from Josef Prusa. https://www.prusa3d.com/. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  30. Anycubic Kobra Series – ANYCUBIC 3D Printing. https://www.anycubic.com/collections/kobra-series. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  31. CREALITY - Official Website, Leading 3D Printer Supplier & Manufacturer. https://www.creality.com/. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  32. The Virtual Foundry Metal 3D Printer, Print Pure Metal Parts | The Virtual Foundry. https://shop.thevirtualfoundry.com/en-ca/collections/metal-3d-printers-and-printing-accessories/products/metal-3d-printer-print-pure-metal-parts?variant=40627055296684. Accessed 28 Sep 2022

  33. Kristiawan RB, Imaduddin F, Ariawan D et al (2021) A review on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: filament processing, materials, and printing parameters. Open Eng 11:639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nabipour M, Akhoundi B, Bagheri Saed A (2020) Manufacturing of polymer/metal composites by fused deposition modeling process with polyethylene. J Appl Polym Sci 137:48717. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mousapour M, Salmi M, Klemettinen L, Partanen J (2021) Feasibility study of producing multi-metal parts by Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technique. J Manuf Process 67:438–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. GIONDA A (2020) How to debind parts produced by additive manufacturing. https://www.tav-vacuumfurnaces.com/blog/57/en/debinding-additive-manufacturing. Accessed 12 Oct 2021

  37. Lu H (2014) Preliminary mechanical characterization of the low-cost metal 3Dprinting

  38. Spiller S, Kolstad SO, Razavi SMJ (2022) Fabrication and characterization of 316L stainless steel components printed with material extrusion additive manufacturing. Proc Struct Integr 42:1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.12.158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Terry S, Fidan I, Tantawi K (2019) Dimensional analysis of metal powder infused filament - low cost metal 3D printing. In: 30th Annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium, pp 535–537

    Google Scholar 

  40. The Virtual Foundry Inc (2020) Webinar: all about Sintering FilametTM. In: Webinar Series https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAv6SrjXibQ&t=2480s&ab_channel=TheVirtualFoundry%2CInc. Accessed 14 Oct 2021

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou C, Wu F, Tang D et al (2023) Effect of subcritical-temperature heat treatment on corrosion of SLM SS316L with different process parameters. Corros Sci 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111214

  42. Wang Y, Zhang L, Li X, Yan Z (2021) On hot isostatic pressing sintering of fused filament fabricated 316L stainless steel – evaluation of microstructure, porosity, and tensile properties. Mater Lett 296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129854

  43. Varmaziar S, Atapour M, Hedberg YS (2022) Corrosion and metal release characterization of stainless steel 316L weld zones in whey protein solution. Npj Mater Degrad 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-022-00231-7

  44. Type 316/316L stainless steels explained. https://www.thoughtco.com/type-316-and-316l-stainless-steel-2340262. Accessed 30 Sep 2022

  45. 17-4 PH stainless steel in AMS 5604, UNS S17400 - sheet, plate, and round bar. https://www.upmet.com/products/stainless-steel/17-4-ph. Accessed 30 Sep 2022

  46. Berns H, Theisen W (2008) Ferrous materials: Steel and cast iron. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71848-2

  47. Tractus3D FDM 3D printing - fused deposition modeling also known as FFF. https://tractus3d.com/knowledge/learn-3d-printing/fdm-3d-printing/. Accessed 12 Oct 2021

  48. Kishore V, Hassen AA (2021) Polymer and composites additive manufacturing: material extrusion processes. In: Additive Manufacturing. Elsevier, pp 183–199

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Sola A, Trinchi A (2023) Basic principles of fused deposition modeling. In: Fused Deposition Modeling of Composite Materials. Elsevier, pp 7–39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Mishra A, Srivastava V, Gupta NK (2021) Additive manufacturing for fused deposition modeling of carbon fiber–polylactic acid composites: the effects of process parameters on tensile and flexural properties. Funct Compos Struct 3:7–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-6331/ac3732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Çevik Ü, Kam M (2020) A review study on mechanical properties of obtained products by FDM method and metal/polymer composite filament production. J Nanomater:3–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6187149

  52. The Virtual Foundry filament for 3D printing metal on an FDM system - 3D Printing Industry. https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/the-virtual-foundry-filament-for-3d-printing-metal-on-an-fdm-system-140705/. Accessed 30 Sep 2022

  53. Rane K, Strano M (2019) A comprehensive review of extrusion-based additive manufacturing processes for rapid production of metallic and ceramic parts. Adv Manuf 7:155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-019-00253-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Strano M, Rane K, Briatico Vangosa F, Di Landro L (2019) Extrusion of metal powder-polymer mixtures: melt rheology and process stability. J Mater Process Technol 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116250

  55. Kan X, Yang D, Zhao Z, Sun J (2021) 316L FFF binder development and debinding optimization. Mater Res Express 8. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac3b15

  56. Roshchupkin S, Kolesov A, Tarakhovskiy A, Tishchenko I (2021) A brief review of main ideas of metal fused filament fabrication. In: Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd, pp 2063–2067

    Google Scholar 

  57. Metal Powders: Particle Characterization. Microtrac.com. https://www.microtrac.com/applications/particle-characterization-of-metal-powders/. Accessed 7 Mar 2023

  58. Nurhudan AI, Supriadi S, Whulanza Y, Saragih AS (2021) Additive manufacturing of metallic based on extrusion process: a review. J Manuf Process 66:231–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mashekov S, Bazarbay B, Zhankeldi A, Mashekova A (2021) Development of technological basis of 3d printing with highly filled metal-poly-dimensional compositions for manufacture of metal products of complex shape. Metalurgija 60:355–358

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liu B, Wang Y, Lin Z, Zhang T (2020) Creating metal parts by fused deposition modeling and sintering. Mater Lett 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127252

  61. Quarto M, Carminati M, D’Urso G (2021) Density and shrinkage evaluation of AISI 316L parts printed via FDM process. Mater Manuf Process 36:1535–1543. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.1905830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sadaf M, Bragaglia M, Nanni F (2021) A simple route for additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel via fused filament fabrication. J Manuf Process 67:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Kurose T, Abe Y, Santos MVA et al (2020) Influence of the layer directions on the properties of 316l stainless steel parts fabricated through fused deposition of metals. Materials 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112493

  64. Hassan W, Farid MA, Tosi A et al The effect of printing parameters on sintered properties of extrusion-based additively manufactured stainless steel 316L parts. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07047-w/Published

  65. Damon J, Dietrich S, Gorantla S et al (2019) Process porosity and mechanical performance of fused filament fabricated 316L stainless steel. Rapid Prototyp J 25:1319–1327. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2019-0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Thompson Y, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Kukla C, Felfer P (2019) Fused filament fabrication, debinding and sintering as a low cost additive manufacturing method of 316L stainless steel. Addit Manuf 30:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wagner MA, Engel J, Hadian A et al (2022) Filament extrusion-based additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel: effects of sintering conditions on the microstructure and mechanical properties. Addit Manuf 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103147

  68. Caminero MÁ, Romero Gutiérrez A, Chacón JM et al (2022) Effects of fused filament fabrication parameters on the manufacturing of 316L stainless-steel components: geometric and mechanical properties. Rapid Prototyp J 28:2004–2026. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2022-0023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Parenti P, Cataldo S, Annoni M (2018) Shape deposition manufacturing of 316L parts via feedstock extrusion and green-state milling. Manuf Lett 18:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lotfizarei Z, Mostafapour A, Barari A et al (2023) Overview of debinding methods for parts manufactured using powder material extrusion. Addit Manuf 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103335

  71. Ortega Varela de Seijas M, Bardenhagen A, Rohr T, Stoll E (2023) Indirect induction sintering of metal parts produced through material extrusion additive manufacturing. Materials 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020885

  72. Moritzer E, Elsner CL, Schumacher C (2021) Investigation of metal-polymer composites manufactured by fused deposition modeling with regard to process parameters. Polym Compos 42:6065–6079. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Godec D, Kukla C et al (2017) Shaping, debinding and sintering of steel components via fused filament fabrication. In: 16 th International Scientific Conference on Production Engineering-CIM2017 Croatian Association of Production Engineering, pp 2–7

  74. Burkhardt C, Hampel S, Sondermaschinenbau H (2021) Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) of 316L green parts for the MIM process. In: World PM2016 – AM - Deposition Technologies

  75. Abe Y, Kurose T, Santos MVA et al (2021) Effect of layer directions on internal structures and tensile properties of 17-4ph stainless steel parts fabricated by fused deposition of metals. Materials 14:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Watson A, Belding J, Ellis BD (2020) Characterization of 17-4 PH processed via bound metal deposition (BMD). In: Minerals, metals and materials series. Springer, pp 205–216

    Google Scholar 

  77. Godec D, Cano S, Holzer C, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J (2020) Optimization of the 3D printing parameters for tensile properties of specimens produced by fused filament fabrication of 17-4PH stainless steel. Materials 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030774

  78. Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Arbeiter F, Schlauf T et al (2019) Tensile properties of sintered 17-4PH stainless steel fabricated by material extrusion additive manufacturing. Mater Lett 248:165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Jiang D, Ning F (2022) Material extrusion of stainless-steel plate-lattice structure: Part shrinkage, microstructure, and mechanical performance. Manuf Lett 33:712–718

  80. Pellegrini A, Lavecchia F, Guerra MG, Galantucci LM (2023) Influence of aging treatments on 17–4 PH stainless steel parts realized using material extrusion additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11136-3

  81. Wu G, Langrana NA, Sadanji R, Danforth S (2001) Solid freeform fabrication of metal components using fused deposition of metals. Mater Des 23:98–105

  82. Rahimi AH, Zamani J (2022) Development of a feedstock for additive manufacturing of 4605 steel compact by FDMS process. Trans Ind Inst Metals 75:3087–3093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02678-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Vetter J, Huber F, Wachter S et al (2022) Development of a material extrusion additive manufacturing process of 1.2083 steel comprising FFF printing, solvent and thermal debinding and sintering. In: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp 341–346

    Google Scholar 

  84. Charpentier N, Barrière T, Bernard F et al (2022) PIM-like EAM of steel-tool alloy via bio-based polymer. In: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp 477–482

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ait-Mansour I, Kretzschmar N, Chekurov S et al (2020) Design-dependent shrinkage compensation modeling and mechanical property targeting of metal FFF. Prog Additive Manuf 5:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-020-00124-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Schumacher C, Moritzer E (2021) Stainless steel parts produced by fused deposition modeling and a sintering process compared to components manufactured in selective laser melting. Macromol Symp 395. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.202000275

  87. Obadimu SO, Kasha A, Kourousis KI (2022) Tensile performance and plastic anisotropy of material extrusion steel 316L: influence of primary manufacturing parameters. Addit Manuf 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103297

  88. Kedziora S, Decker T, Museyibov E et al (2022) Strength properties of 316L and 17-4 PH stainless steel produced with additive manufacturing. Materials 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186278

  89. Santamaria R, Salasi M, Bakhtiari S et al (2022) Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of 316L stainless steel produced using sinter-based extrusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Sci 57:9646–9662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06828-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Gong H, Snelling D, Kardel K, Carrano A (2019) Comparison of stainless steel 316L parts made by FDM- and SLM-based additive manufacturing processes. Jom 71:880–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-3207-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Tosto C, Tirillò J, Sarasini F et al (2022) Fused deposition modeling parameter optimization for cost-effective metal part printing. Polymers (Basel) 14:3264. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Jimbo K, Tateno T (2019) Shape contraction in sintering of 3d objects fabricated via metal material extrusion in additive manufacturing. Int J Autom Technol 13:354–360. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2019.p0354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Atatreh S, Alyammahi MS, Vasilyan H et al (2023) Evaluation of the infill design on the tensile properties of metal parts produced by fused filament fabrication. Results Eng 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100954

  94. Lavecchia F, Pellegrini A, Galantucci LM (2023) Comparative study on the properties of 17-4 PH stainless steel parts made by metal fused filament fabrication process and atomic diffusion additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 29:393–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2021-0350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Alkindi T, Alyammahi M, Susantyoko RA, Atatreh S (2021) The effect of varying specimens’ printing angles to the bed surface on the tensile strength of 3D-printed 17-4PH stainless-steels via metal FFF additive manufacturing. MRS Commun 11:310–316. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-021-00040-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Lawrence BD, Henry TC, Phillips F et al (2023) High-cycle tension-tension fatigue performance of additively manufactured 17–4 PH stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11146-1

  97. Henry TC, Morales MA, Cole DP et al (2021) Mechanical behavior of 17-4 PH stainless steel processed by atomic diffusion additive manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06785-1/Published

  98. Bjørheim F, La Torraca Lopez IM (2021) Tension testing of additively manufactured specimens of 17-4 PH processed by bound metal deposition. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1201:012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1201/1/012037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Fongsamootr T, Thawon I, Tippayawong N et al (2022) Effect of print parameters on additive manufacturing of metallic parts: performance and sustainability aspects. Sci Rep 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22613-2

  100. Suwanpreecha C, Manonukul A (2022) On the build orientation effect in as-printed and as-sintered bending properties of 17-4PH alloy fabricated by metal fused filament fabrication. Rapid Prototyp J 28:1076–1085. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2021-0174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Bouaziz MA, Djouda JM, Chemkhi M et al (2021) Heat treatment effect on 17-4PH stainless steel manufactured by atomic diffusion additive manufacturing (ADAM). In: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp 935–938

    Google Scholar 

  102. Chemkhi M, Djouda JM, Bouaziz MA et al (2021) Effects of mechanical post-treatments on additive manufactured 17-4PH stainless steel produced by bound powder extrusion. In: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp 957–961

    Google Scholar 

  103. Galati M, Minetola P (2019) Analysis of density, roughness, and accuracy of the atomic diffusion additive manufacturing (ADAM) process for metal parts. Materials 12:4122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Forcellese P, Mancia T, Simoncini M, Bellezze T (2022) Investigation on corrosion resistance properties of 17-4 PH bound metal deposition as-sintered specimens with different build-up orientations. Metals (Basel) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12040588

  105. Watson A, Belding J, Ellis BD (2020) Characterization of 17-4 PH processed via bound metal deposition (BMD). In: TMS 2020 149th Annual meeting & exhibition supplemental proceedings. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 205–216

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  106. Banerjee S, Joens CJ (2019) Debinding and sintering of metal injection molding (MIM) components. In: Handbook of Metal Injection Molding. Elsevier, In, pp 129–171

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  107. Hamidi MFFA, Harun WSW, Khalil NZ, et al (2017) Study of solvent debinding parameters for metal injection moulded 316L stainless steel. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Institute of Physics Publishing, pp 2–10. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/257/1/012035

    Google Scholar 

  108. Ghadimi H, Jirandehi AP, Nemati S et al (2023) Effects of printing layer orientation on the high-frequency bending-fatigue life and tensile strength of additively manufactured 17-4 PH stainless steel. Materials 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020469

  109. Giberti H, Strano M, Annoni M (2016) An innovative machine for Fused Deposition Modeling of metals and advanced ceramics. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf20160003

  110. Stainless Steel Melting Point Revealed - thyssenkrupp Materials (UK). https://www.thyssenkrupp-materials.co.uk/stainless-steel-melting-points.html. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  111. 17-4 Stainless steel properties | KVA Stainless. http://www.kvastainless.com/17-4.html. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  112. Tosto C, Tirillò J, Sarasini F, Cicala G (2021) Hybrid metal/polymer filaments for fused filament fabrication (FFF) to print metal parts. Appl Sci (Switzerland) 11:1. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Léonard F, Tammas-Williams S (2022) Metal FFF sintering shrinkage rate measurements by X-ray computed tomography. Nondestruct Test Evaluation 37:631–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2022.2085702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Kinetics MIM 4605 Low Alloy Steel (Quenched + Tempered) datasheet. http://www.lookpolymers.com/polymer_Kinetics-MIM-4605-Low-Alloy-Steel-Quenched-Tempered.php. Accessed 2 May 2023

  115. AK Steel 17-4 PH® Precipitation hardening stainless steel. Condition H 925 https://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet_print.aspx?matguid=f653f7356a524e69916049d0a64a11fc. Accessed 22 Apr 2023

  116. Angelo B Ravisankar PC (2019) Introduction to steels - processing, properties, and applications. LCC TN730 .A58 2019 | DDC 669/.142–dc23

  117. ASM Material Data Sheet. https://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=mq316q. Accessed 21 Feb 2023

  118. Condruz MR, Paraschiv A, Puscasu C (2018) Heat treatment influence on hardness and microstructure of ADAM manufactured 17-4 PH AM

  119. Ding S, Zou B, Wang P, Ding H (2019) Effects of nozzle temperature and building orientation on mechanical properties and microstructure of PEEK and PEI printed by 3D-FDM. Polym Test 78:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Cura Extrusion Multiplier: 5 ways to improve your prints | All3DP. https://all3dp.com/2/extrusion-multiplier-cura-ways-to-improve-your-prints/. Accessed 29 Sep 2022

  121. Birosz MT, Ledenyák D, Andó M (2022) Effect of FDM infill patterns on mechanical properties. Polym Test 113:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Sri Ardion F, Sukanto H, Triyono J (2019) Analisis pengaruh infill overlap terhadap karakteristik produk hasil 3D printing dengan menggunakan material Poly Lactic Acid (PLA). Mekanika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mekanika 18:56

  123. Rankouhi B, Javadpour S, Delfanian F, Letcher T (2016) Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3D printed ABS with respect to layer thickness and orientation. J Fail Anal Prevent 16:467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0113-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Ding S, Zou B, Wang P, Ding H (2019) Effects of nozzle temperature and building orientation on mechanical properties and microstructure of PEEK and PEI printed by 3D-FDM. Polym Test 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105948

  125. Yaman U (2018) Shrinkage compensation of holes via shrinkage of interior structure in FDM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:2187–2197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1018-2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  126. Nizam MAN, Bin MK, Bin IK, Yap TC (2022) The effect of printing orientation on the mechanical properties of FDM 3D printed parts. In: Abdul Sani AS, Osman Zahid MN, Mohamad Yasin MR et al (eds) Enabling Industry 4.0 through Advances in Manufacturing and Materials. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 75–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  127. Ansari AA, Kamil M (2021) Effect of print speed and extrusion temperature on properties of 3D printed PLA using fused deposition modeling process. In: Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd, pp 5462–5466

    Google Scholar 

  128. Masood SH (2014) Advances in fused deposition modeling. Comp Mater Process 10:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01002-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Korkut V, Yavuz H (2020) Enhancing the tensile properties with minimal mass variation by revealing the effects of parameters in fused filament fabrication process. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02610-0

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Drummond.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drummond, M., Eltaggaz, A. & Deiab, I. 3D Printing of high melting iron alloys using metal-fused deposition modeling: a comprehensive review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 1–22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12189-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12189-0

Keywords

Navigation