Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An extended form of the reciprocal-power function for tolerance allocation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optimization of dimensional tolerances requires that a cost-tolerance function is evaluated consistently for all the part features involved in a given functional requirement. This is difficult because the parameters of commonly used functions are set using cost data from various sources and on possibly different scales. As an alternative, the paper proposes a revised form of one of the available cost-tolerance functions (reciprocal power), which expresses its parameters in empirical relationship with a set of design specifications on the toleranced features. These include the nominal dimension, the shape, the surface area, and the material. Following a previous study based on cost data available in literature, the values and expressions of the parameters are validated and refined using a feature-based method for the estimation of machining cost. The properties of the extended function allow to develop a simplified method for tolerance allocation that avoids the task of solving the optimization problem; it is a modified version of proportional scaling where the initial solution satisfies optimal ratios between tolerances. The discussion of the results and an application example help to justify the proposed function on grounds of correctness, convenience, and reference value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The author confirms that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper.

References

  1. Chase KW (1999) Minimum-cost tolerance allocation. In Drake PJ (ed) Dimensioning and tolerancing handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

  2. Singh PK, Jain PK, Jain SC (2009) Important issues in tolerance design of mechanical assemblies. Part 2: tolerance synthesis. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf 223:1249–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karmakar S, Maiti J (2012) A review on dimensional tolerance synthesis: paradigm shift from product to process. Assem Autom 32(4):373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hallmann M, Schleich B, Wartzack S (2020) From tolerance allocation to tolerance-cost optimization: a comprehensive literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107(11–12):4859–4912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Armillotta A (2020) Selection of parameters in cost-tolerance functions: review and approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chase KW, Greenwood WH (1988) Design issues in mechanical tolerance analysis. Manuf Rev 1:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chase KW, Greenwood WH, Loosli BG, Hauglund LF (1990) Least cost tolerance allocation for mechanical assemblies with automated process selection. Manuf Rev 3:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu Z, ElMaraghy WH, ElMaraghy HA (1998) Evaluation of cost-tolerance algorithms for design tolerance analysis and synthesis. Manuf Rev 1:168–179

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edel DH, Auer TB (1964) Determine the least cost combination for tolerance accumulation in a drive shaft seal assembly. Gen Motors Eng J Fourth Quart 37–38

  10. Bandler JW (1974) Optimization of design tolerances using nonlinear programming. J Optim Theory Appl 14:99–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Spotts MF (1973) Allocation of tolerances to minimize cost of assembly. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 95:762–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutherland GH, Roth B (1975) Mechanism design: accounting for manufacturing tolerances and costs in function generating problems. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 97:283–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Speckhart FH (1972) Calculation of tolerance based on a minimum cost approach. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 94:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michael W, Siddall JN (1981) The optimal tolerance assignment with less than full acceptance. Trans ASME J Mech Des 103:855–860

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dong Z, Hu W, Xue D (1994) New production cost-tolerance models for tolerance synthesis. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 116:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chase KW, Parkinson AR (1991) A survey of research in the application of tolerance analysis to the design of mechanical assemblies. Res Eng Des 3:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ashiagbor A, Liu HC, Nnaji BO (1998) Tolerance control and propagation for the product assembly modeler. Int J Prod Res 36:75–93

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Jefferson TR, Scott CH (2001) Quality tolerancing and conjugate duality. Ann Oper Res 105:185–200

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghie W (2009) Functional requirement cost for product using Jacobian-Torsor model. Int CIRP Conf Comput Aid Tolerancing Annecy France

  20. Sahani AK, Jain PK, Sharma SC, Bajpai JK (2014) Design verification through tolerance stack up analysis of mechanical assembly and least cost tolerance allocation. Procedia Mater Sci 6:284–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Trucks HE (1987) Design for economical production. Soc Manuf Eng Dearborn MI

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bjørke Ø (1989) Computer-aided tolerancing. ASME Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kanai S, Onozuka M, Takahashi H (1995) Optimal tolerance synthesis by genetic algorithm under the machining and assembling constraints. Int CIRP Sem Comput Aid Tolerancing Tokyo 235–250

  24. ISO 286–1 (2010) Geometrical product specifications (GPS), ISO code system for tolerances on linear sizes. Part 1: Basis of tolerances, deviations and fits. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

  25. Yeo SH, Ngoi BK, Chen H (1996) A cost-tolerance model for process sequence optimisation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 12(6):423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yeo SH, Ngoi BKA, Poh LS, Hang C (1997) Cost-tolerance relationships for non-traditional machining processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yeo SH, Ngoi BKA, Chen H (1998) Process sequence optimization based on a new cost-tolerance model. J Intell Manuf 9:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Khodaygan S (2019) Meta-model based multi-objective optimisation method for computer-aided tolerance design of compliant assemblies. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 32:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin ZC, Chang DY (2002) Cost-tolerance analysis model based on a neural networks method. Int J Prod Res 40:1429–1452

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Cao Y, Zhang H, Mao J, Yang J (2010) Novel cost-tolerance model based on fuzzy neural networks. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf 224:1757–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Y, Zhai W, Yang L, Wu W, Ji S, Ma Y (2007) Study on the tolerance allocation optimization by fuzzy-set weight-center evaluation method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang G, Yang Y, Wang W, Si-Chao LV (2016) Variable coefficients reciprocal squared model based on multi-constraints of aircraft assembly tolerance allocation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dong Z, Wang GG (1998) Automated cost modeling for tolerance synthesis using manufacturing process data, knowledge reasoning and optimization. In: ElMaraghy HA (ed) Geometric design tolerancing: theories, standards and applications. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 282–293

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Dimitrellou SC, Diplaris SC, Sfantsikopoulos MM (2007) Cost-competent tolerancing in CAD. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dimitrellou SC, Diplaris SC, Sfantsikopoulos MM (2008) Tolerance elements: an alternative approach for cost optimum tolerance transfer. J Eng Des 19:173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Etienne A, Dantan JY, Siadat A, Martin P (2007) Cost estimation for tolerance allocation. Int CIRP Conf Comput Aid Tolerancing Erlangen Germany

  37. Etienne A, Dantan JY, Siadat A, Martin P (2009) Activity-based tolerance allocation (ABTA): driving tolerance synthesis by evaluating its global cost. Int J Prod Res 47:4971–4989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Miramadi S, Etienne A, Hassan A, Dantan JY, Siadat A (2012) Cost estimation method for variation management. Int CIRP Conf Comput Aid Tolerancing Huddersfield UK

  39. Gerth RJ, Klonaris P, Pfeiffer T (1999) Cost tolerance sensitivity analysis for concurrent engineering design support. Int CIRP Conf Comput Aid Tolerancing Twente Netherlands 313–323

  40. Gerth RJ, Pfeiffer T (2000) Minimum cost tolerancing under uncertain cost estimates. IIE Trans 32:493–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Niazi A, Dai JS, Balabani S, Seneviratne L (2006) Product cost estimation: technique classification and methodology review. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 128:563–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Garcia-Crespo A, Ruiz-Mezcun B, Lopez-Cuadrado JL, Gonzalez-Carrasco I (2011) A review of conventional and knowledge-based systems for machining price quotation. J Intell Manuf 22:823–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jha NK (1996) Probabilistic cost estimation in advance of production in a computerized manufacturing system through stochastic geometric programming. Comput Ind Eng 30(4):809–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Maropoulos PG, Baker RP, Paramor KYG (2000) Integration of tool selection with design, Part 2: Aggregate machining time estimation. J Mater Proc Technol 107:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Perera GIP (2014) Operation based cost assessment of machined parts in the early design stages. Eng 8:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tanner JP (2006) Practical cost estimating for manufacturing. In Crowson R (ed.) Factory operations: planning and instructional methods. CRC Press Boca Raton FL

  47. Creese RC, Adithan M, Pabla BS (1992) Estimating and costing for the metal manufacturing industries. Marcel Dekker, New York

  48. Polgar KC (1996) Simplified time estimation for basic machining operations. MSc Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  49. Lovejoy W, Fixson S, Jackson S (2005) Product costing guidelines. University of Michigan, Integrated Product Development

    Google Scholar 

  50. Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight WA (2011) Product design for manufacture and assembly, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ou-Yang C, Lin TS (1997) Developing an integrated framework for feature-based early manufacturing cost estimation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13:618–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Feng CX, Kusiak A, Huang CC (1996) Cost evaluation in design with form features. Comput Aided Des 28(11):879–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Geiger TS, Dilts DM (1996) Automated design-to-cost: integrating costing into the design decision. Comput Aided Des 28(6/7):423–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Evans DH (1975) Statistical tolerancing: the state of the art. Part III: shifts and drifts. J Qual Technol 7(2):72–76

  55. Fischer BR (2004) Mechanical tolerance stackup and analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Armillotta A (2020) Concurrent optimization of dimensions and tolerances on structures and mechanisms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:3141–3157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Drozda TJ, Wick C, Mitchell P, Bakerjian R, Benedict JT, Veilleux RF (1983) Tool and manufacturing engineers handbook, Vol. 6: Design for manufacturability. Soc Manuf Eng Dearborn MI

  58. Uddeholm, (2019) Cutting data recommendations. Böhler-Uddeholm, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento Di Meccanica, Politecnico Di Milano, Via La Masa 1, 20156, Milano, Italy

    Antonio Armillotta

Authors
  1. Antonio Armillotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Armillotta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Armillotta, A. An extended form of the reciprocal-power function for tolerance allocation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119, 8091–8104 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08579-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08579-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation