Skip to main content
Log in

Deep deltoid ligament injury is related to rotational instability of the ankle joint: a biomechanical study

  • ANKLE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

In the athletic population, the prevalence of isolated syndesmotic lesions is high. To detect potential instability of the ankle is crucial to define those lesions in need of surgical management.

The aim was to define how the extent of tibio-fibular syndesmotic ligament injury influences the overall stability of the ankle joint in a cadaver model.

Methods

Twenty fresh-frozen through knee cadaveric leg specimens were subjected to different simulated syndesmotic ligament lesions. In Group 1 (n = 10), the order of ligament sectioning was: anterior tibio-fibular ligament (ATFL), superficial deltoid ligament (SDL), deep deltoid ligament (DDL), posterior tibio-fibular ligament (PTFL), and progressive sectioning at 10, 50 and 100 mm of the distal interosseous membrane (IOM). In Group 2 (n = 10), the sequence was: ATFL, PITFL, 10 and then 50 mm of the distal IOM, SDL, DDL, and 100 mm of the distal IOM. Diastasis of 4 mm in the coronal or sagittal plane and external rotation of the ankle greater than 20° were considered indicative of instability.

Results

Both coronal and sagittal diastasis exceeded 4 mm with injury patterns characterized by IOM lesions extending beyond 5 cm. External rotation of the ankle exceeded 20° with injury patterns characterized by a DDL lesion.

Conclusion

Coronal and sagittal plane diastases of the tibio-fibular syndesmosis are particularly affected by sequential lesions involving the IOM, whereas increased external rotation of the ankle most depends on DDL. The identification of the specific syndesmotic and deltoid ligament injuries is crucial to understanding which lesions need operative management. The knowledge of which pattern of tibio-fibular syndesmotic ligament injury influences the ankle joint stability is crucial in defining which lesions need for surgical management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

All the data are reported in manuscript and tables.

References

  1. Bartonicek J (2003) Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat 25:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beumer A (2007) Chronic instability of the anterior syndesmosis of the ankle. Acta Orthop Suppl 78:4–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, Niesing R, Ginai AZ, Ranstam J et al (2006) Effects of ligament sectioning on the kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a radiostereometric study of 10 cadaveric specimens based on presumed trauma mechanisms with suggestions for treatment. Acta Orthop 77:531–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown KW, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Nothnagel H (2004) MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bulucu C, Thomas KA, Halvorson TL, Cook SD (1991) Biomechanical evaluation of the anterior drawer test: the contribution of the lateral ankle ligaments. Foot Ankle 11:389–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Candal-Couto JJ, Burrow D, Bromage S, Briggs PJ (2004) Instability of the tibio-fibular syndesmosis: have we been pulling in the wrong direction? Injury 35:814–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cedell CA (1975) Ankle lesions. Acta Orthop Scand 46:425–445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Close JR (1956) Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 38A:761–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebraheim NA, Taser F, Shafiq Q, Yeasting RA (2006) Anatomical evaluation and clinical importance of the tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments. Surg Radiol Anat 28:142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards GS Jr, DeLee JC (1984) Ankle diastasis without fracture. Foot Ankle 4:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC (1998) Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot & ankle international. Am Orthop Foot Ankle Soc Swiss Foot Ankle Soc 19:653–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hollis JM, Blasier RD, Flahiff CM (1995) Simulated lateral ankle ligamentous injury. Change in ankle stability. Am J Sports Med 23:672–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt KJ, Goeb Y, Behn AW, Criswell B, Chou L (2015) Ankle Joint Contact Loads and Displacement With Progressive Syndesmotic Injury. Foot Ankle Int 36:1095–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson EE, Markolf KL (1983) The contribution of the anterior talofibular ligament to ankle laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:81–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leeds HC, Ehrlich MG (1984) Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:490–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin CF, Gross ML, Weinhold P (2006) Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCollum GA, van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Calder JD, van Dijk CN (2013) Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1328–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC, Hedman TP (1994) Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints. Arthroscopy 10:558–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Porter DA, May BD, Berney T (2008) Functional outcome after operative treatment for ankle fractures in young athletes: a retrospective case series. Foot Ankle Int 29:887–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stormont DM, Morrey BF, An KN, Cass JR (1985) Stability of the loaded ankle. Relation between articular restraint and primary and secondary static restraints. Am J Sports Med 13:295–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tochigi Y, Rudert MJ, Saltzman CL, Amendola A, Brown TD (2006) Contribution of articular surface geometry to ankle stabilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2704–2713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van den Bekerom MP, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis HW, van Dijk CN (2008) Operative aspects of the syndesmotic screw: review of current concepts. Injury 39:491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. van Dijk CN, Longo UG, Loppini M, Florio P, Maltese L, Ciuffreda M et al (2016) Classification and diagnosis of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1200–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Dijk CN, Longo UG, Loppini M, Florio P, Maltese L, Ciuffreda M et al (2016) Conservative and surgical management of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1217–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Watanabe K, Kitaoka HB, Berglund LJ, Zhao KD, Kaufman KR, An KN (2012) The role of ankle ligaments and articular geometry in stabilizing the ankle. Clin Biomech 27:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Williams BT, Ahrberg AB, Goldsmith MT, Campbell KJ, Shirley L, Wijdicks CA et al (2015) Ankle syndesmosis: a qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis. Am J Sports Med 43:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xenos JS, Hopkinson WJ, Mulligan ME, Olson EJ, Popovic NA (1995) The tibiofibular syndesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:847–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable

Funding

No external source of funding was used.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, U.G.L.; investigation, L.R.A.; methodology, V.D.; resources, V.C.; visualization, A.L.; data curation, C.F.; supervision, C.W.D.; writing-original draft preparation, F.F.; writing-review and editing, M.L.; project administration, U.T..

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umile Giuseppe Longo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not needed.

Consent to participate

Not needed.

Consent for publication

The authors allow publication of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Longo, U.G., Loppini, M., Fumo, C. et al. Deep deltoid ligament injury is related to rotational instability of the ankle joint: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 1577–1583 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06308-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06308-7

Keywords

Navigation