Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Anatomical evaluation and clinical importance of the tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the detailed anatomical arrangement of ligaments of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and to highlight the clinical aspects of fracture dislocations. This study was performed on 42 legs of adult human embalmed cadavers. Tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments attachments and their mutual relationships were described and their dimensions were measured. The anterior tibiofibular ligament is usually composed of three parts. This ligament runs obliquely at laterodistaly direction making 35° angle with horizontal plane and posteriorly 65° angle with sagittal plane. The posterior tibiofibular ligament runs almost horizontally 20° angle with horizontal plane. The mean thicknesses of tibial and fibular attachments are 6.38±1.91 mm and 9.67±1.74 mm, respectively. The inferior transverse ligament originates from just below the posterior tibiofibular ligament, which has variations on the shape and dimensions due to its attachment points. The average length is 36.60±9.51 mm. The network between the fibular notch and the distal fibula has been filled with the interosseous tibiofibular ligament whose fibers follow the laterodistal and anterior direction from the tibia to the fibula. It lies proximally 30–40 mm from the mortise. At the inferior view of the tibiofibular syndesmosis a pyramidal shaped cartilaginous facet was observed which was attached to the fibula. The length of this cartilage was variable. Some of synovial plicas from the ankle joints synovial membrane were observed at this view. We conclude that the results of this study may be useful to both orthopedic surgeons and radiologists for anatomic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akseki D, Pinar H, Yaldiz K et al (2002) The anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament and talar impingement: A cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Tr Ar 10:321–326

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balduini FC, Tetzlaff J (1983) Historical perspectives on injuries of the ligaments of the ankle. Clin Sports Med 1220(1):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartonicek J (2003) Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat 25:379–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L (1991) Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 19(3):294–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bozic KJ, Jaramillo D, DiCanzio J et al (1999) Radiographic appearance of the normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in children. J Pediatr Orthop 19(1):14–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Doskocil M (1988) The distal connection of the tibia and fibula is not just a syndesmosis. Sb Lek 90(1):1–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebraheim NA, Elgafy H, Panadilam T (2003) Syndesmotic disruption in low fibular fractures associated with deltoid ligament injury. Clin Orthop Related Res 409:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H et al (1998) The fibular incisure of the tibia on CT scan: a cadaver study. Foot ankle 19(5):318–321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards GS Jr, DeLee JC (1984) Ankle diastasis without fracture. Foot Ankle 4(6):305–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fick R (1904) Hanbuch de Anatomie und Mechanik der Gelenke unter berucksichtigung der bewegenden Muskeln. Part 1: Anatomie der Gelenke. Fischer, Jena, pp 440–421

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garrick JG (1982) Epidemiologic perspective. Clin Sports Med 1(1):13–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harper MC (1983) An anatomic study of the short oblique fracture of the distal fibula and ankle stability. Foot Ankle 4(1):23–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harper MC, Keller TS (1989) A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle 10(3):156–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB et al (1990) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle 10(6):325–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnston TB, Davis DV, Davis F (eds) (1958) Gray’s anatomy, 32nd edn. Longmans Green, London, pp 530–536

  16. Kelikian H, Kelikian AS (1952) Disorders of the ankle. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1–91

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kos J (1957) CevnT zasobenT pouzdra hlezenneho kloubu. (Blood supply of the articular capsule of the ankle.). Cs Morf 5:80–93

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leeds HC, Ehrlich MG (1984) Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 66-A(4):490–503

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lidtke RH, George J (2004) Anatomy, biomechanics, and surgical approach to synovial folds within the joints of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 94(6):519–527

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu SH, Nguyen TM (1999) Ankle sprains and other soft tissue injuries. Curr Opin Rheumatol 11(2):132–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lutz W (1942) Zur Struktur der unteren Tibiofibularverbindung und der membrane interossea cruris. Anat Entwickl Gesch 111:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Monk CJE (1969) Injuries of the tibiofibular ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg 51B:330–337

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oae K, Takao M, Naito K et al (2003) Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: Value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 227:155–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pankovich AM (1978) Fractures of the fibula proximal to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone and Joint Surg 60-A(2):221–229

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pankovich AM (1979) Fractures of the fibula at the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 143:138–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:356–357

    Google Scholar 

  27. Renstrom PAFH, Kannus P (1994) Injuries to the foot and ankle. Orthop Sports Med pp 1705–1767

  28. Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW et al (1976) Fractures in Adults. Fourth Edition, vol 2. Lippincott & Raven 1976 Chapter 31 pp 2206

  29. Romanes GJ (1972) Cunningham’s textbook of anatomy, 11th edn. Oxford University Press, London, pp 247–249

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sabacinski KA, Walter JH, Saffo G (1990) Anatomical and histologic investigation of the syndesmotic area in the ankle joint. J Am Pod Med Assoc 80(4):204–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarrafian S (1983) Anatomy of the foot and ankle. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schneck CD, Mesgarzadeh M, Bonakdarpour A et al (1992) MR imaging of the most commonly injured ankle ligaments I. Normal anatomy. Radiology 184:499–506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Scurran BL (1990) Foot and Ankle Trauma. Chapter 28, Ankle Fractures by Gumann G. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 579–625

  34. Snedden MH, Shea JP (2001) Diastasis with low distal fibula fractures: An anatomic rationale. Clin Orthop Relat Res 382:197–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sora MC, Strobl B, Staykov D et al (2004) Evaluation of the ankle syndesmosis: A plastination slices study. Clin Anat 17:518–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Standring S, Editor; Gray’s Anatomy (2005) Williams A, Davies MS. Chapter 115, Ankle and Foot. 39th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 1525

  37. Stoller DW (1998) MRI, arthroscopy, and surgical anatomy of the joints. Raven Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Taylor DC, Englehardt DL, Bassett FH 3rd (1992) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. The influence of heterotopic ossification. Am J Sports Med 20(2):146–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yablon IG, Heller FG, Shouse L (1973) The key role of the lateral malleolus in displaced fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg 59A:165

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yablon IG, Segal D, Leach RE (1983) Ankle injuries. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Ohio, 3065 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA

    Nabil A. Ebraheim, Figen Taser & Qaiser Shafiq

  2. Department of Neuroscience and Anatomy, Medical University of Ohio, 3065 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA

    Richard A. Yeasting

Authors
  1. Nabil A. Ebraheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Figen Taser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qaiser Shafiq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard A. Yeasting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Figen Taser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebraheim, N.A., Taser, F., Shafiq, Q. et al. Anatomical evaluation and clinical importance of the tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments. Surg Radiol Anat 28, 142–149 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0077-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0077-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation