Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling, analysis, and optimization under uncertainties: a review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design optimization of structural and multidisciplinary systems under uncertainty has been an active area of research due to its evident advantages over deterministic design optimization. In deterministic design optimization, the uncertainties of a structural or multidisciplinary system are taken into account by using safety factors specified in the regulations or design codes. This uncertainty treatment is a subjective and indirect way of dealing with uncertainty. On the other hand, design under uncertainty approaches provide an objective and direct way of dealing with uncertainty. This paper provides a review of the uncertainty treatment practices in design optimization of structural and multidisciplinary systems under uncertainties. To this end, the activities in uncertainty modeling are first reviewed, where theories and methods on uncertainty categorization (or classification), uncertainty handling (or management), and uncertainty characterization are discussed. Second, the tools and techniques developed and used for uncertainty modeling and propagation are discussed under the broad two classes of probabilistic and non-probabilistic approaches. Third, various design optimization methods under uncertainty which incorporate all the techniques covered in uncertainty modeling and analysis are reviewed. In addition to these in-depth reviews on uncertainty modeling, uncertainty analysis, and design optimization under uncertainty, some real-life engineering applications and benchmark test examples are provided in this paper so that readers can develop an appreciation on where and how the discussed techniques can be applied and how to compare them. Finally, concluding remarks are provided, and areas for future research are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acar E (2016) A reliability index extrapolation method for separable limit states. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53:1099–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acar E, Solanki K (2009) System reliability based vehicle design for crashworthiness and effects of various uncertainty reduction measures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 39(3):311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acar E, Kale A, Haftka R, Stroud W (2006) Structural safety measures for airplanes. J Aircr 43(1):30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acar E, Haftka R, Johnson T (2007) Tradeoff of uncertainty reduction mechanisms for reducing structural weight. J Mech Des 129(3):266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acar E, Haftka R, Kim N (2010) Effects of structural tests on aircraft safety. AIAA J 48(10):2235–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal H, Mozumder C, Renaud J, Watson L (2007) An inverse-measure-based unilevel architecture for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(3):217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal P, Nayal H (2015) Possibility theory versus probability theory in fuzzy measure theory. Int J Eng Res Appl 5(5):37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad I (1982) Nonparametric estimation of the location and scale parameters based on density estimation. Ann Inst Stat Math 34(1):39–53

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Allaire D, Noel G, Willcox K, Cointin R (2014) Uncertainty quantification of an aviation environmental toolsuite. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 126:14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alleman G (2014) Performance-based project management: increasing the probability of project success. Amacom

  • Allen JK, Panchal J, Mistree F, Singh AK, Gautham B (2015) Uncertainty management in the integrated realization of materials and components. In: Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME 2015), Springer, pp 339–346

  • Allen M, Maute K (2004) Reliability-based design optimization of aeroelastic structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 27(4):228–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alyanak E, Grandhi R, Bae H (2008) Gradient projection for reliability-based design optimization using evidence theory. Eng Optim 40(10):923–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An D, Choi J (2012) Efficient reliability analysis based on Bayesian framework under input variable and metamodel uncertainties. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46(4):533–547

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T, Darling D (1952) Asymptotic theory of certain goodness of fit criteria based on stochastic processes. Ann Math Stat 23(2):193–212

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Annis C (2004) Probabilistic life prediction isn’t as easy as it looks. In: Johnson WS, Hillberry BM (eds) Probabilistic aspects of life prediction. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • António CC, Hoffbauer LN (2009) An approach for reliability-based robust design optimisation of angle-ply composites. Compos Struct 90(1):53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoues Y, Chateauneuf A (2010) Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(2):277–294

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt P, Apley D, Chen W (2012) Quantification of model uncertainty: calibration, model discrepancy, and identifiability. J Mech Des 134(10):100908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan A, Kaya M (2001) Determination of fuzzy logic membership functions using genetic algorithms. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118(2):297–306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Au S (2005) Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation. Comput struct 83(14):1048–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au S, Beck J (2001) Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probab Eng Mech 16(4):263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au S, Papadimitriou C, Beck J (1999) Reliability of uncertain dynamical systems with multiple design points. Struct Saf 21(2):113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayyub B, McCuen R (2016) Probability, statistics, and reliability for engineers and scientists. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Azarkish H, Rashki M (2019) Reliability and reliability-based sensitivity analysis of shell and tube heat exchangers using Monte Carlo simulation. Appl Therm Eng 159:113842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo CL, Ciuffo B, Cardoso JL, Ben-Akiva ME (2015) Dealing with uncertainty in detailed calibration of traffic simulation models for safety assessment. Transp Res C 58:395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ba-Abbad M, Nikolaidis E, Kapania R (2006) New approach for system reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 44(5):1087–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacarreza O, Aliabadi M, Apicella A (2015) Robust design and optimization of composite stiffened panels in post-buckling.structural and multidisciplinary

  • Bae H, Alyanak E (2016) Sequential subspace reliability method with univariate revolving integration. AIAA J 54(7):2160–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashtannyk D, Hyndman R (2001) Bandwidth selection for kernel conditional density estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal 36(3):279–298

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Basudhar A, Missoum S (2008) Adaptive explicit decision functions for probabilistic design and optimization using support vector machines. Comput Struct 86(19–20):1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basudhar A, Missoum S, Sanchez A (2008) Limit state function identification using support vector machines for discontinuous responses and disjoint failure domains. Probab Eng Mech 23(1):1–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudoui V, Klotz P, Hiriart-Urruty J, Jan S, Morel F (2012) Local uncertainty processing (LOUP) method for multidisciplinary robust design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46(5):711–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayes T (1991) An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Comput Med Pract 8(3):157

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beck J, Katafygiotis L (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech 124(4):455–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim Y (1994) A non-probabilistic concept of reliability. Struct Saf 14(4):227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim Y (2001) Information-gap decision theory: decisions under severe uncertainty. Academic Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim Y (2006) Information-gap decision theory: decisions under severe uncertainty, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim Y, Elishakoff I (1995) Discussion on: a non-probabilistic concept of reliability. Struct Saf 17(3):195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim Y, Elishakoff I (2013) Convex models of uncertainty in applied mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Benner P, Gugercin S, Willcox K (2015) A survey of projection-based model reduction methods for parametric dynamical systems. SIAM Rev 57(4):483–531

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer HG, Sendhoff B (2007) Robust optimization-a comprehensive survey. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(33–34):3190–3218

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bichon B, Eldred M, Swiler L, Mahadevan S, McFarland J (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46(10):2459–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichon B, Eldred M, Mahadevan S, McFarland J (2013) Efficient global surrogate modeling for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 135(1):011009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatman G (2009) Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansions for uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis

  • Blatman G, Sudret B (2010a) An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis. Probab Eng Mech 25(2):183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatman G, Sudret B (2010b) Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(11):1216–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker A, Dennis J, Frank P, Serafini D, Torczon V, Trosset M (1999) A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Struct Optim 17(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman A (1984) An alternative method of cross-validation for the smoothing of density estimates. Biometrika 71(2):353–360

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung K (1984) Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals. J Eng Mech 110(3):357–366

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung K (2019) The geometry of limit state function graphs and subset simulation: Counterexamples. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 182:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broemeling L (2011) An account of early statistical inference in Arab cryptology. Am Stat 65(4):255–257

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham K, Anderson D (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33(2):261–304

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cadini F, Santos F, Zio E (2014) An improved adaptive Kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 131:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadini F, Gioletta A, Zio E (2015) Improved metamodel-based importance sampling for the performance assessment of radioactive waste repositories. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 134:188–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • das Chagas Moura M, Zio E, Lins ID, Droguett E (2011) Failure and reliability prediction by support vector machines regression of time series data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:1527–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Chatterjee T, Chowdhury R, Adhikari S (2017) A surrogate based multi-fidelity approach for robust design optimization. Appl Math Model 47:726–744

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K, Skerlos S, Papalambros P (2007) An adaptive sequential linear programming algorithm for optimal design problems with probabilistic constraints. J Mech Des 129(2):140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee T, Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2019) A critical review of surrogate assisted robust design optimization. Arch Comput Methods Eng 26(1):245–274

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A, Haftka R (2013) Separable Monte Carlo combined with importance sampling for variance reduction. Int J Reliab Saf 7(3):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A, Kramer B, Willcox K (2020) Information reuse for importance sampling in reliability-based design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 201:106853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Fan J, Xu H, Li B (2020) Calculation of hybrid reliability of turbine disk based on self-evolutionary game model with few shot learning. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2020:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Yang X (2000) Interval finite element method for beam structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 34(1):75–88

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Nikolaidis E, Cudney H, Rosca R, Haftka R (1999) Comparison of probabilistic and fuzzy set methods for designing under uncertainty. In: 40th structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit, p 1579

  • Chen X, Hasselman T, Neill D (1997) Reliability-based structural design optimization for practical applications. In: Proceedings of the 38th AIAA structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Florida

  • Chen Z, Qiu H, Gao L, Su L, Li P (2013) An adaptive decoupling approach for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 117:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Qiu H, Gao L, Li X, Li P (2014) A local adaptive sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using Kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(3):401–416

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Peng S, Li X, Qiu H, Xiong H, Gao L, Li P (2015) An important boundary sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using Kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52(1):55–70

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Li X, Chen G, Gao L, Qiu H, Wang S (2018) A probabilistic feasible region approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(1):359–372

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Wu Z, Li X, Chen G, Gao L, Gan X, Wang S (2019a) A multiple-design-point approach for reliability-based design optimization. Eng Optim 51(5):875–895

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Zhou P, Liu Y (2019b) A novel approach to uncertainty analysis using methods of hybrid dimension reduction and improved maximum entropy. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60:1841–1866

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Chen J (1997) Automatically determine the membership function based on the maximum entropy principle. Inf Sci 96(3–4):163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Liu Z, Qian Y, Zhou Z, Tan J (2020) Non-probabilistic robust equilibrium optimization of complex uncertain structures. J Mech Des 142(2):021405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiralaksanakul A, Mahadevan S (2005) First-order approximation methods in reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 127:851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho H, Choi K, Gaul N, Lee I, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2016a) Conservative reliability-based design optimization method with insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1609–1630

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cho H, Choi K, Lee I, Lamb D (2016b) Design sensitivity method for sampling-based RBDO with varying standard deviation. J Mech Des 138(1):011405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho H, Choi K, Shin J (2020) Iterative most probable point search method for problems with a mixture of random and interval variables. J Mech Des 142(7):071703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho S, Jang J, Kim S, Park S, Lee T, Lee M, Hong S (2016) Nonparametric approach for uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization considering limited data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1671–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho T, Lee B (2011) Reliability-based design optimization using convex linearization and sequential optimization and reliability assessment method. Struct Saf 33(1):42–50

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chutia R (2017) Uncertainty quantification under hybrid structure of probability-fuzzy parameters in Gaussian plume model. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 6(4):277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicala D, Irias X (2014) Utilizing info-gap decision theory to improve pipeline reliability: a case study. In: Pipelines 2014: from underground to the forefront of innovation and sustainability, pp 1749–1760

  • Civanlar M, Trussell H (1986) Constructing membership functions using statistical data. Fuzzy Sets Syst 18(1):1–13

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Constantine P, Emory M, Larsson J, Iaccarino G (2015) Exploiting active subspaces to quantify uncertainty in the numerical simulation of the HyShot II scramjet. J Comput Phys 302:1–20

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Coppitters D, De Paepe W, Contino F (2019) Surrogate-assisted robust design optimization and global sensitivity analysis of a directly coupled photovoltaic-electrolyzer system under techno-economic uncertainty. Appl Energy 248:310–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council NR et al (2009) Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Degrauwe D, Lombaert G, De Roeck G (2010) Improving interval analysis in finite element calculations by means of affine arithmetic. Comput Struct 88(3–4):247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster A (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38(2):325–339

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A (1996) Structural reliability methods for seismic safety assessment: a review. Eng Struct 18(6):412–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A, Dakessian T (1998) Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability. Struct Saf 20(1):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson M, Parks G (2015) Robust aerodynamic design optimization using polynomial chaos. J Aircr 46(2):635–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doltsinis I, Kang Z (2004) Robust design of structures using optimization methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(23–26):2221–2237

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du L, Choi K, Youn B, Gorsich D (2006) Possibility-based design optimization method for design problems with both statistical and fuzzy input data. J Mech Des 128(4):928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Chen W (2004) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. J Mech Des 126(2):225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Hu Z (2012) First order reliability method with truncated random variables. J Mech Des 134(9):091005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Sudjianto A, Chen W (2004) An integrated framework for optimization under uncertainty using inverse reliability strategy. J Mech Des 126(4):562–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Sudjianto A, Huang B (2005) Reliability-based design with the mixture of random and interval variables. J Mech Des 127(6):1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan Z, Jung Y, Yan J, Lee I (2020) Reliability-based multi-scale design optimization of composite frames considering structural compliance and manufacturing constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim 61(6):2401–2421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Possibility theory. Plenum, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubourg V, Sudret B, Bourinet J (2011) Reliability-based design optimization using Kriging surrogates and subset simulation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(5):673–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubourg V, Sudret B, Deheeger F (2013) Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 33:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duong P, Yang Q, Park H, Raghavan N (2019) Reliability analysis and design of a single diode solar cell model using polynomial chaos and active subspace. Microelectron Reliab 100:113477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duong T, Hazelton M (2003) Plug-in bandwidth matrices for bivariate kernel density estimation. J Nonparametr Stat 15(1):17–30

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duong T, Hazelton M (2005) Cross-validation bandwidth matrices for multivariate kernel density estimation. Scand J Stat 32(3):485–506

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M, Relun N (2013) A combined importance sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Moçayd N, Mohamed M, Ouazar D, Seaid M (2020) Stochastic model reduction for polynomial chaos expansion of acoustic waves using proper orthogonal decomposition. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 195:106733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elishakoff I, Bekel Y (2013) Application of Lame’s super ellipsoids to model initial imperfections. J Appl Mech 80(6): 061006

  • Elishakoff I, Zingales M (2003) Contrasting probabilistic and anti-optimization approaches in an applied mechanics problem. Int J Solids Struct 40(16):4281–4297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elishakoff I, Elisseeff P, Glegg S (1994a) Nonprobabilistic, convex-theoretic modeling of scatter in material properties. AIAA J 32(4):843–849

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elishakoff I, Haftka R, Fang J (1994b) Structural design under bounded uncertainty-optimization with anti-optimization. Comput Struct 53(6):1401–1405

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingwood B (1980) Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58: Building code requirements for minimum design loads in buildings and other structures, vol 13. National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce

  • Engelund S, Rackwitz R (1993) A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability. Struct Saf 12:255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan X, Wang P, Hao F (2019) Reliability-based design optimization of crane bridges using Kriging-based surrogate models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(3):993–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G, Xu C, Li Q (2015) Multiobjective robust design optimization of fatigue life for a truck cab. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 135:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferson S, Ginzburg L (1996) Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54(2–3):133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferson S, Joslyn C, Helton J, Oberkampf W, Sentz K (2004) Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 85(1–3):355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund R (2003) Model reduction methods based on Krylov subspaces. Acta Numer 12:267–319

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gao W, Wu D, Song C, Tin-Loi F, Li X (2011) Hybrid probabilistic interval analysis of bar structures with uncertainty using a mixed perturbation Monte-Carlo method. Finite Elem Anal Des 47(7):643–652

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gersem D, Hilde DM, Desmet W, Vandepitte D (2006) Non-probabilistic uncertainty assessment in finite element models with superelements. In: 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference 14th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 7th, p 2072

  • Ghanem R, Spanos P (1991) Stochastic finite element method: response statistics. Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach. Springer, New York, pp 101–119

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem R, Higdon D, Owhadi H (2017) Handbook of uncertainty quantification. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisu T, Parks GT, Jarrett JP, Clarkson PJ (2011) Robust design optimization of gas turbine compression systems. J Propul Power 27(2):282–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles M (2008) Multilevel Monte Carlo path simulation. Oper Res 56(3):607–617

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goel T, Haftka R, Shyy W, Queipo N (2007) Ensemble of surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(3):199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes HM, Awruch AM, Lopes PAM (2011) Reliability based optimization of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks. Struct Saf 33(3):186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grujicic M, Arakere G, Bell W, Marvi H, Yalavarthy H, Pandurangan B, Haque I, Fadel G (2010) Reliability-based design optimization for durability of ground vehicle suspension system components. J Mater Eng Perform 19(3):301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo S, Lu Z (2015) A non-probabilistic robust reliability method for analysis and design optimization of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters. Appl Math Model 39(7):1985–2002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guyonnet D, Bourgine B, Dubois D, Fargier H, Co me B, Chilès JP, (2003) Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments. J Environ Eng 129(1):68–78

  • Hájek A (2019) Interpretations of probability, the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy

  • Håkansson A (2019) Estimating convective heat transfer coefficients and uncertainty thereof using the general uncertainty management (GUM) framework. J Food Eng 263:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao P, Wang Y, Liu C, Wang B, Wu H (2017) A novel non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization algorithm using enhanced chaos control method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:572–593

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hasofer A, Lind N (1974) Exact and invariant second-moment code format. J Eng Mech Div 100(1):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan R, Crossley W (2008) Spacecraft reliability-based design optimization under uncertainty including discrete variables. J Spacecr Rocket 45(2):394–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasuike T, Katagiri H (2016) Construction of an appropriate membership function based on size of fuzzy set and mathematical programming. In: Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists, vol 2

  • Hawchar L, El Soueidy CP, Schoefs F (2018) Global Kriging surrogate modeling for general time-variant reliability-based design optimization problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58:955–968

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Zeng Y, Li G (2020) An adaptive polynomial chaos expansion for high-dimensional reliability analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62:2051–2067

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Helton J, Davis F (2003) Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81(1):23–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC, Johnson JD, Sallaberry CJ, Storlie CB (2006) Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(10–11):1175–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess P, Bruchman D, Assakkaf I, Ayyub B (2002) Uncertainties in material and geometric strength and load variables. Nav Eng J 114(2):139–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman F, Hammonds J (1994) Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. Risk Anal 14(5):707–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Lee C (1996) Induction of fuzzy rules and membership functions from training examples. Fuzzy Sets Syst 84(1):33–47

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hora S (1996) Aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probability elicitation with an example from hazardous waste management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54(2–3):217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosder S, Watson L, Grossman B, Mason W, Kim H, Haftka R, Cox S (2001) Polynomial response surface approximations for the multidisciplinary design optimization of a high speed civil transport. Optim Eng 2(4):431–452

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoseyni S, Pourgol-Mohammad M, Tehranifard A, Yousefpour F (2014) A systematic framework for effective uncertainty assessment of severe accident calculations; hybrid qualitative and quantitative methodology. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 125:22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinzadeh Y, Taghizadieh N, Jalili S (2018) A new structural reanalysis approach based on the polynomial-type extrapolation methods. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58(3):1033–1049

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hu C, Youn BD (2011) Adaptive-sparse polynomial chaos expansion for reliability analysis and design of complex engineering systems. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(3):419–442

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu W, Choi K, Cho H (2016) Reliability-based design optimization of wind turbine blades for fatigue life under dynamic wind load uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(4):953–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Parks G, Chen X, Seshadri P (2015) Discovering a one-dimensional active subspace to quantify multidisciplinary uncertainty in satellite system design. Adv Space Res 57:1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Chen X, Zhao Y, Tuo Z, Yao W (2017) Active subspace approach to reliability and safety assessments of small satellite separation. Acta Astronaut 131:159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Du X (2013a) A sampling approach to extreme value distribution for time-dependent reliability analysis. J Mech Des 135:071003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Du X (2013b) Time-dependent reliability analysis with joint up-crossing rates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:893–907

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Du X (2015) First order reliability method for time-variant problems using series expansions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:1–21

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Du X (2006) Uncertainty analysis by dimension reduction integration and saddlepoint approximations

  • Huang X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2018) A new direct second-order reliability analysis method. Appl Math Model 55:68–80

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Jiang C, Zhou Y, Luo Z, Zhang Z (2016) An incremental shifting vector approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(3):523–543

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Iooss B, Le Gratiet L (2019) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of functional risk curves based on Gaussian processes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 187:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isight (2021) Simulia execution engine—-dassault systèmes\(\textregistered \). https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/isight-simulia-execution-engine/

  • Ito M, Kim N, Kogiso N (2018) Conservative reliability index for epistemic uncertainty in reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):1919–1935

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jalota H, Thakur M, Mittal G (2017) A credibilistic decision support system for portfolio optimization. Appl Soft Comput 59:512–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang J (1993) Anfis: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen H, Valdebenito M, Schuëller G, Kusanovic D (2009) Reliability-based optimization of stochastic systems using line search. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(49–52):3915–3924

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S, Park G (2017) Single loop single vector approach using the conjugate gradient in reliability based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(4):1329–1344

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ji W, Ren Z, Marzouk Y, Law C (2019) Quantifying kinetic uncertainty in turbulent combustion simulations using active subspaces. Proc Combust Inst 37(2):2175–2182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Han X, Li W, Liu J, Zhang Z (2012a) A hybrid reliability approach based on probability and interval for uncertain structures. J Mech Des 134(3):031001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Lu G, Han X, Liu L (2012b) A new reliability analysis method for uncertain structures with random and interval variables. Int J Mech Mater Des 8(2):012–9184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Bi R, Lu G, Han X (2013a) Structural reliability analysis using non-probabilistic convex model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 254:83–98

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Zhang Q, Han X, Liu J, Hu D (2015) Multidimensional parallelepiped model-a new type of non-probabilistic convex model for structural uncertainty analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 103(1):31–59

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Qiu H, Gao L, Cai X, Li P (2017) An adaptive hybrid single-loop method for reliability-based design optimization using iterative control strategy. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(6):1271–1286

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Hu Z, Liu Y, Mourelatos ZP, Gorsich D, Jayakumar P (2020) A sequential calibration and validation framework for model uncertainty quantification and reduction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 368:113172

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang H, Deng H, He Y (2008) Determination of fuzzy logic membership functions using extended ant colony optimization algorithm. In: 2008 Fifth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery, IEEE, vol 1, pp 581–585

  • Jiang Z, Li J (2017) High dimensional structural reliability with dimension reduction. Struct Saf 69:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Chen W, Fu Y, Yang R (2013b) Reliability-based design optimization with model bias and data uncertainty. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 6(3):502–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao G, Moan T (1990) Methods of reliability model updating through additional events. Struct Saf 9(2):139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo H, Lee K, Lee M, Jung Y, Lee I (2021) Optimization-based model calibration of marginal and joint output distributions utilizing analytical gradients. Struct Multidiscip Optim 63:1–16

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ju B, Lee B (2008) Reliability-based design optimization using a moment method and a Kriging metamodel. Eng Optim 40(5):421–438

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y, Cho H, Lee I (2019a) MPP-based approximated DRM (ADRM) using simplified bivariate approximation with linear regression. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(5):1761–1773

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y, Cho H, Lee I (2019b) Reliability measure approach for confidence-based design optimization under insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(5):1967–1982

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y, Cho H, Duan Z, Lee I (2020a) Determination of sample size for input variables in RBDO through bi-objective confidence-based design optimization under input model uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 61(1):253–266

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y, Cho H, Lee I (2020b) Intelligent initial point selection for MPP search in reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62:1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y, Kang K, Cho H, Lee I (2021) Confidence-based design optimization for a more conservative optimum under surrogate model uncertainty caused by gaussian process. J Mech Des 143(9):091701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale A, Haftka R (2008) Tradeoff of weight and inspection cost in reliability-based structural optimization. J Aircr 45(1):77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang HY, Kwak BM (2009) Application of maximum entropy principle for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(4):331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang K, Qin C, Lee B, Lee I (2019) Modified screening-based Kriging method with cross validation and application to engineering design. Appl Math Model 70:626–642

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S, Park J, Lee I (2017a) Accuracy improvement of the most probable point-based dimension reduction method using the Hessian matrix. Int J Numer Methods Eng 111(3):203–217

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Y, Hong J, Lim O, Noh Y (2017b) Reliability analysis using parametric and nonparametric input modeling methods. J Comput Struct Eng Inst Korea 30(1):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Y, Noh Y, Lim O (2018) Kernel density estimation with bounded data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(1):95–113

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Y, Noh Y, Lim O (2019) Integrated statistical modeling method: part I-statistical simulations for symmetric distributions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(5):1719–1740

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Z, Bai S (2013) On robust design optimization of truss structures with bounded uncertainties. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(5):699–714

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Z, Luo Y, Li A (2011) On non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters. Struct Saf 33(3):196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanno Y (2019) A data-driven approach to non-parametric reliability-based design optimization of structures with uncertain load. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(1):83–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kanno Y, Takewaki I (2006) Robustness analysis of trusses with separable load and structural uncertainties. Int J Solids Struct 43(9):2646–2669

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman J, Prager M (1990) Marine structural steel toughness data bank. In: National materials property data network, Columbus OH, abridged edn

  • Kaymaz I, McMahon C (2005) A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 20:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane AJ, Voutchkov II (2020) Robust design optimization using surrogate models. J Comput Des Eng 7(1):44–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2001) Bayesian calibration of computer models. J R Stat Soc 63(3):425–464

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keshtegar B, Hao P (2017) A hybrid self-adjusted mean value method for reliability-based design optimization using sufficient descent condition. Appl Math Model 41:257–270

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim N, Wang H, Queipo N (2006) Efficient shape optimization under uncertainty using polynomial chaos expansions and local sensitivities. AIAA J 44(5):1112–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T, Lee G, Youn B (2019) Uncertainty characterization under measurement errors using maximum likelihood estimation: cantilever beam end-to-end UQ test problem. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(2):323–333

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit, vol 31. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogoroff A (1941) Confidence limits for an unknown distribution function. Ann Math Stat 12(4):461–463

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov A (1933) Sulla determinazione empirica di une legge di distribuzione. Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari 4:83–91

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Konečná K, Horová I (2019) Maximum likelihood method for bandwidth selection in kernel conditional density estimate. Comput Stat 34(4):1871–1887

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Ali S, Jeyaraman S, Gupta S (2020) Uncertainty quantification of bladed disc systems using data driven stochastic reduced order models. Int J Mech Sci 190:106011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Pippy R, Acar E, Kim N, Haftka R (2009) Approximate probabilistic optimization using exact-capacity-approximate-response-distribution (ECARD). Struct Multidiscip Optim 38:613–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplace P (1812) Analytical theory of probability. Courier, Paris

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D, Kim N, Kim H (2016) Validation and updating in a large automotive vibro-acoustic model using a P-box in the frequency domain. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee G, Kim W, Oh H, Youn B, Kim N (2019a) Review of statistical model calibration and validation-from the perspective of uncertainty structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(4):1619–1644

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Choi K, Du L, Gorsich D (2008a) Dimension reduction method for reliability-based robust design optimization. Comput Struct 86(13–14):1550–1562

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Choi K, Du L, Gorsich D (2008b) Inverse analysis method using MPP-based dimension reduction for reliability-based design optimization of nonlinear and multi-dimensional systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(1):14–27

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Choi K, Gorsich D (2010) System reliability-based design optimization using the MPP-based dimension reduction method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(6):823–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Choi K, Noh Y, Zhao L, Gorsich D (2011) Sampling-based stochastic sensitivity analysis using score functions for RBDO problems with correlated random variables. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Noh Y, Yoo D (2012) A novel second-order reliability method (SORM) using noncentral or generalized chi-squared distributions. J Mech Des 134(10):100912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Choi K, Noh Y, Lamb D (2013) Comparison study between probabilistic and possibilistic methods for problems under a lack of correlated input statistical information. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):175–189

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Kwak B (1995) Reliability-based structural optimal design using the Neumann expansion technique. Comput Struct 55(2):287–296

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Park GJ (2001) Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables. Comput Struct 79(1):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Chen W (2009) A comparative study of uncertainty propagation methods for black-box-type problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37(3):239

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Jung J (2008) A sampling technique enhancing accuracy and efficiency of metamodel-based RBDO: constraint boundary sampling. Comput Struct 86(13–14):1463–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee U, Kang N, Lee I (2019) Selection of optimal target reliability in RBDO through reliability-based design for market systems (RBDMS) and application to electric vehicle design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(3):949–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee U, Kang N, Lee I (2020a) Shared autonomous electric vehicle design and operations under uncertainties: a reliability-based design optimization approach. Struct Multidiscip Optim 61(4):1529–1545

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee U, Park S, Lee I (2020b) Robust design optimization (rdo) of thermoelectric generator system using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (nsga-II). Energy 196:117090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Zhang K (2011) A combined reliability analysis approach with dimension reduction method and maximum entropy method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43:121–134

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Cao Z (2016) Matlab codes of subset simulation for reliability analysis and structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(2):391–410

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Cho H, Sugiyama H, Choi K, Gaul NJ (2017) Reliability-based design optimization of wind turbine drivetrain with integrated multibody gear dynamics simulation considering wind load uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(1):183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Jiang C, Ni B, Zhan L (2019a) Uncertain vibration analysis based on the conceptions of differential and integral of interval process. Int J Mech Mater Des 16:225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Wan H, Gao W, Tong F, Li H (2019b) Reliability based multidisciplinary design optimization of cooling turbine blade considering uncertainty data statistics. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(2):659–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Wang Z (2018) Confidence-driven design optimization using Gaussian process metamodeling with insufficient data. J Mech Des 140(12):121405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Wang Z (2019) Surrogate model uncertainty quantification for reliability-based design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 192:106432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Wang Z (2020) Deep learning for high-dimensional reliability analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 139:106399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Gao L, Xiao M (2020) Multidisciplinary robust design optimization under parameter and model uncertainties. Eng Optim 52(3):426–445

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Qiu H, Chen Z, Gao L, Shao X (2016) A local Kriging approximation method using MPP for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 162:102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Gong C, Gu L, Jing Z, Fang H, Gao R (2019c) A reliability-based optimization method using sequential surrogate model and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(2):439–460

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Meng Z, Chen G, Yang D (2019d) A hybrid self-adjusted single-loop approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(5):1867–1885

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Chen J, Feng L (2012) Dealing with uncertainty: a survey of theories and practices. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 25(11):2463–2482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Mourelatos Z, Nikolaidis E (2007) A single-loop approach for system reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Desi 129(12):1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Mourelatos Z, Tu J (2008) A single-loop method for reliability-based design optimisation. Int J Prod Dev 5(1–2):76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim J, Lee B, Lee I (2014) Second-order reliability method-based inverse reliability analysis using Hessian update for accurate and efficient reliability-based design optimization. Int J Numer Meth Eng 100(10):773–792

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin P, Gea HC, Jaluria Y (2011) A modified reliability index approach for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 133(4):044501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Q, Xiong F, Wang F, Yang X (2020) A data-driven polynomial chaos method considering correlated random variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62(4):2131–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Jiang C, Jia X, Long X, Zhang Z, Guan F (2018a) A new uncertainty propagation method for problems with parameterized probability-boxes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 172:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Ong Y, Cai J (2018b) A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(1):393–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Jiang C, Liu J (2019) Uncertainty propagation analysis using sparse grid technique and saddlepoint approximation based on parameterized p-box representation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59:61–74

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Sun X, Meng X, Li K, Zeng G, Wang X (2016) A novel shape function approach of dynamic load identification for the structures with interval uncertainty. Int J Mech Mater Des 12(3):375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Der Kiureghian A (1991) Optimization algorithms for structural reliability. Struct Saf 9:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Wu Y, Wang B, Ding J, Jie H (2017) An adaptive local range sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using support vector machine and Kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(6):2285–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez RH, Lemosse D, de Cursi JES, Rojas J, El-Hami A (2011) An approach for the reliability based design optimization of laminated composites. Eng Optim 43(10):1079–1094

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Z, Wang X, Shi Q, Liu D (2021) Ubc-constrained non-probabilistic reliability-based optimization of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters. Struct Multidiscip Optim 63(1):311–326

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen H, Krenk S, Lind N (2006) Methods of structural safety. Courier Corporation

  • Mahadevan S, Zhang R, Smith N (2001) Bayesian networks for system reliability reassessment. Struct Saf 23(3):231–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makhloufi A, Aoues Y, El Hami A (2016) Reliability based design optimization of wire bonding in power microelectronic devices. Microsyst Technol 22(12):2737–2748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour R, Olsson M (2014) A closed-form second-order reliability method using noncentral chi-squared distributions. J Mech Des 136(10):10402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marelli S, Sudret B (2014) Uqlab: A framework for uncertainty quantification in matlab. The 2nd International conference on vulnerability and risk analysis and management (ICVRAM 2014). University of Liverpool, United Kingdom, pp 2554–2563

  • Martin N, England J (1981) Mathematical theory of entropy. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister CD, Simpson TW (2003) Multidisciplinary robust design optimization of an internal combustion engine. J Mech Des 125(1):124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald M, Mahadevan S (2008) Design optimization with system-level reliability constraints. J Mech Des 130(2):021403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland J, Mahadevan S (2008) Error and variability characterization in structural dynamics modeling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(29–32):2621–2631

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers R (1989) Importance sampling in structural systems. Struct Saf 6:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng D, Li Y, Huang H, Wang Z, Liu Y (2015a) Reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization using subset simulation analysis and its application in the hydraulic transmission mechanism design. J Mech Des 137(5):051402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Z, Li G, Wang B, Hao P (2015b) A hybrid chaos control approach of the performance measure functions for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 146:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Z, Zhou H, Li G, Yang D (2016) A decoupled approach for non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 175:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Z, Zhang D, Liu Z, Li G (2018) An adaptive directional boundary sampling method for efficient reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 140(12):121406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Z, Zhang D, Li G, Yu B (2019) An importance learning method for non-probabilistic reliability analysis and optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(4):1255–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischke CR (1987) Prediction of stochastic endurance strength. J Vib Acoust Stress Reliab Des 109(1):113–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • modeFRONTIER (2021) Robust design and reliability—- www.esteco.com. https://www.esteco.com/technology/robust-design-and-reliability/

  • Moens D, Vandepitte D (2005) A survey of non-probabilistic uncertainty treatment in finite element analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(12–16):1527–1555

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mohsine A, Kharmanda G, El-Hami A (2006) Improved hybrid method as a robust tool for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 32(3):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon M, Choi K, Cho H, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2017) Reliability-based design optimization using confidence-based model validation for insufficient experimental data. J Mech Des 139(3):031404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon M, Cho H, Choi K, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2018) Confidence-based reliability assessment considering limited numbers of both input and output test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):2027–2043

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moon M, Choi K, Gaul N, Lamb D (2019) Treating epistemic uncertainty using bootstrapping selection of input distribution model for confidence-based reliability assessment. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042149

  • Moore R (1966) Interval analysis, vol 4. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore RE, Kearfott RB, Cloud MJ (2009) Introduction to interval analysis. SIAM

  • Motta RdS, Afonso SM (2016) An efficient procedure for structural reliability-based robust design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(3):511–530

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mourelatos Z, Zhou J (2006) A design optimization method using evidence theory. J Mech Des 128(4):901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhanna R, Mullen R, Zhang H (2005) Penalty-based solution for the interval finite-element methods. J Eng Mech 131(10):1102–1111

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay S, Khodaparast H, Adhikari S (2016) Fuzzy uncertainty propagation in composites using gram-schmidt polynomial chaos expansion. Appl Math Model 40(7–8):4412–4428

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel J, Rieckermann J, Sudret B (2020) Principal component analysis and sparse polynomial chaos expansions for global sensitivity analysis and model calibration: application to urban drainage simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 195:106737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nannapaneni S, Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Uncertainty quantification in reliability estimation with limit state surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1509–1526

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nataf A (1962) Determination des distribution don’t les marges sont donnees. Comptes Rendus de l Academie des Sciences 225:42–43

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • das Neves Carneiro G, António CC, (2019) Reliability-based robust design optimization with the reliability index approach applied to composite laminate structures. Compos Struct 209:844–855

  • Ng L, Willcox K (2014) Multifidelity approaches for optimization under uncertainty. Int J Numer Meth Eng 100(10):746–772

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen T, Song J, Paulino G (2010) Single-loop system reliability-based design optimization using matrix-based system reliability method: theory and applications. J Mech Des 132(1):011005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikbay M, Kuru M (2013) Reliability based multidisciplinary optimization of aeroelastic systems with structural and aerodynamic uncertainties. J Aircr 50(3):708–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaidis E, Chen S, Cudney H, Haftka RT, Rosca R (2004) Comparison of probability and possibility for design against catastrophic failure under uncertainty. J Mech Des 126(3):386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaidis E, Ghiocel D, Singhal S (2004) Engineering design reliability handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noh Y, Choi K, Du L (2009) Reliability-based design optimization of problems with correlated input variables using a Gaussian copula. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noh Y, Choi K, Lee I (2010) Identification of marginal and joint CDFs using Bayesian method for RBDO. Struct Multidiscip Optim 40(1–6):35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Noh Y, Choi K, Lee I, Gorsich D, Lamb D (2011a) Reliability-based design optimization with confidence level for non-Gaussian distributions using bootstrap method. J Mech Des 133(9):091001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noh Y, Choi K, Lee I, Gorsich D, Lamb D (2011b) Reliability-based design optimization with confidence level under input model uncertainty due to limited test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(4):443–458

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Oberguggenberger M, Fellin W (2008) Reliability bounds through random sets: nonparametric methods and geotechnical applications. Comput Struct 86(10):1093–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberkampf W, DeLand S, Rutherford B, Diegert K, Alvin K (2002) Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75(3):333–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier GDABCMVLA, Shields M (2020) Uqpy: a general purpose python package and development environment for uncertainty quantification. J Comput Sci 47:101204

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Omizegba E, Adebayo G (2009) Optimizing fuzzy membership functions using particle swarm algorithm. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on systems. man and cybernetics, IEEE, pp 3866–3870

  • OmniQuest (2021) Fesoftware. https://omniquest.world/

  • OptiSLang (2021) Ansys optislang. https://www.ansys.com/en-in/products/platform/ansys-optislang/

  • Paiva R, Crawford C, Suleman A (2014) Robust and reliability-based design optimization framework for wing design. AIAA J 52(4):711–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan H, Xi Z, Yang R (2016) Model uncertainty approximation using a copula-based approach for reliability based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1543–1556

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou I, Betz W, Zwirglmaier K, Straub D (2015) MCMC algorithms for subset simulation. Probab Eng Mech 41:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou I, Breitung K, Straub D (2018) Reliability sensitivity estimation with sequential importance sampling. Struct Saf 75:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Lee I (2018) A study on computational efficiency improvement of novel SORM using the convolution integration. J Mech Des 140(2):025401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Cho H, Lee I (2020) Selective dimension reduction method (DRM) to enhance accuracy and efficiency of most probable point (MPP)-based DRM. Struct Multidiscip Optim 61(3):999–1010

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons S, Hunter A (1998) A review of uncertainty handling formalisms. In: Applications of uncertainty formalisms, Springer, pp 8–37

  • Paté-Cornell M (1996) Uncertainties in risk analysis: six levels of treatment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54(2–3):95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson J, Buehler E, Mesbah A (2017) Arbitrary polynomial chaos for uncertainty propagation of correlated random variables in dynamic systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1):3548–3553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (2014) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peherstorfer B, Cui T, Marzouk Y, Willcox K (2016) Multifidelity importance sampling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 300:490–509

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peherstorfer B, Willcox K, Gunzburger M (2018) Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization. SIAM Rev 60(3):550–591

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Periçaro G, Santos S, Ribeiro A, Matioli L (2015) HLRF-BFGS optimization algorithm for structural reliability. Appl Math Model 39(7):2025–2035

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Picheny V, Kim N, Haftka R, Queipo N (2008) Conservative predictions using surrogate modeling. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. In: 16th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference, 10th aiaa non-deterministic approaches conference, 9th AIAA gossamer spacecraft forum, 4th AIAA multidisciplinary design optimization specialists conference

  • Platz R, Götz B (2017) Non-probabilistic uncertainty evaluation in the concept phase for airplane landing gear design. Model validation and uncertainty quantification, vol 3. Springer, Cham, pp 161–169

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Z, Wang X (2003) Comparison of dynamic response of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters using non-probabilistic interval analysis method and probabilistic approach. Int J Solids Struct 40(20):5423–5439

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Z, Wang X (2005) Parameter perturbation method for dynamic responses of structures with uncertain-but bounded parameters based on interval analysis. Int J Solids Struct 42(18–19):4970

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Z, Yang D, Elishakoff I (2008) Probabilistic interval reliability of structural systems. Int J Solids Struct 45(10):2850–2860

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qu X, Haftka R, Venkataraman S, Johnson T (2003) Deterministic and reliability-based optimization of composite laminates for cryogenic environments. AIAA J 41(10):2029–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R (2001) Reliability analysis-a review and some perspectives. Struct Saf 23(4):365–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaideh M, Kozlowski T (2020) Surrogate modeling of advanced computer simulations using deep Gaussian processes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 195:106731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Wei D (2006) A univariate approximation at most probable point for higher-order reliability analysis. Int J Solids Struct 43(9):2820–2839

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Xu H (2004) A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Probab Eng Mech 19(4):393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi M (2019) Review and comparison of two meta-model-based uncertainty propagation analysis methods in groundwater applications: polynomial chaos expansion and Gaussian process emulation. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 33(2):607–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan A, Luo FJ, Kuang YC, Bai Y, Ooi MPL (2020) Reliability-based design optimisation of structural systems using high-order analytical moments. Struct Saf 86:101970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan B, Rao S (1996) A general loss function based optimization procedure for robust design. Eng Optim 25(4):255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAMDO (2021) Reliability analysis, and design optimization software—-ramdo. https://www.altair.com/ramdo/

  • Ramu P, Qu X, Youn B, Haftka R, Choi K (2006) Inverse reliability measures and reliability-based design optimisation. Int J Reliab Saf 1(1–2):187–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbar A, Mahjouri N (2019) Multi-objective freshwater management in coastal aquifers under uncertainty in hydraulic parameters. Nat Resour Res 29:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao S, Berke L (1997) Analysis of uncertain structural systems using interval analysis. AIAA J 35(4):727–735

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao SS (1992) Reliability-based design. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero V, Swiler L, Giunta A (2004) Construction of response surfaces based on progressive-lattice-sampling experimental designs with application to uncertainty propagation. Struct Saf 26(2):201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronold KO, Larsen GC (2000) Reliability-based design of wind-turbine rotor blades against failure in ultimate loading. Eng Struct 22(6):565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe W (1994) Understanding uncertainty. Risk Anal 14(5):743–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy CJ, Oberkampf WL (2011) A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(25–28):2131–2144

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sandgren E, Cameron TM (2002) Robust design optimization of structures through consideration of variation. Comput Struct 80(20–21):1605–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2011) Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(7):814–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santosh T, Saraf R, Ghosh A, Kushwaha H (2006) Optimum step length selection rule in modified HL-RF method for structural reliability. Int J Press Vessels Pip 83(10):742–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueller G, Pradlwarter H (2007) Benchmark study on reliability estimation in higher dimensions of structural systems—an overview. Struct Saf 29:167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuëller GI, Jensen HA (2008) Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties-an overview. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(1):2–13

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Šehić K, Karamehmedović M (2020) Estimation of failure probabilities via local subset approximations. arxiv:200305994

  • Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence, vol 42. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shahraki AF, Noorossana R (2014) Reliability-based robust design optimization: a general methodology using genetic algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 74:199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan S, Wang G (2008) Reliable design space and complete single-loop reliability-based design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(8):1218–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi L, Lin S (2016) A new RBDO method using adaptive response surface and first-order score function for crashworthiness design. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 156:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Lu Z (2019) Dynamic reliability analysis model for structure with both random and interval uncertainties. Int J Mech Mater Des 15(3):521–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin J, Lee I (2014) Reliability-based vehicle safety assessment and design optimization of roadway radius and speed limit in windy environments. J Mech Des 136(8):081006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim J, Qiu Z, Wang X (2007) Modal analysis of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters via interval analysis. J Sound Vib 303(1–2):29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon C, Bicking F (2017) Hybrid computation of uncertainty in reliability analysis with p-box and evidential networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 167:629–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon D (2002) Sum normal optimization of fuzzy membership functions. Int J Uncertain Fuzz Knowl-Based Syst 10(04):363–384

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smarslok B, Haftka R, Carraro L, Ginsbourger D (2010) Improving accuracy of failure probability estimates with separable Monte Carlo. Int J Reliab Saf 4(4):393–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SmartUQ (2021) Uncertainty propagation—-smartuq. https://www.smartuq.com/software/uncertainty-propagation/

  • Smirnoff N (1939) Sur les écarts de la courbe de distribution empirique. Matematicheskii Sbornik 48(1):3–26

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sohouli A, Yildiz M, Suleman A (2018) Efficient strategies for reliability-based design optimization of variable stiffness composite structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(2):689–704

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Son H, Lee G, Kang K, Kang Y, Youn B, Lee I, Noh Y (2020) Industrial issues and solutions to statistical model improvement: a case study of an automobile steering column. Struct Multidiscip Optim 61(4):1739–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Kang W (2009) System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method. Struct Saf 31(2):148–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroudi A, Keane A (2015) Risk averse energy hub management considering plug-in electric vehicles using information gap decision theory. Plug in electric vehicles in smart grids. Springer, Singapore, pp 107–127

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Soroudi A, Rabiee A, Keane A (2017) Information gap decision theory approach to deal with wind power uncertainty in unit commitment. Electr Power Syst Res 145:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soundappan P, Nikolaidis E, Haftka R, Grandhi R, Canfield R (2004) Comparison of evidence theory and Bayesian theory for uncertainty modeling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 85(1–3):295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Li G, Zhou S, Li H, Hou S, Li Q (2011) Crashworthiness design of vehicle by using multiobjective robust optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(1):99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Zhang H, Fang J, Li G, Li Q (2017) Multi-objective and multi-case reliability-based design optimization for tailor rolled blank (TRB) structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(5):1899–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taflanidis A, Beck J (2008) An efficient framework for optimal robust stochastic system design using stochastic simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(1):88–101

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Taflanidis A, Beck J (2008) Stochastic subset optimization for optimal reliability problems. Probab Eng Mech 23(2–3):324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Chen J, Wei J (2012) A sequential algorithm for reliability-based robust design optimization under epistemic uncertainty. J Mech Des 134(1):014502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teckentrup A, Jantsch P, Webster C, Gunzburger M (2015) A multilevel stochastic collocation method for partial differential equations with random input data. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quantif 3(1):1046–1074

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thom H (1960) Distributions of extreme winds in the united states. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 126(2):450–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toft HS, Sørensen JD (2011) Reliability-based design of wind turbine blades. Struct Saf 33(6):333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonon F, Bernardini A, Elishakoff I (2001) Hybrid analysis of uncertainty: probability, fuzziness and anti-optimization. Chaos Solitons Fract 12(8):1403–1414

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy R, Bilionis I (2018) Deep UQ: learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification. J Comput Phys 375:565–588

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy R, Bilionis I, Gonzalez M (2016) Gaussian processes with built-in dimensionality reduction: applications to high-dimensional uncertainty propagation. J Comput Phys 321:191–223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Choi K, Park Y (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Choi K, Park Y (2001) Design potential method for robust system parameter design. AIAA J 39(4):667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UQWorld (2021) Various uncertainty quantification software tools. https://uqworld.org/t/various-uncertainty-quantification-software-tools/137/

  • Valdebenito M, Schuëller G (2010) A survey on approaches for reliability-based optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(5):645–663

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Viana F, Haftka R, Steffen V (2009) Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor. Struct Multidiscip Optim 39(4):439–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viana F, Picheny V, Haftka R (2010) Using cross validation to design conservative surrogates. AIAA J 48(10):2286–2298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpi S, Diez M, Gaul N, Song H, Iemma U, Choi K, Stern F (2015) Development and validation of a dynamic metamodel based on stochastic radial basis functions and uncertainty quantification. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(2):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wand M, Jones M (1994) Multivariate plug-in bandwidth selection. Comput Stat 9(2):97–116

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Matthies H (2019) Novel model calibration method via non-probabilistic interval characterization and Bayesian theory. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 183:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Duan Q, Tong CH, Di Z, Gong W (2016) A gui platform for uncertainty quantification of complex dynamical models. Environ Modell Softw 76:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Zhang H, Beer M (2018) Computing tight bounds of structural reliability under imprecise probabilistic information. Comput Struct 208:92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Xiong F, Chen S, Song J (2019) Multi-fidelity uncertainty propagation using polynomial chaos and Gaussian process modeling. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(4):1583–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Beeson D, Wiggs G (2004) Efficient and accurate point estimate method for moments and probability distribution estimation. In: 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, p 4359

  • Wang L, Wang X, Li Y, Hu J (2019a) A non-probabilistic time-variant reliable control method for structural vibration suppression problems with interval uncertainties. Mech Syst Signal Process 115:301–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Wang Y (2015a) Nonparametric multivariate density estimation using mixtures. Stat Comput 25(2):349–364

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Wang L, Elishakoff I, Qiu Z (2011) Probability and convexity concepts are not antagonistic. Acta Mech 219(1–2):45–64

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y (2007) On fast computation of the non-parametric maximum likelihood estimate of a mixing distribution. J R Stat Soc Ser B 69(2):185–198

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Chen W (2017) Confidence-based adaptive extreme response surface for time-variant reliability analysis under random excitation. Struct Saf 64:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang P (2012) A nested extreme response surface approach for time-dependent reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 134:121007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang P (2014) A maximum confidence enhancement based sequential sampling scheme for simulation-based design. J Mech Des 136(2):021006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang P (2015b) An integrated performance measure approach for system reliability analysis. J Mech Des 137(2):021406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang Z, Yu S, Zhang K (2019b) Time-dependent mechanism reliability analysis based on envelope function and vine-copula function. Mech Mach Theory 134:667–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Li H, Chen Z, Li L, Hong H (2020) Sequential optimization and moment-based method for efficient probabilistic design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62:1–18

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weinmeister J, Xie N, Gao X, Krishna Prasad A, Roy S (2018) Analysis of a polynomial chaos-Kriging metamodel for uncertainty quantification in aerospace applications. In: 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, p 0911

  • Wu X, Mui T, Hu G, Meidani H, Kozlowski T (2017) Inverse uncertainty quantification of trace physical model parameters using sparse gird stochastic collocation surrogate model. Nucl Eng Des 319:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Kozlowski T, Meidani H (2018) Kriging-based inverse uncertainty quantification of nuclear fuel performance code bison fission gas release model using time series measurement data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 169:422–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Y S, Sues R, Cesare M (2001) Safety factor based approach for probability–based design optimization. In: Proceedings of 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Seattle, WA

  • Wunsch D, Hirsch C, Nigro R, Coussement G (2015) Quantification of combined operational and geometrical uncertainties in turbo-machinery design. In: Turbo expo: power for land, sea, and air. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol 56659, p V02CT45A018

  • Xi Z (2019) Model-based reliability analysis with both model uncertainty and parameter uncertainty. J Mech Des 141(5):051404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao M, Zhang J, Gao L (2020) A system active learning Kriging method for system reliability-based design optimization with a multiple response model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 199:106935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Z, Han X, Jiang C (2016) An efficient uncertainty propagation method for parameterized probability boxes. Acta Mech 227:633–649

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Y, Chen W, Tsui K, Apley D (2009) A better understanding of model updating strategies in validating engineering models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(15–16):1327–1337

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Rahman S (2004) A generalized dimension-reduction method for multidimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61(12):1992–2019

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Wang D (2019) Structural reliability analysis based on polynomial chaos, Voronoi cells and dimension reduction technique. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 185:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav OP, Bhamare SS, Rathore A (2010) Reliability-based robust design optimization: a multi-objective framework using hybrid quality loss function. Qual Reliab Eng Int 26(1):27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D (2010) Chaos control for numerical instability of first order reliability method. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 15(10):3131–3141

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang M, Zhang D, Han X (2020) New efficient and robust method for structural reliability analysis and its application in reliability-based design optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 366:113018

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Gu L (2004) Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization methods. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26(1–2):152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Liu Y, Mi C, Wang X (2018) Active learning Kriging model combining with kernel-density-estimation-based importance sampling method for the estimation of low failure probability. J Mech Des 140:051402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo D, Lee I (2014) Sampling-based approach for design optimization in the presence of interval variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(2):253–266

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo D, Lee I, Cho H (2014) Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for novel second-order reliability method (SORM) using generalized chi-squared distribution. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50(5):787–797

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Youn B, Choi K (2004) An investigation of nonlinearity of reliability based design optimization approaches. J Mech Des 126(3):403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn B, Wang P (2008) Bayesian reliability-based design optimization using eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36(2):107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn B, Choi K, Park Y (2003) Hybrid analysis method for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 125(2):221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn B, Choi K, Yang R, Gu L (2004) Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26:272–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn B, Choi K, Du L (2005a) Adaptive probability analysis using an enhanced hybrid mean value method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 29(2):134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Xi Z (2009) Reliability-based robust design optimization using the eigenvector dimension reduction (edr) method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37(5):475–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Yi K (2005b) Performance moment integration (pmi) method for quality assessment in reliability-based robust design optimization. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 33(2):185–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Du L, Gorsich D (2007) Integration of possibility-based optimization and robust design for epistemic uncertainty

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. J Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1973) Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1:28–44

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zafar T, Wang Z (2020) Time-dependent reliability prediction using transfer learning. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62:147–158

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman K, Mahadevan S (2013) Robustness-based design optimization of multidisciplinary system under epistemic uncertainty. AIAA J 51(5):1021–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman K, Mahadevan S (2017) Reliability-based design optimization of multidisciplinary system under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(2):681–699

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zang C, Friswell M, Mottershead J (2005) A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics. Comput Struct 83(4–5):315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Han X, Jiang C, Liu J, Li Q (2017) Time-dependent reliability analysis through response surface method. J Mech Des 139:041404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Mullen R, Muhanna R (2010a) Finite element structural analysis using imprecise probabilities based on p-box representation. In: The 4th international workshop on reliable engineering computing. Professional Activities Centre, National University of Singapore

  • Zhang H, Mullen R, Muhanna R (2010b) Interval Monte Carlo methods for structural reliability. Struct Saf 32(3):183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Mullen R, Muhanna R (2011) Structural analysis with probability-boxes. Int J Reliab Saf 6(1–3):110–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (2011) Adaptive normal reference bandwidth based on quantile for kernel density estimation. J Appl Stat 38(12):2869–2880

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Du X (2010) A second-order reliability method with first-order efficiency. J Mech Des 132(10):101006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Taflanidis A (2019) Multi-objective optimization for design under uncertainty problems through surrogate modeling in augmented input space. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(2):351–372

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, King M, Hyndman R (2006) A Bayesian approach to bandwidth selection for multivariate kernel density estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal 50(11):3009–3031

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang L, Sørensen J (2020) AKOIS: an adaptive Kriging oriented importance sampling method for structural system reliability analysis. Struct Saf 82:10876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wang J, Jiang C, Huang Z (2019) A new uncertainty propagation method considering multimodal probability density functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(5):1983–1999

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Choi K, Lee I, Gorsich D (2013) Conservative surrogate model using weighted Kriging variance for sampling-based RBDO. J Mech Des 135(9):091003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Qiu Z (2018) Non-probabilistic stability reliability analysis of composite laminated panels in supersonic flow with uncertain-but-bounded parameters. In: 2018 AIAA non-deterministic approaches conference, p 0438

  • Zhou T, Peng Y (2020) Structural reliability analysis via dimension reduction, adaptive sampling, and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62(5):2629–2651

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XY, Ruan X, Gosling P (2019a) Robust design optimization of variable angle tow composite plates for maximum buckling load in the presence of uncertainties. Compos Struct 223:110985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Lu Z (2019) Active polynomial chaos expansion for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 57(12):5431–5446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Lu Z, Cheng K (2019b) Sparse polynomial chaos expansions for global sensitivity analysis with partial least squares and distance correlation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(1):229–247

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P, Shi L, Yang R, Lin S (2015) A new sampling-based RBDO method via score function with reweighting scheme and application to vehicle designs. Appl Math Model 39(15):4243–4256

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z, Du X (2016) Reliability analysis with Monte Carlo simulation and dependent Kriging predictions. J Mech Des 138(12):121403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann H (2001) Fuzzy analysis. In: Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Springer, Dordrecht

  • Zio E, Pedroni N (2013) Literature review of methods for representing uncertainty. FonCSI

  • Zou T, Mahadevan S (2006) A direct decoupling approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 31(3):190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zougab N, Adjabi S, Kokonendji C (2014) Bayesian estimation of adaptive bandwidth matrices in multivariate kernel density estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal 75:28–38

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zuev K, Beck J, Au S, Katafygiotis L (2012) Bayesian post-processor and other enhancements of subset simulation for estimating failure probabilities in high dimensions. Comput Struct 92:283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors dedicate this paper to Prof. Raphael T. Haftka, who worked extensively on topics related to uncertainties for over 3 decades leading to more than 100 contributions in applications spanning from structural composites to turbomachines and material models. He was a prolific collaborator and worked with numerous colleagues from other universities and countries. In that regard, this paper reflects such an effort with collaborators from three different countries/universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EA—Entire manuscript curation, writing Uncertainty modeling, review & editing entire manuscript, resources; GB—Writing, review & editing Uncertainty modeling; YJ—Writing, review & editing Design optimization under uncertainties; IL—Entire manuscript curation, writing Design optimization under uncertainties, review & editing entire manuscript, resources; PR—Entire manuscript curation, writing Uncertainty analysis, review & editing entire manuscript, resources; SSR—Writing, review & editing Uncertainty analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Palaniappan Ramu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Replication of results

In this review paper, we do not provide any results to replicate.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Pingfeng Wang.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Special Issue dedicated to Dr. Raphael T. Haftka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acar, E., Bayrak, G., Jung, Y. et al. Modeling, analysis, and optimization under uncertainties: a review. Struct Multidisc Optim 64, 2909–2945 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03026-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03026-7

Keywords

Navigation