Abstract
Mate choice is generally costly to the choosy sex, so fitness benefits must counterbalance these costs. Genetic benefits of choice are widely examined and have received overall support. Direct benefits such as high quality parental care by highly ornamented individuals are widely assumed to be important but are less frequently tested, theoretically debated, and their support in the recent literature is unknown. Furthermore, in taxa where both sexes provide care, the preferential investment of the partner in relation to ornamentation may reduce own investment and modify apparent parental care quality. In a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis, we collated correlative results from birds concerning parental plumage coloration and the nestling feeding rates of the ornament bearer and its partner. Overall evidence was weak for signalling of parental care quality and somewhat stronger for preferential partner investment. Surprisingly, the sex of the signaller and the type of plumage colour seemed to exert weak effects on the signalling of parental care quality. Finally, there was a group of cases with opposite relationships of care and ornamentation in the two parties. We found that this group arose predominately from preferential partner investment in relation to ornamentation, with concomitant, but weaker, reduction of own investment. We conclude that the effect of partner investment on parental care indication seems system-specific and needs further study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonzo SH (2012) Sexual selection favours male parental care, when females can choose. Proc R Soc B 279:1784–1790
Andersson S, Örnborg J, Andersson M (1998) Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc R Soc B 265:445–450
Badyaev AV (1997) Covariation between life history and sexually selected traits: an example with cardueline finches. Oikos 80:128–138
Badyaev AV, Hill GE (2002) Paternal care as a conditional strategy: distinct reproductive tactics associated with elaboration of plumage ornamentation in the house finch. Behav Ecol 13:591–597
Balenger SL, Johnson LS, Brubaker JL, Ostlind E (2007) Parental effort in relation to structural plumage coloration in the mountain bluebird (Sialia currucoides). Ethology 113:838–846
Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101
Blas J, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Bortolotti GR, Viñuela J, Marchant TA (2006) Testosterone increases bioavailability of carotenoids: insights into the honesty of sexual signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18633–18637
Both C, Visser ME (2001) Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird. Nature 411:296–298
Costa FJV, Macedo RHF (2005) Coccidian oocyst parasitism in the blue-black grassquit: influence on secondary sex ornaments and body condition. Anim Behav 70:1401–1409
Diniz P, Ramos DM, Macedo RH (2015) Attractive males are less than adequate dads in a multimodal signalling passerine. Anim Behav 102:109–117
Ducrest AL, Keller L, Roulin A (2008) Pleiotropy in the melanocortin system, coloration and behavioural syndromes. Trends Ecol Evol 23:502–510
Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Pitcher TE (2001) Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55:161–175
Freckleton RP (2009) The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis. J Evol Biol 22:1367–1375
García-Navas V, Sanz JJ (2010) Flexibility in the foraging behavior of blue tits in response to short-term manipulations of brood size. Ethology 116:744–754
García-Navas V, Ferrer ES, Sanz JJ (2012) Plumage yellowness predicts foraging ability in the blue tit. Biol J Linn Soc 106:418–429
García-Navas V, García del Rincon A, Ferrer ES, Fathi H (2013) Mating strategies, parental investment and mutual ornamentation in Iberian Rock Sparrows (Petronia petronia). Behaviour 150:1641–1663
Germain RR, Reudink MW, Marra PP, Ratcliffe LM (2010) Carotenoid-based male plumage predicts parental investment in the American Redstart. Wilson J Ornithol 122:318–325
Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212
Griffith SC, Parker TH, Olson VA (2006) Melanin-versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? Anim Behav 71:749–763
Griggio M, Zanollo V, Hoi H (2010) Female ornamentation, parental quality, and competitive ability in the rock sparrow. J Ethol 28:455–462
Guindre-Parker S, Love OP (2014) Revisiting the condition-dependence of melanin-based plumage. J Avian Biol 45:29–33
Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Software 33:1–22
Hadfield JD, Nakagawa S (2010) General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J Evol Biol 23:494–508
Harrison F, Barta Z, Cuthill I, Székely T (2009) How is sexual conflict over parental care resolved? J Evol Biol 22:1800–1812
Hill GE, McGraw KJ (2006) Bird coloration, Vol. 2. Function and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Hoelzer GA (1989) The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav 38:1067–1078
Houston AI, Székely T, McNamara JM (2005) Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol Evol 20:33–38
Horváthová T, Nakagawa S, Uller T (2012) Strategic female reproductive investment in response to male attractiveness in birds. Proc R Soc B 279:163–170
Jacot A, Romero-Diaz C, Tschirren B, Richner H, Fitze PS (2010) Dissecting carotenoid from structural components of carotenoid-based coloration: a field experiment with great tits (Parus major). Am Nat 176:55–62
Jennions MD, Møller AP, Petrie M (2001) Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Q Rev Biol 76:3–36
Jawor JM, Gray N, Beall SM, Breitwisch R (2004) Multiple ornaments correlate with aspects of condition and behaviour in female northern cardinals, Cardinalis cardinalis. Anim Behav 67:875–882
Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444–448
Johnsen A, Delhey K, Schlicht E, Peters A, Kempenaers B (2005) Male sexual attractiveness and parental effort in blue tits: a test of the differential allocation hypothesis. Anim Behav 70:877–888
Jones AG, Ratterman NL (2009) Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10001–10008
Kemp DJ, Rutowski RL (2011) The role of coloration in mate choice and sexual interactions in butterflies. Adv Stud Behav 43:55–92
Kelly NB, Alonzo SH (2009) Will male advertisement be a reliable indicator of paternal care, if offspring survival depends on male care? Proc R Soc B 276:3175–3183
Kelly NB, Alonzo SH (2010) Does a trade-off between current reproductive success and survival affect the honesty of male signalling in species with male parental care? J Evol Biol 23:2461–2473
Keyser AJ, Hill GE (1999) Condition-dependent variation in the blue-ultraviolet coloration of a structurally based plumage ornament. Proc R Soc B 266:771–777
Kokko H (1998) Should advertising parental care be honest? Proc R Soc B 265:1871–1878
Kokko H, Jennions MD (2008) Parental investment, sexual selection, and sex ratios. J Evol Biol 21:919–948
Liker A, Székely T (2005) Mortality costs of sexual selection and parental care in natural populations of birds. Evolution 59:890–897
Limbourg T, Mateman AC, Lessells CM (2013) Parental care and UV coloration in blue tits: opposite correlations in males and females between provisioning rate and mate’s coloration. J Avian Biol 44:17–26
Linville SU, Breitwisch R, Schilling AJ (1998) Plumage brightness as an indicator of parental care in northern cardinals. Anim Behav 55:119–127
Lozano GA, Lemon RE (1996) Male plumage, paternal care and reproductive success in yellow warblers, Dendroica petechia. Anim Behav 51:265–272
Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2015) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 3.03. http://mesquiteproject.org
Maguire SE, Safran RJ (2010) Morphological and genetic predictors of parental care in the North American barn swallow Hirundo rustica erythrogaster. J Avian Biol 41:74–82
Matysioková B, Remeš V (2014) The importance of having a partner: male help releases females from time limitation during incubation in birds. Front Zool 11:24
McGraw KJ (2007) Dietary mineral content influences the expression of melanin-based ornamental coloration. Behav Ecol 18:137–142
Meunier J, Pinto SF, Burri R, Roulin A (2011) Eumelanin-based coloration and fitness-parameters in birds: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:559–567
Mitchell DP, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Freeman-Gallant CR (2007) Attractive males provide less parental care in two populations of the common yellowthroat. Anim Behav 73:165–170
Møller AP, Alatalo RV (1999) Good genes effects in sexual selection. Proc R Soc B 266:85–91
Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001) How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88:401–415
Møller AP, Thornhill R (1998) Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection. Anim Behav 55:1507–1515
Møller AP, Barbosa A, Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Merino S, Saino N (1998) Sexual selection and tail streamers in the barn swallow. Proc R Soc B 265:409–414
Møller AP, Biard C, Blount JD, Houston DC, Ninni P, Saino N, Surai PF (2000) Carotenoid-dependent signals: indicators of foraging efficiency, immunocompetence or detoxification ability? Avian Poult Biol Rev 11:137–159
Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82:591–605
Nakagawa S, Santos ESA (2012) Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis. Evol Ecol 26:1253–1274
Nakagawa S, Ockendon N, Gillespie DO, Hatchwell BJ, Burke T (2007) Does the badge of status influence parental care and investment in house sparrows? An experimental test. Oecologia 153:749–760
Nordeide JT, Kekalainen J, Janhunen M, Kortet R (2012) Female ornaments revisited—are they correlated with offspring quality? J Anim Ecol 82:26–38
Norris KJ (1990) Female choice and the quality of parental care in the great tit Parus major. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:275–281
Olson VA, Owens IPF (1998) Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? Trends Ecol Evol 13:510–514
Pagani-Núñez E, Senar JC (2014) Are colorful males of great tits Parus major better parents? Parental investment is a matter of quality. Acta Oecol 55:23–28
Post P, Götmark F (2006) Foraging behavior and predation risk in male and female Eurasian Blackbirds (Turdus merula) during the breeding season. Auk 123:162–170
Poston JP, Hasselquist D, Stewart IRK, Westneat DF (2005) Dietary amino acids influence plumage traits and immune responses of male house sparrows, Passer domesticus, but not as expected. Anim Behav 70:1171–1181
Prokop ZM, Michalczyk Ł, Drobniak SM, Herdegen M, Radwan J (2012) Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than “good genes”. Evolution 66:2665–2673
Radesäter T, Jakobsson S (1989) Song rate correlations of replacement territorial willow warblers Phylloscopus trochilus. Ornis Scand 20:71–73
Rohde PA, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT (1999) Female plumage coloration in the bluethroat: no evidence for an indicator of maternal quality. Condor 101:96–104
Roulin A, Dijkstra C, Riols C, Ducrest AL (2001) Female- and male-specific signals of quality in the barn owl. J Evol Biol 14:255–266
Rosenthal R (1991) Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Sage, New York
Sejberg D, Bensch S, Hasselquist D (2000) Nestling provisioning in polygynous great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus): do males bring larger prey to compensate for fewer nest visits? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:213–219
Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 15:397–402
Siefferman L, Hill GE (2003) Structural and melanin coloration indicate parental effort and reproductive success in male eastern bluebirds. Behav Ecol 14:855–861
Siefferman L, Hill GE (2005) Evidence for sexual selection on structural plumage coloration in female eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Evolution 59:1819–1828
Siefferman L, Hill GE (2007) The effect of rearing environment on blue structural coloration of eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1839–1846
Slagsvold T, Dale S (1996) Disappearance of female Pied Flycatchers in relation to breeding stage and experimentally induced molt. Ecology 77:461–471
Slatyer RA, Mautz BS, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD (2012) Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biol Rev 87:1–33
Smiseth PT, Örnborg J, Andersson S, Amundsen T (2001) Is male plumage reflectance correlated with paternal care in bluethroats? Behav Ecol 12:164–170
Snowberg LK, Benkman CW (2009) Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait. J Evol Biol 22:762–769
Soler JJ, Moreno J (2012) Evolution of sexual dichromatism in relation to nesting habits in European passerines: a test of Wallace’s hypothesis. J Evol Biol 25:1614–1622
Soma M, Garamszegi LZ (2011) Rethinking birdsong evolution: meta-analysis of the relationship between song complexity and reproductive success. Behav Ecol 22:363–371
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J Roy Statist Soc B 64:583–639
Székely T, Remeš S, Freckleton RP, Liker A (2013) Why care? Inferring the evolution of complex social behaviour. J Evol Biol 26:1381–1391
Studd MV, Robertson RJ (1985) Sexual selection and variation in reproductive strategy in yellow warblers (Dendroica petechia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:101–109
Sundberg J, Larsson C (1994) Male coloration as an indicator of parental quality in the yellowhammer, Emberiza citrinella. Anim Behav 48:885–892
Tarof SA, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA (2005) Dual functions of a melanin-based ornament in the common yellowthroat. Proc R Soc B 272:1121–1127
Uy JAC, Patricelli GL, Borgia G (2001) Complex mate searching in the satin bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Am Nat 158:530–542
Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Statist Software 36:1–48
Vitousek MN, Mitchell MA, Woakes AJ, Niemack MD, Wikelski M (2007) High costs of female choice in a lekking lizard. PLoS ONE 2(6):e567
Voltura KM, Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW (2002) Parental feeding rates in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus: are larger-badged males better fathers? Ethology 108:1011–1022
Walker LK, Stevens M, Karadas F, Kilner RM, Ewen JG (2013) A window on the past: male ornamental plumage reveals the quality of their early-life environment. Proc R Soc B 280:20122852
Wiehn J (1997) Plumage characteristics as an indicator of male parental quality in the American kestrel. J Avian Biol 28:47–55
Wolf JB, Moore AJ, Brodie ED (1997) The evolution of indicator traits for parental quality: the role of maternal and paternal effects. Am Nat 150:639–649
Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Moore AJ (1999) The role of maternal and paternal effects in the evolution of parental quality by sexual selection. J Evol Biol 12:1157–1167
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to A. Dreiss, V. García-Navas, A. Johnsen, A. Roulin and L. Siefferman for providing unpublished information for the effect size calculation. We are indebted to L.Z. Garamszegi for detailed guidance on statistics and E. Szász and W. Müller for insightful comments on the material.
Funding
This research was funded by OTKA grant K101611 to G.H. and a PhD scholarship to D.K. from the Eötvös Loránd University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by: Alexandre Roulin
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hegyi, G., Kötél, D. & Laczi, M. Direct benefits of mate choice: a meta-analysis of plumage colour and offspring feeding rates in birds. Sci Nat 102, 62 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-015-1311-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-015-1311-6