Abstract
Theory predicts that traits which signal parental quality might evolve in males of species with biparental care. In avian species, male ornaments may be the most likely candidates for such signals. Male house sparrows (Passer domesticus) possess a black throat patch often referred to as a “badge” or a “badge of status”. By assuming a trade-off between male attractiveness (reflected in male ornaments) and parental care under the differential allocation hypothesis, we predicted that badge size would be negatively correlated with male parental investment. An experiment in which the badge was enlarged in one group and unchanged in a control group was conducted. Our manipulation was predicted to affect female as well as male parental investment. However, we found that eight variables associated with parental investment—the start date for breeding, clutch size, male and female incubation time, male and female food provisioning rate, and average chick weight and the number of fledglings—barely differed between treatments. Also, little evidence for correlations between natural variation in badge size and any of these eight variables was found. Instead, the start date for breeding and the number of fledglings were significantly correlated with both male and female age, while clutch size increased with female age. Female condition was a positive predictor of clutch size and number of fledglings. Female tarsus length, unexpectedly, is related to both male and female incubation time. Badge size was also positively correlated with male age. However, parental age (male or female) was not related to parental care. We conclude that badge size does not signal parental quality, but that the ages of both sexes and the condition of the female play significant roles in the reproductive performance of this species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson TR (2006) Biology of the ubiquitous house sparrow. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Badyaev AV, Hill GE (2002) Paternal care as a conditional strategy: distinct reproductive tactics associated with elaboration of plumage ornamentation in the house finch. Behav Ecol 13:591–597
Becker WA (1984) Manual of quantitative genetics. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA
Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A (1996) Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol J Linn Soc 58:385–399
Brooks R, Kemp DJ (2001) Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends Ecol Evol 16:308
Buchanan KL, Evans MR, Goldsmith AR, Bryant DM, Rowe LV (2001) Testosterone influences basal metabolic rate in male house sparrows: a new cost of dominance signalling? Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1337–1344
Burley N (1986) Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat 127:415–445
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
Evans MR, Goldsmith AR, Norris SRA (2000) The effects of testosterone on antibody production and plumage coloration in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:156–163
Forslund P, Pärt T (1995) Age and reproduction in birds–hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol Evol 10:374
Gonzalez G, Sorci G, Smith LC, de Lope F (2001) Testosterone and sexual signalling in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:557–562
Gonzalez G, Sorci G, Smith LC, de Lope F (2002) Social control and physiological cost of cheating in status signalling male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Ethology 108:289–302
Götmark F (1993) An experimental study of the importance of plumage coloration in breeding males of the white-crowned sparrow. Ornis Scand 24:149–154
Green AJ (2001) Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 82:1473–1483
Griffith SC (2000) A trade-off between reproduction and a condition-dependent sexually selected ornament in the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1115–1119
Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Burke T (1999a) Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature 400:358–360
Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Burke T (1999b) Female choice and annual reproductive success favour less-ornamented male house sparrows. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:765–770
Griffith SC, Stewart IRK, Dawson DA, Owens IPF, Burke T (1999c) Contrasting levels of extra-pair paternity in mainland and island populations of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): is there an “island effect”? Biol J Linn Soc 68:303–316
Hatchwell BJ, Davies NB (1990) Provisioning of nestlings by dunnocks, Prunella modularis, in pairs and trios compensation reactions by males and females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:199–209
Hegner RE, Wingfield JC (1987) Effects of experimental manipulation of testosterone levels on parental investment and breeding success in male house sparrows. Auk 104:462–469
Hepp GR, Folk TH, Manlove CA (2005) Nest temperature, incubation period, and investment decisions of incubating wood ducks Aix sponsa. J Avian Biol 36:523–530
Heywood JS (1989) Sexual selection by the handicap mechanism. Evolution 43:1387–1397
Hoelzer GA (1989) The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav 38:1067–1078
Houston AI, Davies NB (1985) The evolution of cooperation and life history in the dunnock. In: Sibly RM, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 471–481
Houston AI, Székely T, McNamara JM (2005) Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol Evol 20:33–38
Jarvinen A (1991) A meta-analytic study of the effects of female age on laying date and clutch size in the great tit Parus major and the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ibis 133:62–66
Jensen H, Sæther BE, Ringsby TH, Tufto J, Griffith SC, Ellegren H (2003) Sexual variation in heritability and genetic correlations of morphological traits in house sparrow (Passer domesticus). J Evol Biol 16:1296–1307
Jensen H, Svorkmo-Lundberg T, Ringsby TH, Sæther BE (2006) Environmental influence and cohort effects in a sexual ornament in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus. Oikos 114:212–224
Kokko H (1998) Should advertising parental care be honest? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1871–1878
Langmore NE, Davies NB (1997) Female dunnocks use vocalizations to compete for males. Anim Behav 53:881
Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities—a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121
Liker A, Barta Z (2001) Male badge size predicts dominance against females in house sparrows. Condor 103:151–157
Marchetti K, Price T (1989) Differences in the foraging of juvenile and adult birds—the importance of developmental constraints. Biol Rev 64:51–70
Mazuc J, Chastel O, Sorci G (2003) No evidence for differential maternal allocation to offspring in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol 14:340–346
McNamara JM, Gasson CE, Houston AI (1999) Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games. Nature 401:368–371
Møller AP (1987) Variation in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling. Anim Behav 35:1637–1644
Møller AP (1988) Badge size in the house sparrow Passer domesticus: effects of intra-and intersexual selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:373–378
Nakagawa S (2004) A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol 15:1044–1045
Nakagawa S, Burke T (2007) The mask of seniority? A neglected age indicator in house sparrows, Passer domesticus. J Avian Biol (in press)
Nakagawa S, Ockendon N, Gillespie DOS, Hatchwell BJ, Burke T (2007) Assessing the function of house sparrows’ bib size using a flexible meta-analysis method. Behav Ecol (in press) doi:10.1093/beheco/arm050
Ockendon N (2003) Genetic diversity and sexual selection in an isolated population of house sparrows. Department of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Petrie M (1983) Female moorhens compete for small fat males. Science 220:413–415
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New York
Pyle P, Spear LB, Sydeman WJ, Ainley DG (1991) The effects of experience and age on the breeding performance of western gulls. Auk 108:25–33
Qvarnström A, Forsgren E (1998) Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol Evol 13:498–501
R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rohwer SA (1975) The social significance of avian winter plumage variability. Evolution 29:593–610
Rosenthal R (1994) Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV (eds) The handbook of research synthesis. Sage, New York, pp 231–244
Sætre GP, Fossnes T, Slagsvold T (1995) Food provisioning in the pied flycatcher—do females gain direct benefits from choosing bright-colored males? J Anim Ecol 64:21–30
Schwagmeyer PL, Schwabl HG, Mock DW (2005) Dynamics of biparental care in house sparrows: hormonal manipulations of paternal contributions. Anim Behav 69:481–488
Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Senar JC (1999) Plumage coloration as a signal of social status. In: Adams NJ, Slotow RH (eds) Proceedings of the 22nd International Ornithology Congress. Birdlife South Africa, Johannesbrug, pp 1669–1686
Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 15:397–402
Smiseth PT, Ornborg J, Andersson S, Amundsen T (2001) Is male plumage reflectance correlated with paternal care in bluethroats? Behav Ecol 12:164–170
Smithson M (2003) Confidence intervals. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Soma KK, Hartman VN, Wingfield JC, Brenowitz EA (1999) Seasonal changes in androgen receptor immunoreactivity in the song nucleus HVc of a wild bird. J Comp Neurol 409:224–236
Strasser R, Schwabl H (2004) Yolk testosterone organizes behavior and male plumage coloration in house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:491–497
Summers-Smith D (1963) The house sparrow. Collins, London
Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines, 4th edn. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, UK
Václav R, Hoi H (2002) Different reproductive tactics in house sparrows signalled by badge size: is there a benefit to being average? Ethology 108:569–582
Veiga JP (1993) Badge size, phenotypic quality, and reproductive success in the house sparrow: a study on honest advertisement. Evolution 47:1161–1170
Voltura KM, Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW (2002) Parental feeding rates in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus: are larger-badged males better fathers? Ethology 108:1011–1022
Wetton JH, Burke T, Parkin DT, Cairns E (1995) Single locus DNA fingerprinting reveals that male reproductive success increases with age through extra-pair paternity in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Proc R Soc Lond B 260:91–98
Wingfield JC, Ball GF, Duffy AMJ, Hegner RE, Ramenofsky M (1987) Testosterone and agression in birds. Am Sci 75:602–608
Wolf JB, Moore AJ, Brodie III ED (1997) The evolution of indicator traits for parental quality: the role of maternal and paternal effects. Am Nat 150:639–649
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Michael Griesser, Wolfgang Forstmeier, and three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. We especially thank Cassie Schwanger and Scott Sapoznick, and also Jenny Carpenter, Jin-Won Lee, Beth Woodward, Sara Calhim, and Stuart Sharp for invaluable help in the field. We are also grateful for the Landmark Trust and Lundy Company for allowing us to work on Lundy Island. S.N. is supported by the New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission. We declare that the experimental work reported in this study complied with the current laws of the United Kingdom.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Roland Brandl.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakagawa, S., Ockendon, N., Gillespie, D.O.S. et al. Does the badge of status influence parental care and investment in house sparrows? An experimental test. Oecologia 153, 749–760 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0765-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0765-4