Abstract
The Clifford algebraic formulation of the Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau (DKP) algebras is applied to recast the De Donder–Weyl Hamiltonian (DWH) theory as an algebraic description independent of the matrix representation of the DKP algebra. We show that the DWH equations for antisymmetric fields arise out of the action of the DKP algebra on certain invariant subspaces of the Clifford algebra which carry the representations of the fields. The matrix representation-free formula for the bracket associated with the DKP form of the DWH equations is also derived. This bracket satisfies a generalization of the standard properties of the Poisson bracket.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See footnote\(^3\).
In the applications considered here \({\mathbb {F}}\) can be assumed to be \({\mathbb {R}}\) or \({\mathbb {C}}\).
A split bilinear form on W implies that W is hyperbolic [39].
The negative sign in front of the metric is sometimes used in the case of the Clifford algebra relations in order to simplify the correspondence with quaternions: \(vw+wv=-2g(v,w)\), with g(v, w) the Euclidean metric.
References
Awane, A., Goze, M.: Pfaffian Systems, \(k\)-Symplectic Systems. Springer, Berlin (2000)
Becher, P., Joos, H.: The Dirac–Kähler equation and fermions on the lattice. Z. Phys. C 15, 343–365 (1982). (see also:)
Benn, I.M., Tucker, R.W.: Fermions without spinors. Commun. Math. Phys. 89, 341–362 (1983)
Benn, I.M., Tucker, R.W.: An Introduction to Spinors and Geometry with Applications in Physics. Adam Hilger, Bristol (1987)
Bergdolt, G.: Projector bases and algebraic spinors. J. Math. Phys. 29, 2519–2522 (1988)
Bergdolt, G.: The complete reduction of Clifford algebras. J. Math. Phys. 34, 5924–5934 (1993)
Carathéodory, C.: Über die Variationsrechnung bei mehrfachen Integralen. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 4, 193–216 (1929)
Cartan, E.: The Theory of Spinors. Dover Publications, New York (1966)
Corson, I.: Introduction to Tensors, Spinors, and Relativistic Wave equations. Benjamon Press, New York (1953)
De Donder, T.: Théorie Invariantive du Calcul des Variations. Gauthiers-Villars, Paris (1935)
de León, M., McLean, M., Norris, L.K., Rey-Roca, A., Salgado, M.: Geometric structures in field theory. arXiv:math-ph/0208036v1
de León, M., Salgado, M.M., Vilariño, S.: Methods of Differential Geometry in Classical Field Theories, \(k\)-Symplectic and \(k\)-Cosymplectic Approaches. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Hackensack, NJ (2016)
Deligne, P.: Notes on spinors. In: Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1999)
Duffin, R.J.: On the characteristic matrices of covariant systems. Phys. Rev. 54, 1114–1114 (1938)
Esen, O., de León, M., Sardón, C., Zajac, M.: The globalization problem of the Hamilton–DeDonder–Weyl equations on a local \(k\)-symplectic framework. Mediterr. J. Math 18, 26 (2021)
Fernandes, M.C.B., Vianna, J.D.M.: On the Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau algebra and the generalized phase space. Braz. J. Phys. 28(4), 487–495 (1998)
Fernandes, M.C.B., Vianna, J.D.M.: On the generalized phase space approach to Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau particles. Found. Phys. 29, 201–219 (1999)
Fernandes, M.C.B., Santana, A.E., Vianna, J.D.M.: Galilean Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau algebra and symplectic structure. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 3841–3854 (2003)
Gawȩdski, K.: On the geometrization of the canonical formalism in the classical field theory. Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 307–326 (1972)
Giachetta, G., Mangiarotti, L., Sardanashvily, G.: New Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Methods in Field Theoy. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)
Good, R.H., Jr.: Hamiltonian mechanics of fields. Phys. Rev. 93, 239–243 (1954)
Gotay, M.J., Isenberg, J., Marsden J.E.: Momentum maps and classical relativistic fields, part I: covariant field theory. arXiv:physics/9801019v2
Hestenes, D.: Space-Time Algebra. Gordon and Breach, New York (1966)
Kanatchikov, I.V.: From the DeDonder–Weyl Hamiltonian formalism to quantization of gravity. arXiv:gr-qc/9810076
Kanatchikov, I.V.: Canonical structure of classical field theory in the polymomentum phase space. Rep. Math. Phys. 41, 49–90 (1998)
Kanatchikov, I.V.: On the Duffin–Kemmer–Petiau formulation of the covariant Hamiltonian dynamics in field theory. Rep. Math. Phys. 46, 107–112 (2000)
Kanatchikov, I.V.: Precanonical perspective in quantum gravity. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 88, 326–330 (2000)
Kanatchikov, I.V.: Precanonical quantum gravity: quantization without the space-time decomposition. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 40, 1121–1149 (2001)
Kanatchikov, I.V.: De Donder–Weyl Hamiltonian formulation and precanonical quantization of vielbein gravity. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 442, 012041 (2013)
Kanatchikov, I.V.: On the spectrum of DW Hamiltonian of quantum \(\rm SU(2)\) gauge field. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 14, 1750123 (2017)
Kanatchikov, I.V.: Schrödinger Wave functional in quantum Yang–Mills theory from precanonical quantization. Rep. Math. Phys. 82, 373–388 (2018)
Kanatchikov, I.V.: Precanonical structure of the Schrödinger wave functional of a quantum scalar field in curved space-time. Symmetry 11, 1413 (2019)
Kastrup, H.: Canonical theories of Lagrangian dynamical systems in physics. Phys. Rep. 101, 1–167 (1983)
Kemmer, N.: The particle aspect of meson theory. Proc. R. Soc. (Lond.) A173, 91–116 (1939)
Kemmer, N.: The algebra of meson matrices. Proc. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 39, 189–196 (1943)
Kijowski, J.: A finite-dimensional canonical formalism in the classical field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 30, 99–128 (1973)
Kijowski, J., Szczyrba, W.: A canonical structure for classical field theories. Commun. Math. Phys. 46, 183–206 (1976)
Kijowski, J., Tulczyjew, W.M.: A Dymplectic Framework for Field Theories. Springer, Berlin (1979)
Lam, T.Y.: The Algebraic Theory of Quadratic Forms. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Reading (1973)
Marsden, J.E., Montgomery, R.: Covariant Poisson brackets for classical fields. Ann. Phys. 169, 29–47 (1986)
Meinrenken, E.: Clifford Algebras and Lie Theory. Springer, New York (2013)
Paufler, C., Römer, H.: De Donder–Weyl equations and multisymplectic geometry. Rep. Math. Phys. 49, 325–334 (2002)
Petiau, G.: Contribution à la théorie des équations d’ondes corpusculaires. Acad. R. Belg. A. Sci. Mem. Collect. 16(2), 118 (1936) [published in University of Paris thesis (1936)]
Pietrzyk, M.E.: Polysymplectic integrator for the short pulse equation and numerical general relativity. In: Bianchi, M., Jentzen, R.T., Ruffini, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, pp. 2677–2682. World Scientific (2017)
Riahi, N., Pietrzyk, M.E.: On the relation between the canonical Hamilton-Jacobi equation and the De Donder–Weyl Hamilton–Jacobi formulation in general relativity. Acta Phys. Pol. B Proc. Suppl. 13, 213–221 (2020)
Riesz, M.: Comptes Rendus 12me Cong. Math. Scand. 241–266 (1953)
Rünkla, M., Vilson, O.: Family of scalar-nonmetricity theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D 98, 084034 (2018)
Salingaros, N.A., Wene, G.P.: The Clifford algebra of differential forms. Acta Appl. Math. 4, 271–292 (1985)
Sanchez-Valenzuela, O.A., Zuazua-Vega, R.E.: Duffin–Kemmer algebras revisited. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 26, 4967–4990 (1993)
Schönberg, M.: Quantum kinematics and geometry. Nuovo Cim. VI supplem. n. 1, 356–380 (1957)
See also: Rosenfeld, B.A.: A History of Non-Euclidean Geometry: Evolution of the Concept of a Geometric Space. Springer, New York (1988)
Shimpuku, T.: Symmetric Algebra by Direct Product of Clifford Algebra. Seibunsha Publishers, Osaka (1988)
Śnyatycki, J.: On the geometric structure of classical field theory in Lagrangian formulation. Proc. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 68, 475–484 (1970)
Struckmeier, J., Redelbach, A.: Covariant Hamiltonian field theory. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 17, 435–491 (2008)
Tapia, V.: Covariant field theory and surface terms. Nuovo Cim. 102B, 123–130 (1988)
Tulczyjew, W.M.: Warsaw seminar in geometry of phase space (1968) (unpublished)
Vey, D.: Multisymplectic formulation of vielbein gravity: I. De Donder–Weyl formulation, Hamiltonian \((n-1)\)-forms. Class. Quantum Gravity 32, 095005 (2015)
Weyl, H.: Geodesic fields in the calculus of variation for multiple integrals. Ann. Math. 36(3), 607–629 (1935)
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude to J. D. M. Vianna for bringing Ref. [50] to my attention in the early stages of my academic career and for the countless discussions on the fascinating insights into the geometric algebras contained in that reference. I also thank José F. R. Neto for reading early drafts of the manuscript and making useful remarks. Finally, I would also like to thank the referees for the comments and suggestions which greatly contributed to the improvement of this work. Special thanks are due to the editor for making the article better.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Jayme Vaz
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Multilinear Endomorphisms in \(\mathrm {G}_n\)
Appendix: Multilinear Endomorphisms in \(\mathrm {G}_n\)
In this Appendix we show that the splitting \(W=V\oplus V^*\) of the vector space W into two complementary Lagrangian subspaces V and \(V^*\) under the bilinear form, relation (1), in addition with the corresponding invariant projector (P), lead to a useful basis to expand the algebra \(\mathrm {G}_n\). The convenience of this type of basis is that it makes explicit the appearance of the spaces of algebraic spinors [5, 6, 8, 16, 50] in \(\mathrm {G}_n\). These spaces turn out to be the minimal left and right ideals of the algebra. We will also introduce the multi-index notation which is particularly useful when dealing with multilinear algebras.
1.1 The Projector Basis of the Split Form
Start with a dual basis \(e_1,\ldots , e_n\) and \(e^1,\ldots , e^n\) of vectors and covectors respectively of the complementary Lagrangian subspaces V and \(V^*\). Set the invariant projectors as follows,
where
and \(p=0,\ldots ,n\), \(\dim V =n\), with the convention that \(\Pi _{0}:=P= {{\mathcal {N}}}_{1}\cdots {{\mathcal {N}}}_{n}=e_{1}e^{1}\cdots e_{n}e^{n}\). Notice that the projectors (38) are not postulated but they are constructed from Clifford products of isotropic basis vectors. This construction is due to Schönberg [50].
A multi-index I of length k is a k-tuple of positive integers, say \(i_1 i_2\ldots i_k\), from the set \(\{1,2,\ldots ,\dim V\}\). We are going to denote them by the upper-case Roman letters and the associated indices will be denoted by the lower case letters. A multi-index I is said to have the length p if \(k=p\) in the k-tuple that represents I and in that case, we write \(|I|=p\) for the length of I. We will also use the summation convention for the multi-index.
Using the multi-index notation we rewrite Eqs. (38) and (39) accordingly,
where \(J=j_{1}\ldots j_{|J|}\); \(\overleftarrow{J}:=j_{|J|}\ldots j_1\) and \(|\overleftarrow{J}|=|J|=p\). The length |K| of the elements can only runs from 0 to dim V in the \(\mathrm {G}_n\) algebra.
As a consequence of the relations (2), (3), (4) and (6), the elements (39) satisfy the relation,
where \(\delta _{q,p'}\delta ^{j'_{1},\ldots ,j'_{p'}}_{k_1,\ldots ,k_q}\) denotes the generalized Kronecker deltas,
or succinctly stated,
where \(\Delta ^{J'}_{K}\equiv \delta ^{j'_{1},\ldots ,j'_{p'}}_{k_1,\ldots ,k_q}\).
Relation (41) or (42) shows that the set of \(2^{2n}\) elements (39) of \(\mathrm {G}_n\) with \(p,q=0,\ldots ,n\) and \(j_{1}<\cdots <j_{p}\), \(k_{1}<\cdots <k_{q}\), \(j, k=1,\ldots ,n\) are linearly independent and thus form a basis of \(\mathrm {G}_n\), which has dimension \(2^{2n}\).
In particular, the generators \((e_j)\) and \((e^j)\) can be retrieved from the basis elements \({}^{j_1,\ldots ,j_p}\!P_{k_q,\ldots ,k_1}\) by writing
which are seen to satisfy the defining relations (2)–(4) of the \(\mathrm {G}_n\) algebra according to multiplication (41) or (42). Any element of the \(\mathrm {G}_n\) algebra can be written in the basis \((^{J} P_{\overleftarrow{K}})\) as follows:
where we can recognize the coefficients \(A_{j_1,\ldots ,j_p}{}^{k_1,\ldots ,k_q}\) as tensor components. Note that, by writing all the terms of the sum explicitly there will occur all types of tensors including the zeroth rank elements regarded as the scalars, the mixed tensors and finally the antisymmetric ones, either covariant or contravariant up to rank n. The great advantage of studying the \(\mathrm {G}_n\) algebra in this basis is that by using the system of multilinear projectors \(\Pi _{|J|}\) we can easily project on tensor spaces of different lengths within \(\mathrm {G}_n\). One of the most important projectors is the minimal idempotent \(\Pi _0=(P)\). It projects \(\mathrm {G}_n\) onto its minimal left/right ideals. That is, take \(\Lambda \in \mathrm {G}_n\) written in the form (43) and compute the product or right projection \(\Lambda (\Pi _0)=\Lambda (P)\) using rules (41). The result is
Let us call the space of these elements \(\mathrm {G}_n(P)\). Such space is isomorphic to the direct sum of the linear spaces of homogeneous forms of all orders up to \(n=\dim V\). The set \(\mathrm {G}_n(P)\) is a minimal left ideal of \(\mathrm {G}_n\). Clearly, due to rules (41) one can easily check that the elements \(\Lambda \in \mathrm {G}_n\) are endomorphisms of \(\mathrm {G}_n(P)\). So \(\mathrm {G}_n(P)\) is the space of spinors of the vector space \(W=V\oplus V^{*}\) with which we started.
Upon left projection, the analogous arguments lead to the minimal right ideal \((P)\mathrm {G}_n\) which is the dual of \(\mathrm {G}_n(P)\).
It is common in the literature to define these spinors as elements of the Grassmann algebra of the Lagrangian subspace \(V^{*}\) of W [13, 41]. This Grassmann algebra turns out to be a Clifford module. The dual spinors belong to the Grassmann algebra of the complementary space V. These Clifford modules are isomorphic to the minimal left/right ideals of \(\mathrm {G}_n\). These minimal ideals are known as algebraic spinor spaces [5, 6, 8, 46, 50].
By using the system of multilinear projectors \(\Pi _p\), we see that the projection \(\Pi _p\mathrm {G}_n(P)\) is isomorphic to the space of homogeneous forms of order (rank) p. By using the \((\Pi _p)\) we can also write an element of \(\mathrm {G}_n(P)\) in a basis free form
where \(\Lambda \in \text {G}_n\).
From the multiplication rule (41) the following useful algebraic properties can be obtained which are used throughout the text
and
In plain words, \(\Pi _{|J|}\) changes to \(\Pi _{|J|+1}\) when it moves left past a covariant vector, and \(\Pi _{|J|}\) changes to \(\Pi _{|J|+1}\) when it moves right past a contravariant vector. We also assume that \(\Pi _{-1}=0\) and \(\Pi _{n+1}=0\).
1.2 Adjunction and Contraction
Two further operations in the algebra can be defined. The first operation is adjunction which is defined as follows [50],
and similarly,
and hence \((P)^{\dag }=(P)\). The adjunction is an involution of \(\mathrm {G}_n\). In the case of \(\mathrm {G}_n\) over the real numbers the adjunction becomes transposition which is an involution corresponding to the transformation \(v\rightarrow \sum v^i e^i\), \(\alpha \rightarrow \sum \alpha _i e_i\). In the complex case the involution corresponds to the transformation \(v\rightarrow \sum (v^i)^*e_i^{\dag }\) associated to a unitary metric \(g_{ij}=h_{ij}\) [50].
The other operation is contraction. Recall that the standard operation of contraction defined for tensors fields shrinks an (r, s) tensor to an \((r-1,s-1)\) tensor. For example, for (1, 1) tensor fields on a manifold M, the contraction shrinks into functions. It is defined as the \({\mathfrak {F}}(M)\)-linear map
for all one-forms \(\theta \) and vector fields X. In the local chart \((U,x^1\cdots x^n)\) we must have \({\mathbf {C}}(dx^i\otimes \partial _j)=\delta ^i_j\). So for a tensor field \(A \in {\mathfrak {T}}^1_1\), we obtain
Einstein summation rule has been employed.
In analogy with this operation on tensors, we define a similar operation of contraction in the algebra \(\mathrm {G}_n\). For example, for the elements \(A_i^j ({}^{i}\!P_{\!j})\) we define:
where the property (9) and the idempotency of (P) have been used. We extend the contraction operation to the basis elements of \(\mathrm {G}_n\) as follows:
with \(|J|=|K|=p\). This full contraction shrinks the elements \({}^{J}\!P_{\overleftarrow{K}}\) to products s(P) of the projectors P in the subspace of the scalars in \(\mathrm {G}_n\) with s an element of \({\mathbb {F}}\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandes, M. Clifford Algebraic Approach to the De Donder–Weyl Hamiltonian Theory. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 32, 23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00006-022-01202-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00006-022-01202-6