Skip to main content
Log in

A finite-dimensional canonical formalism in the classical field theory

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A canonical formalism based on the geometrical approach to the calculus of variations is given. The notion of multi-phase space is introduced which enables to define whole the canonical structure (physical quantities, Poisson bracket, canonical fields) without use of functional derivatives. All definitions are of pure geometrical (finite dimensional) character.

The observable algebra\(\mathcal{O}\) (physical quantities algebra) obtained here is much smaller then the algebra of all (sufficiently smooth) functionals on the space of states, derived from the standard infinite-dimensional formulation. As it is known, the latter is much too large for purposes of quantization. As the examples prove, our algebra\(\mathcal{O}\) could be an adequate start-point for quantization.

For simplifying the language the notion of observable-valued distribution is introduced. Many concrete physical examples are given. E.g. it is shown that some problems connected with gauge in electrodynamics are automatically solved in this approach. The introduced language allows to obtain the Noether theorem in a most natural way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergman, P. G.: Status of canonical quantization, preprint.

  2. Białynicki-Birula, I., Białynicka-Birula, Z.: Elektrodynamika Kwantowa, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Białynicki-Birula, I.: Gauge invariant canonical formalism, Reports on Math. Phys.1, 83–86 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Białynicki-Birula, I.: Solutions of the Equations of Motion in Classical and Quantum Theories. Ann. Phys.67, (1) 252–273 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop, R. L., Critenden, R. J.: Geometry of Manifolds. New York: Academic Press 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dedecker, P.: Calcul des variations, formes différentielles et champs géodésiques, Colloque International de Géometrie Différentielle. Straßbourg 1953.

  7. Eells, J., Jr.: On the geometry of function spaces. Symp. Inter. de Topologia Alg., Mexico 303–308, 1956–1958.

  8. Gawedzki, K.: On the geometrization of the canonical formalism in the classical field theory, Reports on Math. Phys. (in print).

  9. Kijowski, J.: Existence of differentiable structure in the set of submanifolds. Studia Math.33, 93–108 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kijowski, J.: On representation of functionals of local type by differential forms, Colloquium Mathematicum,26, 293–312 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marsden, J. E.: Generalized Hamiltonian Mechanics. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.28, 323–361 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marsden, J. E.: Hamiltonian One Parameter Groups. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.28, 362–394 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maurin, K.: Analiza, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Segal, J. E.: Mathematical Problems of Relativistic Physics, Proceedings of the Summer Seminar, Boulder, Colorado, 1960.

  15. Tulczyjew, W. M.: Seminar on Phase Space Theory. Warsaw 1968 (unpublished).

  16. Tulczyjew, W. M., Sniatycki, J.: Canonical dynamics of relativistic charged particles. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré A,15, 177–187 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kijowski, J. A finite-dimensional canonical formalism in the classical field theory. Commun.Math. Phys. 30, 99–128 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645975

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645975

Keywords

Navigation