Skip to main content

Generation Z and Beyond

Co-evolution of Human Capabilities and Intelligent Technologies in the Twenty-First Century

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the everyday human competences and capabilities needed to live and learn in a society that is driven by intelligent technologies. We claim that it is especially important to strengthen human capabilities so as to develop the skills to (a) adapt to new situations and tasks, (b) collaborate productively and proficiently, (c) develop socioemotional skills for tackling challenging problems, and (d) have the ability to take initiative, set goals, and monitor themselves and others. We introduce recent advancements in research on socially shared regulation in learning, which provides a framework for developing these competences. We discuss the role of technology in understanding and supporting socially shared regulation and conclude with a future perspective on how co-evolution of human capabilities and technologies can be enhanced for future learning and education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9035-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtiar, A., Webster, E. A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2018). Regulation and socio-emotional interactions in a positive and a negative group climate. Metacognition and Learning, 13(1), 57–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9178-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405–441. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1403_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fozdar, F., & Volet, S. (2012). Intercultural learning among community development students: Positive attitudes, ambivalent experiences. Community Development, 43, 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2011.621085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2010). The measurement of learners’ self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddington, P., Hirvonen, N., Hosio, S., Kinnula, M., Malmberg, J., Simonen, J., Seyfi, S., Ahola, S. Cortés Orduna, M., Enwald, H., Haukipuro, L. Heikkinen, M., Hermes, J. Huikari, S., Iivari, N., Järvelä, S., Kanste, O., Kokkola, L., Kunnari S, … Zabolotna, K. (2021). GenZ white paper: Strengthening human competences in the emerging digital era [White Paper]. University of Oulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 83–106). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Davis, S. K., Bakhtiar, A., & Winne, P. H. (2021). Academic challenges as opportunities to learn to self-regulate learning. In H. Askell-Williams & J. Orrell (Eds.), Problem solving for teaching and learning: A Festschrift for Emeritus Professor Mike Lawson. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400902

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Y. S., Wang, C. Y., & Zhang, W. X. (2017). Supporting technology-enhanced inquiry through metacognitive and cognitive prompts: Sequential analysis of metacognitive actions in response to mixed prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., & Järvelä, S. (2020). Cognitive and socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Exploring fluctuations in students’ participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 831–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1623310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Baker, M. J., & Lund, K. (2021). Social sensitivity: A manifesto for CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09344-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Hadwin, A. F., Malmberg, J., & Miller, M. (2018). Contemporary perspectives of regulated learning in collaboration. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, P. Reimann, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 127–136). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Gašević, D., Seppänen, T., Pechenizkiy, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Bridging learning sciences, machine learning and affective computing for understanding cognition and affect in collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2391–2406. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Sobocinski, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2021). Metacognition in collaborative learning. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Häkkinen, P., & Näykki, P. (2022). Computer supported collaborative learning. In International encyclopedia of education (4th ed.). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvenoja, H., Volet, S., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: An instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process. Educational Psychology, 33(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2012.742334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., Törmänen, T., Näykki, P., Malmberg, J., Kurki, K., Mykkänen, A., & Isohätälä, J. (2018). Capturing motivation and emotion regulation during a learning process. Frontline Learning Research, 6(3), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i3.369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2020a). Supporting groups’ emotion and motivation regulation during collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Törmänen, T., Mänty, K., Haataja, E., Ahola, S., & Järvelä, S. (2020b). A collaborative learning design for promoting and analyzing adaptive motivation and emotion regulation in the science classroom. Frontiers in Education, 5, 111. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Extending the SIPS-model: A research framework for online collaborative learning. In V. Pammer-Schindler, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, H. Drachsler, R. Elferink, & M. Scheffel (Eds.), ECTEL-2018: Lifelong technology-enhanced learning (pp. 277–290). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigsen, S. (2016). CSCL towards the future: The second decade of ijCSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9230-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Patterns in elementary school students’ strategic actions in varying learning situations. Instructional Science, 41(5), 933–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2015). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high-and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2–3), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9012-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, D. M., & King, R. B. (2018). Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 485–502). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey. (2017). Digitally-enabled automation and artificial intelligence: Shaping the future of work in Europe’s digital front-runners. McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnaert, A., Boekaerts, M., & De Brabander, C. (2007). Autonomy, competence, and social relatedness in task interest within project-based education. Psychological Reports, 101(2), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.101.2.574-586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2014). The social and interactive dimensions of collaborative learning. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 418–438). Cambridge UP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2011). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieger, E., & Bannert, M. (2018). Differential effects of students’ self-directed metacognitive prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-018

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2022). Introduction. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (3rd ed.). Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (2018). Historical, contemporary, and future perspectives on self-regulated learning and performance. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation and performance (pp. 1–15). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobocinski, M., Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Dindar, M., Isosalo, A., & Noponen, K. (2020). How does monitoring set the stage for adaptive regulation or maladaptive behavior in collaborative learning? A multimodal analysis. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09224-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törmänen, T., Järvenoja, H., & Mänty, K. (2021). All for one and one for all – How are students’ affective states and group-level emotion regulation interconnected in collaborative learning? International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uttamchandani, S., Bhimdiwala, A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2020). Finding a place for equity in CSCL: Ambitious learning practices as a lever for sustained educational change. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09325-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Li, S. (2021). The trade-off between individuals and groups: Role interactions under different technology affordance conditions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16, 525–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09355-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitebread, D., & Basilio. (2012). The emergence and early development of self-regulation in young children. PRO, 16(1), 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., Nesbit, J. C., & Popowich, F. (2017). nStudy: A system for researching information problem solving. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9327-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T. C., Chen, M. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2018). The influences of self-regulated learning support and prior knowledge on improving learning performance. Computers & Education, 126, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., & Yu, J. (2016). Exploring the behavioral patterns of co-regulation in mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0024-4

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanna Järvelä .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Järvelä, H. (2022). Generation Z and Beyond. In: Lee, W.O., Brown, P., Goodwin, A.L., Green, A. (eds) International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_115-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_115-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2327-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics