Abstract
Neuroscientific research has unequivocally pointed to the deeply social nature of human learning. Learning at the cognitive behavioral level is underpinned by neurophysiological changes in brain structure and connectivity across different parts of the brain as the learner interacts with others and the environment. Studies of epigenetic processes show that learning is dynamic, requiring learner engagement and contingent feedback. Agency, contingency and appropriate feedback are also keys to learning effectiveness at higher cognitive levels. The field of instructional design has traditionally focused on supporting the instructor, built on a model of learning as receiving instructions. Based on learning outcomes that are important for learners in the twenty-first century (communication, collaboration, creativity, critical thinking, and global competence), this model of learning support is outdated and irrelevant. This chapter begins with a review of key research directions in the deployment of technology-enhanced learning for infants and children based on neuroscience research, with a focus on social robots and serious games. It then reviews the challenges in the assessment and provision of learning support for collaborative problem-solving. The chapter ends by identifying some research directions for interdisciplinary collaboration among researchers in learning/instructional design and the science of learning that will help to advance theory and educational practice in collaborative problem-solving.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Social robots deployed for use by adults are primarily for therapeutic purposes in the service of senior adults.
References
Barab, S., Dodge, T., Tuzun, H., Job-Sluder, K., Carteaux Jr., R., Gilbertson, J., et al. (2007). The Quest Atlantis Project: A socially-responsive play space for learning. In B. E. Shelton & D. Wiley (Eds.), The design and use of simulation computer games in education (pp. 159–186). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_2
Bavelier, D., Achtman, R. L., Mani, M., & Föcker, J. (2012). Neural bases of selective attention in action video game players. Vision Research, 61, 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.007
Bavelier, D., & Davidson, R. J. (2013). Games to do you good. Nature, 494, 425. https://doi.org/10.1038/494425a
Bavelier, D., Green, C. S., Han, D. H., Renshaw, P. F., Merzenich, M. M., & Gentile, D. A. (2011). Brains on video games. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 763. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3135
Blakemore, S.-J. (2012). Development of the social brain in adolescence. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105(3), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110221
Blakemore, S.-J., Winston, J., & Frith, U. (2004). Social cognitive neuroscience: Where are we heading? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.012
Care, E., Griffin, P., Scoular, C., Awwal, N., & Zoanetti, N. (2015). Collaborative problem solving tasks. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 85–104). Dordrecht: Springer.
Chang, C.-W., Lee, J.-H., Wang, C.-Y., & Chen, G.-D. (2010). Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1572–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.023
Charsky, D. (2010). From edutainment to serious games: A change in the use of game characteristics. Games and Culture, 5(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412009354727
de Greeff, J., & Belpaeme, T. (2015). Why robots should be social: Enhancing machine learning through social human-robot interaction. PLOS One, 10(9), e0138061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138061
Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 253–273.
Donaldson, M. (Ed.). (1978). Children’s minds. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (Eds.). (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gee, J. P. (2011). Reflections on empirical evidence on games and learning. In J. D. Fletcher & S. Tobias (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 223–232). Charlotte, NC: IAP.
Gordon, G., Spaulding, S., Westlund, J. K., Lee, J. J., Plummer, L., Martinez, M., et al. (2016). Affective personalization of a social robot tutor for children’s second language skills. Paper presented at the 13th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Griffin, P., Care, E., & Harding, S. (2015). Task characteristics and calibration. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Dordrecht: Springer.
Griffiths, M. D. (2002). The educational benefits of videogames. Education and Health, 20(3), 47–51.
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (Ed.). (2013). The international handbook of collaborative learning. New York: Routledge.
Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.-S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
Koepp, M. J., Gunn, R. N., Lawrence, A. D., Cunningham, V. J., Dagher, A., Jones, T., et al. (1998). Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game. Nature, 393, 266. https://doi.org/10.1038/30498
Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., & Tan, Y. K. (2011). Towards an effective design of social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(4), 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0121-z
Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284–288.
Movellan, J. R., Eckhardt, M., Virnes, M., & Rodriguez, A. (2009). Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. Paper presented at the 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
Murad, S. S. (2017). Brain involvement in the use of games in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 7(6), 90. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v7n6p90
Nicaise, M., Gibney, T., & Crane, M. (2000). Toward an understanding of authentic learning: Student perceptions of an authentic classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009477008671
OECD (Ed.). (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume V): Collaborative Problem Solving. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
Park, H. W., Rosenberg-Kima, R., Rosenberg, M., Gordon, G., & Breazeal, C. (2017). Growing growth mindset with a social robot peer. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.
Pearce, S. (2016). Authentic learning: What, why and how? e-Teaching, 10.
Phillips, V., & Popović, Z. (2012). More than child’s play: Games have potential learning and assessment tools. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400207
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology (Woodbridge lectures; no. 8). New York: Columbia University Press.
Richert, R. A., Robb, M. B., & Smith, E. I. (2011). Media as social partners: The social nature of young children’s learning from screen media. Child Development, 82(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01542.x
Rochat, P. (Ed.). (2014). Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life. Hove: Psychology Press.
Romero, M., Usart, M., & Ott, M. (2015). Can serious games contribute to developing and sustaining 21st century skills? Games and Culture, 10(2), 148–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014548919
Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Development, 85(3), 956–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12166
Scassellati, B., Brawer, J., Tsui, K., Nasihati Gilani, S., Malzkuhn, M., Manini, B., et al.(2018). Teaching Language to Deaf Infants with a Robot and a Virtual Human. Paper presented at the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Singer, T. (2012). The past, present and future of social neuroscience: A European perspective. NeuroImage, 61(2), 437–449.
Stevens, R. H., Galloway, T., Berka, C., & Sprang, M. (2009). Can neurophysiologic synchronies provide a platform for adapting team performance? In International Conference on Foundations of Augmented Cognition (pp. 658–667). Berlin: Springer.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (Eds.). (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (Eds.). (2012). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
UNESCO. (2017).Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives (pp. 62). Paris: UNESCO.
Wendel, V., Hertin, F., Göbel, S., & Steinmetz, R. (2010). Collaborative learning by means of multiplayer serious games. Paper presented at the International Conference on Web-Based Learning.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge that this work is funded by the Research Grants Council of the HKSAR Government, #T44-707/16/N, under the Theme Based Research Scheme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Association for Educational Communications and Technology
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Law, N.W.Y., Tsang, H.W.C. (2019). Implications of Social Neuroscience for Learning Technology Research and Development. In: Parsons, T.D., Lin, L., Cockerham, D. (eds) Mind, Brain and Technology. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02631-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02631-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02630-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02631-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)