Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

H2 Producing Activity by Escherichia Coli During Mixed Carbon Fermentation at Slightly Alkaline and Acidic pHs: Novel Functions of Hydrogenase 4 (hyf) and Hydrogenase 2 (hyb)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Black Sea Energy Resource Development and Hydrogen Energy Problems

Abstract

Molecular hydrogen (H2) production by Escherichia coli was studied during mixed carbon (glucose and glycerol) fermentation at slightly alkaline (7.5) and acidic (5.5) pHs. Wild type cells, in the assays with glucose, produced H2 at pH 7.5 with the same level as cells grown on glucose. Compared to wild type, H2 production in fhlA and fhlA hyfG mutants decreased ~6.5 and ~7.9 fold, respectively. In wild type cells H2 formation at pH 5.5 was lowered ~2 fold, compared to the cells grown on glucose. But in hyfG and hybC mutants H2 production was decreased ~2 and ~1.6 fold, respectively. However, at pH 7.5, in the assays with glycerol, H2 production was low, when compared to the cells grown on glycerol. In contrast to slightly alkaline pH, at pH 5.5 in the assays with glycerol H2 production was absent. Moreover, H2 evolution in wild type cells was inhibited by 0.3 mM N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD), an inhibitor of the F0F1-ATPase, in a pH dependent manner. At pH 7.5 in wild type cells H2 production was decreased ~3 fold but at pH 5.5 the inhibition was ~1.7 fold. At both pHs in fhlA mutant H2 formation was totally inhibited by DCCD. Taken together, the results indicate that at pH 7.5 in the presence of glucose glycerol also can be fermented. They suggest that Hyd-4 mainly and Hyd-2 to some extent contribute in H2 production by E. coli during mixed carbon fermentation at pH 5.5 whereas Hyd-1 is only responsible for H2 oxidation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hallenbeck PC (2009) Fermentative hydrogen production: principles, progress, and prognosis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:7379–7389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mudhoo A, Forsater-Carniero T, Sanchez A (2011) Biohydrogen production and bioprocess enhancement: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 31:250–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dharmadi Y, Murarka A, Gonzalez R (2006) Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol by Escherichia coli: a new platform for metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:821–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez R, Murarka A, Dharmadi Y, Yasdani SS (2008) A new model for the anaerobic fermentation of glycerol in enteric bacteria: trunk and auxiliary pathways in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng 10:234–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Murarka A, Dharmadi Y, Yazdani SS, Gonzalez R (2008) Fermentative utilization of glycerol by Escherichia coli and its implications for the production of fuels and chemicals. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1124–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yasdani SS, Gonzalez R (2008) Engineering Escherichia coli for the efficient conversion of glycerol to ethanol and co-products. Metab Eng 10:340–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Trchounian K, Trchounian A (2009) Hydrogenase 2 is most and hydrogenase 1 is less responsible for H2 production by Escherichia coli under glycerol fermentation at neutral and slightly alkaline pH. Int J Hydrog Energ 34:8839–8845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu H, Wood TK (2010) An evolved Escherichia coli strain for producing hydrogen and ethanol from glycerol. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 391:1033–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trchounian K, Sanchez-Torres V, Wood TK, Trchounian A (2011) Escherichia coli hydrogenase activity and H2 production under glycerol fermentation at a low pH. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:4323–4331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poladyan A, Trchounian A (2009) Production of molecular hydrogen by mixed-acid fermentation in bacteria and its energetics. In: Trchounian A (ed) Bacterial membranes. Ultrastructure, bioelectrochemsitry, bioenergetics and biophysics. Research Signpost, Kerala

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cintolesi A, Comburg JM, Rigou V, Zygourakis K, Gonzalez R (2011) Quantitative analysis of the fermentative metabolism of glycerol in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khanna S, Goyal A, Moholkar VS (2012) Microbial conversion of glycerol: present status and future prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol 32(3):235–262. doi:10.3109/07388551.2011.604839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Trchounian K, Poladyan A, Vassilian A, Trchounian A (2012) Multiple and reversible hydrogenases for hydrogen production by Escherichia coli: dependence on fermentation substrate, pH and F0F1-ATPase. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 47:236–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maeda T, Sanchez-Torres V, Wood TK (2007) Escherichia coli hydrogenase 3 is a reversible enzyme possessing hydrogen uptake and synthesis activities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76:1036–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lukey MJ, Parkin A, Roessler MM, Murphy BJ, Harmer J, Palmer T, Sargent F, Armstrong FA (2010) How Escherichia coli is equipped to oxidize hydrogen under different redox conditions. J Biol Chem 285:3928–3938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bagramyan K, Mnatsakanyan N, Poladian A, Vassilian A, Trchounian A (2002) The roles of hydrogenases 3 and 4, and the F0F1-ATPase, in H2 production by Escherichia coli at alkaline and acidic pH. FEBS Lett 516:172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagramyan K, Trchounian A (2003) Structure and functioning of formate hydrogen lyase, key enzyme of mixed-acid fermentation. Biochemistry (Moscow) 68:1159–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mnatsakanyan N, Bagramyan K, Trchounian A (2004) Hydrogenase 3 but not hydrogenase 4 is major in hydrogen gas production by Escherichia coli formate hydrogenlyase ar acidic pH and in the presence of external formate. Cell Biochem Biophys 41:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trchounian K, Pinske C, Sawers G, Trchounian A (2011) Characterization of Escherichia coli [NiFe]-hydrogenase distribution during fermentative growth at different pHs. Cell Biochem Biophys 62:433–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Menon NK, Robbins J, Wendt JC, Shanmugan KT, Przybyla AE (1991) Mutational analysis and characterization of the Escherichia coli hya operon, which encodes [NiFe] hydrogenase 1. J Bacteriol 173:4851–4861

    Google Scholar 

  21. King PW, Przybyla AE (1999) Response of hya expression to external pH in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 181:5250–5256

    Google Scholar 

  22. Richard DJ, Sawers G, Sargent F, McWalter L, Boxer DH (1999) Transcriptional regulation in response to oxygen and nitrate of the operons encoding the [NiFe] hydrogenases 1 and 2 of Escherichia coli. Microbiology 145:2903–2912

    Google Scholar 

  23. Menon NK, Chatelus CY, Dervartanian M, Wendt JC, Shanmugam KT, Peck HD, Przybya AE (1994) Cloning, sequencing, and mutational analysis of the hyb operon encoding Escherichia coli hydrogenase 2. J Bacteriol 176:4416–4423

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dubini A, Pye RL, Jack RL, Palmer T, Sargent F (2002) How bacteria get energy from hydrogen: a genetic analysis of periplasmic hydrogen oxidation in Escherichia coli. Int J Hydrog Energy 27:1413–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ballantine SP, Boxer DH (1986) Isolation and characterisation of a soluble active fragment of hydrogenase isoenzyme 2 from the membranes of anaerobically grown Escherichia coli. Eur J Biochem 156:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Redwood MD, Mikheenko IP, Sargent F, Macaskie LE (2008) Dissecting the roles of Escherichia coli hydrogenases in biohydrogen production. FEMS Microbiol Lett 278:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Francis K, Patel P, Wendt JC, Shanmugam KT (1990) Purification and characterization of two forms of hydrogenase 1 from Escheriochia coli. J Bacteriol 172:5750–5757

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sawers RG, Ballantine SP, Boxer DH (1985) Differential expression of hydrogenase isoenzymes in Escherichia coli: evidence for a third isoenzyme. J Bacteriol 164:324–331

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sauter M, Bohm R, Bock A (1992) Mutational analysis of the operon (hyc) determing hydrogenase 3 formation in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 6:1523–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Andrews SC, Berks BC, Mcclay J, Ambler A, Quail MA, Golby P, Guest JR (1997) A 12-cistron Escherichia coli operon (hyf) encoding a putative proton-translocating formate hydrogenlyase system. Microbiology 143:3633–3647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Self WT, Hasona A, Shanmugan KT (2004) Expression and regulation of silent operon, hyf, coding for hydrogenase 4 isoenzyme in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:580–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schlensog V, Lutz S, Bock A (1994) Purification and DNA-binding properties of FHLA, the transcriptional activator of the formate hydrogenlyase system from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 269:19590–19596

    Google Scholar 

  33. Self WT, Shanmugam KT (2000) Isolation and characterization of mutated FhlA proteins which activate transcription of the hyc operon (formate hydrogenlyase) of Escherichia coli in the absence of molybdate. FEMS Microbiol Lett 184:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  34. Skibinski DAG, Golby P, Chang Y-S, Sargent F, Hoffman R, Harper R, Guest JR, Attwood MM, Berks BC, Andrews SC (2002) Regulation of the hydrogenase-4 operon of Escherichia coli by the σ54-dependent transcriptional activators FhlA and HyfR. J Bacteriol 184:6642–6653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Forzi L, Sawers G (2007) Maturation of [Ni-Fe]-hydrogenases in Escherichia coli. Biometals 20:567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zbell AL, Maier RJ (2009) Role of the Hya hydrogenase in recycling of anaerobically produced H2 in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1456–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trchounian K, Pinske C, Sawers RG, Trchounian A (2011) Dependence on the F0F1-ATP synthase for the activities of the hydrogen-oxidizing hydrogenases 1 and 2 during glucose and glycerol fermentation at high and low pH in Escherichia coli. J Bioenerg Biomembr 43:645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Trchounian A (2004) Escherichia coli proton-translocating F0F1-ATP synthase and its association with solute secondary transpopters and/or enzymes of anaerobic oxidation-reduction under fermentation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 315:1051–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim YJ, Lee HS, Kim ES, Bae SS, Lim JK, Matsumi R, Lebedinsky AV, Sokolova TG, Kozhevnikova DA, Cha SS, Kim SJ, Kwon KK, Imanaka T, Atomi H, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA, Lee JH, Kang SG (2010) Formate-driven growth coupled with H2 production. Nature 467:352–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sasahara KC, Heinzinger NK, Barrett E (1997) Hydrogen sulfide production and fermentative gas production by Salmonella typhimurium require F0F1 ATPase activity. J Bacteriol 179:6736–6740

    Google Scholar 

  41. Noguchi K, Riggins DP, Eldahan KC, Kitko RD, Slonczewski JL (2010) Hydrogenase-3 contributes to anaerobic acid resistance of Escherichia coli. PLoS One 5:e10132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gabrielyan L, Trchounian A (2009) Relationship between molecular hydrogen production, proton transport and the F0F1-ATPase activity in Rhodobacter sphaeroides strains from mineral springs. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:2567–2572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gabrielyan L, Trchounian A (2012) Concentration dependent glycine effect on the photosynthetic growth and bio-hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides from mineral springs. Biomass Bioenerg 36:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Beliustin AA, Pisarevsky AM, Lepnev GP, Sergeyev AS, Shultz MM (1992) Glass electrodes: a new generation. Sens Actuators B Chem 10:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Eltsova ZA, Vasilieva LG, Tsygankov AA (2010) Hydrogen production by recombinant strains of Rhodobacter sphaeroides using a modified photosynthetic apparatus. Appl Biochem Microbiol 46:487–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Piskarev IM, Ushkanov VA, Aristova NA, Likhachev PP, Myslivets TS (2010) Establishment of the redox potential of water saturated with hydrogen. Biophysics 55:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Maeda T, Wood TK (2008) Formate detection by potassium permanganate for enhanced hydrogen production in Escherichia coli. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:2409–2412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bagramyan K, Mnatsakanyan N, Trchounian A (2003) Formate increases the F0F1-ATPase activity in Escherichia coli membrane vesicles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 306:361–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bagramyan K, Galstyan A, Trchounian A (2000) Redox potential is a determinant in the Escherichia coli anaerobic fermentative growth and survival: effects of impermeable oxidant. Bioelectrochemistry 51:151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hopper S, Bock A (1995) Effector-mediated stimulation of ATPase activity by the sigma 54-dependent transcriptional activator FHLA from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 177:1798–1803

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to Prof. T.K. Wood (Chemical Engineering, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA) for supplying mutants and advice, to Drs. A. Poladyan and L. Gabrielyan for useful comments. This study was supported by Research grant (11-F202-2011) from the Ministry of Education and Science of Armenia to AT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biophysics, Biology Faculty, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, 0025, Armenia

    Karen Trchounian & Armen Trchounian

  2. Department of Microbiology & Microbes and Plants Biotechnology, Biology Faculty, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, 0025, Armenia

    Armen Trchounian

Authors
  1. Karen Trchounian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Armen Trchounian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armen Trchounian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. International Association for Hydrogen E, University of Miami, 5794 SW 40 St. # 303, Miami, 33155, Florida, USA

    Ayfer Veziroğlu

  2. Academy of Ecological Sciences of Georgi, Nutsubidze str. 77, Tbilisi, 380077, Georgia

    Marat Tsitskishvili

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Trchounian, K., Trchounian, A. (2013). H2 Producing Activity by Escherichia Coli During Mixed Carbon Fermentation at Slightly Alkaline and Acidic pHs: Novel Functions of Hydrogenase 4 (hyf) and Hydrogenase 2 (hyb). In: Veziroğlu, A., Tsitskishvili, M. (eds) Black Sea Energy Resource Development and Hydrogen Energy Problems. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6152-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6152-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6151-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6152-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation