Abstract
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was the first DNA-based marker, and it was once widely used in biology and, to some extent, plant breeding. But due to the need for high technical skill, considerable marker development work, and some other limitations, the search continued for more user-friendly DNA marker systems. With the discovery of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, the new generation of PCR-based DNA markers was developed. Initially arbitrary primers of different sizes were used to amplify genomic DNA to generate fingerprints of different individuals. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF), and arbitrary-primed PCR (AP-PCR) are examples of marker systems based on arbitrary primers. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) marker system detects polymorphism due to the sequence variation in and around the recognition sites of restriction endonucleases and uses PCR for marker assay. Refinements in the DNA sequencing technology supported the discovery and development of marker systems, which exploit the sequence variation in specific fragments of DNA using the PCR technology. Sequence-tagged site (STS) markers, including microsatellite or simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers, are an example of this group. The SSR markers revolutionized the marker application in crop improvement in view of their abundance, codominant nature, user-friendliness, and other desirable features. But the development of SSR markers is expensive and complicated so that several other simpler PCR-based marker systems like sequence-related amplification polymorphism (SRAP; it uses open reading frame sequences), target region amplification polymorphism (TRAP; it uses expressed sequence tags), etc. were developed. In addition, some markers exploit variation in RNA sequences of a species: cDNA AFLP, cDNA-SSCP, etc. are examples of RNA-based markers. This chapter describes these and other PCR-based marker systems in some details in addition to introducing the technique of PCR.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agarwal M, Shrivastava N, Padh H (2008) Advances in molecular marker techniques and their applications in plant sciences. Plant Cell Rep 27:617–631
Ayliffe MA, Lawrence GJ, Ellis JG (1994) Heteroduplex molecules formed between allelic sequences cause non-parental RAPD bands. Nucleic Acids Res 22:1632–1636
Babu KN, Rajesh MK, Samsudeen K et al (2014) Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and derived techniques. Methods Mol Biol 1115:191–209
Becker J, Heun M (1995) Mapping of digested and undigested random amplified microsatellite polymorphisms in barley. Genome 38:991–998
Caetano-Anolles G, Bassam BJ, Greshoff PM (1991) DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers. Bio/Technol 9:553–557
Caldeira RL, Carvalho OS, Lage RCG et al (2002) Sequencing of simple sequence repeat anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification products of Biomphalaria glabrata. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 97:23–26
Chen XM, Line RF, Leung H (1998) Genome scanning for resistance gene analogs in rice, barley and wheat by high-resolution electrophoresis. Theor Appl Genet 97:345–355
Choi HK, Kim D, Uhm T et al (2004) A sequence-based genetic map of Medicago truncatula and comparison of marker colinearity with M. sativa. Genetics 166:1463–1502
Choumane W, Winter P, Weigand F et al (2000) Conservation and variability of sequence tagged microsatellite sites (STMSs) from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) within the genus Cicer. Theor Appl Genet 101:269–278
Collard BCY, Mackill DJ (2009a) Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 27:86–93
Collard BCY, Mackill DJ (2009b) Conserved DNA-derived polymorphism (CDDP): a simple and novel method for generating DNA markers in plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 27:558–562
de Vienne D, Santoni S, Falque M (2003) Principal sources of molecular markers. In: de Vienne D (ed) Molecular markers in plant genetics and biotechnology. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 3–46
Edwards KJ (1998) Randomly amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). In: Karp A, Isaac PG, Ingram DS (eds) Molecular tools for screening biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 171–175
Ellis THN, Poyser SJ, Knox MR et al (1998) Polymorphism of insertion sites of Ty1-copia class retrotransposons and its use for linkage and diversity analysis in pea. Mol Gen Genet 260:9–19
Fulton TM, Van der Hoeven R, Eannetta NT et al (2002) Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14:1457–1467
Gupta PK, Varshney RK (2000) The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica 113:163–185
Hu J, Vick BA (2003) Target region amplification polymorphism: a novel marker technique for plant genotyping. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21:289–294
Li G, Quiros CF (2001) Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 103:455–461
Litt M, Luty JA (1989) A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Am J Human Gene 44:397–401
McGregor CE, Lambert CA, Greyling MM et al (2000) A comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting techniques (RAPD, ISSR, AFLP and SSR) in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) germplasm. Euphytica 113:135–144
Michaels SD, Amasino RM (1998) A robust method for detecting single-nucleotide changes as polymorphic markers by PCR. Plant J 14:381–385
Mitchelle SE, Kresovich S, Jester CE et al (1997) Application of multiplex PCR and fluorescence-based, semiautomated allele sizing technology for genotyping plant genetic resources. Crop Sci 37:617–624
Mullis KB (1990) The unusual origin of the polymerase chain reaction. Sci Amer 262:36–43
Olson ML, Hood L, Cantor C et al (1989) A common language for physical mapping of the human genome. Science 245:1434–1435
Orita M, Iwahana H, Kanazawa H et al (1989) Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:2766–2770
Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR (1996) Development of microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Gen Genet 252:597–607
Paran I, Michelmore RW (1993) Development of reliable PCR-based markers linked to downy mildew resistance genes in lettuce. Theor Appl Genet 85:985–993
Poczai P, Varga I, Laos M et al (2013) Advances in plant gene-targeted and functional markers: a review. Plant Methods 9:6. doi:10.1186/1746-4811-9-6
Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C et al (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2:225–238
Ribaut J-M, Hu X, Hoisington D et al (1997) Use of STSs and SSRs as rapid and reliable preselection tools is a marker assisted selection - backcross scheme. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15:154–162
Saiki R, Scharf S, Faloona FA et al (1985) Enzymatic amplification of b-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230:1350–1354
Singh AK, Rana MK, Singh S et al (2014a) CAAT box-derived polymorphism (CBDP): a novel promoter-targeted molecular marker for plants. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 23:175–183
Singh VK, Singh AK, Kayastha AM et al (2014b) Bioinformatics for legume genomics research. In: Gupta S, Nadarajan N, Gupta DS (eds) Legumes in the omics era. Springer Science+Business Media, NY, pp 249–275
Staub JE, Serquen FC, Manju G (1996) Genetic markers, map construction and their application in plant breeding. HortSci 31:729–741
Tautz D (1989) Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source of polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res 17:6462–6471
van den Broeck D, Maes T, Sauer M et al (1998) Transposon display identifies individual transposable elements in high copy number lines. Plant J 13:121–129
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker R et al (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414
Vosman B (1998) Variations on a theme. In: Karp A, Isaac PG, Ingram DS (eds) Molecular tools for screening biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 262–264
Wang J, Lin M, Crenshaw A et al (2009a) High-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using nanofluidic Dynamic Arrays. BMC Genomics 10:561–573
Wang Q, Zhang B, Lu Q (2009b) Conserved region amplification polymorphism (CoRAP) a novel marker technique for plant genotyping in Salivia miltiorrhiza. Plant Mol Biol Rep 27:139–143
Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009c) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature Rev Genet 10:57–63
Weber JL, May PE (1989) Abundant class of human DNA polymorphism, which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Hum Genet 44:388–396
Welsh J, McClelland M (1990) Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:7213–7218
Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ et al (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:1631–1635
Williams MNV, Pande N, Nair M et al (1991) Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of polymerase chain reaction products amplified from mapped loci of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genomic DNA. Theor Appl Genet 82:489–498
Witsenboer H, Vogel J, Michelmore RW (1997) Identification, genetic localization and allelic diversity of amplified microsatellite polymorphic loci in lettuce and wild relatives (Lactuca spp). Genome 40:923–926
Wu KS, Jones R, Dannaberger L et al (1994) Detection of microsatellite polymorphisms without cloning. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3257–3258
Wu J-M, Li Y-R, Yang L-T et al (2013) cDNA-SCoT: a novel rapid method for analysis of gene differential expression in sugarcane and other plants. Australian J Crop Sci 7:659–664
Zabeau M, Vos P (1993) European patent application. Publication no: EP0534858
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
1.1 Appendix 3.1: The Number of RAPD Bands Theoretically Expected from a DNA Sample
The number of RAPD bands theoretically expected from a DNA sample can be estimated on the basis of probability concept. It can be shown that the number of RAPD bands (b) of a given average size (f bp) expected from a genome of known size (N bp) amplified using primers of n nt would be given by the following formula:
The above formula is derived as follows. The probability that a specified base would occur at a given site in a DNA strand will be 1/4 since this site could have any one of the four DNA bases. It is assumed that the distribution of nucleotides/bases is random, i.e., governed by chance, so that the four DNA bases occur in the DNA molecule in equal proportion. Surely, this assumption is unrealistic, but it is necessary for an easy estimation of the above and similar parameters. Therefore, the probability that the n bases present in a RAPD primer will be found in a DNA strand will be 1/4n. Exponential amplification can occur only when a second primer binding site occurs in the neighborhood of the first site; the probability of the two primer binding sites occurring together will be 1/42n or 1/16n. Since the template DNA has two complementary strands, the primer binding sites could occur on either strand at a given site. In addition, the two primer binding sites would be separated by f bp, i.e., the RAPD fragment size. Therefore, the probability of two primer binding sites occurring in a DNA duplex of f bp would be 2f/16n. If the size of genomic DNA were N bp, the number of expected RAPD fragments of f bp would be 2Nf/16n.
According to the above formula, a primer of 10 bases is expected to generate 2 bands in rice, which has the genome size of 450Â Mb and 4 bands in tomato that has genome of 950Â Mb. Similarly, it would produce 9 bands in maize (genome size, 2,500Â Mb) and 19 bands in barley (genome size, 5,300Â Mb).
1.2 Appendix 3.2: Polymerase Chain Reaction and Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs
PCR was developed for amplification of a specific segment from a DNA sample of high complexity, e.g., human genomic DNA. Subsequently, this procedure was applied to achieve a variety of other objectives, for each of which the procedure was suitably modified. In a general sense, the term PCR signifies repeated replication of a segment of sample DNA by using suitable primer(s) and DNA polymerase. In this sense, all applications of the technique would qualify as PCR. But in a restricted sense, the term PCR signifies amplification of a specific sequence from the sample DNA; this PCR procedure differs in many ways from the other applications of the technique. The various features of PCR (in the restricted sense) and RAPDs are summarized in Table 3.3.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singh, B.D., Singh, A.K. (2015). Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Markers. In: Marker-Assisted Plant Breeding: Principles and Practices. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2316-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2316-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2315-3
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2316-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)