Abstract
The reach-to-grasp movement is a prototype of human movement coordination. Since the pioneering work of Jeannerod (Attention and performance, ix. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 153–169, 1981), this movement is generally considered to be a coordinated combination of hand transport and grip formation. One of the main theoretical reasons for choosing transport and grip as building blocks is that they are anatomically independent: one can determine for each muscle, joint or brain area whether it belongs to transport or grip. We have proposed a different view on grasping, in which the coordination problem is formulated as one related to the movements of the digits (Smeets and Brenner in Motor Control 3:237–271, 1999). According to this view, both the transport of the hand and the formation of the grip emerge from the combination of independent digits’ movements towards the objects’ surface. This independency of the digits resembles the independence of synergies (as discussed in the chapter of d’Avella). Different synergies are activated independently, but a single muscle can be part of several synergies. In this chapter we will present three types of experiments that were designed to test to what extent the individual digits’ movements can be considered the building blocks of the reach-to-grasp movement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aivar MP, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2008) Avoiding moving obstacles. Exp Brain Res 190:251–264
Brinkman J, Kuypers HGJM (1973) Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. Brain 96:653–674
Cluff T, Crevecoeur F, Scott SH (2015) A perspective on multisensory integration and rapid perturbation responses. Vision Res 110:215–222
Cuijpers RH, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2008) Consistent haptic feedback is required but it is not enough for natural reaching to virtual cylinders. Hum Mov Sci 27:857–872
Cuijpers RH, Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2004) On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. J Neurophys 91:2598–2606
d’Avella A, Saltiel P, Bizzi E (2003) Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. Nat Neurosci 6:300–308
Desmurget M, Prablanc C, Arzi M, Rossetti Y, Paulignan Y, Urquizar C (1996) Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 110:265–278
Galea MP, Castiello U, Dalwood N (2001) Thumb invariance during prehension movement: effects of object orientation. NeuroReport 12:2185–2187
Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20–25
Haggard P, Wing A (1997) On the hand transport component of prehensile movements. J Mot Behav 29:282–287
Hesse C, Franz VH (2009) Corrective processes in grasping after perturbations of object size. J Mot Behav 41:253–273
Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance ix. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 153–169
Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254
Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schoner G (2007) Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Mot Control 11:276–308
Lee WA (1984) Neuromotor synergies as a basis for coordinated intentional action. J Mot Behav 16:135–170
Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT (1996) Throwing while looking through prisms. 1. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain 119:1183–1198
Milner AD, Goodale MA (2006) The visual brain in action, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Milner AD, Goodale MA (2008) Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 46:774–785
Mon-Williams M, McIntosh RD (2000) A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:268–273
Overduin SA, d’Avella A, Roh J, Carmena JM, Bizzi E (2015) Representation of muscle synergies in the primate brain. J Neurosci 35:12615–12624
Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R (1991a) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size. Exp Brain Res 87:407–420
Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M (1991b) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 83:502–512
Redding GM, Wallace B (1988) Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposure: Organization of the eye-hand coordination loop. Percept Psychophys 44:59–68
Schenk T (2012) No dissociation between perception and action in patient df when haptic feedback is withdrawn. J Neurosci 32:2013–2017
Schot WD, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2014) Simultaneous adaptation of the thumb and index finger of the same hand to opposite prism displacements. J Neurophys 111:2554–2559
Shadmehr R, BrashersKrug T (1997) Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci 17:409–419
Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Mot Control 3:237–271
Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2001) Independent movements of the digits in grasping. Exp Brain Res 139:92–100
Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2008) Grasping weber’s law. Curr Biol 18:R1089–R1090
Smeets JBJ, Brenner E, Biegstraaten M (2002) Independent control of the digits predicts an apparent hierarchy of visuomotor channels in grasping. Behav Brain Res 136:427–432
Smeets JBJ, Martin J, Brenner E (2010) Similarities between digits’ movements in grasping, touching and pushing. Exp Brain Res 203:339–346
Smeets JBJ, Oostwoud Wijdenes L, Brenner E (2016) Movement adjustments have short latencies because there is no need to detect anything. Motor Control (in press)
Smeets JBJ, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DDJ, van Beers RJ, Brenner E (2006) Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18781–18786
Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R (2006) Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4:1035–1043
Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1989) An assessment of the existence of muscle synergies during load perturbations and intentional movements of the human arm. Exp Brain Res 74:535–548
Ting LH, Macpherson JM (2005) A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. J Neurophys 93:609–613
Tresch MC, Jarc A (2009) The case for and against muscle synergies. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19:601–607
Trevarthen CB (1968) Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung 31:299–348
Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (1994) ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4:157–165
van de Kamp C, Bongers RM, Zaal FTJM (2009) Effects of changing object size during prehension. J Mot Behav 41:427–435
van de Kamp C, Zaal FTJM (2007) Prehension is really reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res 182:27–34
van der Kooij K, Brenner E, van Beers RJ, Smeets JBJ (2015) Visuomotor adaptation: how forgetting keeps us conservative. PLoS ONE 10:e0117901
Verheij R, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2012) Grasping kinematics from the perspective of the individual digits: a modelling study. PLoS ONE 7:e33150
Voudouris D, Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2013) Ultra-fast selection of grasping points. J Neurophys 110:1484–1489
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smeets, J.B.J., Brenner, E. (2016). Synergies in Grasping. In: Laczko, J., Latash, M. (eds) Progress in Motor Control. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 957. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47312-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47313-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)