Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Academic Cheating: How Can We Detect and Discourage It?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technologies in Biomedical and Life Sciences Education

Part of the book series: Methods in Physiology ((METHPHYS))

  • 494 Accesses

Abstract

We define cheating as the intentional use of prohibited materials, processes or assistance to undermine the validity of the assessment and gain an unfair advantage. We explore various ways in which cheating can occur and classify these under the three terms of the definition. Improper use of materials includes plagiarism, access to prohibited materials before the test and access to prohibited material during the test. Improper processes include denial of material to others and attempts to influence the performance of others by social means. Improper assistance includes impersonation, ghost writing and collusion. Addressing these issues involves questions of deterrence, detection and sanction. We consider technical means by which cheating can be detected, with an emphasis on electronic and online assessment. We then consider cultural, contextual, socio-demographic and personal factors which may have impact on cheating. Finally, we explore ways by which assessments can be designed to reduce the likelihood and impact of cheating. Design of a rewarding educational environment and attention to the cultural and personal factors which might promote cheating are important. We also recommend that assessments be delivered electronically where possible, to aid the detection of cheating, and that proprietary programmes which calculate various relevant statistics are used. We suggest that online solutions which permit proctoring are preferable to non-proctored approaches and that assessments are best designed as rating rather than ranking exercises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.turnitin.com/regions/uk

References

  • Barrett, R., & Malcolm, J. (2006). Embedding plagiarism education in the assessment process. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2, 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1999). Creating contexts for learning and self-authorship. Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2016-03-09). German Defence Minister Von der Leyen cleared of plagiarism. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35769001. Accessed 2021-01-15.

  • Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T. (2013). Challenges in addressing plagiarism in education. PLoS Medicine, 10(12), e1001574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001574

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 44, 1837–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BÅ‚achnio, A., & Weremko, M. (2011). Academic cheating is contagious: The influence of the presence of others on honesty. A study report. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(1), 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, W. W. (1961). Ethics, examinations, and education. School and Society, 89, 412–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, P., Irish, B., & Sales, D. (2004). Using computers for assessment in medicine. BMJ, 329, 606–609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, T. (2014). Cheating on online assessment tests: Prevalence and impact on validity. Collected Faculty and Staff Scholarship, 174. https://scholar.dominican.edu/all-faculty/174

  • Chanock, K. (2008). When students reference plagiarised material—What can we learn (and what can we do) about their understanding of attribution? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, K., Davis, R., Toy, D., & Wright, L. (2004). Academic integrity in the business school environment: I’ll get by with a little help from my friends. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475304268779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaurasia, A. (2016). Stop teaching Indians to copy and paste. Nature, 534(7609), 59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chudzicka-CzupaÅ‚a, A., Grabowski, D., Mello, A. L., Kuntz, J., Zaharia, D. V., Hapon, N., Lupina-Wegener, A., & Börü, B. (2016). Application of the theory of planned behavior in academic cheating research—Cross-cultural comparison. Ethics and Behavior, 26, 638–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1112745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudzicka-CzupaÅ‚a, A., Lupina-Wegener, A., Borter, S., & Hapon, N. (2013). Students’ attitude toward cheating in Switzerland, Ukraine and Poland. The New Educational Review, 32, 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25, 933–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, M. B., Conover, T. L., & Chui, L. C. (2012). A cross-cultural study of the influence of country of origin, justice, power distance, and gender on ethical decision making. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11, 5–34. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-10213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, M. (2002). Minimising plagiarism. Centre for Studies in Higher Education, University of Melbourne. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/docs/PlagMain.pdf

  • Downing, S. (2003). Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education, 37, 830–837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D., & Orosz, G. (2012). Why Hungarian high school students cheat? Practice and Theory in Systems of Education, 7, 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. T. (1970). Levels of cheating under conditions of informative appeal to honesty, public affirmation of value, and threats of punishment. Journal of Educational Research, 64, 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, P. W. (2004). Dishonesty in academics and business: A cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000017969.29461.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2004). Construct-irrelevant variance in high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23, 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, A. (1993). The seven cultures of capitalism: Value, systems for creating wealth in the United States, Britain, Japan, Germany, France, Sweden, and the Netherlands. Piatkus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, A. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, W. M., & Clarke, M. J. (2007). Cheating on tests: Prevalence, detection, and implications for online testing. In E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 255–288). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R., Bretag, T., & Rundle, K. (2021). Detecting contract cheating: Examining the role of assessment type. Higher Education Research and Development, 40(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1724899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpp, D. N., & Hogan, J. J. (1993). Crime in the classroom: Detection and prevention of cheating on multiple choice exams. Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, A., Drinan, P. F., & Cross, M. (1999). Gender and academic integrity. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, M. A., Ram, S., Malpas, P., Sisley, R., Thompson, A., & Hawken, S. J. (2014). Reasons for academic honesty and dishonesty with solutions: A study of pharmacy and medical students in New Zealand. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(10), 702–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, G. A. (1987). Academic fraud: Prevalence, practices, and reasons. Journal of Professional Nursing, 3(1), 39–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrabak, M., Vujaklia, A., Vodopedivec, I., Hren, D., MaruÅ¡ić, M., & MaruÅ¡ić, A. (2004). Academic misconduct among medical students in a transition country. Medical Education, 38, 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01766.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanjirangat, V., & Gupta, D. (2016). Study on extrinsic text plagiarism detection techniques and tools. The Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 9, 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkvliet, J., & Sigmund, C. L. (1999). Can we control cheating in the classroom? The Journal of Economic Education, 30, 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220489909596090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov, M. P., Motrenko, A., Kuznetsova, R., & Strijov, V. V. (2016). Methods for intrinsic plagiarism detection and author diarization. In CLEF (Working notes) (pp. 912–919).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, R. A., Chapman, K. J., & WEISS, John E. (2000). International perspective: A crossnational exploration of business students’ attitudes, perceptions, and tendencies toward academic dishonesty. Journal of Education for Business, 75(4), 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, R. A., & Chapman, K. J. (2002). Russian and American college students’ attitudes, perceptions, and tendencies towards cheating. Educational Research, 44, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880110081080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Doh, J. P. (2012). International management: Culture, strategy, and behavior (8th ed., pp. 123–125). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-811257-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: An analysis across countries. The Journal of Economic Education, 33, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480209596462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud, S., & Bretag, T. (2013). Postgraduate research students and academic integrity: ‘It’s about good research training’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35, 432–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2009). Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Nursing Education, 48, 614–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Feghali, T., & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49, 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9092-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1996). What we know about cheating in college longitudinal trends and recent developments change. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 28, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension of modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43, 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014893102151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J. C., Illing, J., Rothwell, C., Margetts, J. K., Archer, J., & Shrewsbury, D. (2012). Developing an evidence base for the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board Test. Commissioned by the General Medical Council. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/gmc-plab-revision_pdf-57909436.pdf

  • McManus, I. C., Chis, L., Fox, R., Waller, D., & Tang, P. (2014). Implementing statistical equating for MRCP (UK) parts 1 and 2. BMC Medical Education, 14, 204. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J. W., & Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 870–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghdipour, B., & Emeagwali, O. L. (2013). Students’ justifications for academic dishonesty: Call for action. 2nd World Conference on Educational Technology Researches—WCETR2012. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath, L., & Lovaglia, M. (2009). Cheating on multiple choice exams: Monitoring, assessment, and an optional assignment. College Teaching, 57, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relation between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. The Journal of Education for Business, 77, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD Publishing, International Migration Outlook. (2015). Foreign students worldwide and in OECD countries, 2000-12: Millions. https://doi.org/10.1787/migr_outlook-2015-graph13-en

  • Ogilby, S. M. (1995). The ethics of academic behavior: Will it affect professional behavior? Journal of Education for Business, 71, 92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okoroafor, A. U., Henning, M. A., Chibuike, O. M., & Rajput, V. (2016). Disclosing academic dishonesty: Perspectives from Nigerian and New Zealand health professional students. Ethics & Behavior, 26(5), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1055494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, J., Barnes, J., Deaton, A., Fulks, K., Ryan, K., & Rettinger, D. A. (2010). Imitation is the sincerest form of cheating: The influence of direct knowledge and attitudes on academic dishonesty. Ethics & Behavior, 20, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420903482616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osipian, A. L. (2008). Political graft and education corruption in Ukraine: Compliance, collusion, and control. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 16, 323–344. https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.16.4.323-344

  • Ottaway, K., Murrant, C., & Ritchie, K. (2017). Cheating after the test: Who does it and how often? Advances in Physiology Education, 41(3), 368–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, M. A., Arnold, G. K., Blank, L. L., Holmboe, E. S., & Lipner, R. S. (2008). Performance during internal medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, 869–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1937/1968). The structure of social action. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951/1991). The social system. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poltorak, Y. (1995). Cheating behavior among students of four Moscow institutes. Higher Education, 30, 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Al-Khatib, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (2004). Academic dishonesty: A cross-cultural comparison of U.S. and Chinese marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475303262354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosmansyah, Y., Hendarto, I., & Pratama, D. (2020). Impersonation attack-defense tree. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15, 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle, K., Curtis, G. J., & Clare, J. (2019). Why students do not engage in contract cheating. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G., Bonanno, H., Krass, I., Scouller, K., & Smith, L. (2009). Undergraduate and post-graduate pharmacy students’ perceptions of plagiarism and academic honesty. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saana, B. M. E., Ablordeppey, N. J. M., & Karikari, T. (2016). Academic dishonesty in higher education: Students’ perceptions and involvement in an African institution. BMC Research Notes, 9, 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2044-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawdon, M., & McLachlan, J. C. (2020). ‘10% of your medical students will cause 90% of your problems’: A prospective correlational study. BMJ Open, 10, e038472. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038472

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. The Journal of Education for Business, 68, 207–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sindre, G., & Vegendla, A. (2015). E-exams versus paper exams: A comparative analysis of cheating-related security threats and countermeasures. NISK Journal, 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. E., & Stevens, F. W. (1987). Ethical inclinations of tomorrow’s managers revisited: How and why students cheat. Journal of Education for Business, 63, 24–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S., & Zuo, J. (1997). Profile of college examination cheaters. College Student Journal, 31, 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, A., & Rocha, M. (2006). A comparative analysis. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1, 198–209. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2006.1.3.198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodorczuk, A., Fraser, J., & Rogers, G. D. (2018). Open book exams: A potential solution to the ‘full curriculum’? Medical Teacher, 40, 529–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Theart, C. J., & Smit, I. (2012). The status of academic integrity amongst nursing students at a nursing education institution in the Western Cape. Curationis, 35, E1–E8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tippins, N. T. (2009). Where is the unproctored Internet testing train headed now? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitro, F. T., & Schoer, L. A. (1972). The effects of probability of test success, test importance, and risk of detection on the incidence of cheating. Journal of School Psychology, 10, 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, R., Davidson, L., & Bell, M. C. (2008). Faculty attitudes and behaviors concerning student cheating. College Student Journal, 42, 164–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018724900565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yudkowsky, R., Park, Y. S., & Downing, S. M. (Eds.). (2019). Assessment in health professions education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, S., Klusmann, D., & Hampe, W. (2016). Are exam questions known in advance? Using local dependence to detect cheating. PLoS One, 11(12), e0167545.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

    John C. McLachlan & Izabella Penier

Authors
  1. John C. McLachlan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Izabella Penier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John C. McLachlan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK

    Harry J. Witchel

  2. Department of Medical Education, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA

    Michael W. Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McLachlan, J.C., Penier, I. (2022). Academic Cheating: How Can We Detect and Discourage It?. In: Witchel, H.J., Lee, M.W. (eds) Technologies in Biomedical and Life Sciences Education. Methods in Physiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95633-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation