Abstract
This paper reports the results of the first survey conducted in Moscow on student cheating behavior in December of 1991. I propose that cheating, like many other forms of deviant behavior, can be explained as rooted in the social structure. I propose a way of combining Merton's structural approach with the learning theory of deviant behavior. Merton's typology of individual adaptation is extended to a case where there is a difference between official and unofficial goals and means. I use the theory of neutralization to understand how students justified cheating in such social conditions. The survey revealed that an overwhelming majority of students cheat, and that students justify cheating by saying that it is the fault of the education system. In addition my results suggest that there was a linkage between the macro structure of Soviet society (including its educational system) and cheating behavior among students. The structure of the Soviet system provided opportunities and motivation to cheat together with the rationale to justify cheating. The changes which were introduced with Perestroika only worsened the situation by blurring the notions of appropriate and deviant behavior in many spheres of life. The implications for the present changes going on in Russia are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman, Deborah (1994). ‘After Graduation, What?,’ in Anthony Jones (ed.),Education and Society in the New Russia. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, p. 307.
Armstrong J. Scott (1983).Cheating in Management Science. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Balzer, Harley D. (1994). ‘Plans to Reform Russian Higher Education’, in Anthony Jones (ed.),Education and Society in the New Russia. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, p. 27.
Cowell, Frank A. (1990).Cheating the Government: The Economics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Cray, Collin (1984) ‘Moscow is Cheating’.Foreign Policy 56: 141.
Evans, Ellis and Craig, Delores (1990). ‘Teacher and Students Perceptions of Academic Cheating in Middle and Senior High Schools’.Journal of Educational Research 84: 44–52.
Haines, Valerie et al. (1986). ‘College Cheating: Immaturity, Lack of Commitment, and the Neutralizing Attitude’.Research in Higher Education 25: 742–254.
Jones, Anthony (ed.) (1994). ‘Soviet Educational Legacy’, in Anthony Jones (ed.),Education and Society in the New Russia. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, p. 13.
Kitaev, V.A. (1994). ‘The Labor Market and Education’, in Anthony Jones (ed.),Education and Society in the New Russia. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, p. 320.
La Beff, Emile et al. (1990). ‘Situational Ethics and College Student Cheating’.Sociological Inquiry 60: 190–197.
Malcolm, Judith and Sik Hung Ng (1991). ‘Relationship of Self-Awareness of Cheating on an External Standard of Competence’.The Journal of Social Psychology 129: 391–395.
Merton, Robert (1968).Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
Michaels, James and Miethe, Terance (1989). ‘Applying Theories of Deviance to Academic Cheating’.Social Science Quarterly 70: 870–885.
Perry, Anthony et al. (1990). ‘Type A Behavior, Competitive Achievement-Striving, and Cheating among College Students’.Psychological Reports 66: 459–465.
Ward, David (1986). ‘Self-Esteem and Dishonest Behavior Revisited’.The Journal of Social Psychology 126: 709.
Wellborn, Stanley (1980).Cheating in College Becomes an Epidemic. U. S. News & World Report. 20 (Oct.): 39–42.
Wright Mills, C. (1959).The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poltorak, Y. Cheating behavior among students of four Moscow institutes. High Educ 30, 225–246 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384098
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384098