Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

User-Generated Short Video Content in Social Media. A Case Study of TikTok

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing and Social Media. Participation, User Experience, Consumer Experience, and Applications of Social Computing (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12195))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

According to Alexa’s ranking of the top 500 sites on the web, YouTube takes the second place, demonstrating the importance of online services focused on sharing of short self-shot videos. With growing popularity of mobile phones, mobile only short video sharing social media applications appeared on the market. One of such applications is TikTok, probably the most talked-of video sharing platform of 2019, similar to its twin service for the Chinese market, called Douyin. The content on YouTube varies greatly in topic: from music and toys to science and technologies, from computer games and cooking to education and politics. But does the content on mobile short video platforms differ that much too? The content of 1,000 videos on TikTok as a prominent representative of mobile short video sharing social media services was analyzed to find out which content is common and popular on TikTok. Content analysis was applied as the main research technique. Comedy videos and musical performances turned out to be the most popular and the most frequent categories among both male and female performers. Comedy videos are, however, especially frequent among male creators. At that, videos related to beauty and DIY are common for females, but not for males. Additional attention in this study was paid to the potential law infringements on the platform. The cases of potential violations of copyright and personal rights were observed. Videos containing inappropriate contents such as violence, sexual activity, or consumption of drugs and alcohol were, by contrast, not revealed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The top 500 sites on the web, www.alexa.com/topsites.

References

  1. Scheibe, K., Fietkiewicz, K.J., Stock, W.G.: Information behavior on social live streaming services. J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract. 4(2), 6–20 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ByteDance. https://www.bytedance.com/en/about. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  3. TikTok Newsroom: musical.ly and TikTok unite to debut new worldwide short-form video platform upgraded app, titled TikTok, now available globally. https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/musical-ly-and. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  4. TikTok continues to lead social app download rankings in September. https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/tiktok-continues-to-lead-social-app-download-rankings-in-september/565692/. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  5. TikTok Statistics That You Need to Know in 2020. https://www.oberlo.com/blog/tiktok-statistics. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  6. Lu, X., Lu, Z.: Fifteen seconds of fame: a qualitative study of Douyin, a short video sharing mobile application in China. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11578, pp. 233–244. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21902-4_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. TikTok mit 5,5 Mio. aktiven Nutzern in Deutschland. https://www.futurebiz.de/artikel/tiktok-nutzerzahlen-deutschland/. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  8. Making Smart Content Choices on TikTok. https://newsroom.tiktok.com/de-de/newsroom/making-smart-content-choices-on-tiktok. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  9. TikTok Newsroom: DIY: Duets & Reactions on TikTok. https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-gb/diy-duets-reactions-on-tiktok. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  10. Zhang, L., Wang, F., Liu, J.: Understand instant video clip sharing on mobile platforms: Twitter’s vine as a case study. In: Proceedings of Network and Operating System Support on Digital Audio and Video Workshop, pp. 85–90. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. TikTok: Record fine for video sharing app over children’s data. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47396767. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  12. TikTok under investigation over child data use. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/02/tiktok-under-investigation-over-child-data-use. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  13. TikTok Transparency Report. https://www.tiktok.com/safety/resources/transparency-report. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  14. TikTok Has a Predator Problem. A Network of Young Women is Fighting Back. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanhatesthis/tiktok-has-a-predator-problem-young-women-are-fighting-back. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  15. Warum Tik Tok für Kinder gefährlich werden kann. https://www.focus.de/digital/handy/cybergrooming-warum-tik-tok-fuer-kinder-gefaehrlich-werden-kann_id_10407806.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  16. Gurbani, V.K., Migliosi, A., State, R., Payette, C., Cilli, B., Engel, T.: A characterization of short-video and distributed hot-spot activity in Instagram. In: Proceedings of the Principles, Systems and Applications on IP Telecommunications, pp. 28–34. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffmann, C.P., Lutz, C., Meckel, M.: Content creation on the Internet: a social cognitive perspective on the participation divide. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(6), 696–716 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McRoberts, S., Bonsignore, E., Peyton, T., Yarosh, S.: Do it for the viewers!: audience engagement behaviors of young YouTubers. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 334–343. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Milkaite, I., Lievens, E.: Child-friendly transparency of data processing in the EU: from legal requirements to platform policies. J. Child. Media 14(1), 5–21 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Badillo-Urquiola, K., Smriti, D., McNally, B., Golub, E., Bonsignore, E., Wisniewski, P.J.: Stranger danger!: social media app features co-designed with children to keep them safe online. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 394–406. ACM, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rettberg, J.W.: Hand signs for lip-syncing: the emergence of a gestural language on musical.ly as a video-based equivalent to emoji. Soc. Media+ Soc. 3(4) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Literat, I., Kligler-Vilenchik, N.: Youth collective political expression on social media: the role of affordances and memetic dimensions for voicing political views. New Media Soc. 21(9), 1988–2009 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, Z., He, Q., Mao, Z., Chung, H., Maharjan, S.: A study on the characteristics of Douyin short videos and implications for edge caching. In: Proceedings of the ACM Turing Celebration Conference – China, pp. 1–6. ACM, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmer, F., Scheibe, K., Stock, W.G.: A model for information behavior research on social live streaming services (SLSSs). In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) SCSM 2018. LNCS, vol. 10914, pp. 429–448. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91485-5_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Yarosh, S., Bonsignore, E., McRoberts, S., Peyton, T.: YouthTube: youth video authorship on YouTube and vine. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1423–1437. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Che, X., Ip, B., Lin, L.: A survey of current YouTube video characteristics. IEEE Multimed. 22(2), 56–63 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A Week in the Life of Popular YouTube Channels. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/07/25/a-week-in-the-life-of-popular-youtube-channels/. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

  28. Friedländer, M.B.: Streamer motives and user-generated content on social live-streaming services. J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract. 5(1), 65–84 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. van Oosten, J.M., Vandenbosch, L., Peter, J.: Gender roles on social networking sites: investigating reciprocal relationships between Dutch adolescents’ hypermasculinity and hyperfemininity and sexy online self-presentations. J. Child. Media 11(2), 147–166 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. García Jiménez, A., Montes Vozmediano, M.: Subject matter of videos for teens on YouTube. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth 24(1), 63–78 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Scheibe, K., Zimmer, F.: Gender differences in perception of gamification elements on social live streaming services. Int. J. Interact. Commun. Syst. Technol. 9(2), 1–15 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Khan, M.L.: Social media engagement: what motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Comput. Hum. Behav. 66, 236–247 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Agrawal, S., Sureka, A.: Copyright infringement detection of music videos on YouTube by mining video and uploader meta-data. In: Bhatnagar, V., Srinivasa, S. (eds.) BDA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8302, pp. 48–67. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03689-2_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Zimmer, F., Fietkiewicz, K.J., Stock, W.G.: Law infringements in social live streaming services. In: Tryfonas, T. (ed.) HAS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10292, pp. 567–585. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58460-7_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Honka, A., Frommelius, N., Mehlem, A., Tolles, J.N., Fietkiewicz, K.J.: How safe is YouNow? An empirical study on possible law infringements in Germany and the United States. J. MacroTrends Soc. Sci. 1(1), 1–17 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Livingstone, S., Kirwil, L., Ponte, C., Staksrud, E.: In their own words: What bothers children online? Eur. J. Commun. 29(3), 271–288 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huguenin, K., Kermarrec, A.M., Kloudas, K., Taïani, F.: Content and geographical locality in user-generated content sharing systems. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, pp. 77–82. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  39. McMillan, S.J.: The challenge of applying content analysis for the World Wide Web. In: Krippendorff, K., Bock, M.A. (eds.) The Content Analysis Reader, pp. 60–67. Sage, Los Angeles (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fietkiewicz, K.J., Lins, E., Baran, K.S., Stock, W.S.: Inter-generational comparison of social media use: investigating the online behavior of different generational cohorts. In: Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3829–3838. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schumann, L., Stock, W.G.: The information service evaluation (ISE) model. Webology 11(1), 1–20 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data in this project were collected and coded by Aliaksandra Shutsko, Alon Borenshtein, Elisabeth Levin, Fabian Birghan, Jennifer Storms, Neil Suárez Rodríguez, Robert Hettenhausen, Sebastian Blaszczok. The supervisors of the project were Kaja J. Fietkiewicz and Wolfgang G. Stock. The author would like to thank all the participants of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Aliaksandra Shutsko

Authors
  1. Aliaksandra Shutsko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aliaksandra Shutsko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Towson University, Towson, MD, USA

    Gabriele Meiselwitz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shutsko, A. (2020). User-Generated Short Video Content in Social Media. A Case Study of TikTok. In: Meiselwitz, G. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media. Participation, User Experience, Consumer Experience, and Applications of Social Computing. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12195. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49576-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49576-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49575-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49576-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation