Abstract
One of the few cognitive areas in which sex differences can be found is in visuospatial processing abilities. The different abilities show different degrees of sex differences, generally favoring men over women. For example, the largest effects for men are reported on mental rotation tasks, particularly those using three-dimensional shapes. Mental folding, field independence, and most of the visuospatial working memory literature also show male advantages, but lower than for mental rotation. Notably, the visual working memory task known as Object Location Memory counteracts this trend and shows small differences favoring women over men. To explain these sex differences, we describe two sociocultural (nurture) and one biological (nature) causes. The visuospatial experience with sports, hobbies, toys, and videogames is a sociocultural explanation for the unfavorable results of women in visuospatial tests. Another sociocultural cause that shows consistent negative findings for women is stereotype threat, in both implicit and explicit forms. In contrast, hormones, in both prenatal and adult samples, provide biological explanations that may be less conclusive. Independent of these explanations, we argue that visuospatial training could be an effective strategy to diminish the sex gap unfavorable to women, since many different spatial training activities have shown encouraging effects. We finish this chapter by providing instructional implications for health and natural sciences, plus recommendations for future research directions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aleman, A., Bronk, E., Kessels, R. P. C., Koppeschaar, H. P. F., & van Honk, J. (2004). A single administration of testosterone improves visuospatial ability in young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(5), 612–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00089-1.
Berenbaum, S. A., Bryk, K. L. K., & Beltz, A. M. (2012). Early androgen effects on spatial and mechanical abilities: Evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 126(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026652.
Bodner, G. M., & Guay, R. B. (1997). The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test. The Chemical Educator, 2(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897970138a.
Bosco, A., Longoni, A. M., & Vecchi, T. (2004). Gender effects in spatial orientation: Cognitive profiles and mental strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(5), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1000.
Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003.
Campos, A., Pérez-Fabello, M. a. J., & Gómez-Juncal, R. o. (2004). Gender and age differences in measured and self-perceived imaging capacity. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1383–1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.008.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Atit, K. (this volume). Different abilities controlled by visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 23–51). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_2.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Fiorella, L. (this volume). Interactive science multimedia and visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 145–173). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_6.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Uttal, D. H. (this volume). Science education and visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 53–79). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_3.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2018a). Computerized and adaptable tests to measure visuospatial abilities in STEM students. In T. Andre (Ed.), Advances in human factors in training, education, and learning sciences: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (pp. 337–349). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60018-5_33.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., Wong, M., & Paas, F. (2018b). Learning symbols from permanent and transient visual presentations: Don’t overplay the hand. Computers & Education, 116, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.011.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., Wong, M., & Paas, F. (2019a). Visuospatial tests and multimedia learning: The importance of employing relevant instruments. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory: Rethinking teaching (pp. 89–99). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429283895-8.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Wong, M., Adesope, O. O., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2019b). Gender imbalance in instructional dynamic versus static visualizations: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09469-1.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (this volume-a). VAR: A battery of computer-based instruments to measure visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 207–229). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_8.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (this volume-b). Instructional visualizations, cognitive load theory, and visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 111–143). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_5.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Ginns, P. (this volume-c). Embodied cognition, science education, and visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 175–205). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_7.
Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2018). Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: Evidence from the spacing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9426-2.
Cherney, I. D. (2008). Mom, let me play more computer games: They improve my mental rotation skills. Sex Roles, 59(11–12), 776–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9498-z.
Choi, J., & L’Hirondelle, N. (2005). Object location memory: A direct test of the verbal memory hypothesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.02.001.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Courvoisier, D. S., Renaud, O., Geiser, C., Paschke, K., Gaudy, K., & Jordan, K. (2013). Sex hormones and mental rotation: An intensive longitudinal investigation. Hormones and Behavior, 63(2), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.12.007.
Darling, S., Della Sala, S., Logie, R. H., & Cantagallo, A. (2006). Neuropsychological evidence for separating components of visuo–spatial working memory. Journal of Neurology, 253(2), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0944-3.
Della Sala, S., Gray, C., Baddeley, A., Allamano, N., & Wilson, L. (1999). Pattern span: A tool for unwelding visuo–spatial memory. Neuropsychologia, 37(10), 1189–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00159-6.
Drabowicz, T. (2014). Gender and digital usage inequality among adolescents: A comparative study of 39 countries. Computers & Education, 74, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.016.
Drążkowski, D., Szwedo, J., Krajczewska, A., Adamczuk, A., Piątkowski, K., Jadwiżyc, M., et al. (2017). Women are not less field independent than men—The role of stereotype threat. International Journal of Psychology, 52(5), 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12238.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The nature–nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613484767.
Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The Hunter-Gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90020-5.
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Epting, L. K., & Overman, W. H. (1998). Sex-sensitive tasks in men and women: A search for performance fluctuations across the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112(6), 1304–1317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.112.6.1304.
Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18(10), 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01990.x.
Ferguson, A. M., Maloney, E. A., Fugelsang, J., & Risko, E. F. (2015). On the relation between math and spatial ability: The case of math anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.007.
Geiger, J. F., & Litwiller, R. M. (2005). Spatial working memory and gender differences in science. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(1), 49–57.
Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1965). Effects of practice on sex-related differences in performance on Embedded Figures. Psychonomic Science, 3(1–12), 361–362. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03343180.
Grimshaw, G. M., Sitarenios, G., & Finegan, J.-A. K. (1995). Mental rotation at 7 years: Relations with prenatal testosterone levels and spatial play experiences. Brain and Cognition, 29(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1269.
Guillot, A., Champely, S., Batier, C., Thiriet, P., & Collet, C. (2007). Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(4), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9021-7.
Guimarães, B., Firmino-Machado, J., Tsisar, S., Viana, B., Pinto-Sousa, M., Vieira-Marques, P., et al. (2019). The role of anatomy computer-assisted learning on spatial abilities of medical students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(2), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1795.
Halpern, D. F. (2006). Assessing gender gaps in learning and academic achievement. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 635–653). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hammond, A. G., Murphy, E. M., Silverman, B. M., Bernas, R. S., & Nardi, D. (2019). No environmental context-dependent effect, but interference, of physical activity on object location memory. Cognitive Processing, 20(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0875-4.
Hampson, E., & Morley, E. E. (2013). Estradiol concentrations and working memory performance in women of reproductive age. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(12), 2897–2904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.07.020.
Hausmann, M., Schoofs, D., Rosenthal, H. E. S., & Jordan, K. (2009). Interactive effects of sex hormones and gender stereotypes on cognitive sex differences—A psychobiosocial approach. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.09.019.
Hegarty, M. (2018). Ability and sex differences in spatial thinking: What does the mental rotation test really measure? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 1212–1219. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1347-z.
Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005.
Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. R. (2009). How spatial abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, dental education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.006.
Heil, M., Kavšek, M., Rolke, B., Beste, C., & Jansen, P. (2011). Mental rotation in female fraternal twins: Evidence for intra-uterine hormone transfer? Biological Psychology, 86(1), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.11.002.
Heil, M., Jansen, P., Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Neuburger, S. (2012). Gender-specific effects of artificially induced gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 350–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.004.
Hier, D. B., & Crowley, W. F. (1982). Spatial ability in androgen-deficient men. New England Journal of Medicine, 306(20), 1202–1205. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198205203062003.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057.
Jansen, P., Zayed, K., & Osmann, R. (2016). Gender differences in mental rotation in Oman and Germany. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.033.
Jirout, J. J., & Newcombe, N. S. (2015). Building blocks for developing spatial skills: Evidence from a large, representative U.S. sample. Psychological Science, 26(3), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614563338.
Kessels, R. P. C., Postma, A., & de Haan, E. H. F. (1999). Object relocation: A program for setting up, running, and analyzing experiments on memory for object locations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200721.
Kessels, R. P. C., van Zandvoort, M. J. E., Postma, A., Kappelle, L. J., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2000). The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: Standardization and normative data. Applied Neuropsychology, 7(4), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324826AN0704_8.
King, M. J., Katz, D. P., Thompson, L. A., & Macnamara, B. N. (2019). Genetic and environmental influences on spatial reasoning: A meta-analysis of twin studies. Intelligence, 73, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.01.001.
Lejbak, L., Vrbancic, M., & Crossley, M. (2009). The female advantage in object location memory is robust to verbalizability and mode of presentation of test stimuli. Brain and Cognition, 69(1), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.06.006.
Lejbak, L., Crossley, M., & Vrbancic, M. (2011). A male advantage for spatial and object but not verbal working memory using the n-back task. Brain and Cognition, 76(1), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.12.002.
Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science, 16(11), 841–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01623.x.
Levine, S. C., Foley, A., Lourenco, S., Ehrlich, S., & Ratliff, K. (2016). Sex differences in spatial cognition: Advancing the conversation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(2), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1380.
Levinson, A. J., Weaver, B., Garside, S., McGinn, H., & Norman, G. R. (2007). Virtual reality and brain anatomy: A randomised trial of e-learning instructional designs. Medical Education, 41(5), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02694.x.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467.
Loftus, J. J., Jacobsen, M., & Wilson, T. D. (2017). Learning and assessment with images: A view of cognitive load through the lens of cerebral blood flow. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 1030–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12474.
Lord, T. R. (1987). A look at spatial abilities in undergraduate women science majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(8), 757–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240808.
Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x.
Masters, M. S., & Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23(4), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067434.
Mayer, R. E., & Massa, L. J. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.833.
McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2006.06.003.
Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005.
Moè, A., Jansen, P., & Pietsch, S. (2018). Childhood preference for spatial toys. Gender differences and relationships with mental rotation in STEM and non-STEM students. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.003.
Moreau, D., Clerc, J., Mansy-Dannay, A., & Guerrien, A. (2012). Enhancing spatial ability through sport practice. Journal of Individual Differences, 33(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000075.
Nairne, J. S., VanArsdall, J. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Blunt, J. R. (2012). Adaptive memory: Enhanced location memory after survival processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025728.
Nazareth, A., Herrera, A., & Pruden, S. M. (2013). Explaining sex differences in mental rotation: Role of spatial activity experience. Cognitive Processing, 14(2), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0542-8.
Newcombe, N. S. (2016). Thinking spatially in the science classroom. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.010.
Newcombe, N. S., & Stieff, M. (2011). Six myths about spatial thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 955–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.588728.
Newcombe, N. S., Bandura, M. M., & Taylor, D. G. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9(3), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00289672.
Nguyen, H.-H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012702.
Nordvik, H., & Amponsah, B. (1998). Gender differences in spatial abilities and spatial activity among university students in an egalitarian educational system. Sex Roles, 38(11–12), 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018878610405.
Okagaki, L., & Frensch, P. A. (1994). Effects of video game playing on measures of spatial performance: Gender effects in late adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(94)90005-1.
Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1032.
Piccardi, L., Iaria, G., Ricci, M., Bianchini, F., Zompanti, L., & Guariglia, C. (2008). Walking in the Corsi test: Which type of memory do you need? Neuroscience Letters, 432(2), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.12.044.
Postma, A., Jager, G., Kessels, R. P. C., Koppeschaar, H. P. F., & van Honk, J. (2004). Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory. Brain and Cognition, 54(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00238-0.
Provo, J., Lamar, C., & Newby, T. (2002). Using a cross section to train veterinary students to visualize anatomical structures in three dimensions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10007.
Quaiser-Pohl, C., Jansen, P., Lehmann, J., & Kudielka, B. M. (2016). Is there a relationship between the performance in a chronometric mental-rotations test and salivary testosterone and estradiol levels in children aged 9–14 years? Developmental Psychobiology, 58(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21333.
Redick, T. S., Broadway, J. M., Meier, M. E., Kuriakose, P. S., Unsworth, N., Kane, M. J., et al. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000123.
Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2016). Sex and sex-role differences in specific cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 54, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.12.004.
Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2017). Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for STEM education and approaches to reducing the gender gap for parents and educators. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education: Transforming research into practice (pp. 195–224). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0_10.
Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2019). Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). American Psychologist, 74(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000356.
Resnick, S. M., Berenbaum, S. A., Gottesman, I. I., & Bouchard, T. J. (1986). Early hormonal influences on cognitive functioning in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.2.191.
Roberts, J. E., & Bell, M. A. (2000). Sex differences on a computerized mental rotation task disappear with computer familiarization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(3f), 1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.3f.1027.
Roberts, J. E., & Bell, M. A. (2003). Two- and three-dimensional mental rotation tasks lead to different parietal laterality for men and women. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00195-8.
Rochon, P. A., Davidoff, F., & Levinson, W. (2016). Women in academic medicine leadership: Has anything changed in 25 years? Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1053–1056. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001281.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02322211.
Ruggiero, G., Sergi, I., & Iachini, T. (2008). Gender differences in remembering and inferring spatial distances. Memory, 16(8), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802307695.
Ruthsatz, V., Neuburger, S., Rahe, M., Jansen, P., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2017). The gender effect in 3D-mental-rotation performance with familiar and gender-stereotyped objects – A study with elementary school children. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(6), 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2017.1312689.
Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2010). Sex differences in science learning: Closing the gap through animations. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.003.
Sanders, B., Soares, M. P., & D’Aquila, J. M. (1982). The sex difference on one test of spatial visualization: A nontrivial difference. Child Development, 53(4), 1106–1110. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129153.
Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440.
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.
Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007). The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9168-6.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.
Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235.
Stephenson, C. L., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Improved matrix reasoning is limited to training on tasks with a visuospatial component. Intelligence, 41(5), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.05.006.
Stericker, A., & LeVesconte, S. (1982). Effect of brief training on sex-related differences in visual–spatial skill. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 1018–1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.1018.
Syzmanowicz, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.001.
Terlecki, M. S., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). How important is the digital divide? The relation of computer and videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53(5–6), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-6765-0.
Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 996–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1420.
Torgrimson, B. N., & Minson, C. T. (2005). Sex and gender: What is the difference? Journal of Applied Physiology, 99(3), 785–787. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00376.2005.
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., et al. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446.
Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Finding the missing piece: Blocks, puzzles, and shapes fuel school readiness. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2014.02.005.
Vorstenbosch, M. A. T. M., Klaassen, T. P. F. M., Donders, A. R. T., Kooloos, J. G. M., Bolhuis, S. M., & Laan, R. F. J. M. (2013). Learning anatomy enhances spatial ability. Anatomical Sciences Education, 6(4), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1346.
Voyer, D., & Jansen, P. (2016). Sex differences in chronometric mental rotation with human bodies. Psychological Research, 80(6), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0701-x.
Voyer, D., & Jansen, P. (2017). Motor expertise and performance in spatial tasks: A meta-analysis. Human Movement Science, 54, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.004.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250.
Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194024.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S. D., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2017). Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1085-7.
Vuoksimaa, E., Kaprio, J., Kremen, W. S., Hokkanen, L., Viken, R. J., Tuulio-Henriksson, A., et al. (2010). Having a male co-twin masculinizes mental rotation performance in females. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1069–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376075.
Wai, J., & Kell, H. J. (2017). What innovations have we already lost?: The importance of identifying and developing spatial talent. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education: Transforming research into practice (pp. 109–124). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0_6.
Witkin, H. A. (1949). The nature and importance of individual differences in perception. Journal of Personality, 18(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01237.x.
Wong, M., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2015). Gender effects when learning manipulative tasks from instructional animations and static presentations. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 37–52.
Wong, M., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2018). Investigating gender and spatial measurements in instructional animation research. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.017.
Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Herron, T. J., & Yund, E. W. (2016). An improved spatial span test of visuospatial memory. Memory, 24(8), 1142–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1076849.
Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.763.
Young, D. M., Rudman, L. A., Buettner, H. M., & McLean, M. C. (2013). The influence of female role models on women’s implicit science cognitions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313482109.
Zell, E., Krizan, Z., & Teeter, S. R. (2015). Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis. American Psychologist, 70(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038208.
Acknowledgments
Support from PIA–CONICYT Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence Project FB0003, and CONICYT Fondecyt 11180255, is gratefully acknowledged. The first author is thankful to Enrique Castro and Monseratt Ibáñez for their assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castro-Alonso, J.C., Jansen, P. (2019). Sex Differences in Visuospatial Processing. In: Castro-Alonso, J. (eds) Visuospatial Processing for Education in Health and Natural Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20968-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20969-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)