Abstract
Peroxisomes have recently been shown to play important roles in the context of viral infections. However, further and more detailed studies should be performed to unravel the specific mechanisms involved. The analysis of the relevance of particular peroxisomal components, such as peroxisomal proteins, for viral infections can be performed by comparing the production of new virus particles in the absence and presence of those specific components. Different methodologies are used to quantify the production of infectious virus particles, depending on the virus, cell type, and the specific characteristics of the viral infection to be analyzed. Here we provide a detailed protocol to study the importance of a putative peroxisomal protein on infection by viruses that induce the death of their host cells. We use the influenza A virus (IAV) infection in A549 cells as a model, and the quantification of the newly produced infectious virus particles is performed by a plaque assay.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ferreira AR, Marques M, Ribeiro D (2019) Peroxisomes and innate immunity: antiviral response and beyond. Int J Mol Sci 20:1–352. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153795
Dixit E, Boulant S, Zhang Y et al (2010) Peroxisomes are signaling platforms for antiviral innate immunity. Cell 141:668–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.018
Sandalio LM, RodrÃguez-Serrano M, Romero-Puertas MC, del RÃo LA (2013) Role of peroxisomes as a source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling molecules. Subcell Biochem 69:231–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6889-5_13
Ferreira AR, Marques M, Ramos B et al (2022) Emerging roles of peroxisomes in viral infections. Trends Cell Biol 32:124–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2021.09.010
Racaniello VR, Skalka AM, Flint J, Rall GF (2015) Principles of virology, 4th edition
Payne S (2017) Methods to study viruses. Viruses 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803109-4.00004-0
Matrosovich M, Matrosovich T, Garten W, Klenk HD (2006) New low-viscosity overlay medium for viral plaque assays. Virol J 3:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-3-63
Baer A, Kehn-Hall K (2014) Viral concentration determination through plaque assays: using traditional and novel overlay systems. J Vis Exp 52065. https://doi.org/10.3791/52065
Ryu W-S (2017) Diagnosis and methods. Mol Virol Hum Pathog Viruses 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-800838-6.00004-7
De Wit E, Spronken MIJ, Bestebroer TM et al (2004) Efficient generation and growth of influenza virus A/PR/8/34 from eight cDNA fragments. Virus Res 103:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.028
Alenquer M, Vale-Costa S, Etibor TA et al (2019) Influenza A virus ribonucleoproteins form liquid organelles at endoplasmic reticulum exit sites. Nat Commun 10:1629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09549-4
Hollý J, Fogelová M, Jakubcová L et al (2017) Comparison of infectious influenza A virus quantification methods employing immuno-staining. J Virol Methods 247:107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.06.004
Eisfeld AJ, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y (2014) Influenza A virus isolation, culture and identification. Nat Protoc 9:2663–2681. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.180
Karakus U, Crameri M, Lanz C, Yángüez E (2018) Propagation and titration of influenza viruses. Methods Mol Biol 1836:59–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8678-1_4
Jorquera PA, Tripp RA (2016) Quantification of RSV infectious particles by plaque assay and immunostaining assay. Methods Mol Biol 1442:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3687-8_3
Caidi H, Harcourt JL, Haynes LM (2016) RSV growth and quantification by microtitration and qRT- PCR assays. Methods Mol Biol 1442:13–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3687-8_2
McKimm-Breschkin JL (2004) A simplified plaque assay for respiratory syncytial virus – direct visualization of plaques without immunostaining. J Virol Methods 120:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.02.020
Mendoza EJ, Manguiat K, Wood H, Drebot M (2020) Two detailed plaque assay protocols for the quantification of infectious SARS-CoV-2. Curr Protoc Microbiol 57:cpmc105. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpmc.105
Case JB, Bailey AL, Kim AS et al (2020) Growth, detection, quantification, and inactivation of SARS-CoV-2. Virology 548:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VIROL.2020.05.015
Despres HW, Mills MG, Shirley DJ et al (2022) Measuring infectious SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples reveals a higher viral titer:RNA ratio for Delta and Epsilon vs. Alpha variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119:e2116518119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116518119
Jureka AS, Silvas JA, Basler CF (2020) Propagation, inactivation, and safety testing of SARS-CoV-2. Viruses 12:622. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12060622
Yi MK (2010) Hepatitis C virus: propagation, quantification, and storage. Curr Protoc Microbiol Chapter 15. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471729259.mc15d01s19
Stewart H, Bartlett C, Ross-Thriepland D et al (2015) A novel method for the measurement of hepatitis C virus infectious titres using the IncuCyte ZOOM and its application to antiviral screening. J Virol Methods 218:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.03.009
Dangsagul W, Ruchusatsawat K, Tawatsin A et al (2021) Zika virus isolation, propagation, and quantification using multiple methods. PLoS One 16:e0255314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255314
Brien JD, Hassert M, Stone ET et al (2019) Isolation and quantification of zika virus from multiple organs in a mouse. J Vis Exp 2019:e59632. https://doi.org/10.3791/59632
Carneiro PH, Mendes-Monteiro L, Mohana-Borges R (2022) Virus propagation and plaque assay for dengue virus. Methods Mol Biol 2409:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1879-0_1
Payne AF, Binduga-Gajewska I, Kauffman EB, Kramer LD (2006) Quantitation of flaviviruses by fluorescent focus assay. J Virol Methods 134:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.01.003
Nadgir SV, Hensler HR, Knowlton ER et al (2013) Fifty percent tissue culture infective dose assay for determining the titer of infectious human herpesvirus 8. J Clin Microbiol 51:1931–1934. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00761-13
Kalser J, Adler B, Mach M et al (2017) Differences in growth properties among two human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein O genotypes. Front Microbiol 8:1609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01609
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge support from the European Union through the Horizon 2020 program (H2020-WIDESPREAD-2020-5 ID-952373) and from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) (PTDC/BIA-CEL/31378/2017; CEECIND/03747/2017; SFRH/BD/ 137851/2018 and UIDB/04501/2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Marques, M., Ferreira, A.R., Ribeiro, D. (2023). Determining the Importance of Peroxisomal Proteins for Viral Infections in Cultured Mammalian Cells. In: Schrader, M. (eds) Peroxisomes. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2643. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3048-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3048-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3047-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3048-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols