Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dialyseshuntchirurgie

  • Chapter
Dialyseshunts

Zusammenfassung

Die arteriovenöse Fistel mit körpereigenen Gefäßen ist seit der Erstbeschreibung im Jahre 1966 der goldene Standard des Gefäßzuganges zur Dauerdialysebehandlung [4]. Die geniale Idee von Brescia und Cimino — Chirurg war Kenneth Appel — setzte eine Entwicklung in Gang, die bis heute das Geschick, die Erfahrung und die Phantasie des Operateurs fordert. Der Nephrologe erwartet eine gut dilatierte, ein ausreichendes Flussvolumen führende, leicht, sicher und wiederholt zu punktierende Vene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adams MB, Majewski JT, Kiselow MC, Kauffman HM (1986) Diabetic vascular access. Dial Transplant 15:307–308

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berardinelli L (2004) Arteriovenous fistulas: Different types and surgical techniques. In: Ronco C, Levin NW (eds) Hemodialysis vascular access and peritoneal access. Contrib Nephrol, Karger, Basel, vol 142, pp 47–72

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE (1984) Historical perspective on vascular access surgery for chronic hemodialysis. In: Waltzer WC, Rapaport FT (eds) Angioaccess. Principles and practice, Grune & Stratton, Orlando, Florida, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, Hurwich BJ (1966) Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med 275: 1089–1092

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brittinger WD, Twittenhoff WD (1975) Anschlußverfahren an die künstliche Niere. Technische und klinische Aspekte. Bindernagel, Friedberg

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brittinger WD, Twittenhoff WD, Wagner W. (1983) Möglichkeiten des Gefäßzuganges bei Verwendung körpereigener Gefäße. Mitt AG Klin Nephrol 12:78–92

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butt KMH (1978) Blood access Clin Nephrol 9:138–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Canaud B, Desmeules S (2004) Vascular access for hemodialysis. In: Hörl WH, Koch KM Lindsay RM, Ronco C, Winchester JF (eds) Replacement of renal function. 5th. edn, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p 213

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chazan JA, London MR, Pono LM (1995) Long-term survival of vascular accesses in a large chronic hemodialysis population. Nephron 69:228–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Conlon PJ, Schwab SJ (1994) Optimal hemodialysis: Access. Semin Dialysis 7: 268–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghavamian M, Gutch CF, Kopp KF, Kolff WJ (1972) The sad truth about hemodialysis in diabetic nephropathy. JAMA 222:1386–1389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gracz KC, Ing TS, Soung LS, Armbruster KFW, Seim SK, Merkel FK (1977) Proximal forearm fistula for maintenance hemodialysis. Kidney Int 11:71–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jost JO, Rühland D, Müller RP, Schönleben K (1984) Arteriovenöse Fisteln zur Hämodialyse. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 81:3655–3659

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karmody AM, Lempert N (1974) “Smooth loop” arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Surgery 75:238–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Keoghane SR, Kar Leow C, Gray DWR (1993) Routine use of arteriovenous fistula construction to dilate the venous outflow prior to insertion of an expanded polytetrafluoro-ethylene (PTFE) loop graft for dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8:154–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Konner K, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Roys EC, Port FK (2002) Tailoring the initial vascular access for dialysis patients. Kidney Int 62:329–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krönung G (1980) Anschlußverfahren des extrakorporalen Kreislaufes im Rahmen der chronischen Hämodialysebehandlung. Inauguraldissertation, Universität Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mendelssohn DC, Ethier J, Elder SJ, Saran R, Port FK, Pisoni RL (2006) Haemodialysis vascular access problems in Canada: results from the Dialysis Outcomes Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS II). Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:721–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lymberopoulos S, Melchior H, Gerlach R (1974) Die End-zu-End innere AV-Anastomose zur Hämodialyse (Operative Erfahrungen und vergleichende strömungs-dynamische Untersuchungen). Verh Dt Ges Urol 25:326–330

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malovrh M (2002) Native arteriovenous fistula: Preoperative evaluation. Am J Kidney Dis 39:1218–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nonnast-Daniel B, Martin RP, Lindert O, Mügge A, Schaeffer J, von der Lieth H, Söchtig E, Galanski M, Koch KM, Daniel WG (1992) Colour doppler ultrasound assessment of arteriovenous haemodialysis fistulas. Lancet 339:143–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ortega-Gaytan M, Hong JH, Shirani K, Adamsons RJ, Manis T, Friedman EA, Butt KMH (1979) Angioaccess for maintenance hemodialysis in end-stage diabetic nephropathy. Proc Dial Transplant Forum 9:99–101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pflugbeil G, Liepsch D, Sommoggy S von, Tröster J, Klein G, Maurer PC (1993) Die orthotopen arteriovenösen. Fisteln beim Dialysepatienten: eine Sonderstellung fluiddynamischer Problematik. VASA 22:143–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ritz E, Rychlík I, Locatelli F, Halimi S (1999) End-stage renal failure in Type 2 diabetes: A medical catastrophe of worldwide dimensions. Am J Kidney Dis 34: 795–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Röhl L, Franz HE, Möhring K, Ritz E, Schüler HW, Uhse HG, Ziegler M (1968) Direct arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2:191–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sedlacek M, Teodorescu V, Falk A, Vassalotti JA, Uribarri J (2001) Hemodialysis access placement with preoperative noninvasive vascular mapping: comparison between patients with or without dïabetes. Am J Kidney Dis 38:560–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sperling M, Kleinschmidt W, Wilhelm A, Heidland A, Klütsch K (1967) Die subkutane arteriovenöse Fistel zur intermittierenden Hämodialyse-Behandlung. Dtsch Med Wschr 92:425–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tellis VA, Veith FJ, Sobermann RJ, Freed SZ, Gliedman ML (1971) Internal arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 132:866–870

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wedgwood KR, Wiggins PA, Guillou PJ (1984) A prospective study of end-to-side vs. side-to-side arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Br J Surg 71:640–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wehrli H, Chenevard R, Zaruba K (1989) Chirurgische Erfahrungen mit arteriovenösen Hämodialyse-Shunts (1970–1989). Helv Chir Acta 56:621–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wiese P, Nonnast-Daniel B (2004) Colour Doppler ultrasound in dialysis access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:1956–1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Windus DW, Jendrisak MD, Delmez JA (1992) Prothetic fistula survival and complications in hemodialysis patients: Effects of diabetes and age. Am J Kidney Dis 19:448–452

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zanow J, Kruger U, Scholz H (2006) Proximalization of the arterial inflow: a new technique to treat access-related ischemia. J Vasc Surg 43:1216–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Bourquelot P, Cussenot O, Corbi P, Pillion G, Gagnadoux MF, Bensman A, Loirat C, Broyer M (1990) Microsurgical creation and follow up of arterio-venous fistula for chronic hemodialysis in children. Pediatric Nephrol 4:156–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cetto C, Keller F (1995) Relevance of the ulnaris fistula as a dialysis shunt. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:877–878

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cimino JE, Brescia MJ (1994) The early development of the arteriovenous fistula needle technique for hemodialysis. ASAIO J 40:923–927

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Keller F, Löwe HJ, Bauknecht KJ, Schwarz A, Offermann G (1988) Kumulative Funktionsraten von orthotopen Dialysefisteln und Interponaten. Dtsch Med Wschr 113: 332–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kinnaert P (1995) Relevance of the ulnaris fistula as a dialysis shunt. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10(12):2379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peto R, Pike P, Armitage WE (1977) Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. Brit J Cancer 35:585–612

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Ates A, Ozyazicioglu A, Yekeler I, Ceviz M, Erkut B, Karapolat S, Kocogullari CU, Kocak H (2006) Primary and secondary patency rates and complications of upper extremity arteriovenous fistulae created for hemodialysis. Tohoku J Exp Med 210(2):91–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bender MH, Bruyninckx CM, Gerlag PG (1994) The brachiocephalic elbow fistula: a useful alternative angioaccess for permanent hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg 20(5): 808–813

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bender MH, Bruyninckx CM, Gerlag PG (1995) The Gracz arteriovenous fistula evaluated. Results of the brachiocephalic elbow fistula in haemodialysis angio-access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 10(3):294–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dagher FJ, Gelber RL, Ramos EJ, Sadler JH (1976) Basilic vein to brachial artery fistula: a new access for chronic hemodialysis. South Med J 69(11):1438–1440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunlop MG, Mackinlay JY, Jenkins AM (1986) Vascular access: experience with the brachiocephalic fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 68(4):203–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Elcheroth J, de PL, Kinnaert P (1994) Elbow arteriovenous fistulas for chronic haemodialysis. Br J Surg 81(7):982–984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzgerald JT, Schanzer A, Chin AI, McVicar JP, Perez RV, Troppmann C (2004) Outcomes of upper arm arteriovenous fistulas for maintenance hemodialysis access. Arch Surg 139(2):201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Francis DM, Lu Y, Robertson AJ, Millar RJ, Amy J (2007) Two-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula for chronic haemodialysis access. ANZ J Surg 77(3):150–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goff CD, Sato DT, Bloch PH, DeMasi RJ, Gregory RT, Gayle RG, Parent FN, Meier GH, Wheeler JR (2000) Steal syndrome complicating hemodialysis access procedures: can it be predicted? Ann Vasc Surg 14(2):138–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gracz KC, Ing TS, Soung LS, Armbruster KF, Seim SK, Merkel FK (1977) Proximal forearm fistula for maintenance hemodialysis. Kidney Int 11(1):71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hatjibaloglou A, Grekas D, Saratzis N, Megalopoulos A, Moros I, Kiskinis D, Dalainas V (1992) Transposed basilic vein-brachial arteriovenous fistula: an alternative vascular access for hemodialysis. Artif Organs 16(6):623–625

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hossny A (2003) Brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula: different surgical techniques and their effects on fistula patency and dialysis-related complications. J Vasc Surg 37(4):821–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huber TS, Carter JW, Carter RL, Seeger JM (2003) Patency of autogenous and polytetrafluoroethylene upper extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg 38(5):1005–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Konner K, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Roys EC, Port FK (2002) Tailoring the initial vascular access for dialysis patients. Kidney Int 62(1):329–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Konner K, Nonnast-Daniel B, Ritz E (2003) The arteriovenous fistula. J Am Soc Nephrol 14(6):1669–1680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lazarides MK, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou GA, Staramos DN (2007) A meta-analysis of dialysis access outcome in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg 45(2):420–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mihmanli I, Besirli K, Kurugoglu S, Atakir K, Haider S, Ogut G, Numan F, Canturk E, Sayin AG (2001) Cephalic vein and hemodialysis fistula: surgeon’s observation versus color Doppler ultrasonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med 20(3): 217–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Murphy GJ, Saunders R, Metcalfe M, Nicholson ML (2002) Elbow fistulas using autogeneous vein: patency rates and results of revision. Postgrad Med J 78(922): 483–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao RK, Azin GD, Hood DB, Rowe VL, Kohl RD, Katz SG, Weaver FA (2004) Basilic vein transposition fistula: a good option for maintaining hemodialysis access site options? J Vasc Surg 39(5):1043–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Solomonson MD, Johnson ME, Ilstrup D (1994) Risk factors in patients having surgery to create an arteriovenous fistula. Anesth Analg 79(4):694–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Taghizadeh A, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, Taylor J, Koffman G (2003) Long-term outcomes of brachiobasilic transposition fistula for haemodialysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26(6):670–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tautenhahn J, Heinrich P, Meyer F (1994) Arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis — patency rates and complications — a retrospective study. Zentralbl Chir 119(7): 506–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, Konner K, Basci A, Fouque D, Kooman J, Martin-Malo A, Pedrini L, Pizzarelli F, Tattersall J, Vennegoor M, Wanner C, Ter WP, Vanholder R (2007) EBPG on Vascular Access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22(Suppl 2): ii88–ii117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scheltinga MR, Kouwenberg I, Moret KE, Beerenhout CH, Tordoir JH (2006) Steal in hemodialysis patients depends on type of vascular access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32(6):710–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolford HY, Hsu J, Rhodes JM, Shortell CK, Davies MG, Bakhru A, Illig KA (2005) Outcome after autogenous brachial-basilic upper arm transpositions in the post-National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative era. J Vasc Surg 42(5):951–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yilmaz M, Senkaya I, Saba D, Bicer M (2007) Long-term outcomes of basilic vein transposition fistula for hemodialysis. Vasa 36(1):29–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Arroyo MR, Sidemann MJ, Jennings WC (2008) Primary and staged arteriovenous fistulas. Ann Vasc Surg 47:1279–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elwakeel HA, Saad EM, Elkiran YM, Awad I (2007) Unusual vascular access for hemodialysis: transposed venae comitante of the brachial artery. Ann Vasc Surg 21:560–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fitzgerald JT, Schanzer A, Chin AI, McViacar JP, Perez RV, Troppmann C (2004) Outcomes of upper arm arteriovenous fistulas for maintenance hemodialysis acces. Arch Surg. 139:201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Francis DM, Lu Y, Robertson AJ, Millar RJ, Amy J (2008) Two-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula for chronic hemodialysis access. ANZ J Surg 77:150–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gormus N, Ozergin U, Durgut K, Yuksek T, Solak H (2003) Comparison of autologous basilica vein transpositions between forearm and upper arm regions. Ann Vasc Surg 17:522–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hossny A (2003) Brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula: different surgical techniques and their effects on fistula patency and dialysis-related complication. Ann Vasc Surg 36(4): 821–826

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keuter XH, De Smet AA, Kessels AG, van der Sande FM, Welten RJ, Tordoir JH (2008) A randomized multicenter study of the outcome of brachial-basilic arteriovenous fistula and prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop as vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vas Surg 47(2):359–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee CH, Ko PJ, Liu YH, Hsieh HC, Liu HP (2004) Brachiiobasilic fistula as a secondary access procedure: an alternative to a dialysis prosthetic graft. Chang Gung Med J 27(11):816–823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oliver M, McCann R, Indridadson OS, Butterly DW, Schwab ST (2001) Comparison of transposed brachiocephalic fistulas to upper arm grafts and brachiocephalic fistulas. Kidney international Vol. 60:1532–1539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roth S, Schulte S, May T, Horsch S (2005) Standardverfahren in der Hämodialyse-Shuntchirurgie. Der Chirug 76:1091–1104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thon P (2006) Shuntmonitoring durch Flussmessung mit Dopplersonographie und Transonic-Geräten. Vascular Access Forum 2006(1):6–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weyde W, Krajewska M, Letachowicz W, Klinger M (2002)Superficializaation of the wrist native arteriovenous fistula for effective Hemodialysis vascular access construction. Kidney Int 62:1170–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Woo K, Farber A, Doros G, Killeen K, Kohanzadeh S (2007) Evaluation of the efficacy of the transposed upper arm arteriovenous fistula: A single institutional review of 190 basilic and cephalic vein transposition Procedures. J Vas Surg 46(1):94–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Brittinger WD, Twittenhoff WD (2005) Anschlussverfahren an die künstliche Niere, Dialyseshunts: Operationsverfahren, Punktion, Komplikationsmanagement. Thieme, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erike Y (1997) Revisionen direkter a.v.-Fisteln zur chronischen intermittierenden Hämodialyse. Revisionsscore als Prognoseaussage über Revisionsausgang und Sekundärfunktionszeit. Inauguraldissertation, Fachbereich Humanmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davies AH, Gibbons CP (eds) (2003) Vascular access, simplified. Ebenezer Baylis, Worcester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haug M, Popescu M, Vondérbank E et al (1998) Die Rekonstruktion mediastinaler Venen beim gleichseitigen Dialyseshunt. Zentralbl Chir, Gefäßchirurgisches Schwerpunktheft 10

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haug M, Popescu M (2003) Surgery of arteriovenous interposition grafts. Eur Surg 35:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hepp, W (2003) Dialysis Shunt Surgery using autologous material. Eur Surg 35: 203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hepp W, Langer S (2007) Gefäßchirurgische Zugangseingriffe zur Hämodialyse. In: Hepp W, Kogel H (Hrsg) Gefäßchirurgie, 2. Aufl. Urban und Fischer, Elsevier, München Jena, S 535–550

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hepp W, Ehmann T, Langer M, Zwicker C, de Jonge K (1987) Stellenwert der intraarteriellen digitalen Subtraktionsangiographie (i.a.-DSA) bei der Planung von Reoperationen an Dialysefisteln. Angio 9:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hepp W (1995) Behandlung beim “failing”-Dialyse-Shunt. TW Urologie/Nephrologie 7:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kantermann RY, Vesely TM, Pilgram TK (1995) Dialysis access grafts: Anatomic location of venous stenoses and results of angioplasty. Radiology 195:135–139

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keller F, Loewe H-J, Bauknecht K-J, Schwarz A, Offermann G (1988) Kumulative Funktionsraten von orthotopen Dialysefisteln und Interponaten. DMW 113:332–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scholz A, Zwicker Ch, Langer R, Langer M (1991) Postoperative Kontrolle von Hämodialyseshunts durch intraaterielle DSA und Duplexsonographie. angio archiv 20:86–90

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sommoggy S v, Maurer PC (Hrsg) (1995) Hämodialyse, Shuntchirurgie, Shuntzugangswege, Shuntstrategie, Shuntkatheter, Shuntmaterialien, Shuntüberwachungsverfahren, Shunt beim Gefäßkranken, Shunt-Reeingriffe. Erdl, Trostberg

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stohr M (1997) Die direkte a.v.-Fistel zur chronischen Hämodialyse. Inauguraldissertation, Fachbereich Humanmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Baker LD et al (1976) Expanded polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) subcutaneous arteriovenous conduit: an improved vascular access for chronic hemodialysis. Trans Amer Soc Artif Intern Organs 22:382–384

    Google Scholar 

  2. Besarab A, Frinak S (2000) Strategies for the prospective detection of access dysfunction. In: Conlon PJ et al (eds) Hemodialysis Vascular Access: Practice and Problems. Oxford, University Press, pp 157–182

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borchard F et al (1981) Morphologische Befunde an durchströmten arteriovenösen Fisteln zur Hämodialyse. angio 3:135–145

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bourquelot P (2001) Long term results of ProCol bioprosthetic vascular grafts. In: Henry ML (eds) Vascular Access for Hemodialysis-VII. Gore & Associates Inc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 213–216

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brescia MI et al (1966) Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med 275:1089–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke DR et al (2001) Transformation of nonvascular acellular tissue matrices into durable vascular conduits. Ann Thorac Surg 71:434–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen GS et al (2000) External beam irradiation as an adjunctive treatment in failing dialysis shunts. J Vasc Intervention 11:321–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coulson AS, Singh J (2000) Modification of venous end of dialysis grafts: an attempt to reduce neointimal hyperplasia. Dial Transplantation 29:10–18

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dammers R et al (2003) Evaluation of 4-mm to 7-mm versus 6-mm prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop access for hemodialysis: Results of a randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 37:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Sabrout RA et al (1999) Right atrial bypass grafting for central venous obstruction associated with dialysis access. J Vasc Surg 29(3):472–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Pajares R et al (2003) Upper arm polytetrafluorethylene grafts for Dialysis access. Analysis of two different graft sizes: 6 mm and 6–8 mm. Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haimov M et al (1974) Alternatives for vascular access for hemodialysis: Experience with autogenous saphenous vein autografts and bovine heterografts. Surgery 75:708–712

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haug M, Popescu M (2003) Surgery of arteriovenous interposition grafts. Eur Surg 35:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haug M, Müller-Wiefel H (1981) Die Rolle des bovinen Heterotransplantates im Rahmen der Dialyse-Shunt-Chirurgie. angio 5:199–209

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haug M, Vonderbank E (1998) Arteriovenöse Interponate. In: Hepp W, Hegenscheid M (Hrsg) Dialyseshunts: Grundlagen, Chirurgie, Komplikationen. Steinkoff, Darmstadt, S. 104–115

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haug M et al (1999) Die Rekonstruktion mediastinaler Venen beim gleichseitigen Dialyseshunt. Zentralbl Chir 124:2–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hauser H et al (1998) Dialyseshunt-Aneurysmen. In: Hepp W, Hegenscheid M (Hrsg) Dialyseshunts: Grundlagen, Chirurgie, Komplikationen. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, S 176–182

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heintjes RJ et al (1995) The results of denatured homologous vein grafts as conduits for secondary hemodialysis access surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 9: 58–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Himmelfarb J (2000) Pharmacologic approaches in preventing hemodialysis access failure. In: Conlon PJ et al (eds) Hemodialysis Vascular Access: Practice and Principles. University Press, Oxford, pp 261–281

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hiranaka T (2001) Tapered and straight grafts for hemodialysis access: A prospective, randomized comparison study. In: Henry ML (eds) Vascular Access for Hemodialysis-VII. Gore & Associates Inc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 219–224

    Google Scholar 

  21. Humphries AL et al (1981) Thirty-six recommendations for vascular access operations: The American Surgeon 47:145–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kakkos SK et al (2007) Results of aggressive graft surveillance and endovascular treatment on secondary patency rates of Vectra Vascular Access Grafts. J Vasc Surg 45:974–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krueger U et al (2001) Effects of arterial and venous anastomotic design on hemodynamics in arteriovenous prosthetic grafts. In: Henry ML (Hrsg) Vascular Access for Hemodialysis-VII. Gore & Associates Inc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 177–190

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lemson S, Tordoir JH et al (2002) Hemodynamics of venous cuff interposition in prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Blood Purif 20(6):557–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lenz BJ, Veldenz HC (1998) A three-year follow-up on standard versus thin wall ePTFE grafts for hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg 28(3):464–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin E (1987) Anästhesieverfahren bei akuter und chronischer Niereninsuffizienz. In: Lawin P, van Alken H (Hrsg) Anästhesie und eingeschränkte Organfunktion. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, S 65–73

    Google Scholar 

  27. Masuda EM et al (1998) Stent-graft arteriovenous fistula: an endovascular technique in hemodialysis access. J Endovasc Surg 5:18–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. May I et al (1969) Saphenous vein arteriovenous fistula in regular dialysis treatment: N Eng J Med 279:770–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mickley V (2001) Stent oder Bypass? Behandlungsergebnisse zentralvenöser Obstruktionen. Zentralbl Chir 126:445–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Müller-Wiefel H, Haug M (1983) Zur Frage des geeigneten Gefäßersatzes in der Dialyse-Shunt-Chirurgie: engio 5:199–209

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nyberg SL et al (2001) Preliminary experience with a cuffed ePTFE graft for hemodialysis vascular access. ASAIO Journal 47:333–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Parzhuber A et al (1998) Praeoperative Angiographie vor Shuntanlage (unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der CO2-Phlebographie). In: Sommogyi S v (Hrsg) Haemodialyse Shuntchirurgie. Erdl, Trostberg, S 55–64

    Google Scholar 

  33. Polo JR et al (2004) Randomized comparison of 6-mm straight grafts versus 6-to 8-mm tapered grafts for brachial-axillary access. J Vasc Surg 40:319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pruett TL (2001) Vascular Access Infections. In: Henry ML (ed) Vascular Access for Hemodialysis-VII. Gore & Associates Inc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 125–128

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roy-Chaudhury P, Burnett SK (2001) Venous neointimal hyperplasia in polytetrafluorethylene dialysis grafts. Kidney Int 59:2325–2334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Scholz H et al (1991) 10-jähriger klinischer Einsatz allogener, formfixierter, aldehydkonservierter und innenflächensilikonisierter Venen als a.v.-Interponate für die Dialyse bei mehr als 500 Patienten: angio archiv 22:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  37. Scholz H et al (1999) Five year’s experience with an arteriovenous patch prosthesis as access for hemodialysis. In: Henry ML (eds) Vascular Access for Hemodialysis-VI. Gore & Associates Inc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 241–253

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schumann ES et al (1999) Magnetic resonance angiography in evaluation of central and peripheral vasculature prior to dialysis surgery. In Henry ML (ed) Vascular Access for Hemodialysis-VI. Gore & Associates Inc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 103–109

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schumann ES et al (2001) Prospective randomized trial of a silastic based hemodialysis graft. In: Henry ML (ed) Vascular Access for Hemodialysis-VII. Gore & Associates Inc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 227–230

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schwab SR et al (1997) NKF-DOQI clinical practice guide lines for vascular access. New York: National Kidney Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schwab SR et al (1999) Vascular access for hemodialysis. Kidney Int 55:2078–2090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Settmacher U et al (1998) Das arterioarterielle Interponat als Dialysezugang. Gefäßchirurgie 3:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sommogyi S v (1998) Qualität des Shuntmaterials-Polyester Prothese. In: Sommogyi S v (Hrsg) Hemodialyse Shuntchirurgie. Erdl, Trostberg, S 103–107

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sorom AJ et al (2002) Prospective, randomized evaluation of a cuffed expanded polytetrafluorethylene graft for hemodialysis vascular access. Surgery 132(2): 135–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor B et al (1993) Fate of infected and eroded hemodialysis grafts and autogenous fistulas. Am J Surg 165:632–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tordoir JHM, Lemson S (1999) Influencing venous graft geometry by venous cuff implantation. In: Henry ML (ed) Vascular access for Hemodialysis-VI. Gore & Associates Inc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 163–171

    Google Scholar 

  47. West JC et al (1987) Arterial insufficiency in hemodialysis access procedures: Reconstruction by an interposition polytetrafluorethylene graft conduit. Am J Surg 153:300–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Berardinelli L (2004) Arteriovenous fistulas: Different types and surgical techniques. In: Hemodialysis vascular access, and peritoneal dialysis access. In: Ronco C, Levin NM (eds) Contributions to Nephrology 142:47–72, 66–70

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brittinger WD, Twittenhoff WD (2005) Die Hochlagerung der A. femoralis superficialis in das Subkutangewebe des Oberschenkels. In: Anschlussverfahren an die künstliche Niere. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 24–26

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chemla ES, Morsy M, Anderson L, Makanjuola D (2006) Complex bypasses and fistulas for difficult hemodialysis access: a prospective, single-center experience. Semin Dial 19:246–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cull JD, Cull DL, Taylor SM, Carsten, CG, Snyder BA, Youkey JR, Langan, EM, Blackhurst DW (2004) Prosthetic thigh arteriovenous access: outcome with SVS/AAVS reporting standards. J Vasc Surg 39:381–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gradman WS, Cohen W, Haji-Aghaii M (2001) Arteriovenous fistula construction in the thigh with transposed superficial femoral vein: our initial experience. J Vasc Surg 33:968–975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gradman WS, Laub J, Cohen W (2005) Femoral vein transposition for arteriovenous hemodialysis access: improved patient selection and intraoperative measures reduce postoperative ischemia. J Vasc Surg 41:279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Korzets A, Ori Y, Baytner S, Zevin D, Chagnac A, Weinstein T, Herman M, Agmon M, Gafter U (1998) The femoral artery-femoral vein polytetrafluoroethylene graft: a 14-year retrospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:1215–1220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan A, Lazarus M (1975) Vascular access for dialysis. Technics and results with newer methods. Am J Surg 129:432–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott JD, Cull DL, Kalbaugh CA, Carsten CG, Blackhurst D, Taylor, SM, Snyder BA, York JW, Langan EM (2006) The mid-thigh loop arteriovenous graft: patient selection, technique, and results. Am Surg 72:825–828

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seyahi N, Kahveci A, Altiparmak MR, Serdengecti K, Erek E (2005) Ultrasound imaging findings of femoral veins in patients with renal failure and its impact on vascular access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20:1864–1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaldon S (1994) Percutaneous vessel catheterization for hemodialysis. ASAIO J 40:17–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. So SKS (1984) Arteriovenous communication: Internal fistulas. In: Simmons RL, Martin FE, Ascher NL, Najarian JS (eds) Manual of vascular access, organ donation and transplantation. Springer, p 69

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tashjian DB, Lipkowitz GS, Madden RL, Kaufman JL, Rhee SW, Berman J, Norris M, McCall J (2002) Safety and efficacy of femoral-based hemodialysis access grafts. J Vasc Surg 35:691–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas GI (1969) A large-vessel applique A-V shunt for hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 15:288–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, Konner K, Basci A, Fouque D, Kooman J, Martin-Malo A et al (2007) EBPG on Vascular Access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22(Suppl 2):ii88–ii117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Twittenhoff WD, Schwarzbeck A, Brittinger WD (1972) Femoralisverlagerung zur Dauerdialyse. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 97:528

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Pisoni RL, Young EW, Dykstra DM, Greenwood RN, Hecking E, Gillespie B, Wolfe RA, Goodkin DA, Held PJ (2002) Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 61(1):305–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Silva MB, Hobson RW, Pappas PJ, Haser PB, Araki CT, Goldberg MC, Jamil Z, Padberg FT (1997) Vein transposition in the forearm for autogenous hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 26:981–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gefen JY, Fox D, Giangola G, Ewing DR, Meisels IS (2002) The Transposed Forearm Loop Arteriovenous Fistula: A Valuable Option for Primary Hemodialysis Access in Diabetic Patients. Ann Vasc Surg 16:89–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cull DL, Taylor SM, Carsten CG, Youkey JR, Snyder BA, Sullivan TM, Langan EM (2002) The Fistula Elevation Procedure: A Valuable Technique for Maximizing Arteriovenous Fistula Utilization 16:84–88

    Google Scholar 

  5. Konner K (2000) Primary vascular access in diabetic patients: an audit. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:1317–1325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonforte G, Zerbi S, Surian M (2004) The Middle-arm Fistula: A New Native Arteriovenous Vascular Access for Hemodialysis Patients. Ann Vasc Surg 18(4): 448–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bender MH, Bruyninckx CM, Gerlag PG (1995) The Gracz arteriovenous fistula evaluated. Results of the brachiocephalic elbow fistula in haemodialysis angio-access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 10(3):294–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeebregts CJ, Tielliu IFJ, Hulsebos RG, de Bruin C, Verhoeven ELG, Huisman RM, van den Dungen JJAM (2005) Determinants of Failure of Brachiocephalic Elbow Fistulas for Haemodialysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 30(2):209–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunlop MG, Mackinlay JY, Jenkins AM (1986) Vascular access: experience with the brachiocephalic fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 68:203–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zibari GB, Rohr MS, Landreneau MD, Bridges RM, DeVault GA, Petty FH, Costley KJ, Brown ST, Mc Donald JC (1988) Complications from permanent hemodialysis vascular access. Surgery 104:681–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nazzal MM, Neglen P, Naseem J, Christenson JT, al-Hassan HK (1990) The brachiocephalic fistula: a successful secondary vascular access procedure. Vasa 19(4): 326–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy GJ, Saunders R, Metcalfe M, Nicholson ML (2002) Elbow fistulas using autogeneous vein: patency rates and results of revision. Postgrad Med J 78(922): 483–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lok CE, Oliver MJ, Su J, Bhola C, Hannigan N, Jassal SV (2005) Arteriovenous fistula outcomes in the era of the elderly dialysis population. Kidney Int 67(6): 2462–2469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dagher F, Gelber R, Ramos E, Sadler J (1976) The use of basilic vein and brachial artery as an A-V fistula for long term hemodialysis. J Surg Res 20(4): 373–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivers SP, Scher LA, Sheehan E, Lynn R, Veith FJ (1993) Basilic vein transposition: an underused autologous alternative to prosthetic dialysis angioaccess. J Vasc Surg 18:391–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Coburn MC, Carney WI Jr (1994) Comparison of basilic vein and polytetrafluoroethylene for brachial arteriovenous fistula. J Vasc Surg 20:896–904

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. El Mallah S (1998) Staged basilic vein transposition for dialysis angioaccess. International Angiology 17(2):65–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Humphries AL Jr, Colborn GL, Wynn JJ (1999) Elevated basilic vein arteriovenous fistula. Am J Surg 177(6):489–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy GJ, Nicholson ML (2002) Autogeneous elbow fistulas: the effect of diabetes mellitus on maturation, patency, and complication rates. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 23(5):452–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Segal JH, Kayler LK, Henke P, Merion RM, Leavey S, Campbell DA Jr (2003) Vascular access outcomes using the transposed basilic vein arteriovenous fistula. Am J Kidney Dis 42(1):151–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taghizadeh A, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, Taylor J, Koffman G (2003) Long-term outcomes of brachiobasilic transposition fistula for haemodialysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26(6):670–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hossny A (2003) Brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula: Different surgical techniques and their effects on fistula patency and dialysis-related complications. J Vasc Surg 37:821–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rao RK, Azin GD, Hood DB, Rowe VL, Kohl RD, Katz SG, Weaver FA (2004) Basilic vein transposition fistula: a good option for maintaining hemodialysis access site options? J Vasc Surg 39(5):1043–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bazan HA, Schanzer H (2004) Transposition of the brachial vein: A new source for autologous arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg 40:184–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huber TS, Carter JW, Carter RL, Seeger JM (2003) Patency of autogenous and polytetrafluoroethylene upper extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses: A systematic review. J Vasc Surg 38:1005–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Daphne P-P, Williams S, Lee T, Gahtan V (2004) Saphenous Vein Loop to Femoral Artery Arteriovenous Fistula: A Practical Alternative. Ann Vasc Surg 18:1615

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gradman WS, Laub J, Cohen W (2005) Femoral vein transposition for arteriovenous hemodialysis access: Improved patient selection and intraoperative measures reduce postoperative ischemia. J Vasc Surg 41:279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hazinedaroglu SM, Tuzuner A, Ayli D, Demirer S, Duman N, Yerdel MA (2004) Femoral vein transposition versus femoral loop grafts for hemodialysis: a prospective evaluation. Transplant Proc 36(1):65–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Gutschi S et al (1993) Erfahrungen mit PTFE-und Omniflow®-Prothesen beim brachiosubclavialen Dialyseshunt. Angio-Archiv 25:55

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Campistol JM et al (1989) Salvage of upper arm access graft in the presence of symptomatic subclavian vein thrombosis. Nephron 51:551–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chemla ES et al (2006) Complex bypasses and fistulas for difficult hemodialysis access: aprospective, single-center experience. Seminars in Dialysis 19(3):246–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen JC et al (2005) Venovenostomy for outflow venous obstruction in patients with upper extremity autogenous hemodialysis arteriovenous access. Ann Vasc Surg 19:629–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cimochowski GE et al (1987) Axillary artery to iliac vein vascular access using an externally supportes prosthetic graft. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 33:123–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Sabrout RA et al (1999) Right atrial bypass grafting for central venous obstruction associated with dialysis access. J Vasc Surg 29(3):472–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamish M et al (2006) Axillo-iliac conduit for hemodialysis vascular access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31:530–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haug M et al (1999) Die Rekonstruktion mediastinaler Venen beim gleichseitigen Dialyseshunt. Zentralbl Chir 124:2–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hazinedaroglu S et al (2004) Exotic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Transplantation Proceedings 36:59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huber TS et al (2004) Outcome after autogenous brachial-axillary translocated superficial femoropopliteal vein hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 40(2):311–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karp S et al (2004) Axillorenal arteriovenous graft: a new approach for dialysis access. J Vasc Surg 40:379–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kavallieratos N et al (2004) Axillary to saphenous vein bypass for treatment of central venous obstruction in patients receiving dialysis. J Vasc Surg 40:640–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mickley V (2001) Stent oder Bypass? Behandlungsergebnisse zentralvenöser Obstruktionen. Zentralbl Chir 126:445–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Salerno AE et al (2004) Creation of a novel hemodialysis bridge graft to extend the life of an adolescent. Pediatr Nephrol 19:1297–1299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zanow J et al (2007) Arterioarterial prosthetic loop: a new approach for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 41:1007–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Aichinger C (1989) Kunststoffinterponate in der intermittierenden Hämodialyse. Beobachtung und Langzeitergebnisse bei Primäreinsatz von PTFE-Interponanten. Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der medizinischen Doktorwürde an den medizinischen Fachbereichen der Freien Universität Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson JM, Bennert KW, Johnson JM (1988) The pathology and healing responses of expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene vascular access grafts. In: Wilson SE (ed) Vascular access surgery. Year Book Medical Publishers, pp 213–231

    Google Scholar 

  3. Etheredge EE, Haid SD, Maeser MN, Sicard GA, Anderson CB (1983) Salvage operations for malfunctioning polytetrafluoroethylene hemodialysis access grafts. Surgery 94:464–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frei U, Schober-Halstenberg HJ (2007) Nierenersatztherapie in Deutschland. Bericht über Dialysebehandlung und Nierentransplantation in Deutschland 2005–2006. Online: http://www.quasi-niere.de

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geiger G, Krempien B (1988) Strukturanalyse von expanded Polytetrafluorethylen-Prothesen nach Langzeitimplantation beim Menschen. angio 10:169–178

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glickmann MH, Stokes GD, Ross JR et al (2001) Multicenter evaluation of polyurethaneurea vascular access graft as compared with the PTFE vascular access graft in hemodialysis applications, J Vasc Surg 34:465–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hepp W, Ehrmann T, Langer M, Zwicker C, de Jonge K (1987) Stellenwert der intraarteriellen digitalen Subtraktionsangiographie (i.a. DSA) bei der Planung von Reoperationen an Dialysefisteln. angio 9:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson JM, Anderson LM (1983) Reasonable expectations for PTFE grafts in hemodialysis access. Dial Transplant 12:238–2459

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kemkes BM (1984) Gefäßersatz in der Dialyseshuntchirurgie. Dialyse-Journal 9: 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krönung G (1984) Die Punktion der Cimino-Fistel. Dialyse-Journal 9:2–10

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krüger U, Scholz H (2008) Der Einstromradius arteriovenöser Schlingen. Gefäßchirurgie 13:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Loewe HJ (1988) Kumulative Funktionsraten von Hämodialysefisteln. Inaugural-dissertation zur Erlangung der medizinischen Doktorwürde an den medizinischen Fachbereichen der Freien Universität Berlin S 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Müller-Wiefel H, Haug M (1983) Zur Frage des geeigneten Gefäßersatzes in der Dialyse-Shunt-Chirurgie. angio 5:199–209

    Google Scholar 

  14. Munda R, First MR, Alexander JW, Linnemann LL, Fidler JP, Kittur D (1983) Polytetrafluoroethylene graft survival in Hemodialysis. JAMA 249:219–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Palder SB, Kirkman RL, Whittemore AD, Hakim RM, Lazarus JM, Tilney NL (1985) Vascular access for hemodialysis. Ann Surg 202:235–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pisoni RL, Young EW, Dykstra DM et al (2002) Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: Results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 61:305–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rainer HC, Pisoni RL, Gillespie BW, Goodkin D, Akiba T, Akizawa T et al (2003) Creation, cannulation and survival of arterivenous fistulae: Data from Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Kidney Int 61:232–330

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raju S (1987) PTFE grafts for hemodialysis access. Ann Surg 206:666–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rühland D (1983) Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des Gefäßersatzes bei der Anlage arterio-venöser Fisteln zur Hämodialyse. Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für klinische Nephrologie, XII:93–105

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sabanayagam P, Schwartz AB, Soricelli RR, Lyons P, Chinitz J (1980) A comparative study of 402 bovine heterografts and 225 reinforced expanded PTFE grafts as AVF in the ESRD patient. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 26:88–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schneider M (1992) Indikation, Verfahrenswahl und Ergebnisse bei Rezidiveingriffen an Transplantat-Hämodialyse-Shunts. Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der medizinischen Doktorwürde an den medizinischen Fachbereichen der Freien Universität Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Winnsett OE, Wolma FJ (1985) Complications of vascular access for hemodialysis. Southern Medical Journal 78:513–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Ramanathan AK, Curl RG, Harris LM (2008) Two-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula for chronic haemodialysis access. ANZ J Surg 78:215–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Frei U, Schober-Halstenberg HJ (2007) Nierenersatztherapie in Deutschland. Bericht über Dialysebehandlung und Nierentransplantation in Deutschland 2005/2006. Online: http://www.quasi-niere.de

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pisoni RL, Young EW, Dykstra DM et al (2002) Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: Results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 61:305–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mickley V, Widmer MK, Debus ES (2007) Mit der Entwicklung Schritt halten. Gefäßchirurgie 12:159–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sommoggy S von, Altjohann F (1998) qualität der Hämodialyseshuntchirurgie. In: Hämodialyse Shuntchirurgie. Erdl, Trostberg, S 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rooijens PPGM, Tordoir JHM et al (2005) Autogenous radial-cephalic or prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop avF in patients with compromised vessels? A randomized, multicenter study of the patency of primary hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 42:481–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Hoek F, Tordoir JHM et al (2006) Steal in Hemodialysis Patients depends on Type of Vascular Access. Eur J Vasc Endovas Surg 32:710–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehsan O et al (2005) “Extension Technique”: A Modified Technique for Brachio-Cephalic Fistula to Prevent Dialysis Access-Associated Steal Syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29:324–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roy-Chaudhury P et al (2001) Venous neointimal hyperplasia in polytetrafluoroethylene dialysis grafts. Kidney Int 59(6):2325–2334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sterpetti AV, Stipa S et al (1996) Progression and regression of myointimal hyperplasia in experimental vein grafts depends on platelet derived growth factor and basic fibroblastic growth factor production. J Vasc Surg 23(4):568–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cagiannos C, Fabian TC et al (2005) Rapamycin-coated ePTFE bypass grafts exhibit decreased anastomotic neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine model. J Vasc Surg 42(5):980–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee BH, Kim DJ et al (2006) Paclitaxel-coated ePTFE haemodialysis grafts inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in porcine model of graft stenosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21(9):2432–2438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rectenwald JE et al (2001) External-beam radiation therapy for improved dialysis access patency: feasibility and early safety. Radiat Res 156(1):43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roy-Chaudhury P et al (2003) Vascular brachytherapy for hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: exploring an unmet clinical need. J Invasive Cardiol 15(Suppl A):25A–30A

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Misra S et al (2006) BRAVO I: A Pilot study of vascular brachytherapy in ePTFE dialysis access grafts. Kidney Int 70(11):2006–2013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heckenkamp J et al (2007) Photodynamic therapy reduces myointimal hyperplasia in prosthetic vascular bypass grafts in a pig model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34(3):333–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Konner K (1998) Qualität der Erstanlage. In: Hämodialyse Shuntchirurgie. Erdl, Trostberg, S 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kritz H, Sinzinger H (1996) Pharmacological prevention of myointimal hyperplasia (restenosis) following angioplasty. Gefäßchirurgie 1:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  18. Machens HG et al (2001) Gentherapeutische Techniken und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten in der Gefäßchirurgie. Gefäßchirurgie 6:72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tordoir JHM (1998) Qualität des Shuntmaterials. In: Hämodialyse Shuntchirurgie. Erdl, Trostberg, S 103–107

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mickley V et al (1996) Einfluß der Anastomosentechnik auf die Neointimahyperplasie bei mikrovaskulärer ePTFE-Protheseninterposition. Gefäßchirurgie 1:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dember LM, Holmberg FE, Kaufmann JS (2004) Randomized Trial of prophylactic repair of hemodialysis arteriovenous graft stenosis. Kidney Int 66(1):390–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moist LM et al (2003) Regular monitoring of access flow compared with monitoring of venous pressure fails to improve garft survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 14(10): 2645–2653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. NKF K/DOQI Guidelines, incl. Updates 2006, CPG 6.2–6.8. http://www.kidney.org/professionals/K/DOQI/guideline

    Google Scholar 

  24. VASCULAR ACCESS SOCIETY Guidelines. 15. Management of graft stenosis, 16. Management of graft thrombosis. http://www.vascularaccesssociety.com/

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hill SL, Donato AT (1991) Complications of dialysis access: a six year study. Am J Surg 162:265–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Raju S (1987) PTFE grafts for hemodialysis access. Techniques for insertion and management of complications. Ann Surg 206:666–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sullivan KL et al (1993) Hemodynamics of failing grafts. Radiology 186:867–872

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lilly RS et al (2001) Predictors of arteriovenous graft patency after radiologic intervention in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 37(5):945–953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Murray BM et al (2001) Assessment of access blood flow after preemptive angioplasty. Am J Kidney Dis 37(5):1029–1038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. LeSar CJ et al (1999) Thrombotic complications resulting from hypercoagulable states in chornic hemodialysis vascular access. J Am Coll Surg 189(1):73–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lumsden AB et al (1997) Prophylactic balloon angioplasty fails to prolong the patency of ePTFE arteriovenous grafts: results of a prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg 26:382–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gray RJ et al (1995) Use of Wallstents for hemodialysis access-related venous stenoses and occlusions untreatable with balloon angioplasty. Radiology 195(2):479–484

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoffer EK et al (1997) Prospective randomized trial of a metallic intravascular stent in hemodialysis graft maintenance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8(6):965–973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Patel RI et al (1998) Patency of Wallstents placed across the venous anatomosis of hemodialysis grafts after percutaneous revascularisation. Radiology 209(12): 365–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vogel PM, Parise C (2005) Comparison of SMART stent placement for arteriovenous graft salvage versus successful graft PTA. J Vasc Interv Radiolog 16(12): 1619–1626

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mickley V et al (1998) Stenosen der venösen Anastomose beim Prothesenshunt — Therapiealternativen. In: Hämodialyse Shuntchirurgie. Erdl, Trostberg, S 95–99

    Google Scholar 

  37. Brooks JL et al (1987) Transluminal Angioplasty versus surgical repair for stenosis of hemodialysis grafts. Am J Surg 153:530–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Depunt O et al (1987) Transluminal Angioplasty versus surgical repair for stenosis the treatment of hemodialysis fistula stenosis: results from a 5-year study. Br J Surg. 74:1004–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kariya S et al (2007) Primary patency with cutting and conventional balloon angioplasty for different types of hemodialysis access stenosis. Radiology 243(2):578–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vesely TM, Siegel JB (2005) Use of the peripheral cutting balloon to treat hemodialysis-related stenoses. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(12):1593–1603

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Green LD (2002) A metaanalysis comparing surgical thrombectomy, mechanical thrombectomy and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for thrombosed dialysis grafts. J Vasc Surg 36(5):939–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Marston WA et al (1997) Prospective randomized comparison of surgical versus endovascular management of thrombosed dialysis access grafts. J Vasc Surg 26(3): 373–380; discussion 380–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Trerotola S et al (1994) Thrombosed hemodialysis access greafts: percutaneous mechanical declotting without urokinase. Radiology 191:721–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Valji K et al (1991) Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and angioplasty in the management of clotted hemodialysis grafts: early and late clinical results. Radiology 178:243–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dougherty MJ et al (1999) Endovascular versus surgical treatment for thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: a prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg 30:1016–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Beathard GA et al (1992) Percutaneous transvenous angioplasty in the treatment of vascular access stenosis. Kidney Int 42:1390–1397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Puckett JW et al (1988) Midgraft curettage as a routine adjunct to salvage operations for thrombosed PTFE hemodialysis access grafts. Am Surg 156:139–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Carty GA et al (1991) Mid-graft stenosis in ePTFE hemodialysis conduits. Dial Transplant 19:486–489+512

    Google Scholar 

  49. Trerotola SO et al (2005) Prospective study of balloon inflation pressures and other technical aspects of hemodialysis access angioplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(2):1613–1618

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Georgiadis GS et al (2005) Use of short PTFE segments (<6 cm) compares favorably with pure autologous repair in failing or thrombosed native arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg 41(1):76–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Konner K (1998) Reeingriffe bei Dysfunktion, Arteriovenöse Interponate. In: Dialyseshunts, Grundlagen-Chirurgie-Komplikationen, 1. Aufl. Steinkopff, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  52. Besarab A et al (1995) Utility of intra-access pressure monitoring in detecting and correcting venous outlet stenoses prior to thrombosis. Kidney Int 47(5): 1364–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Schwab SJ et al (1989) Prevention of hemodialysis fistula thrombosis. Early detection of venous stenoses. Kidney Int 36(4):707–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sands JJ, Miranda CL (1995) Prolongation of hemodialysis access survival with elective revision. Clin Nephrol 44(5):329–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Tordoir JH et al (1990) The correlation between clinical and duplex ultrasound parameters and the development of complications in arterio-venous fistulae for hemodialysis. Eur J Vasc Surg 4(2):179–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Turmel-Rodrigues L et al (2000) Treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulas and grafts by interventional radiology. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15(12):2029–2036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Glanz S et al (1987) The role of percutaneous angioplasty in the managemenet of chronic hemodialysis fistulas. Ann Surg 206(6):777–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Charara J, Guidoin R, Gill F, Guzman R (1990) Morphologic assessment of ePTFE graft wall damage following hemodialysis needle punctures. J Appl Biomater 1:279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Delorme JM, Guidoin R, Canizales S et al (1992) Vascular access for hemodialysis: Pathologic features of surgically excised ePTFE grafts. Ann Vasc Surg 6:517–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Rizzuti RP, Hale JC, Burkart TE (1988) Extended patency of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for vascular access using optimal configuration and revisions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 166:23–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ballard JL, Bunt TJ, Malone JM (1992) Major complications of angioaccess surgery. Am J Surg 164:229–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Scher LA (2004) Strategies for hemodialysis access grafts: Where to start, where to go next. American College of Surgeons 32nd Annual Spring meeting, April, 2004, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  63. Berardinelli L (2006) Grafts and Graft Materials as Vascular Substitutes for Haemodialysis Access Construction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32:203–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. III. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice guidelines for vascular access: update 2000. (2001) Am J Kidney Dis 37:S137–S181

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ayarragaray JEF (2003) Surgical treatment of HD-related central venous stenosis or occlusion: Another option to maintain vascular access. J Vasc Surg 37:1043–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brittinger WD, Strauch M, Huber W (1969) Shuntlose Hämodialyse durch Punktion der subkutan fixierten Arteria femoralis superficialis. Klin Wochenschr 47: 824–826

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Butt KMH, Kountz SL (1976) A new vascular access for hemodialysis: The arteral jump graft. Surgery 79:476–479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bünger CM, Kröger J, Kock J, Henning A, Klar E, Schareck W (2005) Axillaryaxillary interarterial chest loop conduit as an alternative for chronic hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 42:290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coronel F, Herrero J.A, Mateos P, Illescas ML, Torrente J, del Valle MJ (2001) Long-term experience with the Thomas shunt, the forgotten permanent vascular access for haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:1845–1849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dammers R, de Haan MW, Planken NR, van der Sande FM, Tordoir JH (2003) Central vein obstruction in hemodialysis patients: results of radiological and surgical intervention. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26:317–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dodson TF, Stewart MT, Martin LG (1993) Polytetrafluoroethylene aorta-vena cava graft for hemodialysis: report of a case. J Vasc Surg 17:759–761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Sabrout RA, Duncan JM (1999) Right atrial bypass grafting for central venous obstruction associated with dialysis access: another treatment option. J Vasc Surg 29:472–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalra M, Gloviczki P, Andrews JC, Cherry KJ Jr, Bower TC, Panneton JM, Bjarnason H, Noel AA, Schleck C, Harmsen WS, Canton LG, Pairolero PC (2003) Open surgical and endovascular treatment of superior vena cava syndrome caused by nonmalignant disease. J Vasc Surg 38:215–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karp SJ, Hawxby A, Burdick JF (2004) Axillorenal arteriovenous graft: A new approach for dialysis access. J Vasc Surg 39:379–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smayra T, Otal P, Chabbert V, Chemla P, Romero M, Joffre F, Rousseau H (2001) Long-term results of endovascular stent placement in the superior caval venous system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:388–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zanow J, Kruger U, Petzold M, Petzold K, Miller H, Scholz H (2005) Arterioarterial prosthetic loop: A new approach for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 41:1007–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zingraff J, Drueke T, Di Giulio S. (1979) Pontage arterio-arteriel pour abord vasculaire en hemodialyse. La Nouvell Press Medicale 8:2834

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Hollenbeck M, Mickley V, Brunkwall J, Daum H, Haage P, Ranft J, Schindler R, Thon P, Vorwerk D (2009) Interdisziplinäre Empfehlungen deutscher Fachgesellschaften zum Gefäßzugang zur Hämodialyse. Nephrologe 4:158–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pastan S, Soucie JM, McClellan WM (2002) Vascular access and increased risk of death among hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 62:620–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allon M, Daugirdas J, Depner TA et al (2006) Effect of change in vascular access on patient mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 47:469–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pisoni RL, Young EW, Dykstra DM et al (2002) Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 61:305–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer MR (2002) Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access — a systematic review. Crit Care Med 30: 454–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weijmer MC, Vervloet MG, ter Wee PM (2004) Compared to tunnelled cuffed hemodialysis catheters, temporary untunnelled catheters are associated with more complications already within 2 weeks of use. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:670–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwab SJ, Quarles LD, Middleton JP et al (1988) Hemodialysis-associated subclavian vein stenosis. Kidney Int 33:1156–1159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R et al (2003) Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 327:361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mey U, Glasmacher A, Hahn C et al (2003) Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided technique for central venous access via the internal jugular vein in 493 patients. Support. Care Cancer 11:148–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gladziwa U, Krieger S, Bocker G, Nilius J (2000) Success and failure with the Demers catheter in dialysis. Zentralbl Chir 125:48–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bambauer R, Inniger R, Pirrung KJ, Schiel R, Dahlem R (1994) Complications and side effects associated with large-bore catheters in the subclavian and internal jugular veins. Artif Organs 18:318–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cimochowski GE, Worley E, Rutherford WE et al (1990) Superiority of the internal jugular over the subclavian access for temporary dialysis. Nephron 54:154–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hernandez D, Diaz F, Suria S et al (1993) Subclavian catheter-related infection is a major risk factor for the late development of subclavian vein stenosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8:227–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haage P, Vorwerk D, Piroth W, Schuermann K, Guenther RW (1999) Treatment of hemodialysis-related central venous stenosis or occlusion: results of primary Wallstent placement and follow-up in 50 patients. Radiology 212:175–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mickley V (2001) Stent or bypass? Treatment results in benign central venous obstruction. Zentralbl Chir 126:445–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dogra GK, Herson H, Hutchison B et al (2002) Prevention of tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related infections using catheter-restricted filling with gentamicin and citrate: a randomized controlled study. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:2133–2139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weijmer MC, van den Dorpel MA, Van de Ven PJ et al (2005) Randomized, clinical trial comparison of trisodium citrate 30% and heparin as catheter-locking solution in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:2769–2777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention beim Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI) (2002) Prävention Gefäßkatheter-assoziierter Infektionen. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 45:907–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. European Best Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Expert Group (2002) VI.1 Prevention of infection. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17:72–87

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spindler B (2004) Gefäßzugänge für die Hämodialyse. Pflege Z 57:89–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khanna R, Twardowski ZJ (1996) Recommendations for treatment of exit-site pathology. Perit Dial. Int 16(Suppl 3):S100–S104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams J (1998) “A change for the better”. A nursing innovation for change in the CAPD catheter exit site care. EDTNA ERCA J 24:23–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gorke A (2005) Microbial contamination of haemodialysis catheter connections. EDTNA ERCA J 31:79–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Bargmann JM (2007) New technologies in peritoneal dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:576–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bender TO, Witowski J, Jörres A (2007) Peritonealdialyselösungen-differenzierte Therapie und klinische Konsequenzen. Nephrologe 2:100–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Comert M, Borazan A, Kulah E, Ucan, BH (2005) A new laparascopic technique for the placement of a permanent peritoneal dialysis catheter: the preperitoneal tunnelling method. Surg Endosc 19:245–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Danielson A (2007) The controversy of placement of periotoneal dialysis catheters. Perit Dial Int 27:153–154

    Google Scholar 

  5. Falcon GT, Rodriguez-Carmona A, Fonton MP, Rivera MP, Bouza P, Lozano IR, Valdez F (1994) Complications of permanent catheter implantation for peritoneal dialysis. Incidence and risk factors. Adv Perit Dial 10:206–209

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferriani M, Catizone L, Fracasso A (2000) Peritoneal dialysis solutions and systems. In: Gokal R, Khanna R, Krediet R, Nolph K (eds) Textbook of peritoneal dialysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 253–307

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herold A, Krug F, Jochims H, Bruch HP (1996) Laparaskopische Anlage von Oreopoulos-Zellerman Kathetern zur Peritonealdialyse. Chirurg 67:77–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kienzle HF, Reitinger J, Paatz D, von Gottberg C, Bähr R (1986) Die Bedeutung der operativen Katheterimplantation für die CAPD bezüglich der postoperativen Peritonitisrate im Verlauf der Langzeitbehandlung. Helv Chir Acta 53:133–134

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kitsche B, Nebel M, Merkel F, Weber M (2006) Enteritische Peritonitis bei PD-Patienten. Nieren Hochdruckkrankh 35:42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manouras AJ, Kekis PB, Stamou KM, Konstadoulakis MM, Apostolidis NS (2004) Laparascopic placement of Oreopulos-Zellerman catheter in CAPD-patients. Perit Dial Int 2004:252–255

    Google Scholar 

  11. Montenegro J, Saracho RM, Martinez IM, Munoz RI, Ocharan JJ, Valladares E (2006) Long-term clinical experience with pure bicarbonate peritoneal dialysis solutions. Perit Dial Int 26:89–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nebel M, Marczewski K, Finke K (1991) Three years of experience with the swan neck Tenckhoff catheter. Adv Perit Dial 7:208–213

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nebel M, Gerding W, Finke K (1995) 7 months of amino acid solution in CAPD. Perit Dial Int 15:35

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ogunc G (2005) Minilaparascopic extraperitoneal tunnelling with ometopexy: a new technique for CAPD catheter placement. Perit Dial Int 25:551–555

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozener C, Bihorac A, Akoglu E (2001) Technical survival of CAPD catheters: Comparison between percutaneous and conventional surgical placement techniques. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:1893–1899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Santarelli S, Zeiler M, Marinelli R, Monteburini T, Federico A, Ceraudo E (2006) Videolaparoscopy as rescue therapy and placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a thirty-two case single centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:1348–1354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thodis E, Passadakis P, Lyrantzopoulos N, Panagoutsos S, Vargemizis V, Oreopoulos D (2005) Peritoneal catheters and related infections. Int Urol Nephrol 37: 379–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tiong HY, Poh J, Sunderaraj K, Wu YJ, Consigliere DT (2006) Surgical complications of Tenckhoff catheters used in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Singapore Med J 47:707–711

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Twardowski ZJ, Nickols WK (2000) Peritoneal access and exit-site care including surgical aspects. In: Gokal R, Khanna R, Krediet R, Nolph K (eds) Textbook of peritoneal dialysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers., pp 307–362

    Google Scholar 

  20. Varela JE, Elli EF, Vanuno D, Horgan S (2003) Mini-laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter. Surg Endosc 17:2025–2027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Verreet PR, Rötscher V, Ulrich B (1983) Implantationstechnik des Oreopoulos-Zellerman-Katheters zur Peritonealdialyse. Chirurg 54:609–612

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Crabtree JH, Fishman A (2005) A laparoscopic method for optimal peritoneal dialysis access. Am Surg 71:135–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hauser H, Roob JM, Shabrawy A E, Hohl MA, Razmara J, Holzer H, Mischinger HJ (2003) Continuous ambulatoryoperationeal dialysis — surgical technique, early and late compliations. European Surgery 35:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kopriva-Altfart G, Moser E, Prokschi A, Kraus B, Kovarik J (2005) Prophylaxe und Management von Katheter-assoziierten Infektionen bei Peritonealdialyse-Patienten: rezente Studien und aktuelle Guidlines. Wien Klin Wochenschrift 117:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kribben A, Nebel M, Herget-Rosenthal S, Philipp T (2007) Stellenwert, Indikationen und Grenzen der Peritonealdialyse. Der Nephrologe 2:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Witzigmann H, Richter O, Kohlhaw K, Achenbach H, Otto M, Hauss J (1998) Die laparoskopische Implantation von Kathetern zur kontinuierlichen ambulanten Peritonealdialyse. Zentralbl Chir 123:76–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Felcht H, Strunz M, Blank K (1993) Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der ambulanten Dialyseshuntchirurgie. In: Sommoggy S von Kistler D (Hrsg) Hämodialyse, Shuntchirurgie. Blackwell, Berlin S 24–31

    Google Scholar 

  2. Felcht H, Strunz M, Matzdorf H, Schlüter T (1995) Serviceorientierte ambulante Gefäßchirurgie am Krankenhaus der Grundversorgung. In: Hierholzer G (Hrsg) Kurzreferate Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, 112. Kongress. Demeter, Gräfeling, S 359

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friedell M, Cohen MJ, Martin SP (1991) Outpatient or Inpatient Surgeriy for Hemodialysis Access? In: Sommer BC, Henry ML (eds) Vascular Access for Hemodialysis, II. Gore + Ass Precept Press, USA, pp 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fritz K (1994) Möglichkeiten, Voraussetzungen und Probleme des ambulanten Operierens. In: Graf-Baumann T, Hirsch G, Weissauer W, Welter HF (Hrsg) Ambulantes Operieren. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, S 43–56

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hempel IK, Siewert JR, Lehr L (1995) Ambulante Chirurgie — Definitionen, sozialökonomische und juristische Aspekte. Chirurgie 66:277–281

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hepp W, De Jonge K, Scholz A, Langer R, Langer M (1991) Diagnostisches und therapeutisches Konzept beim „failing shunt“. In: Maurer PC, Häring R (Hrsg) angio archiv 22:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jansen C (1995) Zeitpunkt der Aufklärung bei ambulanten und stationären Operationen. Rhein Äbl 49 (3):48–50

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jost JO (1995) Arteriovenöse Fisteln zur chronischen Hämodialyse. In: Brug E, Rieger H, Strobel M (Hrsg) Ambulante Chirurgie. Deutscher Ärzte Verlag, Köln, S 403–416

    Google Scholar 

  9. Puchstein C, Aken H van (1995) Anästhesie beim ambulanten Operieren. In: Brug E, Rieger H, Strobel M (Hrsg) Ambulante Chirurgie. Deutscher Ärzte Verlag, Köln, S 23–42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rüggeberg JA (1995) Ambulante Chirurgie — Grenzen und Risiken aus der Sicht des Niedergelassenen. Chirurg 66:282–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weissauer W (1994) Ambulantes Operieren — Sorgfaltspflicht., Aufklärung und Haftung. In: Graf-Baumann T, Hirsch G, Weissauer W, Welter HF (Hrsg) Ambulantes Operieren. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, S 89–104

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Schau Ins Land 24, 51429, Bergisch Gladbach

    Dr. K. Konner

  2. Sektion Nephrologie Abteilung Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm

    Prof. Dr. F. Keller

  3. Fürstenwalder Allee 318, 12589, Berlin

    Dr. C. Cetto

  4. Klinik für Gefässchirurgie, Univ.-Klinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen

    Dr. S. Langer

  5. Haaner Straße 114, 42719, Solingen

    Prof. Dr. W. Hepp

  6. Kreiskrankenhaus Dialysezentrum, Am Wendeberg 2, 36251, Bad Hersfeld

    Dr. P. Thon

  7. Abteilung für Gefäßchirurgie, SANA-Klinikum Remscheid, Burgerstraße 211, 42859, Remscheid

    Dr. M. Haug

  8. Medisch Centrum, Maastricht Universitair, Postbus 5800, NL-6202 AZ, Maastricht

    Dr. J. H. M. Tordoir, Dr. M. W. de Haan & Dr. F. M. van der Sande

  9. Hermann-Löns-Weg 24, 69245, Bammental

    Prof. Dr. W. D. Brittinger

  10. Am Fürstenweiher 61, 69118, Heidelberg

    Dr. W. -D. Twittenhoff

  11. HELIOS-Klinikum Erfurt Gefäßzentrum, Nordhäuserstraße 74, 99089, Erfurt

    Dr. M. Schneider

  12. Fachbereich Shuntchirurgie, Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, Aukammallee 33, 65191, Wiesbaden

    Prof. Dr. G. Krönung

  13. Gefäßchirurgische Klinik, Städtisches Klinikum-Kemperhof, Koblenzer Straße 115-155, 56065, Koblenz

    Dr. J. Schäfer & Dr. E. Zanea-Wangler

  14. Univ.-Klinik für Allgemein-Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena Lobeda-Ost

    Dr. J. Zanow

  15. Klinik für Nephrologie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Osterfelder Straße 157, 46242, Bottrop

    Prof. Dr. M. Hollenbeck

  16. Campus Virchow-Klinikum Charité Centrum 13 Med. Klinik Abt. Nephrologie, Intensivmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin

    Prof. Dr. R. Schindler

  17. Nephrologische Praxis, Ostmerheimer Straße 212, 5119, Köln

    Dr. M. Nebel

  18. Haan GmbH Chirurgische Abteilung, St. Josef Krankenhaus, Robert-Koch-Straße 16, 42781, Haan

    Dr. J. Neumann

  19. Abt. Chirurgie, Marienkrankenhaus Schwerte gem. GmbH, Goethestraße 19, 58239, Schwerte

    Dr. H. Felcht

  20. Chirurgische Klinik I, Kath. Krankenhaus Dortmund-West, Zollernstraße 40, 44379, Dortmund

    Dr. H. Böhner

Authors
  1. Dr. K. Konner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. F. Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dr. C. Cetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dr. S. Langer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Prof. Dr. W. Hepp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dr. P. Thon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dr. M. Haug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dr. J. H. M. Tordoir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dr. M. W. de Haan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dr. F. M. van der Sande
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Prof. Dr. W. D. Brittinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dr. W. -D. Twittenhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Dr. M. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Prof. Dr. G. Krönung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Dr. J. Schäfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Dr. E. Zanea-Wangler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Dr. J. Zanow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Prof. Dr. M. Hollenbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Prof. Dr. R. Schindler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Dr. M. Nebel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Dr. J. Neumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Dr. H. Felcht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Dr. H. Böhner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Haaner Straße 114, 42719, Solingen

    Wolfgang Hepp

  2. Nephrologisches Zentrum Mettmann, Gartenstraße 8, 40822, Mettmann

    Michael Koch

  3. Schau ins Land 24, 51429, Bergisch Gladbach

    Klaus Konner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Steinkopff Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Konner, K. et al. (2009). Dialyseshuntchirurgie. In: Hepp, W., Koch, M., Konner, K. (eds) Dialyseshunts. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1572-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1572-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1571-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1572-7

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation