Abstract
Case-based reasoning (CBR) solves problems by retrieving similar, previously solved problems and reusing their solutions. The case base contains a set of cases, and each case holds knowledge about a problem or situation, together with its corresponding solution or action. The case base acts as a memory, remembering is achieved using similarity-based retrieval, and the retrieved solutions are reused. Newly solved problems may be retained in the case base and so the memory is able to grow as problem-solving occurs.CBR reuses remembered experiences, where the experience need not record how the solution was reached, simply that the solution was used for the problem. The reliance on stored experiences means that CBR is particularly relevant in domains which are ill defined, not well understood, or where no underlying theory is available. CBR systems are a useful way to capture corporate memory of human expertise.The fundamental assumption of CBR is that similar problems have similar solutions: a patient with similar symptoms will have the same diagnosis, the price of a house with similar accommodation and location will be similar, the design for a kitchen with a similar shape and size can be reused, and a journey plan is similar to an earlier trip. A related assumption is that the world is a regular place, and what holds true today will probably be true tomorrow. A further assumption relevant to memory is that situations repeat, because if they do not, there is no point remembering them!
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Recommended Reading
Aamodt A, and Plaza E (1994) Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Commun 7:39–59. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.39.1670
Cheetham W (2005) Tenth anniversary of the plastics color formulation tool. AI Mag 26(3):51–61 www.aaai.org/Papers/Magazine/Vol26/26-03/AIMag26-03-007.pdf
Craw S, Wiratunga N, Rowe RC (2006) Learning adaptation knowledge to improve case-based reasoning. Artif Intell 170(16–17):1175–1192. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2006.09.001
Dong R, Schaal M, O’Mahony MP, McCarthy K, Smyth B (2014) Further experiments in opinionated product recommendation. In: Lamontagne L, Plaza E (eds) Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on case-based reasoning, Cork. LNAI, vol 8765. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 110–124. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11209-1_9
Gokër MH, Roth-Berghofer T (1999) The development and utilization of the case-based help-desk support system HOMER. Eng Appl Artif Intell 12:665–680. doi:10.1016/S0952-1976(99)00037-8
Gundersen OE, Sørmo F, Aamodt A, Skalle P (2013) A real-time decision support system for high cost oil-well drilling operations. AAAI AI Mag 34(1): 21–31. www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2434
Hammond KJ (1990) Explaining and repairing plans that fail. Artif Intell 45(1–2):173–228
Jaidee U, Muñoz-Avila H, Aha DW (2013) Case-based goal-driven coordination of multiple learning agents. In: Delaney SJ, Ontanon S (eds) Proceedings of the 21st international conference on case-based reasoning, Saratoga Springs. LNAI, vol 7969. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 164–178. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39056-2_12
Jalali V, Leake D (2013) Extending case adaptation with automatically-generated ensembles of adaptation rules. In: Delaney SJ, Ontanon S (eds) Proceedings of the 21st international conference on case-based reasoning, Saratoga Springs. LNAI, vol 7969. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 188–202. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39056-2_14
López de Mántaras R, McSherry D, Bridge D, Leake D, Smyth B, Craw S, Faltings B, Maher ML, Cox MT, Forbus K, Aamodt A, Watson I (2005) Retrieval, reuse, revision, and retention in case-based reasoning. Knowl Eng Rev 20(3):215–240. doi:10.1017/S0269888906000646
Minor M, Bergmann R, Görg S (2014) Case-based adaptation of workflows. Inf Syst 40:142–152. doi:10.1016/j.is.2012.11.011
Ontañón S, Ram A (2011) Case-based reasoning and user-generated AI for real-time strategy games. In: Artificial intelligence for computer games. Springer, New York, pp 103–124. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8188-2_5
Quijano-Sánchez L, Bridge D, DÃaz-Agudo B, Recio-GarcÃa JA (2012) Case-based aggregation of preferences for group recommenders. In: DÃaz-Agudo B, Watson I (eds) Proceedings of the 20th international conference on case-based reasoning, Lyon. LNAI, vol 7466. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 17–31. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32986-9_25
Richter MM (2009) The search for knowledge, contexts, and case-based reasoning. Eng Appl Artif Intell 22(1):3–9. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2008.04.021
Wender S, Watson I (2014) Combining case-based reasoning and reinforcement learning for unit navigation in real-time strategy game AI. In: Lamontagne L, Plaza E (eds) Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on case-based reasoning, Cork. LNAI, vol 8765. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 511–525. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11209-1_36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Craw, S. (2016). Case-Based Reasoning. In: Sammut, C., Webb, G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_34-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_34-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7502-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Case-Based Reasoning- Published:
- 05 December 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_34-2
-
Original
Case-Based Reasoning- Published:
- 28 July 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_34-1