Skip to main content
Log in

Model analysis of the fragmentation of large H\(\mathsf{_{2}}\)O and NH\(\mathsf{_{3}}\) clusters based on MD simulations

  • Published:
The European Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The fragmentation statistics of (H2O) n and (NH3) n clusters (n = 100-1000) is investigated by MD simulations at different temperatures. The fragment size distributions are found to be well described by power laws over a wide range of excitation energies. The maximum fragment size depends linearly on the cluster size. A compact analytical model, implying the maximum fragment size and the power law exponent, is shown to fairly fit the average fragment size profiles. Measurements are carried out for the maximum fragment sizes after electron impact ionisation for water and ammonia clusters in the size range of n = 50 to 2100. The measured linear dependence on cluster size is used to estimate the fragment size distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. X. Campi, H. Krivine, N. Sator, E. Plagnol, Eur. Phys. J. D 11, 233 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Raz, U. Even, R.D. Levine, J. Chem. Phys. 103 , 5394 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B.F. Edwards, M.F. Gyure, M. Ferer, Phys. Rev. A 46, 6252 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.-M. Debierre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3145 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Campi, H. Krivine, N. Sator, Physica A 296, 24 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M.E. Fisher, Rep. Prog. Phys. 30, 615 (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Belkacem, V. Latora, A. Bonsera, Phys. Rev. C 52, 271 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V.N. Kondratyev, H.O. Lutz, Z. Phys. D 40, 210 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D.H.E. Gross, M.E. Madjet, O. Schapiro, Z. Phys. D 39, 75 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Farizon, M. Farizon, M.J. Gaillard, F. Gobet, G. Guillermier, M. Carré, J.P. Buchet, P. Scheier, T.D. Märk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4108 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Farizon, M. Farizon, M.J. Gaillard, F. Gobet, M. Carré, J.P. Buchet, P. Scheier, T.D. Märk, Eur. Phys. Lett. 5, 5 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E.E.B. Campbell, T. Raz, R.D. Levine, Chem. Phys. Lett. 253, 261 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Svanberg, L. Ming, N. Markovic, J.B.C. Petterson, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 5888 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T.A. Beu, Phys. Rev. A 67, 045201 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Bobbert, S. Schütte, C. Steinbach, U. Buck, Eur. Phys. J. D 19, 183 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W.L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J.D. Madura, R.W. Impey, M.L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R.W. Impey, M.L. Klein, Chem. Phys. Lett. 104, 579 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T.A. Beu, C. Steinbach, U. Buck, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 3149 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L.G. Dowell, A.P. Rinfret, Nature 188, 1144 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.W. Reed, P.M. Harris, J. Chem. Phys. 35, 1730 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.P. Devlin, J. Sadlej, V. Buch, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 974 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.P. Devlin, C. Joyce, V. Buch, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 1974 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Schütte, U. Buck, Int. J. Mass Spec. 220 , 183 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Schütte, U. Buck, Appl. Phys. A 69, S209 (1999)

  25. P. Lohbrandt, R. Galonska, H.-J. Kim, M. Schmidt, C. Lauenstein, U. Buck, in Atomic and Molecular Beams (Springer, Berlin, 2001), p. 623

  26. P. Andersson, C. Steinbach, U. Buck, Eur. Phys. J. D 24, 53 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Buck.

Additional information

Received: 25 June 2003, Published online: 26 August 2003

PACS:

36.40.-c Atomic and molecular clusters - 36.40.Qv Stability and fragmentation of clusters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beu, T.A., Steinbach, C. & Buck, U. Model analysis of the fragmentation of large H\(\mathsf{_{2}}\)O and NH\(\mathsf{_{3}}\) clusters based on MD simulations. Eur. Phys. J. D 27, 223–229 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2003-00268-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2003-00268-4

Keywords

Navigation