Abstract.
A suitable wave function for the baryon decuplet is framed with the inclusion of the sea containing quark-gluon Fock states. Relevant operator formalism is applied to calculate the magnetic moments of J P = \( {\frac{{3}}{{2}}}\) + baryon decuplet. The statistical model assumes the decomposition of the baryonic state in various quark-gluon Fock states and is used in combination with the detailed balance principle to find the relative probabilities of these Fock states in flavor, spin and color space. The upper limit to the gluon is restricted to three with the possibility of emission of quark-antiquark pairs. We study the importance of strangeness in the sea (scalar, vector and tensor) and its contribution to the magnetic moments. Our approach has confirmed the scalar-tensor sea dominancy over the vector sea. Various modifications in the model are used to check the validity of the statistical approach. The results are matched with the available theoretical data. A good consistency with the experimental data has been achieved for \( \Delta^{{++}}_{}\) , \( \Delta^{{+}}_{}\) and \( \Omega^{{-}}_{}\) .
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CMS Collaboration (S. Chatrchyan et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 252002 (2012)
CMS Collaboration (S. Chatrchyan et al.), JHEP 07, 163 (2013)
S. Coleman, S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 423 (1961)
Particle Data Group (K.A. Olive et al.), Chin. Phys. C. 38, 090001 (2014)
A. Bosshard, C. Amsler, M. Doebeli, M. Doser, M. Schaad, J. Riedlberger, P. Truoel, J.A. Bistirlich et al., Phys. Rev. D 44, 1962 (1991)
H.T. Diehl, S. Teige, G.B. Thomson, Y. Zou, C. James, K.B. Luk, R. Rameika, P.M. Ho et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 804 (1991)
N.B. Wallace, P.M. Border, D.P. Ciampa, G. Guglielmo, K.J. Heller, D.M. Woods, K.A. Johns, Y.T. Gao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3732 (1995)
M. Kotulla et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 272001 (2002)
I.V. Gorelov, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 69, 012009 (2007)
EMC Collaboration (J. Ashman et al.), Phys. Lett. B 206, 364 (1988)
SMC Collaboration (B. Adeva et al.), Phys. Rev. D 58, 112001 (1998)
X. Song, V. Gupta, Phys. Rev. D. 49, 2211 (1994)
H. Dahiya, M. Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 67, 114015 (2003)
M.D. Slaughter, Phys. Rev. C 82, 015208 (2010)
M.D. Slaughter, Phys. Rev. D 84, 071303 (2011)
J. Linde, T. Ohlsson, H. Snellman, Phys. Rev. D 57, 452 (1998)
J. Linde, T. Ohlsson, H. Snellman, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5916 (1998)
I.S. Sogami, Oh’yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2295 (1985)
B.S. Bains, R.C. Verma, Phys. Rev. D 66, 114008 (2002)
F. Schlumpf, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4478 (1993)
G. Ramalho, K. Tsushima, F. Gross, Phys. Rev. D 80, 033004 (2009)
P. Ha, Phys. Rev. D 58, 113003 (1998)
C.S. An, Q.B. Li, D.O. Riska, B.S. Zou, Phys. Rev. C 74, 055205 (2006)
B.S. Bains, R.C. Verma, Phys. Rev. D 66, 114008 (2002)
R. Dhir, R.C. Verma, Eur. Phys. J. A 42, 243 (2009)
T.M. Aliev, A. Ozpineci, M. Savci, Phys. Rev. D 62, 053012 (2000)
F.X. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 57, 1801 (1998)
S.L. Zhu, W.Y.P. Hwang, Z.S.P. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 57, 1527 (1998)
A. Iqubal, M. Dey, J. Dey, Phys. Lett. B 477, 125 (2000)
B. Schwesinger, H. Weigel, Nucl. Phys. A 540, 461 (1992)
Y. Oh, Phys. Rev. D 75, 074002 (2007)
T. Ledwig, A. Silva, M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 79, 094025 (2009)
H-C. Kim, M. Praszalowicz, K. Goeke, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2859 (1998)
G.S. Yang, H-C. Kim, M. Praszalowicz, K. Goeke, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114002 (2004)
R. Flores-Mendieta, Phys. Rev. D 80, 094014 (2009)
L.S. Geng, J.M. Camalich, M.J.V. Vacas, Phys. Rev. D. 80, 034027 (2009)
S. Boinepalli, D.B. Leinweber, P.J. Moran, A.G. Williams, J.M. Zanotti, J.B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054505 (2009)
C. Aubin, K. Orginos, V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 79, 051502 (2009)
CSSMand QCDSF/UKQCD Collaborations (P.E. Shanahan et al.), Phys. Rev. D 89, 074511 (2014)
F.X. Lee, R. Kelly, L. Zhou, W. Wilcox, Phys. Lett. B 627, 71 (2005)
A.O. Bazarko et al., Z. Phys. C 65, 189 (1995)
HAPPEX Collaboration (A. Acha et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 032301 (2007)
S. Baunack et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 151803 (2009)
G0 Collaboration (D. Androic et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 012001 (2010)
R. Bijker et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 035204 (2012)
J.F. Donoghue, E. Golowich, Phys. Rev. D 15, 3421 (1977)
He Hanxin, Zhang Xizhen, Zhuo Yizhong, Chin. Phys. 4, 359 (1984)
E. Golowich, E. Haqq, G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D 2, 160 (1983)
F.E. Close, Z. Li, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2194 (1990)
F.E. Close, Rep. Prog. Phys. 51, 833 (1988)
Z. Li, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2841 (1991)
Y.J. Zhang, B. Zhang, B.Q. Ma, Phys. Lett. B 523, 260 (2001)
Y.J. Zhang, B.Q. Ma, L. Yang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 1465 (2003)
Y.J. Zhang, Wei-Zhen Deng, B.Q. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 65, 114005 (2002)
M. Batra, A. Upadhyay, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1350062 (2013)
J.P. Singh, A. Upadhyay, J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 30, 881 (2004)
A. Upadhyay, M. Batra, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 160 (2013)
M. Batra et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 481, 012024 (2014)
S. Stein et al., Phys. Rev. D 12, 1884 (1975)
E288 Collaboration (A.S. Ito et al.), Phys. Rev. D 23, 604 (1981)
E.A. Hawker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3715 (1998)
J.C. Peng et al., Phys. Rev. D 58, 092004 (1998)
R.S. Towell et al., Phys. Rev. D 64, 052004 (2001)
Y.J. Zhang, B. Zhang, B.Q. Ma, Phys. Lett. B 524, 260 (2001)
S.T. Hong, Phys. Rev. D 76, 094029 (2007)
S.T. Hong, G.E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A 580, 408 (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Shi-Lin Zhu
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaur, A., Upadhyay, A. Magnetic moments of JP = \( {\frac{{3}}{{2}}}\) + decuplet baryons using the statistical model. Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16105-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16105-3