Abstract
In this study, the author tests for economies of scale with the use of patent citationsand assesses the impacts of technological opportunity on research productivity inthree global industries, namely, computer, chemical, and electrical and electronic.Technological opportunity in an industry is jointly represented by knowledgespillovers, inter-firm research overlap and scope of research. In particular, the effect of knowledge spillovers is decomposed into internal, intra-industry and inter-industry spillovers. The results suggest no evidence for economies of scale, but the impacts of various aspects of technological opportunity on research productivity are significantly positive. Moreover, the data indicate that if the number of firms in each overlapping research area is small, a rise in the number of these areas enhances research productivity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bound, J. et al. (1984) ‘Who Does R&D and Who Patents?’, in Z. Griliches, ed., R&D, Patents, and Productivity. NBER Conference Report. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 21–54.
Cockburn, I. M., and R. M. Henderson (1994) ‘Racing to Invest? The Dynamics of Competition in Ethical Drug Discovery’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 3, 481–519.
Cohen, W. M., and R. C. Levin (1989) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in R. Helms, ed., Handbook of Industrial Organization. New York: North-Holland.
Griliches, Z. (1990) ‘Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey Part I’, NBER Working Paper 3301.
Hall, B. H., Z. Griliches, and J. A. Hausman (1986) ‘Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?’, International Economic Review, 27, 265–283.
Hall, H. B., B. A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg (2000) ‘Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look’, NBER Working Paper 7741.
Henderson, R., and I. Cockburn (1996) ‘Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery’, RAND Journal of Economics, 27, 32–59.
Jaffe, A. (1988) ‘Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 431–437.
Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg, and M. Fogarty (2000) ‘Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors’, American Economic Review, 90, 215–218.
Lanjouw, O. J., and M. Schankerman (1999) ‘The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators’, NBER Working Paper 7345.
Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo (1995) ‘Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 47–65.
Panzar, J. C., and R. D. Willig (1981) ‘Economies of Scope’, American Economic Review, 71, 268–272.
Reinganum, J. F. (1989) ‘The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion’, in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization. New York: North-Holland.
Scherer, F. M. (1981) ‘Using Linked Patent and R&D Data to Measure Inter-Industry Technology Flows’, in Zvi Griliches ed., R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER, pp. 417–464.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1950) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd edn. New York: Harper.
Spence, M. (1984) ‘Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance’, Econometrica, 52, 101–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fung, M.K. Technological Opportunity and Economies of Scale in Research Productivity: A Study on Three Global Industries. Review of Industrial Organization 21, 419–436 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021170731353
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021170731353