Abstract
The evaluation of the superintendent by the school board can be a process characterized by mutual respect or, conversely, it can be an intensely stressful, highly political process. This article gives an overview of the superintendent evaluation process, explores the politics that surround it, and provides strategies/processes for improvement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berliner, D.C., & Biddle, J.C. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Blase, J. (1991). The micropolitical perspective. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Blumberg, A. (1985). The school superintendent: Living with conflict. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Bolton, D. (1980). Evaluating administrative personnel in school systems. New York: Teachers College Press.
Brown, G., & Irby, B. (1997). Administrative appraisal system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Vail, Colorado.
Burbank, N.B. (1968). The superintendent of schools: His headaches and rewards. Danville, IL: Interstate Printers & Publishers.
Candoli, C.I., Cullen, K., & Stufflebeam, D.L. (1997). Superintendent performance evaluation: Current practice and directions for improvement. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Carter, G.R., & Cunningham, W.G. (1997). The American school superintendent: Leading in an age of pressure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cuban, L. (1985). Conflict and leadership in the superintendency. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(1), 28–30.
Glass, T.E. (1992). The 1992 study of the American school superintendency. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Goodman, R.H., Fulbright, L., & Zimmerman, W.G. (1997). Getting there from here: School board–superintendent collaboration: Creating a school governance team capable of raising student achievement. Arlington, VA: Education Research Service.
Hord, S.M. (1990). Images of superintendents' leadership for learning. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Horler, B. (1996). A comparison of criteria used in evaluation of the superintendency in Illinois as perceived by school board presidents and public school superintendents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
Hoyle, J. (1993). The professional standards for the superintendency. Arlington, VA: The American Association of School Administrators.
Hoyle, J.R. (1994). What standards for the superintendency promise. The School Administrator, 7(51), 22–26.
Hoyle, J.R., & Oates, A. (1994). New professional standards for the superintendency: Will they close the governance gap? In J. Burdin (Ed.), Leadership and diversity in education: The second yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
Hoyle, J.R., English, F.W., & Steffy, B.E. (1998). Skills for successful 21st century school leaders: Standards for peak performers. Arlington, VA: The American Association of School Administrators.
Johnson, S.M. (1996). Leading to change: The challenge of the new superintendency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Knezevich, S. (1975). Administration of public education. New York: Harper & Row.
Konnert, M.W., & Augenstein, J.J. (1995). The school superintendency: Leading education into the 21st century. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
Kowalski, T.J. (1998). Critiquing the CEO: Tie superintendent to school improvement. The American School Board Journal, 185(2), 13–14.
Leithwood, K. (1995). Introduction: Transforming politics in education. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Effective school district leadership: Transforming politics into education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Malen, B. (1995). The micropolitics of education. In J.D. Scribner & D.H. Layton (Eds.), The study of educational politics. Washington, DC: Falmer.
Manatt, R. (1997). Feedback from 360 degrees: Client-driven evaluation of school personnel. The School Administrator, 3(54), 8–13.
Manatt, R., Palmer, K., & Hidlebaugh, E. (1976). Evaluating teacher performance with improved rating scales. NASSP Bulletin, 60(40), 21–24.
Marshall, C. (1993). Gender and race issues in administration. In C. Marshall (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender: The 1992 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association. Washington, DC: Falmer.
Marshall, C., & Scribner, J.D. (1991). It's all political: Inquiry into the micropolitics of education. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 347–355.
Negroni, P.J. (1999). The right badge of courage: The way superintendents respond to difference with their boards has a profound impact on school improvement. The School Administrator, 56(2), 14–16.
Norton, M.S., Webb, L.D., Dlugosh, L.L., & Sybouts, W. (1996). The school superintendency: New responsibilities, new leadership. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
O'Hara, D.G. (1994). The superintendent's first contract. The School Administrator, 51(7), 19–27.
Ondorvich, P. (1997). Hold them, fold them, or walk away: Twelve cardinal principles for dealing with board conflict. The School Administrator, 54(2), 12–15.
Ortiz, F.I., & Ortiz, D.J. (1993). Politicizing executive action. In C. Marshall (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender: The 1992 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association. Washington, DC: Falmer.
Redfern, G.B. (1980). Evaluating teachers and administrators: A performance objective approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Rosenberger, M.K. (1997). Team leadership: School boards at work. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
Scribner, J.D., Reyes, P., & Fusarelli, L.D. (1995). Educational politics and policy: And the game goes on. In J.D. Scribner & D.H. Layton (Eds.), The study of educational politics. Washington, DC: Falmer.
Skrla, L. (1998). Women superintendents in politically problematic work situations: The role of gender in structuring conflict. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Stufflebeam, D. (1995). Improving superintendent performance. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9, 305–316.
Stufflebeam, D., Candoli, C., & Nichols, C. (1995). A portfolio for evaluation of school superintendents. Kalamazoo, MI: Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation, The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
Tallerico, M. (1989). The dynamics of superintendent–school board relationships: A continuing challenge. Urban Education, 24(2), 215–231.
Tallerico, M. (1992). School board membership: Gender issues and women's perspectives. Urban Education, 26(4), 371–389.
Tallerico, M., Burstyn, J.N., & Poole, W. (1993). Gender and politics at work: Why women exit the superintendency. Fairfax, VA: National Policy Board for Educational Administration (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 361 911).
Texas Association of School Administrators. (1998). Superintendent evaluation handbook. Austin, TX: Author.
Texas Association of School Boards. (1998). Evaluating the superintendent: A guide for appraising your district's chief administrator. Austin, TX: There are no authors or editors listed for these reports. Citation conforms to APA 4th edition format for reports from private organizations (p. 210).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoyle, J.R., Skrla, L. The Politics of Superintendent Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13, 405–419 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008113501592
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008113501592