Skip to main content
Log in

Rationalizing Early Embryogenesis in the 1930s: Albert Dalcq on Gradients and Fields

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present account aims to contribute to a better characterization of the state and the dynamics of embryological knowledge at the dawn of the molecular revolution in biology. In this study, Albert Dalcq (1893–1973) was chosen as a representative of a generation of embryologists who found themselves at the junction of two very different approaches to the study of life: the first, focusing on global properties of organisms; the second focusing on the characterization of basic molecular constituents. Though clearly belonging to the organismic tradition, Dalcq was already blending his experimental and explanatory practices with biochemical aspects by the 1930s. Principally based on published sources, the present analysis focuses on the conceptual definitions, modifications and interrelations on which Dalcq's explanation of development rested. Among these are variant process concepts such as gradients and fields, which are often thought to have strongly holistic implications. I will argue that Dalcq's version of these concepts was compatible with a more reductionist treatment of embryos than was accepted by most embryologists as late as the 1950s, pointing to some extent toward the recent molecular characterization of gradients by molecular geneticists such as Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard. Moreover, I will show how the embryological research program of Dalcq and his pupil Jean Brachet has been largely instrumental in the development of molecular biology in Belgium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandre, Henri. 1992. “Jean Brachet and his School.”International Journal of Developmental Biology 36: 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Garland E. 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton University Press.

  • Boveri, Theodor. 1910. “Über die Teilung zentrfugierter Eier von Ascaris megalocephala.” Roux's Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen 30: 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brachet, Albert. 1913. “Recherches sur le déterminisme héréditaire de l'œuf des Mammifères. Développement ‘in vitro’ de jeunes vésicules blastodermiques de Lapin.” Les Archives de Biologie XXVIII.

  • —— 1921. Traité d'Embryologie des Vertèbrés. Masson et Cie. [2nd edition (1935) revised by A. Dalcq and P. Gérard

  • ——1923. “Notice sur Edouard Van Beneden.” Annuaire de l'Académie Royale de Belgique: 167–242.

  • ——1927. La Vie Créatrice des formes. Alcan.

  • Brauckmann, Sabine. Submitted. “The Developmental Field. Alexander G. Gurwitsch and Paul A. Weiss.”

  • Burian, Richard M. and Thieffry, D. (eds.) 1997. Research Programs of the Rouge-Cloître Group. History and Philosophy of the Life Science 19: 5–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, Richard M., Gayon, J. and Zallen, D. T. 1988. “The Singular Fate of Genetics in the History of French Biology, 1900–1940.” Journal of the History of Biology 21: 357–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, Charles M. 1914. “Susceptibility Gradients in Animals.” Science 39: 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, Charles M. 1941. Patterns and Problems of Development. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Churchill, Frederick B. 1969. “From Machine-Theory to Entelechy: Two Studies in Developmental Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 2: 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1973. “Chabry, Roux and the experimental method in nineteenth century embryology.” In: The Foundation of Scientific Method: The Nineteenth Century, ed. R. N. Giere and R. S. Westfall, pp. 161–205. Indiana University Press.

  • —— 1993. “An analysis of Julian Huxley & Gavin de Beer's Elements of Embryology.” In: Julian Huxley. Biologist and Statesman of Science, ed. C. K. Waters and A. Van Heden, pp. 107–126. Rice University Press.

  • —— 1928. Les Bases Physiologiques de la Fécondation et de la Parthénogénèse. Presses Universitaires de France.

  • ——1935. L'Organisation de l'Oeuf chez les Chordés. Gauthier-Villars.

  • Dalcq, Albert. 1938. Form and Causality in Early Development. Cambridge University Press.

  • ——1941. L'oeuf et son dynamisme organisateur. Albin Michel.

  • ——1957. Introduction to General Embryology. Tr. J. Medawar. Oxford University Press.

  • —— 1974. “Cyto-morphologie normale du testicule et spermatogénèse chez les mamifères.” Mémoires de l'Académie Royale de Médecine de Belgique, vol. XLVI.

  • Dalcq, Albert and Pasteels, J. 1937. EsUne conception nouvelle des bases physiologiques de la morphogénèse. Les Archives de Biologie XLVIII: 669–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1937. “EsUne conception nouvelle des bases physiologiques de la morphogépnèse.” Les Archives de Biologie 48: 669–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winiwarter, H. 1933. “Notice sur Albert Dalcq.” Annuaire Académie Royale de Belgique: 143–192.

  • Dinsmore, Charles E. (ed.). 1991. A History of Regeneration Research. Cambridge University Press.

  • Fischer, Jean-Louis and Smith, J. 1984. “French Embryology and the ‘Mechanics of Development’ from 1887 to 1910: L. Chabry, Y. Delage and E. Bataillon.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 6: 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florilège des Sciences en Belgique. 1968. Bruxelles: Académie Royale de Belgique.

  • Gilbert, Scott F. 1978. “The Embryological Origins of the Gene Theory.” Journal of the History of Biology 11: 307–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——1988. “Cellular Politics: Just, Goldschmidt, and the Attempts to Reconcile Embryology and Genetics.” In: The American Development of Biology, ed. R. Rainger, K. Benson and J. Maienschein, pp. 311–346 University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • ——(ed.). 1991. A Conceptual History ofModern Embryology. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • ——(ed.). 1997. Developmental Biology (5th edition). Sinauer.

  • Gilbert, Scott F. and Saxén, L. 1993. “Spemann's Organizer: Models and Molecules.” Mechanisms of Development 41: 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitsch, Alexander G. 1922. “Über den Begriff des embryonalen Feldes.” Roux's Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen 51: 388–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämmerling, Joachim. 1935. “Über Genomwirkungen und Formbildungsfähigkeit by Acetabularia.” Roux's Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen 132: 434.

  • Held, Lewis I.,Jr. 1992. Models of Embryonic Periodicity. Karger.

  • Holley, A. H. and Ferguson, E. F. 1997. “Fish are Like Flies are Like Frogs: Conservation of Dorso-Ventral Patterning Mechanisms.” BioEssays 19: 281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horder, Timothy J., Witkowski, J. A. and Wylie, C. C. (eds.). 1986. A History of Embryology. Cambridge University Press.

  • Huxley, Julian S. and De Beer, G. R. 1934. The Elements of Experimental Embryology. Cambridge University Press.

  • Kay, Lily. 1998. Who Wrote the Book of Life? University of Chicago Press.

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1995. Refiguring Life:Metaphors of Twentieth Century Biology. Columbia University Press.

  • —— 1996. “Drosophila Embryos as Transitional Objects: The Work of Donald Poulson and Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 26: 313–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——1997. “Developmental Biology as a Feminist Cause.” OSIRIS 12: 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: “Drosophila” Genetics and the Experimental Life. University of Chicago Press.

  • Lawrence, Peter A. 1992. The Making of a Fly. Blackwell Scientific Publications.

  • Maienschein, Jane. 1991. Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915. John Hopkins University Press.

  • Meinhardt, Hans. 1978. “Space-Dependent Cell Determination under the Control of a Morphogen Gradient.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 74: 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, Hans and A. Gierer. 1980. “Generation and Regeneration of Sequence of Structures during Morphogenesis.”Journal of Theoretical Biology 85: 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, John A. 1963. Heredity and Development. Oxford University Press.

  • ——1987. “Science as a Way of Knowing – Developmental Biology.” American Zoologist 27: 415–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morange, Michel. 1998. The History of Molecular Biology. Harvard University Press.

  • Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1905. “ ‘Polarity’ Considered as a Phenomenon of Gradation of Materials.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 2: 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulnard, Jacques G. 1992. “The Brussels School of Embryology.” International Journal of Developmental Biology 36: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop, Pieter D. 1967. “The ‘Organization Centre.’ I. Field Phenomena, Their Origin and Significance.” Acta Biotheoretica XVII: 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nüsslein-Volhard, Christiane and Wieschaus, E. 1980. “Mutations Affecting Segment Number and Polarity.” Nature 287: 795–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, Jane. 1967. Essays in the History of Embryology and Biology. M.I.T. Press.

  • Pasteels, Jean Jules. 1975. “Notice sur Albert Dalcq.” Annuaire de l'Académie Royale de Belgique CXLI: 3–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, Nicholas. 1938. Mathematical Biophysics. Chicago University Press.

  • Sander, Klaus. 1975. “Pattern Specification in the Insect Embryo.” Cell Patterning CIBA Foundation Symposia 29: 241–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, Jan. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. Oxford University Press.

  • Schleip, Waldemar. 1929. Die Determination der Primitiventwicklung. Akademishe Verlagsgesellschaft.

  • Spemann, Hans. 1936. Experimentelle Beiträge zu einer Theorie de Entwicklung. Leipzig: Akademishe Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——1938. Embryonic Development and Induction. Yale University Press.

  • Spemann, Hans and Mangold, H. 1924. “Induction of Embryonic Primordia by Implementation of Organizers from a Different Species.” In: Foundations of Experimental Embryology, ed. B. H. Willier and J. M. Oppenheimer, pp. 144–184. Hafner Publishing Company.

  • Thieffry, Denis. 1996. “E. coli as a Model System with which to Study Cell-Differentiation.” History and Philosophy of Life Sciences 18: 163–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, Alan M. 1952. “The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London [B] 237: 37–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, Conrad H. 1940. Organizer and Genes. Cambridge University Press.

  • Weiss, Paul. 1939. Principles of Development. Hafner Publishing Company.

  • Wolpert, Lewis. 1969. “Positional Information and the Spatial Pattern of Cellular Differentiation.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 25: 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thieffry, D. Rationalizing Early Embryogenesis in the 1930s: Albert Dalcq on Gradients and Fields. Journal of the History of Biology 34, 149–181 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010389907221

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010389907221

Navigation