Skip to main content
Log in

Polynomial Time-Marching for Nonreflecting Boundary Problems

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The newly developed polynomial time-marching technique has been successfully extended to nonperiodic boundary condition cases. In this paper, a special non-periodic boundary condition, nonreflecting or absorbing boundary condition, is incorporated into the pseudospectral polynomial time-marching scheme. Thus, this accurate and stable time-dependent PDE solver can be applied to some open domain or free space problems. The balanced overall spectral accuracy is illustrated by some numerical experiments in the one-dimensional case. The error goes to zero at a rate faster than many fixed orders of the finite-difference scheme. The order of the absorbing boundary approximation is addressed in one-dimension. Also, in the two-dimensional case, a 2nd-order absorbing approximation has been incorporated into the polynomial time-marching scheme with Chebyshev collocation in space. Comparison with the previous finite-difference implementation indicates that the high stability and efficiency of the polynomial time-marching remains. The overall accuracy is mainly limited by the 2nd-order absorbing approximation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barnett, S. (1990). Matrices, Methods and Applications, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. P. (1989). Chebyshev & Fourier Spectral Methods, Springer-Verlag.

  • Canuto, C. et al. (1988). Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag.

  • Engquist, B., and Majda, A. (1977). Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Math. Comput. 31, 629–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornberg, B. (1987). The pseudospectral method: comparisons with finite differences for the elastic wave equation. Geophysics 52(4), 483–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, G. E. Q. (1993). Numerical Simulation of Viscoelastic Waves, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

  • Gottlieb, D. et al. (1984). Introduction: Theory and Applications of Spectral Methods, SIAM, Philadelphia, pp. 1–54.

  • Lindman, E. (1975). Free space boundary conditions for the time dependent wave equation, J. Comput. Phys. 18, 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., and Yedlin, M. J. (1994). Polynomial time-marching for non-periodic boundary value problems, J. Sci. Comput. (in press).

  • Renaut, R. (1992). Absorbing boundary conditions, difference operator, and stability, J. Comput. Phys. 102, 236–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal-Ezer, H. (1986). Spectral methods in time for hyperbolic equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 23(1).

  • Tal-Ezer, H. (1989). Polynomial approximation of functions of matrices and applications, J. Sci. Comput. 4(1), 25–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal-Ezer, H. (1991). High degree polynomial interpolation in Newton form, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 12(3), 648–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirkas, P. A., et al. (1992). Higher order absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference time-domain method, IEEE Trans. on Ant. & Prop. 40(10), 1215–1222.

  • Trefethen, L., and Halpern, L. (1986). Well-posedness of one-way wave equations and absorbing boundary conditions, Math. Comput. 47, 421–435.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Yedlin, M.J. Polynomial Time-Marching for Nonreflecting Boundary Problems. Journal of Scientific Computing 12, 31–50 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025654303349

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025654303349

Navigation