Skip to main content
Log in

Dialing for Dollars: Opportunities, Justifications, and Telemarketing Fraud

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Opportunities for deviant economic exploitation grew significantly in the second half of the twentieth century. Drawing from interviews with forty-seven fraudulent telemarketers, this article describes the backgrounds and pursuits of one type of deviant actor that has stepped forward to exploit these opportunities. The men and women interviewed for this research were reared in middle-class, disproportionately managerial and entrepreneurial families. Their class and family backgrounds provided them with high, but ill-defined, expectations for material success. Their preparation for successful conventional careers was unremarkable. As a result, they were predisposed to economic activities that required few credentials but provided a high income. Once involved in and aware of the deviant nature of their endeavors, continuation in fraud was facilitated by the income it produced and the lifestyle it permitted, by self-definitions enhanced by their manipulative abilities, and by acquisition and use of a vocabulary of motive that deflected blame. An augmented version of sociological strain theory provides an analytic vantage point from which to examine the backgrounds, aspirations, and perspectives of those involved in fraudulent telemarketing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

references

  • Agnew, R. (2000). Sources of criminality: Strain and subcultural theories. In J. F. Sheley (Ed.), Criminology: A contemporary handbook, 3rd edition (pp. 349-371). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlanta Journal-Constitution (2000). Alleged scam on elderly by telemarketers is revealed. September 6, B3.

  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation (2001). Beyond the boiler room. September 24. www.abc.net.au/4corners/.

  • Barnett, H. (1979). Wealth, crime, and capital accumulation. In D. F. Greenberg (Ed.), Crime and capitalism: Readings in Marxist criminology (pp. 182-188). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, M. (1974). The criminogenic society: Social values and deviance. In A. Blumberg (Ed.), Current perspectives on criminal behavior (pp. 68-86). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. L. (1985). Denying the guilty mind: Accounting for involvement in white-collar crime. Criminology, 23, 589-599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. L., & Moore, E. (1992). Are white-collar and common criminals the same? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 251-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, R. (1972). Deceivers and deceived. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, M. (Ed.) (1964). Anomie and deviant behavior: A discussion and critique. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Direct Marketing Association (2001). www.the-dma.org.

  • Doocy, J., Shichor, D., Sechrest, D., & Geis, G. (2001). Telemarketing fraud: Who are the tricksters and what makes them trick? Securities Journal, 14, 7-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, C. (2003). Going, going, gone. AARP Bulletin, June, 24.

  • Francis, D. (1988). Contrepreneurs. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, E. (2002). Deviance in everyday life. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, P. N., Smith, R. G., & Dempsey, G. (2001). Electronic theft: Unlawful acquisition in cyberspace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, F., & Benekos, P. (1992). What Charles Keating and “Murf the Surf” have in common: A symbiosis of professional and occupational and corporate crime. Criminal Organizations, 7, 3-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, S. M., & Scott, M. B. (1970). A sociology of the absurd. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, D. W. (1940). The big con. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, D. W. (1974). The American confidence man. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672-682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (2000). Crime and the American dream, 3rd edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (2001). An institutional-anomie theory of crime. In R. Paternoster & B. Bachman (Eds.), Explaining criminals and crime (pp. 151-160). Los Angeles: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passas, N. (1990). Anomie and corporate deviance. Contemporary Crisis, 14, 157-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebovich, D., & Layne, J. (2000). The national public survey on white collar crime. Washington, DC: National White Collar Crime Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (1999). Using NVivo in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, M., & Gandossy, R. F. (1982). Sad tales: The accounts of white-collar defendants and the decision to sanction. Pacific Sociological Review, 4, 449-473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, D. (1999). Confessions of a phone-scam artist. Saturday Night, 114, 86-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, F. (1995). Fleeced! Telemarketing rip-offs and how to avoid them. New York: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shover, N. (1996). Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, M. K. (1996). License to steal: Why fraud plagues America's health care system. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, G. (2002). Crime in cyberspace. In B. Jacobs (Ed.), Investigating deviance (pp. 307-312). Los Angeles: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J. (2000). The boiler room and other telephone sales scams. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 667-670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (1999). Crime in context: A critical criminology of market societies. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I., Walton, P., & Young, J. (1973). The new criminology. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, R. (1998). Broken promises: Fraud by small business health insurers. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, R. (2001). Personal fraud and its victims. In N. Shover & J. P. Wright (Eds.), Crimes of privilege: Readings in white-collar crime (pp. 57-67). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, R. M., Heinzelmann, F., & Boyle, J. M. (1995). Victimization of persons by fraud. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 54-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulick, J. (2003). The dark side of the Internet. Newsweek, March 17, E5.

  • U.S. Congress, Senate (1993). Telemarketing fraud and S. 568, The Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Protection Act. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Consumers of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 103rd Congress, 1st session. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vold, G., & Bernard, T. (1986). Theoretical criminology, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Chayet, E. F., & Waring, E. (2001). White-collar crime and criminal careers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neal Shover.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shover, N., Coffey, G.S. & Sanders, C.R. Dialing for Dollars: Opportunities, Justifications, and Telemarketing Fraud. Qualitative Sociology 27, 59–75 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015544.69646.f1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015544.69646.f1

Navigation