Skip to main content
Log in

Scavenging Evaluation of Different Free Radicals by Three Species of Ziziphus and Their Fractions

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A free radical is a compound with one or more unpaired electrons in its outer orbital. Excess production of free radicals in the body is dangerous. Today, antioxidants are consumed in the food industry and cosmetics. Most of the antioxidants are manufactured synthetically. The main disadvantage of these synthetic antioxidants is their side effects. Plants are the potential sources of natural antioxidants. In the present study, we investigated the antioxidant activities of three species of Ziziphus and their fractions. In vitro, antioxidant activity was evaluated by using methods such as nitric oxide radical scavenging, hydroxyl radical scavenging and DPPH radical scavenging. For this purpose, after preparation of the crude extracts they were loaded on the resin as the stationary phase and eluted by water, water–ethanol (1:1) and ethanol, respectively. Then the different fractions were obtained. In this study, the results showed that water–ethanol fractions possessed the highest free radical scavenging. In the DPPH radical scavenging, the IC50 of water–ethanol fractions of Ziziphus jujuba, Ziziphus mauritiana and Ziziphus spina christi was 140.24 ± 2.21, 115.8 ± 1.07 and 174.34 ± 2.52 μg/ml, respectively. The IC50 of quercetin as a standard was 61.4 ± 0.98 μg/ml. In nitric oxide radical scavenging, the crude extract of Z. mauritiana showed the highest antioxidant activity (IC50 = 143 ± 9.3 μg/ml). The water–ethanol fractions of all the samples exhibited the greatest hydroxyl radical inhibition at concentration of 1 mg/ml.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abalak, M.E., Mann, A. & Adeyemo, S.O. (2010). Studies on in vitro antioxidant and free radical scavenging potential and phytochemical screening of leaves of Ziziphus L and Ziziphus spina-christi L. compared with Ascorbic acid. J Med Genet mauritiana Genom, 3(2), 28–34

  • Abalaka, M.E., Mann, A., & Adeyemo, S. O. (2010).Studies on in vitro antioxidant and free radical scavenging potential and phytochemical screening of leaves of Ziziphus mauritiana L. and Ziziphus spina-christi L. compared with Ascorbic acid. J Med Genet Genom, 3(2), 28–34

  • Adam M (2008) Plant in vitro culture for the production of antioxidants — A review. Biotechnol Adv 26(6):548–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Reza SM, Bajpai VK, Kang SC (2009) Antioxidant and antilisterial effect of seed essential oil and organic extracts from Zizyphus jujuba. Food Chem Toxicol 47(9):2374–2380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin G (2005) Popular medicinal plants of Iran. Deputy of Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Raj NR, Shrivastava A, Prathani R (2009) The evaluation of nitric oxide scavenging activity of Acalypha indica linn. Asian J Research Chem. 2(2):148–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Basha SM (2011) In vitro evaluation of free radical scavenging activities of Panax ginseng and Lagerstroemia speciosa: a comparative analysis. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 3(1):165–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredt DS (2003) Nitric oxide signaling specificity-the heart of the problem. J Cell Sci 116(1):9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano A, Hernandez-Ruiz J, Garcia-Canovas F, Acosta M, Arnao MB (1998) An end point method for estimation of the total antioxidant activity in plant material. Phytochem Anal 9(4):196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahiru D, Sini JM, Africa JL (2006) Antidiarrhoeal activity of Ziziphus mauritiana root extract in rodents. Afr J Biotechnol 5(10):941–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice AC (1996) Seed production, dispersal and germination in Cryptostegia grandiflora and Ziziphus mauritiana, two invasive shrubs in tropical woodlands of northern Australia. Aust J Ecol 21(3):324–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisham, M. & McCord, J.M. (1986). Chemistry and cytotoxicities of reactive oxygen metabolites. In: Taylor, A.E., Matalon, S., Ward, P. (Eds.), Bethesda, 1–8

  • Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC, Cross CE (1999) Free radicals, antioxidants and human disease: Where are we now? J Lab Clin Med 119(6):598–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM, Min DS, Lee CG, Kim KS, Khoy H (2003) Cytotoxic triterpenoids from the fruits of Zizyphus jujuba. Planta Med 69(11):1051–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, Lee JBL, Lee KW, Jeon YJ (2010) Antioxidant properties of tidal pool microalgae, Halochlorococcum porphyrae and Oltamannsiellopsis unicellularis from Jeju Island. Korea. Algae 25(1):45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcocci L, Maguire JJ, Droxy-Le Faix MT, Packer L (1994) Antioxidant action of Ginkgo biloba extract EGb. Methods Enzymol 234:462–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra T, Bhatia A (2010) Augmentation of expression of immunocytes’ functions by seed extract of Ziziphus mauritiana (Lamk.). J Ethnopharmacol 127(2):341–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moein S, Moein MR, Khoshnoud MJ, Kalanteri T (2012) In vitro antioxidant properties evaluation of 10 Iranian Medicinal plants by different methods. Iran Red Crescent Med J 14(12):771–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux P (2004) The use of the stable free radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) for estimating antioxidant. J sci. Technol. 26(2):211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Özyürek M, Bektasoglu B, Guclu K, Apak R (2008) Hydroxyl radical scavenging assay of phenolics and flavonoids with a modified cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) method using catalase for hydrogen peroxide degradation. Anal Chim Acta 616(2):196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowska AM, Camangi F, Bader A, Braca A (2009) Flavonoids of Zizyphus jujuba L. and Zizyphus spina christi (L.) Willd (Rhamnaceae) fruits. Food Chem 112(4):858–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash A, Miller RF (2001) Antioxidant activity. Medallion Laboratories. Anal Progr 19(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D.E. & Hudson, B.J.F. (1990). Natural antioxidants not exploited commercially. In: Hudson, B.J.F. (Ed). Ámsterdam: Elsevier; 171-192

  • Samsam Shariat, H. (1371). Extraction of effective matters medicinal plant and methods of recognition and assessment of those. Isfahan, publication of Isfahan

  • Schwarz K, Bertelsen G, Nissen LR, Gardnu PT, Heinonen NI, Hopia A et al (2001) Investigation of plant extracts for the protection of processed foods against lipid oxidation. Comparison of antioxidant assays based on radical scavenging. Lipid oxidation and analysis of the principal antioxidant compounds. Eur Food Res Technol 212:319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Jiang L, Ye S, Ye Y, Ren F (2010) Systematic evaluation of antioxidant capacities of the ethanolic extract of different tissues of jujuba (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) from China. Food Chem Toxicol 48(6):1461–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Y, Lu Y, Wei D (2004) Antioxidant activity of a flavonoid-rich extract of Hypericum perforatum L. in vitro. J Agric Food Chem 52(16):5032–5039

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (Grant No. 9265) and Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Grant No.89-5478).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soheila Moein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moein, M., Moein, S., Fard, T.B. et al. Scavenging Evaluation of Different Free Radicals by Three Species of Ziziphus and Their Fractions. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Sci 41, 249–255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-017-0205-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-017-0205-1

Keywords

Navigation