Skip to main content
Log in

Bone Mineralization of Broiler Chicks Challenged with Salmonella enteritidis Fed Diet Containing Probiotic (Bacillus subtilis)

  • Published:
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was carried out to determine the effect of probiotic, Bacillus subtilis, on ash and calcium contents of tibia bone in unchallenged and challenged broiler chicks with Salmonella enteritidis. In a completely randomized design, 160 chicks were divided into four groups. Each group had four replicates with 10 birds each. Treatments were control group, probiotic-treated group, challenged group and challenged probiotic-treated group. Ash and calcium contents of tibia at 21 and 42 days of age were determined. At 21 days of age, the highest contents of ash and calcium were related to probiotic-treated group and the lowest means to challenged chicks (P < 0.05). At this period, inclusion of probiotic to diet of challenged chick increased (P < 0.05) ash and calcium contents of tibia. With increases in age, the negative effects of challenging and beneficial effects of probiotic on bone mineralization diminished; since at 42 days of age, challenging or probiotic treatment had no effect on ash and calcium contents of tibia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mutus R, Kocabagli N, Alp M, Acar N, Eren M, Gezen SS (2006) The effect of dietary probiotic supplementation on tibial bone characteristics and strength in broilers. Poult Sci 85:1621–1625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Warren KR, Neuman WF (1971) Some factors affecting mineralization of bone in tissue culture. Am J Physiol 220:270–274

    Google Scholar 

  3. van Heeckeren AM, Rikihisa Y, Park J, Fertel R (1993) Tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1 alpha, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin E2 production in murine peritoneal macrophages infected with Ehrlichia risticii. Infect Immun 61:4333–4337

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW (1994) Production variable and nutrient retention in Single Comb White Leghorn laying pullets fed diets supplemented with direct fed microbials. Poult Sci 73:1699–1711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Panda AK, Rama Rao SV, Raju MVLN, Sharma SR (2006) Dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus sporgenes on performance and serum biochemico-lipid profile of broiler chickens. J Poult Sci 43:235–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis, 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, Virginia, USA

  7. Hall LE, Shirley RB, Bakalli RI, Aggrey SE, Pesti GM, Edwards HM (2003) Power of two methods for the estimation of bone ash of broilers. Poult Sci 82:414–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Plavnik I, Scott ML (1980) Effects of additional vitamins, minerals or brewer’s yeast upon leg weaknesses in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 59:459–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, Elliott R, Colombero A, Elliott G, Scully S, Hsu H, Sullivan J, Hawkins N, Davy E, Capparelli C, Eli A, Qian YX, Kaufman S, Sarosi I, Shalhoub V, Senald G, Guo J, Delaney J, Boyle WJ (1998) Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 93:165–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marriott I (2004) Osteoblast responses to bacterial pathogens: a previously unappreciated role for bone-forming cells in host defense and disease progression. Immunol Res 30:291–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Teng YT, Nguyen H, Gao X, Kong YY, Gorczynski RM, Singh B, Ellen RP, Penninger JM (2000) Functional human T-cell immunity and osteoprotegerin ligand control alveolar bone destruction in periodontal infection. J Clinic Invest 106:R59–R67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson B, Nair SP, Ward JM, Wilson M (2003) Molecular pathogenicity of the oral opportunistic pathogen Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Annu Rev Microbiol 57:29–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Okamura M, Lillehoj HS, Raybourne RB, Babu US, Heckert RA (2004) Cell-mediated immune responses to a killed Salmonella enteritidis vaccine: lymphocyte proliferation, T-cell changes and interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1, IL-2, and IFN-y production. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 27:255–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaggia F, Mattarelli P, Biavati B (2010) Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. Inter J Food Microbiol 141:S15–S28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Selvam R, Maheswari P, Kavitha P, Ravichandran M, Sas B, Ramchand CN (2009) Effect of Bacillus subtilis PB6, a natural probiotic on colon mucosal inflammation and plasma cytokines levels in inflammatory bowel disease. Ind J Biochem Biophys 46:79–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S (1997) Probiotics in poultry: modes of action. Worlds Poult Sci J 53:351–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simmering R, Blaut M (2001) Pro- and prebiotics: the tasty guardian angels? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55:19–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patterson JA, Burkholder KM (2003) Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult Sci 82:627–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch for research funding support and to Agricultural, Medical and Industrial Research School, NSTR (AEOI) for supplying the basal diet and allowing use of poultry unit and to Baltec Company (presentation of Biochem Company, Germany) for providing probiotic Gallipro sample. The author also thanks all staffs (Mr. Zargaran and Mrs. Shakorzadeh) in the poultry unit for the assistance in the care and feeding of the chicks used in this research.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Sadeghi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadeghi, A.A. Bone Mineralization of Broiler Chicks Challenged with Salmonella enteritidis Fed Diet Containing Probiotic (Bacillus subtilis). Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. 6, 136–140 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-014-9170-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-014-9170-6

Keywords

Navigation