Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer—Learning Curve Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS) lobectomy has been gradually applied for the surgical treatment of resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purposes of this study were to analyze the learning curve of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for the treatment of resectable non-small-cell lung cancer and discuss the clinical application value. We retrospectively evaluated 160 consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent intended uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy by a single surgical team in our ward between May 2016 and April 2017. The patients were divided into four groups in chronological order. The general clinical date, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were individually compared and analyzed among the four groups. The four groups were similar in terms of incision length, chest tube duration, total number of dissected lymph nodes, and nodal stations and postoperative length of stay. The differences of operative time (185.9 SD 17.9 versus 139.9 SD 10.7 versus 128.7 SD 7.8 versus 124.0 SD 9.3 min), intraoperative blood loss (233.9SD135.8 versus 126.8SD18.1 versus 116.4 SD 22.6 versus 112.8 SD 25.3 ml), conversion rate (17.5% versus 7.5% versus 5.0% versus 5.0%), and postoperative complications rate (27.5% versus 10.0% versus 10.0% versus 7.5%) were significant among the four groups (p < 0.05). Compared with group A, the operative time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly decreased in groups B, C, and D, with significant differences (p < 0.05). Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy can be safely and feasibly performed on resectable non-small-cell lung cancer; the learning curve of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy is approximately 40 cases. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and conversion rates can be used as the main measure indexes for surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65(2):87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nwogu CE, D’Cunha J, Pang H et al (2015) VATS lobectomy has better peri-operative outcomes than open lobectomy: CALGB 31001, an ancillary analysis of CALGB 140202 (Alliance). Ann Thorac Surg 99(2):399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McKenna RJ Jr (1995) VATS lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node sampling or dissection. Chest Surg Clin N Am 5(2):223–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ng CS, Gonzalez-Rivas D, D'Amico TA, Rocco G (2015) Uniportal VATS-a new era in lung cancer surgery. J Thorac Dis 7:1489–1491

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. MURAKAWA T, ICHINOSE J, HINO H et al (2015) Long-term outcomes of open and video-assisted thoracoscopic lung lobectomy for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer are similar: a propensity-matched study[J]. World J Surg 39(5):1084–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kara HV, Balderson SS, D'Amico TA (2014) Modifed uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: Duke approach. Ann Thorac Surg 98:2239–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Detterbeck F, Molins L (2016) Video-assisted thoracic surgery and open chest surgery in lung cancer treatment: present and future. J Vis Surg 2:173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boffa D, Dhamija A, Kosinski A, Kim AW et al (2014) Fewer complications result from a video-assisted approach to anatomic resection of clinical stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Carciovasc Surg 148:637–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Law TD, Boffa DJ, Detterbeck FC, Wang Z, Park HS, Kim AW (2014) Lethality of cardiovascular events highlights the variable impact of complication type between thoracoscopic and open pulmonary lobectomies. Ann Thorac Surg 97:993–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng T, Ng CS, Li Z (2018) Innovative surgical endoscopes in video-assisted thoracic surgery[J]. J Thorac Dis 10(Suppl 6):S749–S755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzalez D, Paradela M, Garcia J et al (2011) Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. Interact Cardiovasc ThoracSurg 12(3):514–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Aymerich H, Bonome C, Fieira E (2015) From open operations to nonintubated uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: minimizing the trauma to the patient. Ann Thorac Surg 100:2003–2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tamura M, Shimizu Y, Hashizume Y (2013) Pain following thoracoscopic surgery: retrospective analysis between single-incision and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 8:153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang BY, Liu CY, Hsu PK, Shih CS, Liu CC (2015) Single-incision versus multiple-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy. Ann Surg 261:793–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris CG, James RS, Tian DH, Yan TD, Doyle MP, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Cao C (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of uniportal versus multiportal video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 5:76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111(5):518–526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu L, Che G, Pu Q, Ma L, Wu Y, Kan Q, Zhuge X, Shi L (2010) A new concept of endoscopic lung cancer resection: single-direction thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. Surg Oncol 19(2):e71–e77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sihoe AD (2016) Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 5(2):133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reinersman JM, Passera E, Gaetano RG (2016) Overview of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS): past and present. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 5(2):112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bertolaccini L, Rocco G, Viti A et al (2013) Geometrical characteristics of uniportal VATS. J Thorac Dis 5(Suppl 3):S214–S216

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao H, Bu L, Yang F, Li J, Li Y, Wang J (2010) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: the learning curve[J]. World J Surg 34(10):2368–2372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. LEE PC, KAMEL M, NASAR A et al (2016) Lobectomy for non small cell lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery: effects of cumulative institutional experience on adequacy of lymphadenectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3):1116–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gonfiotti A, Bongiolatti S, Borgianni S, Borrelli R, Jaus MO, Politi L, Tancredi G, Viggiano D, Voltolini L (2016) Development of a video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy program in a single institution: results before and after completion of the learning curve[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg 11:130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Petersen RH, Hansen HJ (2012) Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy[J]. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1:47–50

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Q, Cai YX, Deng Y, Fu SL, Fu XN, Zhang N (2016) Modular 3-cm uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy with systemic lymphadenectomy[J]. J Thorac Dis 8(8):2264–2268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan J, Yao J, Wang Q, Chang Z (2016) Safety and feasibility of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Thorac Dis 8(12):3543–3550

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, China (1708085MH179) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (WK9110000021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.X. designed the study, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. G.W.X., G.X.W. and X.H.S. collected and verified the data. H.R.W. and C.Q.L. analyzed and interpreted the data. M.R.X. designed the study, interpreted the data, revised the manuscript, and made the decision to submit for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-ran Xie.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, R., Wu, Hr., Wang, Gx. et al. Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer—Learning Curve Analysis. Indian J Surg 83, 908–914 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02522-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02522-2

Keywords

Navigation