Skip to main content
Log in

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: The Learning Curve

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is an acceptable alternative to open lobectomy for treating early-stage lung cancer. As with any video-assisted surgical procedure, there is a learning curve to overcome before becoming proficient. In this study, the outcomes of 90 consecutive VATS lobectomies for lung cancer were evaluated to determine the learning curve for this procedure.

Methods

A single group of surgeons performed VATS lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection in 90 patients with lung cancer between September 2006 and January 2009. The patients were divided equally and chronologically into three groups: group A, group B, and group C; group A was the earliest group of patients treated. Clinical data were collected. The operative time, blood loss, number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes and nodal stations, conversion rate to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, duration of chest drainage, and hospital stay duration were compared between the three groups.

Results

There were no differences between the three groups with respect to age, gender, size of tumor, pathological stage, and operative procedure. The operative time and blood loss were significantly lower in groups B and C than in group A (P < 0.01); however, there were no differences between groups B and C. There were no differences among the groups in the number lymph nodes harvested, conversion rate, postoperative complications, duration of chest drainage, or hospital stay duration.

Conclusions

A learning curve for VATS lobectomy existed in this series. The surgeon became more proficient after 30–60 cases and was able to perform the procedure with decreased blood loss and operative time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKenna R Jr (1995) VATS lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node sampling or dissection. Chest Surg Clin N Am 5:223–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Onaitis MW, Petersen RP, Balderson SS et al (2006) Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:420–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Swanson SJ, Herndon JE II, D’Amico TA et al (2007) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802. A prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol 25:4993–4997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitson BA, Andrade RS, Boettcher A et al (2007) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 83:1965–1970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watanabe A, Koyanagi T, Ohsawa H et al (2005) Systematic node dissection by VATS is not inferior to that through an open thoracotomy: a comparative clinicopathologic retrospective study. Surgery 138:510–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scott WJ, Howington J, Feigenberg S et al (2007) American College of Chest Physicians. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I and stage II: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 132:234s–242s

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mckenna RJ Jr (2008) Complications and learning curves for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchmann P, Dincler S (2005) Learning curve-calculation and value in laparoscopic surgery. Ther Umsch 62:69–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J et al (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Forbes TL (2005) A cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon’s early experience with elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Am J Surg 189:469–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc 17:515–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Toker A, Tanju S, Ziyade S et al (2008) Learning curve in videothoracoscopic thymectomy: how many operations and in which situations? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34:155–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang G, Wang J, Li Y et al (2008) Complete video-assisted thoracic surgery is favorable than thoracotomy for lobectomy on stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 24:152–155

    Google Scholar 

  14. Watanabe A, Koyanagi T, Obama T et al (2005) Assessment of node dissection for clinical stage I primary lung cancer by VATS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:745–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sagawa M, Sato M, Sakurada A et al (2002) A prospective trial of systematic nodal dissection for lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery: can it be perfect? Ann Thorac Surg 73:900–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chin CS, Swanson SJ (2008) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: centers of excellence or excellence of centers? Thorac Surg Clin 18:263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Bu, L., Yang, F. et al. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: The Learning Curve. World J Surg 34, 2368–2372 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0661-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0661-7

Keywords

Navigation