Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Acidified Sodium Chlorite, Chlorine Dioxide, Peroxyacetic Acid and Tri-Sodium Phosphate Spray Washes for Decontamination of Chicken Carcasses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food and Bioprocess Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to directly compare the antimicrobial effect of acidified sodium chlorite (ASC), chlorine dioxide (CD), peroxyacetic acid (PAA) and tri-sodium phosphate (TSP) on naturally occurring Campylobacter, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. on the breast and neck skin of chicken carcasses treated post-evisceration and prior to primary chilling. Naturally contaminated Campylobacter-positive chicken carcasses, obtained from a commercial processing line immediately post-evisceration but prior to the inside–outside wash, were treated in a purpose-built automated spray rig. Replicated batch treatments for 15 and 30 s of chemical and water-only spray wash were performed. Untreated control carcasses were examined to provide baseline data for the initial numbers. Numbers of colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of skin excised from neck and breast locations were determined using selective agar media. For analysis, the results were subdivided into six microbe type/skin location combinations with each subdivision ranked by the following: (a) CFU remaining after treatment, (b) mean reductions and (c) the proportional change in numbers of samples below the limit of detection (LoD). The three groups of bacteria responded similarly to the chemicals applied. Campylobacter spp. were no more susceptible than the other two groups. No single chemical treatment gave the best effect across all ranking methods. Generally, ASC and TSP were more effective in reducing microbial counts than PAA, with CD and water having the least effect. A 30-s chemical treatment was usually more effective than a 15-s treatment. Where only a short (15 s) spray time is possible, ASC appears to be the most effective of the chemicals tested. Where longer treatments are possible, TSP becomes the most effective choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso-Hernando, A., Alonso-Calleja, C., & Capita, R. (2013). Growth kinetic parameters of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria on poultry treated with various chemical decontaminants. Food Control, 33, 429–432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Hernando, A., Capita, R., & Alonso-Calleja, C. (2012). Behaviour of co-inoculated pathogenic and spoilage bacteria on poultry following several decontamination treatments. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 159, 152–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2004a) Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union. L226:22–82.

  • Anonymous (2004b) Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29th April 2004. Laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union L139/55.

  • Arritt, F. M., Eifert, J. D., Pierson, M. D., & Sumner, S. S. (2002). Efficacy of antimicrobials against Campylobacter jejuni on chicken breast skin. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 11(4), 358–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashor, M. P., Curtis, P. A., Keener, K. M., Sheldon, B. W., Kathariou, S., & Osborne, J. A. (2004). Effect of carcass washers on Campylobacter contamination in large broiler processing plant. Poultry Science, 83, 1232–1239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chantarapanont, W., Berrang, M. E., & Frank, J. F. (2004). Direct microscopic observation of viability of Campylobacter jejuni on chicken skin treated with selected chemical sanitizing agents. Journal of Food Protection, 67(6), 1146–1152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cogan, T. A., Bloomfield, S. F., & Humphrey, T. J. (1999). The effectiveness of hygiene procedures for prevention of cross-contamination from chicken carcasses in the domestic kitchen. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 29, 354–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cosansu, S., & Ayhan, K. (2012). Effects of lactic and acetic acid on survival of Salmonella enteritidis during refrigerated and frozen storage of chicken meats. Journal of Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5(1), 372–377. doi:10.1007/s11947-009-0320-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2005). Opinion of the scientific panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food (AFC) on a request from the commission related to treatment of poultry carcasses with chlorine dioxide, acidified sodium chlorite, trisodium phosphate and peroxyacids. The EFSA Journal, 297, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2010). Revision of the joint AFC/BIOHAZ guidance document on the submission of data for the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of substances for the removal of microbial surface contamination of foods of animal origin intended for human consumption. EFSA Journal, 8(4), 1544 (32 pp).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2011). Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses in the EU, 2008, part A: Campylobacter and Salmonella prevalence estimates. EFSA Journal, 8(3), 1503. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1503 (99 pp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, C. R., Niemam, J., Wegener, H. C., & Tauxe, R. V. (2000). Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialised nations. In I. Nachamkin & M. J. Blaser (Eds.), Campylobacter (2nd ed., pp. 121–138). Washington, D.C.: ASM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food Standards Agency (FSA). (2009). A UK survey of Campylobacter and Salmonella contamination of fresh chicken at retail sale. London: Food Standards Agency. Food survey information sheet 04/09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, P. N., Lyng, J. G., Morgan, D. J., Cronin, D. A., Noci, F., Fanning, S., et al. (2012). An evaluation of the potential of high-intensity ultrasound for improving the microbial safety of poultry. Journal of Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5(3), 992–998. doi:10.1007/s11947-010-0372-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y., & Song, K. B. (2009). Inhibition of pathogenic bacteria inoculated on raw chicken by aqueous chlorine dioxide treatment. Italian Journal of Food Science, 21(SI), 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C., James, S. J., Hannay, N., Purnell, G., Barbedo-Pinto, C. S., Yaman, H., et al. (2007). International Journal of Food Microbiology, 114(2), 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, G. K., Aldricht, M. L., Guerra, M. L., & Schneider, K. R. (2001). Continuous online processing of fecal- and ingesta-contaminated poultry carcasses using an acidified sodium chlorite antimicrobial intervention. Journal of Food Protection, 64, 807–812.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. J., Logan, J. M. J., O’Niell, G. L., Desai, M., & Stanley, J. (1999). Large-scale survey of Campylobacter species in human gastroenteritis by PCR and PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 71, 3860–3864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loretz, M., Stephan, R., & Zweifel, C. (2010). Antimicrobial activity of decontamination treatments for poultry carcasses: a literature survey. Food Control, 21, 791–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mor-Mur, M., & Yuste, J. (2010). Emerging bacterial pathogens in meat and poultry: an overview. Journal of Food and Bioprocess Technology, 3(1), 24–35. doi:10.1007/s11947-009-0189-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, G. M., Bauermeister, L. J., Bratcher, C. L., Singh, M., & McKee, S. R. (2013). Salmonella and Campylobacter reduction and quality characteristics of poultry carcasses treated with various antimicrobials in a post-chill immersion tank. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 165(3), 281–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oyarzabal, O. A., Hawk, C., Bilgili, S. F., Warf, C. C., & Kemp, G. K. (2004). Effects of post-chill application of acidified sodium chlorite to control Campylobacter spp. and Escherichia coli on commercial broiler carcasses. Journal of Food Protection, 67(10), 2288–2291.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, H., Gücükoğlu, A., & Koluman, A. (2006). Acidified sodium chlorite, trisodium phosphate and populations of Campylobacter jejuni on chicken breast skin. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 30(5), 608–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purnell, G., Mattick, K., & Humphrey, T. (2004). The use of ‘hot wash’ treatments to reduce the number of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria on raw retail poultry. Journal of Food Engineering, 62(1), 29–36. doi:10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00168-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, E. C., Griffith, C. J., Slader, J., & Humphrey, T. J. (2004). Microbiological and observational analysis of cross contamination risks during domestic food preparation. British Food Journal, 106, 581–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, C. T., Brøndsted, L., Rosenquist, H., Haxgart, S. N., & Christensen, B. B. (2009). Chemical decontamination of Campylobacter jejuni on chicken skin and meat. Journal of Food Protection, 72, 1173–1180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Committee on Veterinary measures relating to Public Health (SCVPH) (2003) The evaluation of antimicrobial treatments for poultry carcasses. European Commission Scientific Committee.

  • Slavik, M. F., Kim, J. W., Pharr, M. D., Raben, D. P., Tsai, S., & Lobsinger, C. M. (1994). Effect of trisodium phosphate on Campylobacter attached to post chill chicken carcasses. Journal of Food Protection, 57(4), 324–326.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, P., Collins, J. D., McGill, K., Monahan, C., & O’Mahony, H. (2001). Quantitative investigation of the effects of chemical decontamination procedures on the microbiological status of broiler carcasses during processing. Journal of Food Protection, 64, 179–183.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Food Standards Agency (FSA) funding for these studies under project MO1039: ‘Reducing Campylobacter cross-contamination during poultry processing.’ The authors would also like to thanks the poultry companies that helped us in this project in providing their time, thoughts and access to their plants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Purnell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Purnell, G., James, C., James, S.J. et al. Comparison of Acidified Sodium Chlorite, Chlorine Dioxide, Peroxyacetic Acid and Tri-Sodium Phosphate Spray Washes for Decontamination of Chicken Carcasses. Food Bioprocess Technol 7, 2093–2101 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-013-1211-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-013-1211-8

Keywords

Navigation