Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a Unique Definition of the Mutation Rate

  • Perspectives Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In around 1943, while writing a classic paper with Luria, Delbrück envisioned two kinds of mutation rates: One was expressed as mutations per bacterium per unit time, the other as mutations per bacterium per division cycle. Due to minor mathematical errors, the precise connection between the two concepts remained elusive for Delbrück. As a result, researchers and educators alike are still grappling with the definition of the mutation rate. Within the context of microbial mutation, the current author proposes an idealized model to bring new clarity to the distinction between the two forms of the mutation rate that Delbrück once attempted to define and characterize. The paper also critiques two incorrect estimators of mutation rates and brings to light two important yet unexplored “invariance” hypotheses about mutation rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armitage P (1952) The statistical theory of bacterial populations subject to mutation. J R Stat Soc Ser B 14:1–44

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage P (1953) Statistical concepts in the theory of bacterial mutation. J Hyg 51:162–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beale GH (1948) A method for the measurement of mutation rate from phage sensitivity to phage resistance in E. coli. J Gen Microbiol 2:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbrück M (1945) Spontaneous mutations of bacteria. Ann Mo Bot Gard 32:223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JW (2013) Mutation rate. In: Brenner S, Miller JH (eds) Brenner’s encyclopedia of genetics, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 550–552

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ford CB, Lin PL, Chase MR, Shah RR, Iartchouk O, Galagan J, Modaideen N, Ioerger TR, Sacchettini JC, Lipsitch M, Flynn JL, Fortune SM (2011) Use of whole genome sequencing to estimate the mutation rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis during latent infection. Nat Genet 43:482–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen O, Fridman O, Robin I, Balaban NQ (2014) Direct observation of single stationary-phase bacteria reveals a surprisingly long period of constant protein production activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:556–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths AJF, Miller JH, Suzuki DT, Lewontin RC, Gelbart W (2000) An introduction to genetic analysis, 7th edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber AJ, Erdem AL, Sabat G, Karata K, Jaszczur MM, Vo DD, Olsen TM, Woodgate R, Goodman MF, Cox MM (2015) A RecA protein surface required for activation of DNA polymerase V. PLoS Genet 11:e1005066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingman JFC (1993) Poisson processes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo S (1972) A theoretical study on spontaneous mutation rate. Mutat Res 14:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krašovec R, Belavkin RV, Aston JAD, Channon A, Aston E, Rash BM, Kadirvel M, Forbes S, Knight CG (2014) Mutation rate plasticity in rifampicin resistance depends on Escherichia coli cell–cell interactions. Nat Commun 5:3742. doi:10.1028/ncomms4742

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea EA, Coulson CA (1949) The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J Genet 49:264–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewe L, Textor V, Scherer S (2003) Hige deleterious genomic mutation rate in stationary phase of Escherichia coli. Science 302:1558–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luria SE (1946) Spontaneous bacterial mutations to resistance to antibacterial agents. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 11:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luria SE (1984) A slot machine. A broken test tuber. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria SE, Delbrück M (1943) Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28:491–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Niccum BA, Poteau R, Hamman GE, Varada JC, Dshalalow JH, Sinden RR (2012) On an unbiased and consistent estimator for mutation rates. J Theor Biol 300:360–367

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Novick A, Szilalrd L (1950) Experiments with the chemostat on spontaneous mutations of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 36:708–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oide S, Gunji W, Moteki Y, Yamamoto S, Suda M, Jojima T, Yukawa H, Inui M (2015) Thermal and solvent stress cross-tolerance conferred to Corynebacterium glutamicum by adaptive laboratory evolution. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:2284–2298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw E (1991) Modelling biological populations in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Russell PJ (2006) iGenetics. A Mendelian approach. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan FJ (1959) Bacterial mutation in a stationary phase and the question of cell turnover. J Gen Microbiol 21:530–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder L, Champness W (2007) Molecular genetics of bacteria, 3rd edn. ASM Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin EW (1946) Inherited differences in sensitivity to radiation in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 32:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamenhof S (1946) Discussion of Shapiro’s paper. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 11:235

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Q (2002) Statistical and algorithmic methods for fluctuation analysis with SALVADOR as an implementation. Math Siosci 176:237–252

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Q (2003) Mathematical issues arising from the directed mutation controversy. Genetics 164:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Q (2005) Update on estimation of mutation rates using data from fluctuation experiments. Genetics 171:61–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Q (2010) The Luria–Delbrück distribution: early statistical thinking about evolution. CHANCE 23(2):15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author expresses his gratitude to a referee for numerous thoughtful suggestions that substantially enhanced the paper’s readability.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Q. Toward a Unique Definition of the Mutation Rate. Bull Math Biol 79, 683–692 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-017-0247-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-017-0247-8

Keywords

Navigation